|
On September 24 2011 10:28 OriginalName wrote: Also look how he claims that he checked the only person to really recieve any attention at all when he posts it.
His check is bullshit, his kill is a mafia kill, there is no reason to suspect somebody who has already probably lied, sure he abides by his so called "claim" but what reason do we have to believe it. In my eyes iGrok is completely scum regardless of team or otherwise and has to go today.
Lying or not its one less KP in the game.
You saying he necessarily wasn't lying? tsk tsk..
|
I AM RUNNING IN CIRCLES OF JOY
|
and meanwhile everyone forgot about the precious!
|
##vote: OriginalName
I have nothing to add to pyos and heists accuses. I filtered ON and I got the same impression. I don't know whether iGrok really checked him or not, and I don't care. I want to kill scum today.
|
On September 24 2011 21:01 supersoft wrote: ##vote: OriginalName
I have nothing to add to pyos and heists accuses. I filtered ON and I got the same impression. I don't know whether iGrok really checked him or not, and I don't care. I want to kill scum today.
|
GOT SOMETHING STICKING IN MY EYYYYYYYYYYYYYYE
|
GOT SOMETHING STICKING IN MY EYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
|
|
On September 24 2011 20:53 Palmar wrote: I AM RUNNING IN CIRCLES OF JOY
On September 24 2011 22:35 Archon_Toilet wrote: I HATE YOU KITAMAN
Stop spamming the thread.
##vote: OriginalName
Vote jumped up so quickly and willingly on iGrok, 9 votes before the end of day one by far. I'm up for ON. His very first post in the thread after start of the game got me suspicious of him. He hasn't gotten much better.
On September 17 2011 11:10 OriginalName wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2011 10:29 chaoser wrote: OriginalName, what do you "sorta see" about greymist? I sort of see why people are suspicous but it really boils down to a poor reaction to a really null tell (IE fishing for the ring as if you noted i fished for the wand in PYP2 and flipped town) I want to see how things develop first.
The non-commitment is fresh in this.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 24 2011 22:35 Archon_Toilet wrote: I HATE YOU KITAMAN
Wait.....what? You're one voting me? o.O
chaoser, what's your imaginary kill restriction?
|
On September 24 2011 22:47 kitaman27 wrote:Wait.....what? You're one voting me? o.O chaoser, what's your imaginary kill restriction?
What's your take on ON?
|
Ye s kitaman, you will die. I will ride my horsie and kill you hahahahahahaha
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 24 2011 22:55 Archon_Toilet wrote: Ye s kitaman, you will die. I will ride my horsie and kill you hahahahahahaha
Right....
On September 24 2011 22:49 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On September 24 2011 22:47 kitaman27 wrote:On September 24 2011 22:35 Archon_Toilet wrote: I HATE YOU KITAMAN Wait.....what? You're one voting me? o.O chaoser, what's your imaginary kill restriction? What's your take on ON?
igrok is a dying man. He will say anything to keep himself alive.
Its amusing that you've been defending him though. Third party gotta stick together, right? As long as he is around, you live a day longer? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt=""
The fact that he managed to find his target with 1/17 odds is rather convenient, no?
|
don't take orders from scum chaoser!
|
I think iGrok's claim that he found a Maia in OriginalName is incredibly convenient. In my opinion, he simply looked around for whom he thought was most likely scum (and with the analysis that other players provided) announced his target as a part of the effort to get the vote off of him.
Think about it, if you had found a Maia through your investigations, you would come out and say "I found out that x was Maia" at the beginning of the day. Instead what iGrok did was say "I won't tell you who it is" - but then he later switches to "yeah, it was ON" when a few other players were attacking OriginalName at the time.
Finally, I find it strange that iGrok 'chose to investigate' OriginalName when his FOS in the previous day was Palmar. Would you not want to confirm your suspicions?
|
You guys can lose game idgaf.
Go listen to wishy washy pyo and bad logic heist all you want see if I really give a shit anymore.
|
On September 25 2011 00:24 TranceStorm wrote: I think iGrok's claim that he found a Maia in OriginalName is incredibly convenient. In my opinion, he simply looked around for whom he thought was most likely scum (and with the analysis that other players provided) announced his target as a part of the effort to get the vote off of him.
Think about it, if you had found a Maia through your investigations, you would come out and say "I found out that x was Maia" at the beginning of the day. Instead what iGrok did was say "I won't tell you who it is" - but then he later switches to "yeah, it was ON" when a few other players were attacking OriginalName at the time.
Finally, I find it strange that iGrok 'chose to investigate' OriginalName when his FOS in the previous day was Palmar. Would you not want to confirm your suspicions?
This is what i find suspicious too. Also iGrok stated in his big post the following:
Here, minimal interaction with DrH is played off as enough to auto-confirm him. This post sets off alarm bells in my head. Palmar contributed 4 posts before DrH died, 2 of which were "Herp I'm not reading the thread" (He was obviously reading the thread). Its his fourth post that interests me: "DrH is giving me really bad vibes." At the time, it looked like just another throwaway post. But post DrH's death, this post looks more like DrH new he was going to be modkilled and Palmar jumped out early to get a townie point.
For the rest of the game, two things are going on. He puts faith in Radfield, and he continues to stress Sandroba town. (yes theres other shit but those're the important parts)
Palmar already feels scummy. So lets continue on that assumption, and introduce possibilities. 1)Radfield and Sandroba are both town. If this is true, then Palmar is trying to gain town cred when they flip. With sandroba acting scummy and a possible lynch, and Radfield a good mafia target, thats two points for him. Fits with calling DrH scum. 2)Radfield is town, Sandroba is scum. This is using Radfield's town cred to make Sandroba look better. Even those who don't trust Palmar will subliminally put them on closer levels. If sandroba didn't look so damn scummy, it might work. 3)Radfield is scum, Sandroba is town. I just... don't see this as possible. 4)Both are scum. I don't know what this would mean actually
Why didn't you check Palmar n2? Who did you check n1?
|
On September 25 2011 00:27 OriginalName wrote: You guys can lose game idgaf.
Go listen to wishy washy pyo and bad logic heist all you want see if I really give a shit anymore.
At least if you actually are town, you could provide us something more than just insulting these ppl who give analysis and push your lynch.
Who do you think is mafia then (other than iGrok) and why?
|
On September 24 2011 23:31 Palmar wrote: don't take orders from scum chaoser! Oh the irony
|
Also iGrok; Why didn't you shoot anyone last night, lets make it clearer. Why didn't you kill Palmar, when you were so sure about him being scum. Why did you check ON instead?
|
|
|
|