|
Zbot apparently isn't picking up my votes. I've PM'd Kitaman. My election vote is currently on GreYMist and not being counted, so tell me if I should move it.
@Deus: I don't think I'll ever be happy with your explanation but your list looks solid so let's roll with it for the moment. Electing you as police chief rather than prankster is zero-risk anyway.
Hoping that the secretary of defence power really is a nuke.
|
Vatican City State258 Posts
a nuke would be so awesome :D
and yes, thanks @ radfield for explaining that to zentor. Zentor, we can't protect radfield with a 100% chance. But we can hunt down his killer. From that point of view it doesn't matter who does that PC job.
The PC job is all about protection. And I know that I need that protection the most. Imagine what happens if Radfield and I suddenly die/stop posting etc. I think we would lose this game.
Look at your filter, Zentor. If you hadn't have this power, you would be suspect #1... We don't need you to win. :-(
|
I think i'm getting dragged off to a 'celebratory' dinner for finals with my suite, so it looks like i wont be around for lynch time.
It really seems like i'm being bandwagoned into a lynch just because of my 'lack of activity'
If you're going to lynch me just to buy time to get reds, then that's cool as long as you have a plan and don't fuck up tonight like last night and get reds
|
Vatican City State258 Posts
I really am afraid, that you guys screw up... I need to sleep now. I hope Radfield watches the process...
My wishlist:
lynch between Cascades and Comprissent (I favor casc)
and #1 election for me and #2 for Greymist.
don't get paranoid and screw up!!! I saw such play several times!!!
|
On December 21 2011 07:06 MrZentor wrote: Guys, I really don't understand why we're electing Deus as watcher. We don't know he's town, and our entire plan rests on the fact that the watcher is town. If the Watcher isn't town, we get several townies, including Radfield, killed, and allow mafia to have a good chance of winning.
Nah, that'd make no sense given that most people have a town read on him. What mafia really need is one player to survive through several days. Killing Radfield a night early by throwing away a well-positioned player and crippling their KP doesn't sound smart to me.
|
On December 21 2011 07:34 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote: I really am afraid, that you guys screw up... I need to sleep now. I hope Radfield watches the process...
My wishlist:
lynch between Cascades and Comprissent (I favor casc)
and #1 election for me and #2 for Greymist.
don't get paranoid and screw up!!! I saw such play several times!!! Is this what I think it is?
|
Vatican City State258 Posts
On December 21 2011 07:37 TotallyNotTwoPeople wrote:Show nested quote +On December 21 2011 07:34 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote: I really am afraid, that you guys screw up... I need to sleep now. I hope Radfield watches the process...
My wishlist:
lynch between Cascades and Comprissent (I favor casc)
and #1 election for me and #2 for Greymist.
don't get paranoid and screw up!!! I saw such play several times!!! Is this what I think it is?
I don't know what you actually think, because I can't look into your head. But I think this is the paranoia i was talking about.
|
On December 21 2011 07:41 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote:Show nested quote +On December 21 2011 07:37 TotallyNotTwoPeople wrote:On December 21 2011 07:34 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote: I really am afraid, that you guys screw up... I need to sleep now. I hope Radfield watches the process...
My wishlist:
lynch between Cascades and Comprissent (I favor casc)
and #1 election for me and #2 for Greymist.
don't get paranoid and screw up!!! I saw such play several times!!! Is this what I think it is? I don't know what you actually think, because I can't look into your head. But I think this is the paranoia i was talking about. I think it looks like soft-claiming paranoid cop.
|
Vatican City State258 Posts
On December 21 2011 07:44 TotallyNotTwoPeople wrote:Show nested quote +On December 21 2011 07:41 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote:On December 21 2011 07:37 TotallyNotTwoPeople wrote:On December 21 2011 07:34 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote: I really am afraid, that you guys screw up... I need to sleep now. I hope Radfield watches the process...
My wishlist:
lynch between Cascades and Comprissent (I favor casc)
and #1 election for me and #2 for Greymist.
don't get paranoid and screw up!!! I saw such play several times!!! Is this what I think it is? I don't know what you actually think, because I can't look into your head. But I think this is the paranoia i was talking about. I think it looks like soft-claiming paranoid cop.
No, I am not a paranoid cop. I am afraid, that you guys get paranoid and lynch Radfield and elect Zentor and Evantress. Something like that.
|
On December 21 2011 07:53 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote:Show nested quote +On December 21 2011 07:44 TotallyNotTwoPeople wrote:On December 21 2011 07:41 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote:On December 21 2011 07:37 TotallyNotTwoPeople wrote:On December 21 2011 07:34 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote: I really am afraid, that you guys screw up... I need to sleep now. I hope Radfield watches the process...
My wishlist:
lynch between Cascades and Comprissent (I favor casc)
and #1 election for me and #2 for Greymist.
don't get paranoid and screw up!!! I saw such play several times!!! Is this what I think it is? I don't know what you actually think, because I can't look into your head. But I think this is the paranoia i was talking about. I think it looks like soft-claiming paranoid cop. No, I am not a paranoid cop. I am afraid, that you guys get paranoid and lynch Radfield and elect Zentor and Evantress. Something like that.
That would be pretty awesome.
Aside from the lynching Radfield thing. :p
|
##unvote nyczbrandon ##vote Comprissent
better be the right move because i have strong vibe from brandon
|
United States2095 Posts
On December 21 2011 07:02 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote: Announcement:
we don't lynch nyczbrandon today!!!
You may chose between Cascades and Comprissent
I don't know why you guys do that! There is nothing favouring nyczbrandon over the other two players. :-(
I don't get this. I think we should lynch him honestly. I'm keeping my vote on him, I'll read through Comprissent's filter in a second though I geuss and decide for sure if I want to switch or not. Would you care to say why you don't want him lynched?
|
I prefer Cascades over comprissent atm, unless radfield or deus can tell me why they favor comp.
|
United States2095 Posts
On December 21 2011 08:29 GreYMisT wrote: I prefer Cascades over comprissent atm, unless radfield or deus can tell me why they favor comp.
They havn't really told me why they don't want NYCZ either. Who would you have killed if Deus / TNTP hadn't said anything?
|
I'm off to bed shortly, so I switched my election vote to Deus because it's a bit close and my votes still aren't registering. Hoping that Comprissent is both dead and red by tomorrow morning, but any of the top three lynch candidates are ok by me so I'm not too worried about a late switch.
|
On December 21 2011 08:30 Liquid`Sheth wrote:Show nested quote +On December 21 2011 08:29 GreYMisT wrote: I prefer Cascades over comprissent atm, unless radfield or deus can tell me why they favor comp. They havn't really told me why they don't want NYCZ either. Who would you have killed if Deus / TNTP hadn't said anything?
Both nycz and cascades were on my top 3 list a few days ago, I was fine with either
|
United States2095 Posts
|
On December 21 2011 06:42 TotallyNotTwoPeople wrote:I favor comprissent, as I mostly have null-reads on these people, but he has soft-defended the known scum: Show nested quote +Spackle, your analysis on Dropbear is 100% theory, and I would not like to lynch based off that Show nested quote +On December 17 2011 06:02 Comprissent wrote:On December 17 2011 05:58 VisceraEyes wrote: Sheth and GiygaS calm down...mafia can hide when people go back and forth and back and forth. Implying they aren't already hiding behind the ProfBA/Arc drama? ...fuck flood control -_-
Ok the first one i can understand as a soft defense, but did you bother to read his 'analysis'? My reasoning there was perfectly solid. I don't understand the second one, how is that defending scum?
Are we able to do a no-lynch? We seem to have a solid plan for picking off reds tonight, i see no point in risking lynching a townie with whatever odds there are being thrown around
|
Also, my filter link in the second post is wrong (it links to deus-ex's profile)
|
On December 21 2011 10:54 Comprissent wrote:Show nested quote +On December 21 2011 06:42 TotallyNotTwoPeople wrote:I favor comprissent, as I mostly have null-reads on these people, but he has soft-defended the known scum: Spackle, your analysis on Dropbear is 100% theory, and I would not like to lynch based off that On December 17 2011 06:02 Comprissent wrote:On December 17 2011 05:58 VisceraEyes wrote: Sheth and GiygaS calm down...mafia can hide when people go back and forth and back and forth. Implying they aren't already hiding behind the ProfBA/Arc drama? ...fuck flood control -_- Ok the first one i can understand as a soft defense, but did you bother to read his 'analysis'? My reasoning there was perfectly solid. I don't understand the second one, how is that defending scum? Are we able to do a no-lynch? We seem to have a solid plan for picking off reds tonight, i see no point in risking lynching a townie with whatever odds there are being thrown around We cannot no-lynch. If you wish to avoid being lynched, you have one hour to convince people that someone else is a better target. The second one is soft defending because saying mafia is using that drama to hide implies that neither of the involved parties are mafia.
|
|
|
|