• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:29
CEST 15:29
KST 22:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent9Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway13
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues22LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris76
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon What happened to Singapore/Brazil servers?
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast
Brood War
General
The Korean Terminology Thread Recommended FPV games (post-KeSPA) [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent FlaSh on ACS Winners being in ASL ASL20 General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group B [ASL20] Ro16 Group A Is there English video for group selection for ASL BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Iron Harvest: 1920+ General RTS Discussion Thread Diablo IV S10 Infernal Tides Guide Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Collective Intelligence: Tea…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1175 users

Resistance I - London Calling - Page 7

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 14 Next All
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 21:12 GMT
#429
All my mocking aside, I do actually think VE is probably town... My current scumlist is Radfield, Palmar, Zona. ._.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 21:19 GMT
#431
Whoa man no need to go all Lou Ferrigno on me. When you phrase it in the way you just phrased it it sounds totally reasonable. But when you just say "hey guys i'm totally town" I don't think it added much.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 21:28 GMT
#432
Also I think we're beyond the point where anyone's actually gonna put me on today's team, given how people voted on my team-- at this point the best thing I can do is ask people questions and help out with the discussion.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 21:33 GMT
#435
I really don't see a difference between saying "a team that includes me is a team with a higher success rate" and "hey guys, i'm totally town"

Literally the only way a team that includes you would have a higher success rate would be that you're town, right? But we're all claiming town. That's how this setup works. Like, obviously NOW that you've made the second post it's like "oh, ok VE is just thanking me, Blazinghand, for including him in a team selection" but could you possibly understand how someone might interpret your post as a redundant and largely unuseful Town claim?
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 21:34 GMT
#436
On January 04 2012 06:32 GreYMisT wrote:
VE i would like to know who you think is the spy team.

Blazinghand and Radfield same question.


On January 04 2012 06:12 Blazinghand wrote:
All my mocking aside, I do actually think VE is probably town... My current scumlist is Radfield, Palmar, Zona. ._.



So i'm thinking Greymist just literally doesn't read my posts. Like, at first I was kind of joking but now i'm substantially more serious.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 21:42 GMT
#438
Fair enough. As an addendum, I'm not 100% on the Rad/Palmar combination-- it's possible that one of them is innocent. This is my strongest set of reads, though, and my voting and team selection are based on this.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 22:15 GMT
#440
On January 04 2012 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote:
BH, your flailing around and not making sense. But you sound town. So I'm at an impasse.

:/


On January 04 2012 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote:
Right now my scumlist includes Blazinghand, Toadeastern and Jackal but I barring some meteorically Town post from Palmar, I can't include him on a mission list I'd yay. I'm similarly biased against Radfield solely because he chose the first team that ended in failure. Statistically, it seems like D1 would be town favored, so the fact that our N1 ended in failure makes me mistrust Radfield, albeit a little irrational.


OK I'M TOTALLY NOT DEFENDING RADFIELD but i feel the need to call out bad math.

There's about a 50% chance of exactly one spy on a randomly-selected N1 team of 3 players.
There's a 21% chance of exactly two spies on a randomly-selected N1 team of 3 players.

Given that the first leader was chosen at random, there was a 33% chance of this leader being a spy, and a 67% chance of the leader being town. Assuming the leader is town, there's a (3/8) chance that the first guy he picks is a spy, and following that a 5/7th chance that the second guy he picks is town, leading to a 26% chance of one spy in permutation one. There's a 5/8th chance that the first guy he picks is a town, and a 3/7th chance that the second guy he picks is scum, leading to a 26% chance of one spy in the second permutation. If he makes two picks, there's a 3/8th chance the first pick is spy, and following that a 2/7th chance the second guy is spy, making it 12.5% chance he picked two spies to go with him.

This means that, assuming Radfield is town, there was a 56% chance of him picking exactly one spy, and a 12.5% chance he picked two spies if he picked completely at random.


My math from previously in the thread.
+ Show Spoiler +

On January 02 2012 19:53 Blazinghand wrote:
In the event of 1 spy on the d1 team:
33% chance of Blazinghand
33% chance of Palmar
33% chance of Radfield

What are (randomly) the odds of 1 spy on d1 team?
there's a 1/3rd chance for the first guy to be a spy, right? so assuming that, for the other two not to be spy, there is a 3/4ths chance to not pick the 2/8 ppl who are spies, then a 5/7ths chance not to pick the 2/7 people who are spies, meaning there is a 1/3*3/4*5/7 = 0.1786 of the first guy being a spy

"but wait blazinghand" you say "what if the first guy is town, then the second guy is spy?

well don't worry man, i can help you with that. Check this:
the odds of the first guy being town is 2/3rds, right? well ok if the second guy is a spy there's a 3/8ths chance of getting him as spy, then if the third guy is a town, there's a 5/7ths chance of him being town... which comes out to 2/3 * 3/8 * 5/7 = 0.1786 of the second guy being a spy

"oh shoot blazinghand" you say "how does that work?"

well, we're just multiplying probabilities, so the order doesn't matter, right? The one thing we can determine for sure is that it should be the same probability of a single person on that team being a spy. That makes sense, yes?

Adding these three probabilities together, the probabilities come out to 53% chance of exactly 1 spy on N1 team! That still leaves a lot of room for the possibility of 2 spies N1.

What are the odds of 2 spies on the d1 team?
The odds of there being 2 spies means that after there has been picked a spy (1/3rd chance) there is another spy pick, either immediately (1/4 chance), and then the third spy ISN'T picked (6/7) chance or there is a town pick then a spy pick (the other 3/4 of the time, there is a 2/7 chance of a second spy). (1/3) * (2/8) * (6/7) = 0.0714, and with three combinatorial routes, this leaves us with a 21% chance of 2 spies on D1.

Well, what about the remaining 26% chance?
There is a small but non-zero chance that there were no spies D1 (which wasn't the case, but for completeness sake) and the odds of that would be 2/3rd * 5/8 * 4/7 (order irrelevant) which gives us a 23% chance. There's also a very small chance that the mission actually contained 3 spies, which would be a 1/3rd * 2/7 * 1/6 = 1.5% chance. Very small.

Now you're probably thinking "Wait why would there be 3 spies N1, Blazinghand? that sounds horribly unlikely and sub-optimal for the spies, doesn't it?"

Why yes, reader, that DOES?

See, the thing a raw probability calculation like this leaves out is that in every situation, there's a chance that the spy is Radfield, rather than Blazinghand or Palmar. See, if Blazinghand or Palmar is the spy, that has no impact on whether the other dude (Blazinghand or Palmar) is the spy. However, if Radfield is the spy, he's the dude who put together the team. He could easily chose to include 1, 2, 3, or 0 spies regardless of probability.

This makes things much more interesting.

Now imagine you're Radfield. This means you are a spy and are totally devious and smart etc etc. So you lucked into a d1 captainship, and you get the feeling people are gonna sheep all over you. You posted a question and some people have made some vaguely scummy d1 posts (Zona, Blazinghand both made posts prior to Greymist's warning about posting anything that could be used as spy meta). What's an optimal strategy?

Well, as Radfield, you'd pick your scumbuddy Palmar, who has been judiciously silent, and Blazinghand. Blazinghand, being the mad nerd baller that he is, will nayvote the team, looking even scummier, but luckily the (now probably not) scum Jackal comes in and hammers the vote.

Now, you get into a big long argument with Blazinghand and Palmar sort of chills. Townies, operating under the assumption that there was 1 spy N1 (when really there were two-- you sabotaged and palmar did nothing, so it looked like there was only 1 spy), are not going to select an "only new dudes" 4-man team. They don't want to select Blazinghand, because you've made a case against him. And, despite (or because of) your best efforts, Blazinghand has made a case of sorts against you.

Naturally, the pick Palmar. You wait until a team of 3 townies plus Palmar gets suggested, and of course it passes-- nobody wants a team with Blazinghand on it, and you are vaguely suspicious to some.

Palmar sabotages, and now things are looking scary. People immediately assume it's not Palmar, even though he's the common article between the two missions. Some people are like "Well radfield isn't confirmed town any more" and some people are suspicious of Palmar, but Blazinghand is still on everyone's scum list...

and then your Third man swoops in, Zona, who busts out this big "Blazinghand and Rad are working together" theory and it doesn't really make sense but people buy it because people will buy things when they're desperate. Zona took a hit earlier during the "is this a scum strat being said" deal, but things start to make sense. Radfield/Blazinghand/Zona? could be. Radfield/Blazinghand/someone else? maybe.

But these people aren't paying attention to the facts and the facts are that Radfield is scummy and the ONLY REASON HE WOULD BRING ME D1 when I looked scummy would be to entrap me as he has! it's an elaborate plot

When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 22:16 GMT
#441
However, all that math is irrelevant because Radfield is scum.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 22:25 GMT
#442
Oh yeah and as a side note, when we put together a 4-man team of all town players tonight, it means we're set for N4 as well, BUT NOT FOR N5. N4 is the only night that requires 2 spies to sabotage, probably specifically because this game is designed for town to fail two nights in a row then win N3 and N4, or at least come into N4 with scum leading 2-1.

If we nail it today it'll go to the ace match.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 22:27 GMT
#444
You seriously just put scare quotes around the word Math?

YOU BROUGHT UP STATISTICS. You are basic a read of off WRONG MATH. I corrected that math. Then you say "math is irrelevant"

On January 04 2012 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote:
Statistically, it seems like D1 would be town favored, so the fact that our N1 ended in failure makes me mistrust Radfield, albeit a little irrational.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 22:29 GMT
#445
VE wrote:
Statistically it seems like D1 would be town favored


I just pointed out that D1 literally isn't town favored.

How can you try to cop out of that. How is this a thing.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 22:31 GMT
#447
BTW I'm not saying VE is scum or anything, he's just inconsistent and didn't think about the math, and then he's like "well blazinghand why did you bring up math" and what am I gonna do here, not tell him he's wrong? because he IS wrong, you know.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 22:33 GMT
#448
On January 04 2012 07:31 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'm not basing any read on any statistics. You'll notice that Radfield isn't on my scumlist. I said why I mistrust Rad, not why I believe Rad is scum.

Your math IS irrelevant because it assumes totally random selection when Radfield didn't select totally at random. He chose based on the information inside the thread...which was obviously limited due to it being D1, but it was still enough for him to choose his team based on. It wasn't random, and it makes your argument that N1 is scum favored totally irrelevant because it wasn't random.


Alright, I'll buy that argument. That's fair enough.

What, then, was the meaning of this sentence?


On January 04 2012 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote:
Statistically, it seems like D1 would be town favored, so the fact that our N1 ended in failure makes me mistrust Radfield, albeit a little irrational.


You mention that the failure N1 makes you mistrust Radfield. That's fine-- I feel the same way.

But what's that first phrase there?

On January 04 2012 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote:
Statistically, it seems like D1 would be town favored,


When you say "statistically"

you mean "well, statistically but not using any math"??
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 22:43 GMT
#451
:D I'm glad we could come to an agreement, but the point isn't that Radfield is innocent. He's still scum, just for different reasons. Look, people thought I was scum D1 right? It was after this post:



On December 26 2011 17:03 Blazinghand wrote:

Team: Radfield (yourself, who is confirmed town to you), plus Zona (for example), plus someone who gives off a solid town read like, say, Blazinghand. If the mission fails, you can reasonably say "well I think this was Zona" (though others will not be able to do so). The beauty of this though is, assuming you're right about the "1 mafia among Zona/Palm/Rad", If your mission succeeds, you've pinned down a mafia member! (WIFOM alert: Mafia, knowing this, might intentionally not sabotage, etc).


A post like this which shared spy information is very scummy, and several people pointed this out, which is why people were suspicious of both Zona and myself who made posts like this on day 1. It's why Zona didn't even bother making a team because people were probably gonna mass nayvote it anyways.

There's no way a reasonable town player would have put me on the team, but Rad did. For this reason I think he is scum (that and his lack of justifications, and his lack of acknowledgment that he used the team I suggested he use...)
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 22:49 GMT
#453
On January 04 2012 07:46 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2012 07:43 Blazinghand wrote:
:D I'm glad we could come to an agreement, but the point isn't that Radfield is innocent. He's still scum, just for different reasons. Look, people thought I was scum D1 right? It was after this post:



On December 26 2011 17:03 Blazinghand wrote:

Team: Radfield (yourself, who is confirmed town to you), plus Zona (for example), plus someone who gives off a solid town read like, say, Blazinghand. If the mission fails, you can reasonably say "well I think this was Zona" (though others will not be able to do so). The beauty of this though is, assuming you're right about the "1 mafia among Zona/Palm/Rad", If your mission succeeds, you've pinned down a mafia member! (WIFOM alert: Mafia, knowing this, might intentionally not sabotage, etc).


A post like this which shared spy information is very scummy, and several people pointed this out, which is why people were suspicious of both Zona and myself who made posts like this on day 1. It's why Zona didn't even bother making a team because people were probably gonna mass nayvote it anyways.

There's no way a reasonable town player would have put me on the team, but Rad did. For this reason I think he is scum (that and his lack of justifications, and his lack of acknowledgment that he used the team I suggested he use...)


Can you explain what you mean by the bolded statement?


MAN ITS' LIKE NOBODY READS THE THREAD.

Look, read the quoted post. This was a post that explicitly discussed mafia strategy. In case you don't know, the mafia don't have a QT in this game, so they can't communicate. Posts like this are very scummy-- I basically suggested a mafia strat and communicated vital information that would allow for a 2-man mafia team, one of which is Radfield, to have Radfield sabotage and the other player not sabotage with ease.

this post is the reason everyone thinks i'm mafia, and zona (nominally) has a ridiculous "Rad and Blazinghand are scumbuddies" case, and also the reason we have a "no mafia strat discussions" rule.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 22:51 GMT
#454
BTW I said "nominally" about zona's case because Zona is just bussing Rad and trying to get me implicated in an attempt to absolve the guilt of having made a similarly scummy post at about the same time I did-- in an attempt to get on and sabotage our D3 team.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 22:52 GMT
#455
I guess I have two chief beefs with Palmar. One is that he and radfield are pulling the stunt that Zona accuses me and radfield of doing (zona is in on it with them). The other is that he is the common factor between the d1 and d2 teams.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 22:59 GMT
#457
On January 04 2012 07:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
Okay, I thought that's what you were referring to, but I wanted to make sure.

Seriously guy, you need to STOP saying people aren't reading the thread. I just said that I read the thread, I can assure you I've read the thread. I was asking about your phrasing. You phrased it like you had scum information to share. You phrased it like you're guilty. That's what I was asking about. You were referring to Palmar's post that makes it out to be scummy, I know that now...but what you said was "shared spy information" which caused my confusion.


Yeah by "shared spy information" i meant "mentioned that the 2nd spy would intentionally not sabotage"

Like, given that everyone seems to have a scum read on me, I ASSUMED that people would know WHY they had a scum read on me. However, of the 8 non-me people in the thread, 3 of them don't actually have a good reason and are mafia. The other 5 have a bad reason but don't realize it's bad.

You could see how Zona's argument could be alluring. Yes, of course! Radfield and Blazinhand in cahoots. But really I'm being framed. However, Zona's arguments that Rad is scum are totally valid.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 23:05 GMT
#458
On January 04 2012 07:59 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2012 07:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
Okay, I thought that's what you were referring to, but I wanted to make sure.

Seriously guy, you need to STOP saying people aren't reading the thread. I just said that I read the thread, I can assure you I've read the thread. I was asking about your phrasing. You phrased it like you had scum information to share. You phrased it like you're guilty. That's what I was asking about. You were referring to Palmar's post that makes it out to be scummy, I know that now...but what you said was "shared spy information" which caused my confusion.


Yeah by "shared spy information" i meant "mentioned that the 2nd spy would intentionally not sabotage"

Like, given that everyone seems to have a scum read on me, I ASSUMED that people would know WHY they had a scum read on me. However, of the 8 non-me people in the thread, 3 of them don't actually have a good reason and are mafia. The other 5 have a bad reason but don't realize it's bad.

You could see how Zona's argument could be alluring. Yes, of course! Radfield and Blazinhand in cahoots. But really I'm being framed. However, Zona's arguments that Rad is scum are totally valid.


Actually, hold on a sec-- assuming you didn't know about that post, why did you have a scum read on me?
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25552 Posts
January 03 2012 23:33 GMT
#460
So, to sum it up, this was your initial argument that I was scum:
+ Show Spoiler +

On December 29 2011 08:00 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2011 14:21 Blazinghand wrote:
P.S.: although Rad's team has 3 votes, he hasn't voted for it yet, meaning that the next non-Radfield person who votes for it will let him vote for it to make it 5. Think carefully about the way this guy has presented his case and his picks before you vote.


FoS Blazinghand

Radfield has been catching a lot of flak for the way he chose his initial team...but the thing is, nothing can happen until we have some information, which we have now.

I liked Palmar's post about people discussing Spy strategy, and I liked Radfield's posting d1...so that leaves me with Blazinghand. And he made this post just before the day ended. Like, if you're town and you're on the team, why would you want to cast suspicion on who picked you?

I will insta-nay any team that includes Blazinghand.

Smooches.

On December 29 2011 09:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
/:| (that's a raised eyebrow...at you sir.)

Calm down a second. First of all, you just got back from a failed mission, and you shouldn't be calling ANYONE spy.

Now, I found your post suspicious REGARDLESS of when it was made. The content was what I had a problem with (if you'll kindly read MY post on the matter...which you're either ignoring or intentionally overlooking.) The fact that you Nay'd a team that included you (as town) doesn't make any sense. I can understand after N1 maybe because you have more information, but ALL you have to go on, as town, is YOUR alignment...so a team that includes you is more likely to succeed by virtue of you being town.

But I wouldn't expect a Spy like you to think in those terms.



You revise to:

+ Show Spoiler +
On December 30 2011 00:46 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2011 21:00 Zona wrote:
Actually, there's one thing I posted that I regret, which you guys should be calling me out on:
On December 27 2011 06:44 Zona wrote:
However, the other factor in the game is that a spy could be the leader - and then this person could pretty much do whatever the heck he/she wanted. 1 spy on the team? Done. Or maybe 2 spies on the team while trying to subtly tell the other spy not to sabotage? Dunno. On day 1 I doubt we can really tell with confidence if the leader is a spy or not, so I believe that Radfield should be the one to pick. On later days we may want to reject picks from suspected spy leaders.

It's for this reason that if Truth's team is rejected, I will forgo choosing a team and all of you should just vote nay on me. That means GreY should start thinking about what team to propose.

As for Truth's team, I'm still mulling over whether or not Truth is likely town, because I think whether or not the team is good solely depends on if Truth is town.


Believe it or not, I was waiting to see which of Palmar or Radfield called you out on it. XD

The fact that Palmar didn't doesn't sit well with me...but I'm still in favor of the 1 scum on N1 mission, and I still think that's Blaze at this juncture...



Then...
+ Show Spoiler +

On January 01 2012 16:21 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 01 2012 12:28 TruthBringer wrote:
I think you guys are way off. You think it is more likely that Palmar is a spy and Greymist, Toadesstern, VisceraEyes, Radfield, and Blazinghand are all townies?

I think it is more likely that 1 of Radfield and Blazinghand was a spy, and 1 of Greymist, Toadesstern, VisceraEyes is a spy.

In that case, I would say Blazinghand is a spy and Toadesstern is a spy.


This post resonates with me. Toad has seemed to me to be kinda iffy with his suspicions. I'm rereading and keeping a particular eye on BH and Toad.


and finally...

On January 04 2012 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote:
BH, your flailing around and not making sense. But you sound town. So I'm at an impasse.



So basically your argument is that I nay-voted a team with myself on it on Day 1, but I sound town-- is this accurate?
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 14 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
12:00
SC:EVO Monthly
MaxPax vs CreatorLIVE!
ByuN vs Classic
SteadfastSC222
IndyStarCraft 134
Liquipedia
Replay Cast
10:05
Maestros of the Game Ro24 B
Ryung vs ByuNLIVE!
Zoun vs TBD
CranKy Ducklings208
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 270
SteadfastSC 222
Harstem 187
IndyStarCraft 134
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 59053
Bisu 4405
Rain 2901
Flash 2018
Shuttle 1578
BeSt 828
Larva 511
firebathero 505
Light 445
Stork 439
[ Show more ]
EffOrt 389
Mini 386
Barracks 358
actioN 348
hero 275
Last 223
sSak 177
Soma 175
Mind 106
Snow 104
Mong 94
PianO 93
Rush 91
Backho 69
Nal_rA 47
Sharp 36
zelot 35
sorry 34
Yoon 32
Movie 23
Sacsri 22
yabsab 19
scan(afreeca) 17
soO 16
Icarus 12
Noble 12
Terrorterran 11
Shine 7
HiyA 7
Dota 2
Gorgc4484
qojqva2254
Dendi1163
BananaSlamJamma252
League of Legends
Reynor10
Counter-Strike
byalli327
zeus228
edward40
Other Games
singsing1731
B2W.Neo1063
olofmeister809
hiko633
crisheroes427
DeMusliM417
Hui .202
ArmadaUGS197
QueenE56
Liquid`VortiX48
FunKaTv 34
SortOf4
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick834
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• FirePhoenix0
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV444
League of Legends
• Nemesis3884
• Jankos1077
Upcoming Events
OSC
2h 31m
Moja vs Babymarine
Solar vs TBD
sOs vs goblin
Nice vs INexorable
sebesdes vs Iba
Nicoract vs TBD
NightMare vs TBD
OSC
10h 31m
ReBellioN vs PAPI
Spirit vs TBD
Percival vs TBD
TriGGeR vs TBD
Shameless vs UedSoldier
Cham vs TBD
Harstem vs TBD
RSL Revival
20h 31m
Cure vs SHIN
Reynor vs Zoun
Kung Fu Cup
22h 31m
The PondCast
23h 31m
RSL Revival
1d 20h
Classic vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Maru
Online Event
1d 22h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 22h
BSL Team Wars
2 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
BSL Team Wars
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
2 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Clem vs herO
Serral vs Bunny
Reynor vs Zoun
Cosmonarchy
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
[BSL 2025] Weekly
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maestros of the Game
4 days
BSL Team Wars
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Copa Latinoamericana 4
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
EC S1
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.