edit: making my signup bolt.
##Signup
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
edit: making my signup bolt. ##Signup | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
/confirm Anyways, i'll try to lurk less this game and try to not make the same mistakes as before. I'm reading the thread right now but thought that confirming would be better soon than later. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 16 2011 21:29 Palmar wrote: hey guys, I'm in a good mood today, so here's a great offer to you: I will write an alignment analysis on the first three players people ask me to do. Each player can only select one person for me to analyse, and I will provide a post for each subject on what I currently think of their alignment. Go! Eventhough i did like your analysis, i'm kinda confused on why you didn't just post an analysis on people you found suspicious. Don't you care on who you are doing analysis on? Or are you trying to avoid drawing a connection between you and some other persons? btw why are you voting coagulation and drazerk? You made a case against chaoser before voting for him, but not for those two. And nobody else made a case against them. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 17 2011 00:30 Palmar wrote: Show nested quote + On November 17 2011 00:10 hyshes wrote: On November 16 2011 21:29 Palmar wrote: hey guys, I'm in a good mood today, so here's a great offer to you: I will write an alignment analysis on the first three players people ask me to do. Each player can only select one person for me to analyse, and I will provide a post for each subject on what I currently think of their alignment. Go! Eventhough i did like your analysis, i'm kinda confused on why you didn't just post an analysis on people you found suspicious. Don't you care on who you are doing analysis on? Or are you trying to avoid drawing a connection between you and some other persons? btw why are you voting coagulation and drazerk? You made a case against chaoser before voting for him, but not for those two. And nobody else made a case against them. prplhz told me Drazerk is scum Coag because he's always scum and he always lurks. And yeah, that's actually the case, generally it doesn't matter whose posts you read. I am pretty sure no one in this game has gone through everyone's filters and formed an opinion. Most people are likely focusing on somewhere between 2-5 people and mostly ignoring the rest of the game. So as an experiment I allowed random townies to pick which people I should focus on, because that gives the additional benefit of me not entering the analysis biased. I think it's working out well, again I am going to re-iterate: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=12303438 chaoser is scum You all should be voting for him. + Show Spoiler + If you really want to know why I'm voting Drazerk and Coag, read through their filters. the coag thing i get now, it's the lurking/inactive part. But i filterd drazrk and i couldn't find anything suspicious. Can you atleast give me a general direction what i should be looking for? #Vote: chaoser | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
##Vote: chaoser | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 17 2011 06:01 Zephirdd wrote: Huh, I just found this on our beautiful bot-induced vote system. Now, looking through his filters, Lanaia has not made an statement on voting Kenpachi, except that he prefers to vote on sinani over him. Which means that, either the system is bugged(unlikely), or Lanaia has the ability to anti-vote someone through PM. Looking through the roles, the closest I've found is "Double Voter", but I assume anti-voting is a variation of that. Which means Lanaia is not green(assuming green = vanilla town) So either Lanaia is scum or Lanaia is a blue to be killed. The question is: which one? And if he doesn't die next day, can we confirm he is scum or maybe the Mafia just want us to believe that? And why would he want Kenpachi to not die(anti-voting him)? I'd like to have these questions clarified or at least discussed, I got really confused right now. only scum would defend lurkers. ##vote: Lanaia | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
##vote: Lanaia | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 16 2011 21:37 Palmar wrote: okay, prplhz, tyrran and chaoser I'll do. any reason why you didn't do tyrran? | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1. That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta. Vote: Drazerk Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well. You make a good point about lanaia. If she knew it would be public, it would be very weird that she did it as scum. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 17 2011 08:39 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Kenpachi is at 12 votes, if he hits 14 at any point he will be killed at the end of the day. Please be careful about hammering. We have over 24 hours to go. from the auto count: Kenpachi (12): bumatlarge, DCLXVI, prplhz, Drazerk, Zephirdd, i'm counting 12 votes minus the anti-vote.. so it is 11 right? | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 17 2011 09:09 chaoser wrote: Show nested quote + This game uses a Majority Multi-Lynch system. During the day, any player may vote for as many other players as he or she wishes. If at any point during the day over half of players alive are voting for a particular player, that player will be condemned to the lynch and will die at the end of that day. He's dead already so why would he lie... He's dead at the end of the day.. would be benifical to spread chaos for the remaining scum by claiming a important role.. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 17 2011 10:32 Palmar wrote: I forgot again about that alignment analysis on Tyrren, I'll do it tomorrow, sorry. Was just looking up the quotes to ask for this btw its Tyrran | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 16 2011 07:19 Coagulation wrote: You guys still have yet to figure out that anything kenpachi says should be ignored. If in doubt vote for Kenpachi But dont run the town directive into the ground trying to figure out why he does what he does. Just kill him If we have nothing solid to go on. On November 17 2011 10:23 Coagulation wrote: #vote Coagulation placeholder vote while I read over thread On November 17 2011 10:35 Coagulation wrote: ##Vote Kenpachi LAL + hes pretty much distracting town completely. He needs to die for town to progress Im not sure about chaoser yet but im gonna keep reading up on him and his accusers. Also Im starting to see why everyone hates you wherebugsgo. So you read and analysised 1 day and a few hours of thread in 12 minutes? To come up with a vote that is useless? | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 18 2011 01:28 Forumite wrote: Show nested quote + On November 17 2011 22:13 xsksc wrote: I was asleep while all that shit went down last night I can't help it man, when I'm on nothing happens. I posted my analysis a couple of hours ago and not much has happened since then. What are your current reads forumite? Still think think I'm newbie scum based on my hello post? Cause honestly, that was a pretty silly case. Yeah, I don´t think you are scum, I still want you active in the game. The original case was a gamble, scum have been caught by things like that. It didn´t work now, but I also have your word that you are going to contribute despite being a new player, so it´s still a win! I´m agreeing with Palmar, we need another lynch, ONE by the way, not 5. I don´t want Chaoser or Lalala lynched. I have to run now, but will be back several hours before the lynch. Than who would you suggest? | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 17 2011 19:53 Tyrran wrote: * Hyshes : Show nested quote + On November 17 2011 06:21 hyshes wrote: On November 17 2011 06:01 Zephirdd wrote: Huh, I just found this on our beautiful bot-induced vote system. Kenpachi (4): bumatlarge, DCLXVI, prplhz, Drazerk, Zephirdd, Lanaia (Anti-Vote) Now, looking through his filters, Lanaia has not made an statement on voting Kenpachi, except that he prefers to vote on sinani over him. Which means that, either the system is bugged(unlikely), or Lanaia has the ability to anti-vote someone through PM. Looking through the roles, the closest I've found is "Double Voter", but I assume anti-voting is a variation of that. Which means Lanaia is not green(assuming green = vanilla town) So either Lanaia is scum or Lanaia is a blue to be killed. The question is: which one? And if he doesn't die next day, can we confirm he is scum or maybe the Mafia just want us to believe that? And why would he want Kenpachi to not die(anti-voting him)? I'd like to have these questions clarified or at least discussed, I got really confused right now. only scum would defend lurkers. ##vote: Lanaia With this in mind, the fact that he jumped extremely quickly on the Lanaia bandwagon with the only excuse "only scum would defend a lurker" is extremelly scummy. Not only that, but while this statement suggest that Kenpachi is also scum, he did not vote for him, focusing only on Lanaia. This is very suspect. Note that he later 'said' that it would be weird if Lanaia did this as scum, but did not remove his vote! bold text: no it does not.. lurkers are good for scum. Scum defending a lurker doesn't mean the lurker is scum. italic text: I did not say that. I said: You make a good point about lanaia. If she knew it would be public, it would be very weird that she did it as scum. This does not imply what you say. It would be weird if lanaia did this as scum knowing we would see the vote.. We can't be sure if she knew. btw, i don't want it to go like yesterday so: ##Unvote: chaoser | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 18 2011 01:48 Sabin010 wrote: Show nested quote + On November 18 2011 01:35 hyshes wrote: oh god.. it could be i meant "then" i actually don't know which is right.. than or then? im a native speaker and still havent figured that one out bro. No you're not :p you're american | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:27 Tyrran wrote: Show nested quote + On November 18 2011 07:22 sinani206 wrote: On November 18 2011 07:20 Tyrran wrote: So within four hours, we must focus on getting another lynch. We already have 2 people a 8 votes, i suggest we focus on them. Both look scummy, both are in my likely scum list, yet Drazerk voted for Sinani206 so its unlikely that both are scum. First of all, Sinani was a big partisan of dividing our attention . Quite amusingly he used the divide and conquer analogy, where as pointed by WBG, you are suppose to divide you enemy. Meaning we town are the enemy? He Bandwagoned against Lanaia, which as i explained before, is something that is very pro-mafia. Just look at his post just before, when we already established that Lanaia should not be lynched. Both his votes are given without any explanation other than "its obvious". He is either scum or an extremely bad town. Even Drazerk looks good in comparison. I dont think town needs him. ##Vote Sinani206 lololol hypocrite Great defense. I will remind you that I voted kenpachi only becaused i agreed with risk.nuke that this was the rigth way to proceed. And i will redirect you to This post where i explain why mafia would press charges on Lanaia, and thus why those who blindly voted for her are suspects. That post of you made totally wrong implications and assumptions. Read my respond to that. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 17 2011 09:11 Drazerk wrote: Show nested quote + On November 17 2011 09:10 Kenpachi wrote: On November 17 2011 09:08 Cyber_Cheese wrote: On November 17 2011 08:58 Kenpachi wrote: On November 17 2011 08:49 Kenpachi wrote: ill claim when we hit 12!1!11!!! now that i proved that you guys are indeed retards, i have no regrets. implies i have a role On November 17 2011 08:59 Kenpachi wrote: didnt want to. im against claiming On November 15 2011 13:29 Kenpachi wrote: real long day ok. hi i am Kenpachi and i am a Townie welcome to TL mafia to those who are just starting and i hope you have a good time here. That is two lies in a game where we should be lynching all liars. ##Unvote: Coagulation ##Vote: Kenpachi Typing ## and : is a pain. Kk you suck. Scumteam: Hiroruby Drazerk Cyber_Cheese Unlike you I will never be lynched though | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 18 2011 08:27 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Show nested quote + On November 18 2011 08:24 hyshes wrote: Ok, as so many people have suggested.. i've filtered drzazerk. Where do you guys get that Drazerk is claiming a lynchproof role?... Drazerk is saying he won't be lynched that doesn't state that he is unlynchable in which he would of just said he can't be lynched. I don't see him being as a power role just being an arogant dick On November 17 2011 09:11 Drazerk wrote: On November 17 2011 09:10 Kenpachi wrote: On November 17 2011 09:08 Cyber_Cheese wrote: On November 17 2011 08:58 Kenpachi wrote: On November 17 2011 08:49 Kenpachi wrote: ill claim when we hit 12!1!11!!! now that i proved that you guys are indeed retards, i have no regrets. implies i have a role On November 17 2011 08:59 Kenpachi wrote: didnt want to. im against claiming On November 15 2011 13:29 Kenpachi wrote: real long day ok. hi i am Kenpachi and i am a Townie welcome to TL mafia to those who are just starting and i hope you have a good time here. That is two lies in a game where we should be lynching all liars. ##Unvote: Coagulation ##Vote: Kenpachi Typing ## and : is a pain. Kk you suck. Scumteam: Hiroruby Drazerk Cyber_Cheese Unlike you I will never be lynched though http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=282366¤tpage=45#899 That one as well. The fact he will never be lynched, doesn't say he can't be | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 18 2011 10:47 wherebugsgo wrote: Show nested quote + On November 18 2011 10:24 chaoser wrote: On November 18 2011 10:23 wherebugsgo wrote: So? We already lynched a lurker today. Leave sinani till tomorrow, he's not playing any different than he normally does as town. When he's scum he lurks so hardcore he doesn't even post. It's funny you use the "he's not reading the thread" logic to further your case on sinani when you don't do the same with nisani. Matter of convenience, chaoser? wait what? Let me be more clear for you. You're saying sinani is not reading the thread, therefore he is scum. Why is it that you are selectively using this logic, and not applying it to nisani? Oh, right, cause you have an agenda. Sinani is playing like he plays as town. You probably weren't paying attention in PYP, but when he's scum he's a grade of useless even below his current level of useless. If he flips scum I will be shocked. I don't have the luxury like you of having played before with him. But i do need information. And something is telling me this could be a good call. ##Vote: sinani206 | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 18 2011 11:15 Nisani201 wrote: DCLXVI Drazerk Zephirdd GreYMisT risk.nuke Tyrran Lemonwalrus Cyber_Cheese These people voted for both Kenpachi and sinani206. There is 1-2 scum on this list. Drazerk is one of them care to elaborate on why? | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 19 2011 00:33 xsksc wrote: Show nested quote + On November 19 2011 00:24 Palmar wrote: On November 19 2011 00:23 xsksc wrote: Well Palmar, here's my thoughts. I think the Kenpachi/Sinani lynches were silly. The only real scum read I have right now is on Drazerk. I'm not sure about Chaoser, I don't know his meta so it's harder for me to form an opinion on his town play. There are a couple of others I'm undecided on. People I think are town : wherebugsgo palmar risk.nuke harbingerofdoom lanaia forumite People I think are scum/I'm suspicious of : prphlz chaoser drazerk lemonwalrus That's my current opinions, I have nothing solid to go on with chaoser/prphlz/lemon though. Also, I'm really surprised I made it onto your vig list. I actually made a case on someone and stuck with it, I didn't join those ridiculous bandwagons that got two of our blues killed day 1. well, to be fair, maybe it's just best if vigis hold their shots. I can relate to your list though I don't agree with all the reads (pending re-reading I'd say harbringer could be scum, and prplhz could be town). The reason HoD is on my town list is because he voted drazerk before most people. I'm reasonably confident that drazerk is scum, which would make HoD almost confirmed townie to me. And yeah the prphlz thing is really just a feeling at the moment, I don't have anything solid on him. What kind of reasoning is that? With so much votes needed to lynch scum will always vote between themselves. Not that i see drazerk as scum.. can anyone please explain to my why you guys do? | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 20 2011 02:57 prplhz wrote: @hyshes So you are mason and you chose to mason Drazerk or what? Do you know what masons are? | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 20 2011 03:01 Forumite wrote: Show nested quote + On November 20 2011 02:59 hyshes wrote: On November 20 2011 02:57 prplhz wrote: @hyshes So you are mason and you chose to mason Drazerk or what? Do you know what masons are? We know how they work, but we don´t know how they works in this game. Did you both start with PM-rights to eachother from the beginning of the game, or did either of you need to choose the other to join the mason circle? Did your role-PM state that your mason-buddy is a confirmed Town player, or can one of you be scum? Ok i didn't knew that was also an possibility. We both started as masons and i got that in a pm. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 20 2011 03:05 Forumite wrote: Hyshes, did your PM say that your mason-buddy is a confirmed Townie too? yes | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 20 2011 02:31 prplhz wrote: So ... I wasn't around and when I was around I had to go through 20 pages of chaoser and Palmar and wherebugsgo going at it and then finally when I reached the end of that shitstorm, I arrive at people wanting to lynch another known lurker. I didn't have a decidedly town read on him but I didn't think he was scummy enough at all. Look at his posts, all one liners. I just think they looked like he actually tried to contribute with his single lines compared to other games so I wrote in caps lock DO NOT LYNCH. Why the hell aren't you focusing on the moron who actually went ahead and lynched him instead, I believe it was hyshes but don't hold me up on that. Now I am defending people in the interest of getting them lynched? Well that's up hill now wouldn't you say so. I said what I meant, the guy shouldn't get lynched. Blaming me for getting him lynched is stupid when all I ever said was that he was a moron but that he was probably town and people shouldn't vote him. @hyshes Why the hell did you vote sinani206 after I had written IN CAPS LOCK that you shouldn't vote him? Why did you think it was a good idea? What kind of information did you hope to gain from it? What information did you actually end up gaining? You didn't comment on his lynch at all since it happened so it doesn't seem like you got any information from it. Also your filter is very underwhelming at first sight, didn't have time to read it through 'cause I kinda have to go cook some food right now. Erm first off all, if i see things in full caps.. i don't think "this is important".. i think "this person wants to be important while talking shit". Secondly, where did you get your information from? I cannot come up with any role that could have that information. And wtf.. no time to read my filter? come on.. if you even glanzed at it you could have read it. It takes just a few minutes to read my filter. You didn't even bother to check if your statement was valid. ##Vote: prplhz | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 20 2011 04:23 prplhz wrote: This is insanity, I wrote before he was hammered that I wanted less people to vote for him. How is this subtly wanting him dead? I never called for a lynch on sinani206 at all, a lot of people voted him for shitty reasons and you should look at them instead. Look at people who voted him even though they know his meta. Look at hyshes who just ignored everything and played the newbie card voting for a guy in spite of all warnings. I'm gonna read your god damn filter later, I had to go cook food 'cause my sister was bitching at me, does that make me scum? Jesus christ. I never said that caps lock equals convincing statement, but does it equal unconvincing statement? I posted my opinion very clearly. Unfortunately I was too late and hyshes didn't give a shit anyway (who the hell doesn't take a post seriously just because it's in caps, jesus christ. If you had any doubts, why didn't you ask before you hammered?) so sinani206 ended up lynched. Not a big deal anyway, it's not like he would have scum hunted ever and his role required a lot of skill to use. Would have been useful at a mylo though. ##Unvote Drazerk For now. I'm sorry that i don't follow statements from people that i think aren't trustworthy. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 20 2011 14:41 prplhz wrote: guys I don't think prplhz is scum, here is why...
i didn't say that. You said you glanzed at my filter.. but then decided not to read it? That tells me you didn't even glanzed at it.. You didn't even bother to open my filter. You can read my filter on like 5min.. You just wanted to make a statement there. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 23 2011 01:36 Tyrran wrote: Show nested quote + On November 23 2011 00:48 Palmar wrote: So, I've been having a conversation in another thread. How does everyone like my new plan "Just do whatever Palmar tells us to do"? Everyone in favor go ahead and give me a ##Fistpound My guts keep telling me you are scum, my brain keeps telling me you are town. I wish i knew why. Probably bc he wants to control town.This looks very scummy, but because of the huge backfire this can have it is actually probably town play. If he is scum, he is taking great risk by getting out there like that. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
explain this. + Show Spoiler + On November 23 2011 19:05 wherebugsgo wrote: Show nested quote + On November 23 2011 18:53 Palmar wrote: Assuming you are correct about DCLXVI Tyrran, this is Nisani's vote record: (I think putting it in quotes stops ZBot from picking up on it) ##Vote: Forumite ##Vote: Kenpachi ##Vote: Palmar ##Vote: Drazerk ##Vote: wherebugsgo ##Vote: prplhz ##Vote: DCLXVI ##Vote: RebirthOfLeGenD RoL, WBG and Forumite all look pretty good to me btw. I would believe those are all townies. + Show Spoiler + On November 23 2011 19:47 wherebugsgo wrote: also ##vote Forumite for being repeatedly thick/repeatedly pushing stupid lynches. Stop it. Really. It's starting to get annoying. If you're actually town, take your head out of your ass and look at what you're doing. Whitin 1 post you change your thought on forumite? Without a post inbetween from forumite? Or any post concerning the matter? Everybody knows you don't post without reading the thread, so this makes no sence. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 24 2011 01:22 hyshes wrote: @wbg: explain this. + Show Spoiler + On November 23 2011 19:05 wherebugsgo wrote: Show nested quote + On November 23 2011 18:53 Palmar wrote: Assuming you are correct about DCLXVI Tyrran, this is Nisani's vote record: (I think putting it in quotes stops ZBot from picking up on it) ##Vote: Forumite ##Vote: Kenpachi ##Vote: Palmar ##Vote: Drazerk ##Vote: wherebugsgo ##Vote: prplhz ##Vote: DCLXVI ##Vote: RebirthOfLeGenD RoL, WBG and Forumite all look pretty good to me btw. I would believe those are all townies. + Show Spoiler + On November 23 2011 19:47 wherebugsgo wrote: also ##vote Forumite for being repeatedly thick/repeatedly pushing stupid lynches. Stop it. Really. It's starting to get annoying. If you're actually town, take your head out of your ass and look at what you're doing. Whitin 1 post you change your thought on forumite? Without a post inbetween from forumite? Or any post concerning the matter? Everybody knows you don't post without reading the thread, so this makes no sence. On November 23 2011 19:50 wherebugsgo wrote: I didn't read his last vote post. I'm unsure on Forumite, but he's pushing scum agenda. He needs to be set straight. I'm acting on logic, my instinct tells me he's the most retarded townie in existence. I can't make an exception for anyone. I want to elaborate on my question. Since when don't you read the thread carefully? I don't find your first answer sufficient enough. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 24 2011 01:46 Forumite wrote: Show nested quote + On November 24 2011 01:22 hyshes wrote: @wbg: explain this. + Show Spoiler + On November 23 2011 19:05 wherebugsgo wrote: Show nested quote + On November 23 2011 18:53 Palmar wrote: Assuming you are correct about DCLXVI Tyrran, this is Nisani's vote record: (I think putting it in quotes stops ZBot from picking up on it) ##Vote: Forumite ##Vote: Kenpachi ##Vote: Palmar ##Vote: Drazerk ##Vote: wherebugsgo ##Vote: prplhz ##Vote: DCLXVI ##Vote: RebirthOfLeGenD RoL, WBG and Forumite all look pretty good to me btw. I would believe those are all townies. + Show Spoiler + On November 23 2011 19:47 wherebugsgo wrote: also ##vote Forumite for being repeatedly thick/repeatedly pushing stupid lynches. Stop it. Really. It's starting to get annoying. If you're actually town, take your head out of your ass and look at what you're doing. Whitin 1 post you change your thought on forumite? Without a post inbetween from forumite? Or any post concerning the matter? Everybody knows you don't post without reading the thread, so this makes no sence. He posted his thread before reading my post where I voted 3 of the lurkers who voted prplhz yesterday. It´s allready been answered earlier, you probably missed the post. I explained my question some more in my previous post. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 24 2011 05:51 Coagulation wrote: #vote: Cyber_Cheese #vote: DCLXVI #vote: Forumite #vote: GreYMisT #vote: RebirthOfLeGenD #vote: Kibibit #vote: Lanaia #vote: Lemonwalrus #vote: Nisani201 #vote: Palmar #vote: Sabin010 #vote: Tyrran #vote: Zephirdd #vote: bumatlarge #vote: MrZentor #vote: hyshes #vote: wherebugsgo #vote: xsksc wtf is this? i've cut som # to avoid bugs in zbot btw are these counted? since they are not the same code as a normal vote ( the bold code is around all votes) | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
Vote: Nisani201 | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
##Vote: Nisani201 | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 24 2011 22:20 Palmar wrote: Show nested quote + On November 24 2011 21:32 hyshes wrote: I'm willing to lynch nisani today. If he is not scum, atleast 3 out of wherebugsgo/palmar/tyrran/RebirthOfLeGenD should be. Vote: Nisani201 That logic doesn't hold up. Shape up, you're in the prestigious position of being confirmed town, don't squander the opportunity through idiocy. You guys votes are too close to eachother for this not being true. But i'm actually guessing you guys are town and nisani is scum. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
forumite i understand, zbot just recently updated the votes.. but palmar you voted for him and posted way behind the zbot update.. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 25 2011 02:58 Forumite wrote: Show nested quote + On November 25 2011 01:51 hyshes wrote: @forumite: care to explain your reasoning behind your statement about the votes on nisani? I can't really follow your logic in that. Which part of it? @Tyrran The point of listing only confirmed Town is because it hasn´t got to do with Scum voting Nisani, it has to do with Scum leaving alive those Townies who want to vote Nisani. I don´t throw suspicion on the players voting Nisani, but I think they survived the night because Scum would rather kill people like risk and Harbringer who couldn´t care either way about Nisani. It´s like the opposite of when Scum kill those suspecting them, now they killed those not caring about Nisani, thereby making it more likely that Nisani was lynched. I agree with those saying that we should lynch another player. My suggestion would be Zephirdd. just the whole thing. What are you stating actually? | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 25 2011 05:14 MrZentor wrote: Show nested quote + No, you don't. Now, I would like you to write a big post on the current situation of the game. Additionally, I would like you to either retract or confirm chaoser's claim that you are vanilla town. I think we need to kill a mafia badly and I am mostly if not entirely partially vanilla town. You do know you cannot state such things without explanation.. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 25 2011 08:42 Forumite wrote: Show nested quote + On November 25 2011 08:37 Tyrran wrote: Why would any vigi hit Drazerk when after he claimed Mason. That doesnt remotely makes sense. Mafia killing two almost confirmed town ( drazerk and risk.nuke) makes a lot of sense on the other hand. Why assume the opposite ? From Towns perspective, neither was confirmed, but once drazerk died hyshes was confirmed. risk was generally considered Town, but that doesn´t make him confirmed. The thing that is odd is why scum didn´t shoot both masons if they were going for one, killing one mason confirms the other, but killing both makes sure there are no confirmed Townies. Scum hate confirmed Townies. Expecting scum making the obvious kills is retarded. Maybe scum wants us to have this discussion to distract us from more scumhunting. You might be scum who wants to have this stupid discussion? | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
##Vote: Forumite | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 26 2011 00:41 Forumite wrote: Show nested quote + On November 26 2011 00:26 hyshes wrote: So everyone is blue? Anyway, none of you is confirmed and some of you are smart enough to setup things. But as the only confirmed townie i'm going to vote forumite. I've no hidden agenda whatsoever. ##Vote: Forumite Confirmed Townie or not, I´d still appreciate if you provide your reasoning. I just read the thread. I've looked at your filter and voting paterns. Can't exactly say "its this post..." or "it that vote...", Its just a conclusion after putting all the information on a line. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 26 2011 03:39 Zephirdd wrote: LSB, HarbingerOfDoom, risk.nuke, GreYMisT, Forumite, Tyrran, wherebugsgo These all claimed/confirmed green. Just because you asked <3 Any chance you got a list of claims? (i can look it up also.. just easier) I'm just wondering who is left over. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 24 2011 05:51 Coagulation wrote: ##vote: Cyber_Cheese ##vote: DCLXVI ##vote: Forumite ##vote: GreYMisT ##vote: RebirthOfLeGenD ##vote: Kibibit ##vote: Lanaia ##vote: Lemonwalrus ##vote: Nisani201 ##vote: Palmar ##vote: Sabin010 ##vote: Tyrran ##vote: Zephirdd ##vote: bumatlarge ##vote: MrZentor ##vote: hyshes ##vote: wherebugsgo ##vote: xsksc On November 26 2011 06:12 Coagulation wrote: Show nested quote + On November 25 2011 23:02 Zona wrote: Kibibit has notified me that he has an emergency and will be excused. If I do not have replacements available by 11:00 KST, Kibibit and Coagulation will be modkilled. (Sigh.) Are you kidding? I posted every 24 hour cycle between your last 2 posts there is more than 48h (nov24 05:50 => nov26 06:12 | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 20 2011 04:33 Coagulation wrote: and if drazek is gonna run around going "im confirmed town now anyone that doesn't believe me is scum" than hes an idiot. 47h,49m On November 22 2011 04:22 Coagulation wrote: ##vote: prplhz I wouldnt mind lynching ROL either after his "LOL LETS LYNCH KENPACHI" a real credit to town. 49h29m On November 24 2011 05:51 Coagulation wrote: ##vote: Cyber_Cheese ##vote: DCLXVI ##vote: Forumite ##vote: GreYMisT ##vote: RebirthOfLeGenD ##vote: Kibibit ##vote: Lanaia ##vote: Lemonwalrus ##vote: Nisani201 ##vote: Palmar ##vote: Sabin010 ##vote: Tyrran ##vote: Zephirdd ##vote: bumatlarge ##vote: MrZentor ##vote: hyshes ##vote: wherebugsgo ##vote: xsksc or is my math totally wrong? | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 26 2011 06:19 Coagulation wrote: ok you got me I was busy on turkey day. Fuck my life. Like i stated, it's not only on thanksgiving | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
##Vote: MrZentor | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 26 2011 07:43 xsksc wrote: Hmm, I re-read and it says I can choose X targets to protect where X is the number of targets we lynched. If only one of the players out of those I targeted was hit during the night, and was only hit once, I will successfully protect that player. Otherwise, the protection fails. Does this mean my protection on all my targets fails if multiple protected targets are hit? Not entirely sure how this works actually, am I allowed to PM Zona for clarification? yes, you can always ask zona for clarification. | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 26 2011 09:52 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: ##Vote: Coagulation ##Vote: Sabin010 We need more lynches. No we don't | ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 27 2011 04:16 DCLXVI wrote: Why must you assume that every role works the same in this game as it does in others. I know I am a miller because that is part of my role. I would not claim miller if I was scum because of this response, I felt it was necessary to make the best out of our dts since their time is short. Easy to say after you made the mistake.. | ||
| ||
Next event in 11h 4m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games summit1g22655 shahzam1607 WinterStarcraft661 FrodaN565 JimRising 446 PiGStarcraft279 NuckleDu165 Maynarde115 StateSC2109 Mew2King81 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH132 StarCraft: Brood War• Hupsaiya 73 • RayReign 65 • davetesta26 • practicex 13 • Kozan • Laughngamez YouTube • aXEnki • Poblha • intothetv • Gussbus • Migwel • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamez Trovo Dota 2 League of Legends |
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
Online Event
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Sparkling Tuna Cup
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
[ Show More ] ESL Pro Tour
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
PassionCraft
|
|