• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:38
CEST 14:38
KST 21:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed14Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Who will win EWC 2025? Server Blocker Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Soulkey Muta Micro Map? Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 703 users

Lord of the Rings Mafia - Page 2

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 17 2011 20:19 GMT
#334
The game does not end when you give me the ring. But yes, I must obtain it.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 17 2011 20:33 GMT
#336
I don't know either of those things.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 17 2011 20:39 GMT
#339
On September 18 2011 05:35 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Drazerk never said that you're scum because you have posting restrictions. You aren't making any sense and now that you're getting "pressure" to scumhunt you're showing the worst case of scumhunting I've ever seen.

"TranceStorm is scum TranceStorm is scum Trancestorm is scum" is not scumhunting. Neither are OMGUS votes based on bad misunderstandings of what another player is saying.

You said your first vote/reasons were bad. Yet in that same post you say "
I already found you scum, look at TranceStorm." That's some big confidence for a "bad" vote. Cut the bullshit. It's obvious that what ever you are, you're not here to help us.

Honestly on Day 1 I'd be more content lynching a pretty sure SK/Third Party player than some gut scum read that is probably wrong and end up killing some VT or power role that is actually helping us. As far as your posting all you are is an annoyance and a distraction.


Are you fucking kidding?

Drazerk didn't say anything about me being scum other than "leaning" scum on me. In the same post he says there are "definitely posting restrictions" when participating in a conversation about me talking about the ring in posts I make.

Drazerk is scummy. I also think TranceStorm is scummy, I don't think my vote reason was bad, I just didn't explicitly state my vote reason. I wanted it to appear "bad" to promote discussion (which I did, no?)
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 17 2011 20:58 GMT
#344
On September 18 2011 05:49 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2011 05:39 wherebugsgo wrote:
On September 18 2011 05:35 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Drazerk never said that you're scum because you have posting restrictions. You aren't making any sense and now that you're getting "pressure" to scumhunt you're showing the worst case of scumhunting I've ever seen.

"TranceStorm is scum TranceStorm is scum Trancestorm is scum" is not scumhunting. Neither are OMGUS votes based on bad misunderstandings of what another player is saying.

You said your first vote/reasons were bad. Yet in that same post you say "
I already found you scum, look at TranceStorm." That's some big confidence for a "bad" vote. Cut the bullshit. It's obvious that what ever you are, you're not here to help us.

Honestly on Day 1 I'd be more content lynching a pretty sure SK/Third Party player than some gut scum read that is probably wrong and end up killing some VT or power role that is actually helping us. As far as your posting all you are is an annoyance and a distraction.


Are you fucking kidding?

Drazerk didn't say anything about me being scum other than "leaning" scum on me. In the same post he says there are "definitely posting restrictions" when participating in a conversation about me talking about the ring in posts I make.

Drazerk is scummy. I also think TranceStorm is scummy, I don't think my vote reason was bad, I just didn't explicitly state my vote reason. I wanted it to appear "bad" to promote discussion (which I did, no?)


You specifically said this.

Show nested quote +
THIS GUY IS SCUM.

He thinks, "wherebugsgo has a posting restriction"=he must be scum.

Hey genius, guess what, I'm not scum just because I have a posting restriction.


Drazerk never even once implied that you having a posting restriction makes you scum. So no, I'm not kidding my point still stands. He never said or implied it was scummy. Sorry. This entire quoted attack on Drazerk is based on a bad misunderstanding.

You didn't say anything about TranceStorm being scum other than he was scum and that was it. It wasn't until way later that you explained your vote (giving us all of one sentence of justification). If that's your basis for voting Drazerk, perhaps you should vote for yourself.



Oh I see you're playing bad on purpose to "promote discussion" i.e draw all attention to yourself and make the whole day 1 discussion worthless. Very good town play, bravo.



Why don't you tell me Drazerk's motivation for voting for me, then?

Why did he mention the posting restrictions in the context of his vote on me?

Why did he sheep Chaoser?

You seem to know all about Drazerk. Go ahead and tell us.

And yes, I did say that my vote reason was bad, because that was the way I intended it to appear. I have reasons for voting him, I don't have to state everything and put it out on a silver platter for you. This is the same reason why I'm not going to tell anyone why I want the ring. If you guys decide to give me the ring, fine, if you don't, you're just hurting yourselves.

Of course, I might actually have to put everything on a nice silver platter, since most townies are usually extraordinarily thick and incapable of reasoning.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 17 2011 21:56 GMT
#354
On September 18 2011 06:32 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2011 06:15 prplhz wrote:
On September 18 2011 05:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
My vote is on prplhz, at least now. Let's c if anything new comes up before day ends.

##vote prplhz


wow what a 100th post i'm so blown away i want to vote for me too now

i don't like drh or heist or wiggles but there are tons of people here who are worthy of scrutiny

On September 18 2011 04:46 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

It's generally agreed that a 50/50 bandwagon is pretty much the ideal situation for mafia. Actually when the town all agrees on one player that is the scummiest and tunnels them leaving no wiggle room, that is the worst scenario for mafia because assuming town was correct they have no way out of it.

Vain is definitely being antagonistic and the fact that he slipped under the radar for such bad posting isn't a good sign.

People seem to be complaining that we're still talking about Gollum or the ring or whatever but most of the discussion on the last few pages is about a lynch so stop complaining. I'm keeping my vote on WBG until I make up my mind. Vain, Drazerk, prplhz are all people I'm looking at.


stuff like this, it's the wiggle room we want 'cause that's when people really have to talk about stuff, even if we're lynching a scum i think 51/49 is better than 100/0 and drh should probably think so too unless he's a crazyman

i'm fine with wbg and cyriandor and syllogism, good questions and wbg is not worth the attention he's getting right now, let him troll around and then maybe a vig can shoot him at some point or whatever


I'm not gonna fight with you on this. I'm not saying people shouldn't press who they think is scum. But when there is one overwhelming bandwagon against an obvious mafia we shouldn't go out of our way to split it since that's what the mafia wants. I'm not advocating analyzing/voting for only one player a day. That's silly. There is usually only a single bandwagon when something like a major scum slip/red DT check/really good analysis comes up on a player and that's exactly what should happen in that case. Maybe there is just a misunderstanding between us but I think having (in a vacuum) a split wagon between two players is the ideal situation for scum.

Show nested quote +
On September 18 2011 05:58 wherebugsgo wrote:
On September 18 2011 05:49 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
On September 18 2011 05:39 wherebugsgo wrote:
On September 18 2011 05:35 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Drazerk never said that you're scum because you have posting restrictions. You aren't making any sense and now that you're getting "pressure" to scumhunt you're showing the worst case of scumhunting I've ever seen.

"TranceStorm is scum TranceStorm is scum Trancestorm is scum" is not scumhunting. Neither are OMGUS votes based on bad misunderstandings of what another player is saying.

You said your first vote/reasons were bad. Yet in that same post you say "
I already found you scum, look at TranceStorm." That's some big confidence for a "bad" vote. Cut the bullshit. It's obvious that what ever you are, you're not here to help us.

Honestly on Day 1 I'd be more content lynching a pretty sure SK/Third Party player than some gut scum read that is probably wrong and end up killing some VT or power role that is actually helping us. As far as your posting all you are is an annoyance and a distraction.


Are you fucking kidding?

Drazerk didn't say anything about me being scum other than "leaning" scum on me. In the same post he says there are "definitely posting restrictions" when participating in a conversation about me talking about the ring in posts I make.

Drazerk is scummy. I also think TranceStorm is scummy, I don't think my vote reason was bad, I just didn't explicitly state my vote reason. I wanted it to appear "bad" to promote discussion (which I did, no?)


You specifically said this.

THIS GUY IS SCUM.

He thinks, "wherebugsgo has a posting restriction"=he must be scum.

Hey genius, guess what, I'm not scum just because I have a posting restriction.


Drazerk never even once implied that you having a posting restriction makes you scum. So no, I'm not kidding my point still stands. He never said or implied it was scummy. Sorry. This entire quoted attack on Drazerk is based on a bad misunderstanding.

You didn't say anything about TranceStorm being scum other than he was scum and that was it. It wasn't until way later that you explained your vote (giving us all of one sentence of justification). If that's your basis for voting Drazerk, perhaps you should vote for yourself.



Oh I see you're playing bad on purpose to "promote discussion" i.e draw all attention to yourself and make the whole day 1 discussion worthless. Very good town play, bravo.



Why don't you tell me Drazerk's motivation for voting for me, then?

Why did he mention the posting restrictions in the context of his vote on me?

Why did he sheep Chaoser?

You seem to know all about Drazerk. Go ahead and tell us.

And yes, I did say that my vote reason was bad, because that was the way I intended it to appear. I have reasons for voting him, I don't have to state everything and put it out on a silver platter for you. This is the same reason why I'm not going to tell anyone why I want the ring. If you guys decide to give me the ring, fine, if you don't, you're just hurting yourselves.

Of course, I might actually have to put everything on a nice silver platter, since most townies are usually extraordinarily thick and incapable of reasoning.


You're pretty good at jumping to conclusions. He mentioned it because it was what we were talking about. Other people were speculating about whether or not you have a posting restriction and he is coming out and saying you probably do. He never connected it to his vote for you or his reasons for thinking you're scum. I'm not Drazerk I don't know why he voted for you. Stop being obnoxious I never said I knew anything about his reasons or what he's thinking I'm just saying your basis for attacking him is flawed. You have no reason to be this defensive unless you're guilty of something, slow to understand basic logic, or intent on being as annoying as possible in this game.

I've decided you're a clown and I'm not wasting anymore discussion talking to you about this. Come up with something good enough to reply to and I'll think about it. You're just noise.


You're also pretty good at soft defending him, not to mention doing the same things you're accusing me of doing. You accuse me of being overly defensive. Way to jump to conclusions (eyeroll)

I'm not voting Drazerk in defense.

Until Drazerk explains himself or I find someone else who I think is a better lynch today I'm leaving my vote on him.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 17 2011 22:04 GMT
#357
Here's some more logic for you:

If I'm a weak lynch target, and I've purposely drawn a lot of attention to myself, then why would Drazerk bother voting me? Think about it. It doesn't make sense from a town perspective for him to vote me. He's not contributing anything by voting me. He's not contributed anything yet, in fact.

I'd also like to point out that there are several players who have not even posted yet.

Sandroba we already have a reason for, but Palmar is completely absent. Erandorr as well.

No matter how stupid/scummy you think I am for wanting the ring we need to get these people to post so we don't have to fuck around with lurkers who end up boning us from behind by day 2 or 3. If you're not willing to encourage discussion and you'd rather just ignore these players too then I have to question your motives.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 17 2011 22:04 GMT
#358
On September 18 2011 07:01 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
explains what you didn't even make a case on him


why he voted me.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 00:09 GMT
#371
Thank God some people in this town have some sense (aka iGrok)

Also I find it really funny that both Erandor and Palmar posted ONCE very shortly after I called them out on inactivity.

I will be back in several hours, I have a thing to go to tonight. If I don't have the ring...well, can't say I won't be surprised.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 07:21 GMT
#400
I still don't have the ring! What a surprise.

The following post is well-reasoned and should be listened to:

On September 18 2011 11:45 kitaman27 wrote:
There are far too many people that are getting away with posting the minimum or nothing at all.

Palmar decides he isn't going to read the thread the first two days
JeeJee goes and randomly votes for himself
Erandorr has 9 pre-game posts and one real post
Archon_Toilet has two posts about flavor
Pyo has nothing of interest

If we don't call people out for doing nothing, scum are going to take advantage and lurk the game away.


As I said earlier and as Kitaman has nailed pretty well, we absolutely need to encourage the lurkers to participate. If they don't participate, or we let them get away with stupid shit (more on this later) then we are just hurting ourselves.

We cannot let mafia blend in, and we need to identify when someone is trying to blend in, to identify them as scum. I will give you all two examples of this right now:

On September 18 2011 15:32 Archon_Toilet wrote:
So many people yelling at each other, hard to read what is going on.

Many plans and ideas, some good some bad. People who are making plans are probably not mafia, even if bad plans. Sauron would want us to not be planning, yes? All the people talking about ideas are not Mafia we need to look at the others. All the guys talking lots lik bugs, TranceStorm etc are probably fine just giving bad ideas.

We should kill GGQ. Happy to hide and let everyone yell at each other. He only talk when the arguing has died down and only make one line posts, just trying to make the 5 posts.

He make excuse and sorry about making bad suspicion, promise to come back and say more but never did. Vote igrok when he said there are no good candidates? Then try to direct vote? Add another suspicion on Vain for no reason just muddy the waters.

So wishy-washy too. We should push him into mount doom.

##Push GGQ into the fire


Firstly, this guy is saying absolutely nothing with this entire post.

He says there are so many people yelling at each other, that it's hard to read what's going on. He insinuates that there is a lot of confusion and noise, yet he adds to this by splitting the vote even further and throwing a shitty vote on a person who so far has not done anything scummy (as far as I can tell.) The worst part is that there are no specifics in this post.

To clarify:

On September 18 2011 15:32 Archon_Toilet wrote:
Many plans and ideas, some good some bad.

Many plans and ideas, some good some bad. People who are making plans are probably not mafia, even if bad plans. Sauron would want us to not be planning, yes? All the people talking about ideas are not Mafia we need to look at the others. All the guys talking lots lik bugs, TranceStorm etc are probably fine just giving bad ideas.


wat

so, he says there are "many plans and ideas, some good some bad." Way to go sherlock, either the plan is good or it's bad. You've really told us a lot there. What the fuck is that supposed to contribute? What's specifically good about these "good plans"? Who made them?

What about the bad plans? The only thing he alludes to is that he thinks people like me and Trance are probably fine and just giving bad ideas. Well, the only idea I've pushed is giving me the ring. Trance is receiving votes, if Archon is scum then it totally makes sense for him to soft defend him here. And "all the guys" talking like us are fine.

Whoa, so if someone makes a plan they're autoconfirmed town? Wtf?

God this makes no sense whatsoever.

On September 18 2011 15:32 Archon_Toilet wrote:
We should kill GGQ. Happy to hide and let everyone yell at each other. He only talk when the arguing has died down and only make one line posts, just trying to make the 5 posts.

He make excuse and sorry about making bad suspicion, promise to come back and say more but never did. Vote igrok when he said there are no good candidates? Then try to direct vote? Add another suspicion on Vain for no reason just muddy the waters.

So wishy-washy too. We should push him into mount doom.

##Push GGQ into the fire


Yeah hey guess what genius, you were lurking until now too, AFTER you were called out on your shitty posting record. I'm pretty sure you're just throwing a random vote out there and feigning analysis so you don't get a shitstorm for not posting and not contributing anything.

This isn't even a real vote!

Our last example is this:

On September 18 2011 15:48 Pyo wrote:
At this point I'm gonna vote for wherebugsgo.

I feel like 3rd parties tend to be more harmful to town than scum and at the very least he hasn't been particularly pro-town. Throw on top of that the potential that he's full of shit or that we might learn something about the game set-up/mechanics, I'm perfectly happy to see him flip.

##vote wherebugsgo



Clear lack of reading comprehension/hasn't read the thread.

Granted, from what I saw in XLIV his town play is absolutely horrible so I'm not inclined to think he's scum. However, the type of logic he's using is precisely pro-mafia logic. I wouldn't put it past him to be scum, but for now we just need to push more posts out of our friend here Pyo.

Specifically, the bolded part is his reason for voting me. In other words, he doesn't think I'm scum. He's voting me because he wants to get information.

That's a terrible reason to want to lynch someone. You lynch someone primarily because you think they're scum. You get information NO MATTER WHO YOU LYNCH.






wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 07:23 GMT
#401
On September 18 2011 16:08 iGrok wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2011 15:48 Pyo wrote:
At this point I'm gonna vote for wherebugsgo.

I feel like 3rd parties tend to be more harmful to town than scum and at the very least he hasn't been particularly pro-town. Throw on top of that the potential that he's full of shit or that we might learn something about the game set-up/mechanics, I'm perfectly happy to see him flip.

##vote wherebugsgo

This is pretty much why I voted for him. I want to see what his role does, and he's not acting at all like he did in Resurrection or... XL, was it? one of the normals where he beast-moded the game


Wtf you voted me? It's not in this thread o_O
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 07:27 GMT
#402
##unvote

##vote Archon_Toilet
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 07:40 GMT
#404
On September 18 2011 16:31 iGrok wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2011 16:23 wherebugsgo wrote:
On September 18 2011 16:08 iGrok wrote:
On September 18 2011 15:48 Pyo wrote:
At this point I'm gonna vote for wherebugsgo.

I feel like 3rd parties tend to be more harmful to town than scum and at the very least he hasn't been particularly pro-town. Throw on top of that the potential that he's full of shit or that we might learn something about the game set-up/mechanics, I'm perfectly happy to see him flip.

##vote wherebugsgo

This is pretty much why I voted for him. I want to see what his role does, and he's not acting at all like he did in Resurrection or... XL, was it? one of the normals where he beast-moded the game


Wtf you voted me? It's not in this thread o_O

Show nested quote +
I feel like 3rd parties tend to be more harmful to town than scum and at the very least he hasn't been particularly pro-town.

At this point, I feel like you're 3rd party. And you aren't scumhunting at all. So... no.


Don't discredit me without actually reading my posts.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 07:52 GMT
#406
On September 18 2011 16:46 iGrok wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2011 16:40 wherebugsgo wrote:
On September 18 2011 16:31 iGrok wrote:
On September 18 2011 16:23 wherebugsgo wrote:
On September 18 2011 16:08 iGrok wrote:
On September 18 2011 15:48 Pyo wrote:
At this point I'm gonna vote for wherebugsgo.

I feel like 3rd parties tend to be more harmful to town than scum and at the very least he hasn't been particularly pro-town. Throw on top of that the potential that he's full of shit or that we might learn something about the game set-up/mechanics, I'm perfectly happy to see him flip.

##vote wherebugsgo

This is pretty much why I voted for him. I want to see what his role does, and he's not acting at all like he did in Resurrection or... XL, was it? one of the normals where he beast-moded the game


Wtf you voted me? It's not in this thread o_O

I feel like 3rd parties tend to be more harmful to town than scum and at the very least he hasn't been particularly pro-town.

At this point, I feel like you're 3rd party. And you aren't scumhunting at all. So... no.


Don't discredit me without actually reading my posts.

I'll do whatever I want (though I did read your posts). You've given us no reason to trust anything you say.


I can't say much for you when you ninja voted me.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 07:56 GMT
#407
On September 18 2011 05:07 iGrok wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2011 02:24 iGrok wrote:
Greymist's thing is not something to lynch for, but it is something to remember in the future. But he is someone to keep an eye on.
I think whoever said WBG is probably gollum with a post restriction is right.
But Drazerk has my biggest suspicions today, and lynching him will also give us the most information so far, both about greymist and the others who jumped on him. So,
##Vote Drazerk



What suspicions are those? Not to mention how bout we lynch to kill scum, instead of lynching to figure out information.


I'm all for lynching scum, but I highly doubt we hit scum today. There's no good candidates yet.

That being said, upon rereading I have no idea why I was suspicious of Drazerk. Chalk that up to an awful hangover. I'll try to work up something better soon[/QUOTE]

This failed pretty hard.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 07:56 GMT
#408
Ugh your broken /quote messed up the formatting.

On September 18 2011 05:07 iGrok wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2011 02:24 iGrok wrote:
Greymist's thing is not something to lynch for, but it is something to remember in the future. But he is someone to keep an eye on.
I think whoever said WBG is probably gollum with a post restriction is right.
But Drazerk has my biggest suspicions today, and lynching him will also give us the most information so far, both about greymist and the others who jumped on him. So,
##Vote Drazerk



What suspicions are those? Not to mention how bout we lynch to kill scum, instead of lynching to figure out information.


I'm all for lynching scum, but I highly doubt we hit scum today. There's no good candidates yet.

That being said, upon rereading I have no idea why I was suspicious of Drazerk. Chalk that up to an awful hangover. I'll try to work up something better soon

This failed pretty hard.

wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 07:57 GMT
#409
oh fuck it
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 08:41 GMT
#411
Can you explain, syllogism, why you prefer Jackal over GGQ or iGrok?

For those who care, Jackal's filter: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=264699&user=124528
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 17:55 GMT
#465
Scum is voting me. I'll keep this short since I'm on my phone.

I asked for the ring relentlessly. People thought that was scummy. Look at the bandwagon on me right now.

Then, look at Jackal's votepost on me. He says it's a good idea to give me the ring, because he doubts the game will end if I get it, but wants to lynch me anyway.

That's a pro mafia stance. If I get the ring and get lynched, the ring is randomly sent to one of the voters. If the majority of the voters are scum then they get a better chance of getting the ring.

Between Dr H, Jackal, Pyo, iGrok, and Drazerk, I'd bet we can find at least 3 scum. (these are the current voters on me)

You can also easily make a case against any one of these players. Filter them all if you don't believe me.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 17:57 GMT
#467
Your vote reason is terrible Erandor, use your brain.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
September 18 2011 18:04 GMT
#470
Actually add Erandor to that list, his vote is terrible too, he hasn't talked about anything else, and he's skirting by the minimum post requirement.

Also, for those who have actually been reading my posts you'd see that I've claimed both gollum and Sauron so you can't really say I'm third party. A few people have actually pointed out the correct read that was based on my behavior (I don't remember who but someone nailed it on the head)
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Epic.LAN
12:00
Epic.LAN 45 Group Stage
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 333
Lowko229
Creator 59
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 35145
EffOrt 704
Hyuk 584
Larva 546
Stork 521
Shuttle 499
firebathero 354
Light 202
Pusan 190
Snow 161
[ Show more ]
Dewaltoss 124
Rush 115
ToSsGirL 89
Soulkey 86
Barracks 69
TY 50
zelot 47
Aegong 44
sas.Sziky 38
Sharp 35
Backho 25
Sacsri 24
Icarus 18
sSak 18
Shinee 15
JulyZerg 15
[sc1f]eonzerg 13
Bale 4
Dota 2
Gorgc9620
singsing2736
qojqva578
Fuzer 238
XcaliburYe231
Counter-Strike
sgares481
allub72
Other Games
B2W.Neo1272
hiko411
DeMusliM379
Scarlett`319
Liquid`VortiX73
Liquid`LucifroN51
ROOTCatZ40
ArmadaUGS38
Trikslyr27
QueenE26
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2455
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos646
Upcoming Events
Big Brain Bouts
3h 22m
sebesdes vs SpeCial
Harstem vs YoungYakov
GgMaChine vs uThermal
CranKy Ducklings
21h 22m
Epic.LAN
23h 22m
CSO Contender
1d 4h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 21h
Online Event
2 days
Esports World Cup
3 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.