• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:02
CEST 03:02
KST 10:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall5HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL36Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster14Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? StarCraft Mass Recall: SC1 campaigns on SC2 thread How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
$5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29) WardiTV Mondays SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall Help: rep cant save Where did Hovz go?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Trading/Investing Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 550 users

Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46)

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 09 2011 05:27 GMT
#104
I suppose I have time

##Signup
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 10 2011 23:43 GMT
#151
On November 11 2011 08:23 Lemonwalrus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2011 08:06 GMarshal wrote:
On November 11 2011 08:02 Lemonwalrus wrote:
On November 11 2011 07:52 Zephirdd wrote:
On November 11 2011 07:46 jaybrundage wrote:
Hm i was hoping we would start today. Im really looking foward to my first game :D


Ditto. So, do I get to use some fancy weapon? Oh Oh Oh I want a bazooka! A Bazooka looks like a common weapon for someone in a Mafia game, even if he isn't in the Mafia!

Or you could be like GMarshal and get 3 rocket launchers but never use them.

That was bumatlarge.

I'd never be that irresponsible.

(disclaimer: may or may not fakeclaim medic and almost screw his team over)

Oh, my apologies, as soon as I wrote your name I started to think I had the wrong guy.


I think you are all jealous.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 15 2011 06:10 GMT
#269
/confirm

I'm mostly interested in the multi-lynch. It's possible to blanket votes over multiple scummy players, so if instead of busting LSBs balls on posting piles of garbage, I'll echo the analysis statement. There is no wrong way to do it, just post who and why. And going out of your way to point out someone is acting townie does not help any discussion. I'll vote anyone who has a good argument against them.

And since I only know a quarter of the player-base, I'll forgive Hiroruby for his fairly obvious insights, because it's effort and if he can forge that into scumhunting, it makes the town that much stronger.

And also I see no reason not to do this.

##Vote Kenpachi

And I will most likely not be taking it off until I see something that benefits town come out of his mouth. I don't really care about spam, I'll read all of it anyway so I won't discourage it. It will just help my reads so thats all I'm concerned about.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 15 2011 06:32 GMT
#272
On November 15 2011 15:12 DCLXVI wrote:
Is it worth speculating what dangers there are in roleclaiming/lynching multiple people in a day? Both are warned against in the OP, but at some point (not now) I can see either becoming a legitimate strategy.
Unless we set a low bar for lurkers, I think that many players will qualify as lurkers and so far the general consensus is to lynch them all. I don't think we want to run the risk of "hazards in store for the town that lynches too many players in a particular day" while we don't need to. Instead of setting a certain number of posts/quality to pass/fail, we can determine the 1-2 least helpful/scummiest players and agree to vote them.
I don't see any merit in roleclaiming now, or even townie-claiming. If kenpachi and hiroruby would explain why they did so I would be ever so grateful. Personally I will not claim for now, but that is open to change. Both the warning in the OP and the lack of activity so far makes me hesitant to do so.


I don't see what there is to discuss with roleclaiming, we have no information on the numbers of blues we have, so fakeclaims are strong, and we can't bank on them one way or another. They can claim when it matters, none of them can break the system claiming now.

Lynching multiple people in a day is extremely strong, and the fact that one person can vote as many people as they want makes it more town favorably then double lynch. Mafia can't sheath their vote into a person and expect not to be bugged for voting their scummy partner.

Technically, we could all vote every other person and force a draw at any point in the game, because Even when the threshold is reached, people can still be voted, and as long as town has a majority, we can never lose during the day if all hope is lost. That's why I think Zona mentioned the warnings on it, probably because there is some prevention to degenerate voting plans. Rather then make plans around the system, let the system accommodate us. We will lynch as many people as there are scummy individuals, and setting restrictions to that is anti-town.

Why should we play around something we know nothing about if it impedes our progress?
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 15 2011 17:32 GMT
#331
Next person that mentions LAL is getting a vote placed on them. Seriously enough with the useless shit.

We will be lynching however many scummy people we can find on the particular day. We are restricting ourselves when we don't have a clue as to what our boundaries are.

Nisani has posted complete fluff and none of it shows any effort in actually heling town. I don't think the new people are brain-dead, so unless the specifically ask about something, don't use them as an excuse to post asinine shit.

Oh, hi kibbibit

##Vote Nisani201
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 16 2011 01:36 GMT
#380
Why would you FoS when you can just vote them. Don't be pansies. Realized I didn't properly vote. I doubt I will ever take my vote off of kenpachi, it's not that I don't like him, but he is not an asset to the town at the moment, or the forseeable future. Nisani has proceeded to call me dumb or scum, but that doesn't change the fact that his fluffy posts stick out, so it will stay there until he remedies it.

##Vote: Kenpachi
##Vote: Nisani201


And this


On November 16 2011 05:13 Drazerk wrote:
##Vote: Sabin010


Bad vibes also this -

Show nested quote +
On November 16 2011 00:22 Sabin010 wrote:
I have seen to many games where we lose our cop or doc first day and end up wasting our time as the mob picks us off.


Show nested quote +
On November 16 2011 01:06 Sabin010 wrote:
This is my first game and im not sure of all the terms. I thought scum, mob, and mafia are the same.



Is why LAL is bad. What possible reason would cause mafia to post this instead of town. By all means keep up the detective work and checking out all the inconsistencies, but use a little sense. This definetely contradicts itself, and it could very well be an intentional lie, but even that doesn't make him scum. The bad strategy reason tht DCL brought up is actually something to go on.

You are pushing your luck by trying to find lies a day into the game. Use that energy to filter a suspicious person instead and get a general vibe, and see if their future posts push you one way or the other.

If there wasn't a majority lynch in play, I'd put my vote on everyone, and start taking off people who don't register as scum. That's about how many people I think should be lynched each day.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 16 2011 03:37 GMT
#395
We got 48 hours from now, right? This time tomorrow we need to look at the votes and see where people stand. I'm honestly surprised how few votes there are, you get as many as you want, a decent townie can take advantage of this. There is no comparing how scummy certain players are to others, you just lynch them or you don't. I guess it's still early, and I'm still fishing for reads here.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 16 2011 03:50 GMT
#397
Welcome to WBG logic. But that doesn't make what he says untrue, I think chaoser should focus his attention more and prove singleton cases rather then babble on about everything. Doubt he's scum though.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 17 2011 02:18 GMT
#836
Finally people are really posting and voting. Make them fear you! I'm going to go through individuals I think are scum and vote them. It makes it easier to do now then nighttime, so you know exactly where I stand.

Kenpachi and Lanaia
This is pretty incriminating for the both of them, but it's not that impactful if both of them die. Not weighing how good either of these players are, it would be better to lynch the one with the anti-vote ability, and that would be much more enlightening as to what we should do with the other. Since kenpachi's already getting lynched, I think it would would be in our best interests to keep lanaia alive. We can discuss it further after seeing him get lynched. Because of multi-lynch, there is no pressure in killing lanaia immediately. We aren't going to reduce mafia's KP on the first day, so please take your votes off lanaia at the moment. Even if kenpachi flips town, there is still a likelihood of lanaia being scum. Lanaia, from what memory serves me, is an "innoncence" reliant player. Properly utilized, she could easily get away with this rather then a more influential player. I honestly think she made a mistake, and I don't think she would have carelessly done that as scum. I'm going to put her as town. I feel no remorse over losing a townie-kenpachi. Sorry bro. If he's scum, fantastic, he's annoying as balls to analyze later. Saying this now, if he claims blue, he's more likely scum than actually blue.

By the way, I think lanaia's ability is very anti-town this early, but very useful later when mafia can threaten to mass vote people. You should have kept that a secret. From that logic I think you are town.

chaoser
Maybe others see it, but I don't see a reason to be killing chaoser right now. He's a strong player, and there is too little to go on this early in making a decisive lynch on him. Again, multi-lynch is much more lenient for us in being able to easily lynch people later. Let him potentially bloom into a strong scumhunter, or if he stays on this path, we'll lynch him.

prplhz
Very strong scum read on this dude. Multiple people have been calling him scummy, but for some reason he's not gathering votes, whats up with that town.

On November 16 2011 22:07 prplhz wrote:
You all realize that Palmar is just manipulating you, right?


This is a ridiculous thing to say with nothin to back it up. Manipulation is not something a townie does, he leads strong arguments that convince others of what he sees. He has no reason to manipulate. It would be completely different if you had reasons to believe he was doing this as scum, but I see no mention of anything palmar is doing there on out, until he himself asks you what you are trying to prove, which you very handily respond with, "Nothing." Maybe not exactly like that, but this is a pretty damn close.

On November 16 2011 22:30 prplhz wrote:
Yes, no one will pay attention to your analysis because of my one-line, muahahaha! Or maybe all the new people in this game will read twice before they trust you unconditionally. You always set yourself up as townie prophet, coming down from the mountain to converse with the plebs for exactly 3 posts before you retire up there again to meditate and achieve endless insight in the game. A lot of people may fall for this, I'm just saying that if you're new maybe you should read twice before listening to Palmar.

Also, I'm not getting lynched day1, wtfux???


Absurd thing to say when there is no section where you reference the content. Please get lynched.

##Vote: prplhz

I don't have enough time to finish this, but hopefully I'll be able to go through more players as I go. I'm very satisfied with the players here, keep posting like this

And for those that are questioning my alignment because I'm not posting alot, would I lurk? Ever? Nah, I'm just a busy man. I'll still maintain a prescence.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 17 2011 02:24 GMT
#838
On November 17 2011 10:37 Lemonwalrus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2011 10:29 wherebugsgo wrote:
please elaborate on why you think a self-contradiction doesn't constitute a reason to vote somebody.

Lemon wanted chaoser to provide reasons for voting, yet voted bumatlarge with no stated reason. Even now he deflects the question by saying he intended to vote that way before. That's fine, but that's not a reason. Intent and motivation are different things, and any person with the capability to understand the two definitions should know that.

I wanted to hear why chaoser was voting bum because I too had suspicions about bum, and wanted to see if his were the same as mine. I posted with a reference to my reasoning which had been discussed openly on the preceding pages. Honestly I can't point to a specific post of bum to give you my reasoning because he hasn't been making them. That in itself is my reason for voting him when you take the fact that he usually is so outspoken into account. At least now he will have to respond if more people start voting him and we can get some sort of information out of him.


What the hell are you trying to say? This has no direction what-so-ever. Please be clear about your accusations and think them through. You don't catch scum by this slow-rolling non-sense.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 17 2011 04:37 GMT
#843
On November 17 2011 13:02 wherebugsgo wrote:
Lemon can you explain why you are more concerned about bum "watching the thread go by" instead of Coag?

I don't see bum doing anything weird. Coag voted for someone who was already hammered.


Is that the issue? Well to be fair last I checked the thread yesterday, it was at 23 pages, now its at 42. I probably only would have mentioned that it would be better for us to keep kenpachi alive rather then lanaia as it gives us more information, and lynching the other later is no concern.

Coag only posted twice, but I do recall him lurking in the beginning last time I played with him. I forget if he was a scum that game. I'd be more afraid of active scum Coag, then lurking scum coag, as vets who lurk have no presence in a game with a lot of fresh faces. I would say it would be different the other way around if this was a few months ago.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 18 2011 01:47 GMT
#1067
I'll look into sinani, he seems to post unsurprisingly similar to nisani, but I'm not feeling confident about him either. I don't really feel a need to defend the votes on me, everyone who has has given piss-poor reasons. If we only lynch kenpachi tonight, that would be alright, but I'm still sold on prphlz, and would prefer to get rid of him now. I nearly cut my finger in half so I'd rather keep my posts short, but I will try to post more if thats all people want. As if that is magically going to help town.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 18 2011 01:56 GMT
#1077
On November 18 2011 10:53 prplhz wrote:
##Vote bumatlarge

oh my god you suck

MORE PEOPLE ON DRAZERK, HIRORUBY, AND CYBER_CHEESE

LESS PEOPLE ON SINANI206

THANK YOU


Yes, I find that on rare occasions, I do suck. Fortunately that is not right now
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 18 2011 07:07 GMT
#1128
I never really looked at drazerk. Did someone do an analysis on him? Shame kenpachi get's the cool role. Maybe if he gave up the I'm useless card I wouldn't be so hard on him. At least lanaia is looking pretty good as a townie, and I don't see mafia really going out of their way to kill her, so her anti-vote might prove useful later. I think she is capable of good thoguhts IIRC.

After kenpachi flipped town, I'm not really seeing chaoser as scum. Still sold on prphlz. There are other some individuals that I guess comes down to me to analyze. I don't think I'm doing anything saturday so if I survive I'll burn some time doing that.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 19 2011 03:04 GMT
#1322
Is it really that scummy to say you'll do something and that not follow up? Palmar might be scum, but the chief reason is not and never will be, "he said he would analyze this guy, and then did not". The incentive doesn't really get scum anywhere, and if it's intentionally done as scum, it draws attention. The best you could argue against this is that I'm making it WIFOM, but there is no upside for scum to do this where they could simply not mention it. Everytime it will be unintentional, and everytime it will hold no water in proving alignment. On the other hand I think it's extremely scummy to make this a prime reason to vote someone. Reading the last few pages, I can't pinpoint who brings this up, and it just seems to meld into the conversation for no reason. Whatever.

After reading, I am definetly buying the WBG and Palmar side of whatever they are arguing about (sometimes I can't really tell), and chaoser looks much scummier for the distraction he is causing. I say distraction because I ultimately do not find him as scummy as other individuals such as drazerk, who is fitting the envelope fairly well, and prplhz, who I'm still getting red from.

Other individuals who strike me are kibbibit, lemonwalrus and DCL. I will be focusing on them tomorrow. If I'm dead, one of them for sure is scum.

Also, I started the kenpachi vote, twas no wagon. If I was present, I would have tried to switch it to lanaia, because that gives much better information when we need to lynch one of the two. It's inconsequential now, unless lanaia is all of a sudden a really clever scum player.

Sinani was not a good lynch, and his death did little other then start some other randoms on little scuhunting adventures based on voting patterns day 1. Best of luck to those endeavors.

Filtering LSBs posts, his palmar analysis is probably the strongest against palmar, and even there we can see alot of flaws that I feel palmar rebuked well. But certain points are viable. The "no true scotsman" does apply to palmar more then others, but from what I can remember, it delves into the pride of a player. If every player posted without some self-conciousness, you could make the arguement, but proving things wrong and then doing them yourselves is not a scumtell, it's a lapse of humility and aim of the game. Pride makes you point things out just for the sake of doing it. What you pointed out as palmar being hypocritical, I see as an insignificant hole that a good player falls in. The fact that this was a bulk or your arguement made me dismiss it more.

The forced analysis is applicable though, and LSB's analysis on palmar does not feel forced, where as just about everything on chaoser's does. Meta is too fickle. A towny will intentionally try to get out of a mold if people peg him too much on it. It may be disruptive to the goal of the game, but I think its a process we use to become well-rounded in mafia discussion. Palmar is more likely mafia then LSB, but chaoser is more likely mafia than palmar. That being said, I really have no confidence in what chaoser will flip. I may be convinced tomorrow, but I I would only lynch chaoser at this point just for the sake of seeing what color his blood is. I'd advise the Chaoser/WBG/Palmar arena to take a hiatus and discuss what we can do with the others.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 19 2011 03:06 GMT
#1323
Fuck my timing, pretend that post was before night.

##Vote: prphlz
##Vote: Drazerk


Why is drazerk voting lanaia. This is past the point of bad reasoning, I can't see him doing this as town.

Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 19 2011 03:16 GMT
#1327
On November 19 2011 12:09 chaoser wrote:
Bum, you really think Palmar's "I think chaoser is 90% scum but I don't want him shot, I want him checked" makes sense? Not taking into account godfather or even a framer if I was mafia would be silly. If he really thought I was mafia and knew he was going to push for my lynch today like he said he would, why would he ask for someone to check me? That's a wasted check since he'd hope that I'd be lynched today by him.

I don't mind a double Palmar Chaoser lynch. Here, I'll start. I think he's mafia. I know I'm town. I don't mind a 1 for 1 trade here. Let's go!

##vote: Chaoser
##vote: Palmar


(yes I know my vote on myself doesn't count, it's symbolic)

oh, and also

##vote: Drazerk


You would rather be shot? I feel like palmar is respecting you as a good player asking not to get shot. If a DT came out and said he got a town check on you. I don't see why he would say that as mafia. Percentages and blue instruction are generally uselessly fluffy, but it gets a point across.

If that's your biggest scumtell for palmar, that sorry to break it to you, he aint scum. Lynching both you and palmar at this point is stupid. There is no reason to do that, swallow your pride, and find the 4 other scum. No one needs you to martyr yourself here.

I'll be around tomorrow giving my verdicts on some dudes.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 19 2011 03:18 GMT
#1328
On November 19 2011 12:16 bumatlarge wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2011 12:09 chaoser wrote:
Bum, you really think Palmar's "I think chaoser is 90% scum but I don't want him shot, I want him checked" makes sense? Not taking into account godfather or even a framer if I was mafia would be silly. If he really thought I was mafia and knew he was going to push for my lynch today like he said he would, why would he ask for someone to check me? That's a wasted check since he'd hope that I'd be lynched today by him.

I don't mind a double Palmar Chaoser lynch. Here, I'll start. I think he's mafia. I know I'm town. I don't mind a 1 for 1 trade here. Let's go!

##vote: Chaoser
##vote: Palmar


(yes I know my vote on myself doesn't count, it's symbolic)

oh, and also

##vote: Drazerk


You would rather be shot? I feel like palmar is respecting you as a good player asking not to get shot. If a DT came out and said he got a town check on you, that would be massive, and worth a DT claim in my eyes (if I were to disregard fakeclaims). I don't see why he would say that as mafia. Percentages and blue instruction are generally uselessly fluffy, but it gets a point across.

If that's your biggest scumtell for palmar, that sorry to break it to you, he aint scum. Lynching both you and palmar at this point is stupid. There is no reason to do that, swallow your pride, and find the 4 other scum. No one needs you to martyr yourself here.

I'll be around tomorrow giving my verdicts on some dudes.


EBWOP
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 19 2011 07:24 GMT
#1349
Hi rolly. Add WBG in there as well

I'll wait for tomorrow so we can hear any other claims. As of right now, mafia hitting both palmar and LSB seems extraordinarily fruity.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
November 19 2011 20:07 GMT
#1429
Lemonwalrus

I've been keeping my eye on your posts ever since you voted me, and it would make sense if you were scum. You are incredibly wishy-washy, yet you focus only on topics that have already been discussed. Yet you do have a firm opinion on certain things like the Kenpachi/Lanaia thing, after kenpachi had garnered some weight, I thought your reasoning was very good. Yet you show a complete lack of commitment in every area where town could swing one way or the other.

On November 17 2011 07:22 Lemonwalrus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2011 07:15 chaoser wrote:
On November 17 2011 07:14 Lemonwalrus wrote:
On November 17 2011 07:00 GreYMisT wrote:
On November 17 2011 06:39 Lemonwalrus wrote:
On November 17 2011 06:32 risk.nuke wrote:
Okey, but isn't this exacly one of those situations where we connected two people and should not lynch both of them incase they are town.

##Vote Kenpachi

That's why I only voted Lanaia, figure Lanaia flips scum, Kenpachi auto-lynch day 2, Lanaia flips town, then back to the drawing board. I felt that Lanaia was the best choice since she is either a scum or a town that used a powerful role in what I consider to be an untownly fashion, what is your reasoning for Kenpachi instead?



Lemon, what do you think of risk's response?



On November 17 2011 06:47 risk.nuke wrote:
On November 17 2011 06:34 GreYMisT wrote:
On November 17 2011 06:32 risk.nuke wrote:
Okey, but isn't this exacly one of those situations where we connected two people and should not lynch both of them incase they are town.

##Vote Kenpachi


perhaps, but why choose to lynch kenpachi over the guy who anti-voted him?

If kenpachi is green, then lanaia probably isn't scum.
If kenpachi is red we got a scumkill even if that doesn't necessarily mean lanaia is his buddy.

If lanai is green that means nothing for kenpachis alignment.
If lanai is red then kenpachi is scum.

I think we learn more from knowing kenpachis alignment.


Im starting to agree with him a bit, but in my eyes neither kenpachi or lanaia is off the hook just yet.

I don't agree with risk's assessment and no longer agree with my original assessment because I can't see any scum team doing something this risky (or dumb, depending on how you want to look at it) on day 1. However, since Kenpachi has now adopted the "lol town is bad I'm not going to try anymore" mentality he is either scum or a townie that is no longer playing to win. Either way I don't want him to still be here for day 2.

##Vote: Kenpachi

I know that Kenpachi is capable of a lot, but if he can't offer simple explanations for what he considers to be obvious things then what is the point?


oh oh vote for me too! I fall under that category!

"lol town is bad I'm not going to try anymore" mentality

I've got a town read on you that I can't quite explain and am holding on to hope that you will stop being butt-hurt and start being useful in the near future, or that all of your play so far has been part of some grand plan that will help town in some way, so I'll hold my vote off of you for now. At least this way when you do get yourself lynched (which you seem to be doing quite efficiently) and flip green I'll be able to congratulate myself or something.


I find this quite baffling that this should provoke you in the direction to defend chaoser and attack palmar, but you take a stand on this matter later, so it isn't wishy-washy if you form an opinion on it later.

On November 17 2011 09:54 Lemonwalrus wrote:
##Unvote: Lanaia
She made a mistake, but I don't think it was a scum mistake. And besides, I'd like to see Kenpachi's flip before we decide what to do with her.

##Vote: Palmar
He has been pushing a moronic case against chaoser since the beginning and most of you are eating it up. When the Lanaia/kenpachi thing came up, he threw his vote their way haphazardly, my guess because they are both town (although I still have some hope that KP was scum) and he just wants to make more town lynches day 1. All the while he has been pushing this chaoser lynch as a sure thing. If we lynch chaoser and he flips green or blue, I want palmar dead the next day for sure. He wants chaoser dead because as he said himself chaoser is a good player for town. He has built a case against him on LAL so he can hide behind policy when he is proven wrong about chaoser when chaoser flips.

##Vote: bumatlarge
Be the batman that this steamship deserves.


Here was the break from your wishy-washiness. Seeing you take your vote off lanaia, put your vote on palmar, and then vote me, made me think you actually have some backbone. FoS is retarded this game, just vote people you FoS instead.

On November 20 2011 04:32 Lemonwalrus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 20 2011 04:21 Coagulation wrote:
edit formatting
##vote: lemonwalrus

##vote: BumatLarge


should be self explanatory.

Why don't you spell it out for us?

In other news:
Someone asked me and a bunch of others about prplhz, I've been slowly finding him more and more scummy as the game has progressed. Almost all of my early scum reads are either dead townies or more or less confirmed townies in my eyes though, so I guess take that for what it is worth. Right now I see him as probably one of the best lynch targets. I could also see decent cases for nisani and for bum, although I would not be comfortable lynching bum right now.

I am inclined to believe it, and am not trying to heap suspicions on either of them, but just want to know if I'm looking at it correctly:
the hyshes-Drazerk mason claim MUST be one of the following:
1. They are both town and telling the truth.
2. They are both scum and this is the riskiest thing ever.

If those two options are the only ones, I believe them for obvious reasons.

I'm not saying I suspect him now, but I am now going over chaoser's posts from the beginning of the game. I feel that I sheeped to him on day 1 because I had strong town feelings about him, but now with new information that has come to light I feel that may have been a mistake.


It's certain paragraphs like the prplhz one that makes me cringe. I don't see you do it that often, but whenever you get on to another topic, you kinda slouch your way into it, and things like that set off warning bells for me. "Seeing decent cases" is inconsequential here. It's either there is a case or there isn't.

I've decided LW isn't scum, but if palmar is town and chaoser is scum, he'll be there first person I come back to.

##Vote: prplhz

I think I typo'd in my first post. Honestly, I wouldn't mind drazerk flipping, because I have no read on hyshes one way or another. I'm not going to give them the credit of being that clever as scum, but if my scum-buddy was going down in flames and was feeling especially clever that day, I could see the mason claim. But hyshes, a more unnotcable poster who no one has voted (I think) doing it? I don't see it.

##Unvote: Drazerk

Back to le drawing board.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
HSC 27: Groups A & B
CranKy Ducklings87
Liquipedia
OSC
20:00
Mid Season Playoffs
Gerald vs MojaLIVE!
ArT vs Jumy
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 108
RuFF_SC2 85
Vindicta 79
CosmosSc2 53
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 880
Aegong 103
NaDa 39
Icarus 5
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm118
League of Legends
JimRising 548
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox666
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor112
Other Games
summit1g9877
tarik_tv1820
Day[9].tv837
shahzam432
Maynarde135
monkeys_forever118
Mew2King52
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1292
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH222
• davetesta52
• Hupsaiya 50
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5153
• Jankos1409
• masondota2805
Other Games
• Day9tv837
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
8h 58m
RSL Revival
8h 58m
ByuN vs Classic
Clem vs Cham
WardiTV European League
14h 58m
Replay Cast
22h 58m
RSL Revival
1d 8h
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
WardiTV European League
1d 14h
FEL
1d 14h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
[ Show More ]
FEL
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL: ProLeague
3 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.