EPTOn December 14 2011 11:56 Spaackle wrote:
Remember. This mislynch is on your heads.
Remember. This mislynch is on your heads.
If only that were true.
Election Mafia - Page 44
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
If only that were true. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On December 14 2011 11:54 GreYMisT wrote: my name has only come up multiple times only by you, and even though i have asked for your actual reasoning like 4 times, you always ignore it. If you wanted us to lynch Grey, Risk, why not make a strong case on him? You're so sure of him being scum, but I haven't seen anything scummy about his play thus far. I know you're capable of making a good case, I've seen you do it before, why not now? | ||
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
|
nyczbrandon
United States124 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On December 14 2011 11:56 xsksc wrote: If you wanted us to lynch Grey, Risk, why not make a strong case on him? You're so sure of him being scum, but I haven't seen anything scummy about his play thus far. I know you're capable of making a good case, I've seen you do it before, why not now? Yes I agree with this. You didn't really have much of a case at all on Grey and when he asked you about it multiple times you didn't answer with anything good. Why is this ? | ||
|
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
On December 14 2011 11:53 Liquid`Sheth wrote: Zeks, could you answer the question though please? I am merely comparing the situations in which who would give us more to work with the next day assuming both are dead townies | ||
|
Refallen
452 Posts
Also, the major scumread I have is evantrees, and specifically, this post by him On December 14 2011 10:11 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + The cause of Arctocod's withdraw will not be revealed Kidnapped! Debating on voting for ProfessorBadass but there is this post... On December 12 2011 14:44 ProfessorBadass wrote: Well first thing's first: Palmar is scum. Palmar and I have a long history of never rolling the same alignment. Since I am Town this game Palmar must indeed be scum. Also I am running for Mayor. and for now for lynch, for fun? ##Vote Nisani201 This seems really scummy to me; especially the last sentence. Is he implying that the lynch is for fun? I'll be voting for evantrees too. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On December 14 2011 11:56 xsksc wrote: If you wanted us to lynch Grey, Risk, why not make a strong case on him? You're so sure of him being scum, but I haven't seen anything scummy about his play thus far. I know you're capable of making a good case, I've seen you do it before, why not now? It's much harder then it looks to make a strong case day 1. The example that was brought up before. I suspected Toad and Ciryandor to be scum. My gut told me Ciryandor (who was scum) but I could build a good case on Toad who then turned up to be town. Altough in my defense he kept playing scummy and half the observer QT was convinced he was scum. | ||
|
evantrees
Canada497 Posts
| ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
-.- | ||
|
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On December 14 2011 11:58 prplhz wrote: I really don't think that Spaackle is scum, last minute vote switches are notoriously unreliable and while he's played somewhat bad he's been active and transparent. People should really be voting Nisani201. Do you really think it likely nisani is scum? Other than being completely inactive, I don't see a lot of red to his posts. What in particular sets you off? | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On December 14 2011 12:00 risk.nuke wrote: It's much harder then it looks to make a strong case day 1. The example that was brought up before. I suspected Toad and Ciryandor to be scum. My gut told me Ciryandor (who was scum) but I could build a good case on Toad who then turned up to be town. Altough in my defense he kept playing scummy and half the observer QT was convinced he was scum. If its hard to make a strong case day one, then how is it possible that i am confirmed scum in your eyes? the flawed logic...it burns me... | ||
|
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On December 14 2011 12:01 GreYMisT wrote: If its hard to make a strong case day one, then how is it possible that i am confirmed scum in your eyes? the flawed logic...it burns me... Instinct. | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 14 2011 12:00 MrZentor wrote: I like how Comprissent comes in and votes one minute before it's too late. -.- -.- to you too I've got another final tomorrow morning, it didn't help i was up vomiting at 5am this morning before a final at 8:30 | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On December 14 2011 12:00 risk.nuke wrote: It's much harder then it looks to make a strong case day 1. The example that was brought up before. I suspected Toad and Ciryandor to be scum. My gut told me Ciryandor (who was scum) but I could build a good case on Toad who then turned up to be town. Altough in my defense he kept playing scummy and half the observer QT was convinced he was scum. That's fair enough if you only feel someone is suspicious day 1, but you seem almost adamant that Greymist is scum. What reasons do you have for this? Why would you expect us to lynch him just because you say so? | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On December 14 2011 12:01 Radfield wrote: Do you really think it likely nisani is scum? Other than being completely inactive, I don't see a lot of red to his posts. What in particular sets you off? No, but I think that Spaaackle is town. Nisani201 is difficult to work with and he is lurking while Spaaackle has shown transparency and activity and willingness to learn. I don't think there's a bigger chance of having one flip scum over the other, maybe slightly bigger on Nisani201 but in the end it's the activity that does it. | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
| ||
| ||
