EPTI know, we've been doing visit votes for the psychs at night time.
Cosmic Horror Mafia - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
I know, we've been doing visit votes for the psychs at night time. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 02 2011 18:20 Eiii wrote: I don't understand this logic. It's pointless to assume that, because all the deaths so far have been sane, that the EA hasn't been sending in night actions. So trying to use that justification to show that the EA is a lurker when you could just point out that EA's best chance at winning is to fly under the radar for as long as possible seems just as pointless. It's almost like he's trying to downplay the EA's threat level | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Someone insane had to die some time Chaos seems like an odd choice I checked the Chaos filter, I'm leaning towards the idea that tnkted killed him, either him or Jackal, based solely off accusations Chaos made before he died. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 03 2011 12:02 Jackal58 wrote: Tnkted is most likely the remaining scum. I think our vote today should go on the most likely EA candidate don't you? Won't the day be extended either way? ##Vote Tnkted | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
for the psych vote tonight I'm thinking ##Visit Sevryn Or whoever his replacement is anyway. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 05 2011 07:39 Jackal58 wrote: Keeping the psych alive by having him visit people he's already visited and knows are not the EA keeps him alive and keeps you from winning. It has a chance of keeping him alive sure, there is no guarantee. If we find and lynch the EA, insane people aren't a problem. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 04 2011 23:53 wherebugsgo wrote: LOL. Jackal not dead yet = definitely not a townie. Also upon reading the first several pages Cyber is either really stupid or really scum/third party. On September 06 2011 01:18 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Hmmm that's interesting, wherebugsgo accused jackal and died that night Note that I said interesting, it's not necessarily incriminating because it's much more likely he died for threatening to publish reads. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 27 2011 08:05 Erandorr wrote: palmar that town read of yours... how strong is it? Asking the person defending Tnkted, who dies that night On August 29 2011 07:30 Erandorr wrote: oh ##vote jeejee, completely forgot that part. looks like we might get a majority for him after all! He was among the last to vote on this one The final thing I would like to bring to note is his constant promises to post a write-up but never actually doing it. As for his replacement: On September 02 2011 05:36 Kurumi wrote: Hello I am Kurumi and I am replacing a scummy lurker, I will answer all questions You might have tomorrow after I read the thread. Note that for someone replacing a scummy lurker, Kurumi hasn't contributed much to convince us otherwise, but he was fourth (5 req) on the Tnkted bandwagon with: On September 03 2011 20:27 Kurumi wrote: Oh also, I've read the most important parts of the thread so I know tnkted is scum. ##vote: tnkted ##Vote Kurumi On September 06 2011 02:58 Forumite wrote: Nightkills is not a reliable way of finding scum, it´s mostly WIFOM. Kurumi, could you tell us what you think about the game so far, and where you think the Scum and EA hide? Yeah your right, I actually think Kurumi's the EA though and forgot to change up that first Erandorr bit, that point should have been more along the lines of trying to fit in as a townie. If he were mafia, I doubt he would have tried to bus Wiggles quite that hard. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Everything under the vote was new, the rest is unchanged | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 07 2011 07:55 Forumite wrote: With 6 players left, we need 4 votes to lynch today. Tomorrow, it´s 5 players, and we will still need 4 votes to lynch. We need to be, if not sure, then at least united, if we want to lynch. I had a town-read on Navillus for a long time, but I´ve been wrong before in this game. Navillus doesn´t want to lynch lurkers, but Erandorr is/was a lurker, and an unknown read because of it. Voteanalysis doesn´t help here much either. Eiii, what do you think? Cyber, what´s your read on Navillus? I have Navillus pegged as a townie too, I really don't think he's EA at the moment. I think Jackal is probably a townie, and out of the remaining three Forumite you are the most likely townie. Eiii has been lurking much more hardcore than I'd like, and Erandorr/Kurumi isn't much better I see more potential for Eiii to get lynched today, so I'm changing my vote off Kurumi for now. On August 28 2011 08:28 Eiii wrote: I don't like lynching jeejee for a supposed 'hey guys i'm scum lol' breadcrumb in one of his posts. I DO like lynching him because he kept his vote on CC and was one of the few who forced a nolynch yesterday. so let's do this ##vote JeeJee Note that this was the fifth vote, he didn't vote wiggles the day before All his votes follow this bandwagoning, and his filter is a single page with most of them more or less equating to fluff. ##Unvote ##Vote Eiii | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 06 2011 22:42 Kurumi wrote: Navillus wants to lynch active people and leave lurkers alone. This isn't town agenda, You know that? I know my alignment, I belive Jackal about his alignment, Forumite seems town. Navillus was rarely active, his reasons are not townish (aka fake/bad/seem like policy lynches) and Eiii just "ignored" the game. I think scum will rather go full lurk mode in present situation and wait for things, while 3rd party will try to do everything to call suspicion somewhere else / distract town from themselves and give them more time for their objective. Notice how the second half of his post describes the first half? Add to that he hasn't voted yet and it's awfully suspicious. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
didn't someone get saved from a no vote by the first extension? and don't we have a second extension? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=257133¤tpage=14#280 | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=257133¤tpage=10#183 | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On September 08 2011 01:42 Forumite wrote: GM removed the rule about extensions quite recently. Blue post, I saw it. Oh sorry, my mistake I forgot about that, just for the record, it was http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=257133¤tpage=35#694 | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
| ||
