|
On August 07 2011 14:29 Curu wrote:
Eh I'm not sold on them being scum. I was being pretty useless but they would've probably hitched onto a Coagulation wagon or someone else with more votes instead of targeting me.
Curu, for the good of the town please either drop the coagulation bandwagon or come up with some actual reasons to kill him.
|
It's night, I'm not trying to start anything. Does me putting his name in red bother you that much?
It was a lynch completely inactives policy vote, that's my reasoning.
|
I may have been slightly (or highly) intoxicated when I wrote that last post, sorry.
|
I'm quite suspicious of Mig. Before the game started he seemed quite interested in the setup, especially the puzzles, but now he has been fairly inactive and his late palmar vote and the lack of thread presence after that doesn't look like townie Mig.
|
Btw ignore what I said about checking syllo Varp, it's not a bad check as we've never seen his scumplay, but just do whatever you feel should be done with the card.
|
lol if syllo is scum we can throw that secondary win condition out the window, can't we?
I'm rereading the thread, got a few people i'd like to know the alignment of.
|
United States4714 Posts
On August 07 2011 18:16 syllogism wrote:
I'm quite suspicious of Mig. Before the game started he seemed quite interested in the setup, especially the puzzles, but now he has been fairly inactive and his late palmar vote and the lack of thread presence after that doesn't look like townie Mig.
Kill Mig!
You know if I had kept my vote on Coag he would have had 3 votes first and he would have died instead of Amber. I switched to Palmar because I thought he was more likely to be scum.
|
Mig do you have any reads?
|
On August 08 2011 00:52 Mig wrote:Show nested quote +On August 07 2011 18:16 syllogism wrote:
I'm quite suspicious of Mig. Before the game started he seemed quite interested in the setup, especially the puzzles, but now he has been fairly inactive and his late palmar vote and the lack of thread presence after that doesn't look like townie Mig. Kill Mig! You know if I had kept my vote on Coag he would have had 3 votes first and he would have died instead of Amber. I switched to Palmar because I thought he was more likely to be scum.
You right, that does alleviate some of my concerns, though perhaps you thought I would switch with you. If Amber was a recruiter, who do you think he would have recruited on n0? I can't really make much sense of the voting patterns unless the other scum was someone who wasn't around for the lynch.
|
United States4714 Posts
On August 08 2011 00:54 redFF wrote:
Mig do you have any reads?
Coag/Bum
I think Bum is probably the scummiest considering his poor reasoning for voting me before combined with he was the 2nd one to follow kita in trying to last minute vote switch to curu. Coag is also likely to be scum, his day 1 play was scummy combined with there must be a reason mafia didn't put votes onto him to try and save amber.
|
In what way was Coags day 1 play scummy?
|
United States4714 Posts
On August 08 2011 00:59 syllogism wrote:
You right, that does alleviate some of my concerns, though perhaps you thought I would switch with you. If Amber was a recruiter, who do you think he would have recruited on n0? I can't really make much sense of the voting patterns unless the other scum was someone who wasn't around for the lynch.
If Coag is scum then Kita/Bum would both be possible. If coag is not scum there is a chance you could have been recruited.
The other possible scenario is, maybe he did recruit from the townies but didn't have a choice and it was random or pick 1 random 1, or we are wrong with what selection criteria amber used to decide who to recruit.
Overall Coag/Bum seems the most plausible scenario to me.
|
United States4714 Posts
On August 08 2011 01:04 redFF wrote:
In what way was Coags day 1 play scummy?
He voted for trotske. Disappears gives no reasons for the vote. When he is called out on it he appears to defend himself says trotske is the most scummy but lists no new reasons why. If Coag actually thought trotske was the scummiest there was plenty of evidence to push for his lynch, but he chose not to. So the reasons for that would either be A) coag is just lazy/useless town or B) he didn't actually want trotske lynched because he knew he was town and didn't want the backlash.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Is there anyone who doesn't have an item? I know this sounds like role fishing, but I have a purpose for asking.
|
no it just sounds like role fishing.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On August 08 2011 01:31 redFF wrote:
no it just sounds like role fishing.
Cmon now. Think to yourself: What purpose would it serve me as scum to learn a single person who doesn't have an item. I already know several people who do have items, so if I was looking for a hit I would just kill one of them. If someone does come forward, they will likely be able to learn that my intentions were pro-town anyways.
|
On August 08 2011 01:45 kitaman27 wrote:Cmon now. Think to yourself: What purpose would it serve me as scum to learn a single person who doesn't have an item. I already know several people who do have items, so if I was looking for a hit I would just kill one of them. If someone does come forward, they will likely be able to learn that my intentions were pro-town anyways.
Palmar said his cabinet was empty, which probably means he has no item
|
I have yet to receive a single valid night action. The day ends in 5 hours.
|
On August 08 2011 01:49 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2011 01:45 kitaman27 wrote:On August 08 2011 01:31 redFF wrote:
no it just sounds like role fishing. Cmon now. Think to yourself: What purpose would it serve me as scum to learn a single person who doesn't have an item. I already know several people who do have items, so if I was looking for a hit I would just kill one of them. If someone does come forward, they will likely be able to learn that my intentions were pro-town anyways. Palmar said his cabinet was empty, which probably means he has no item
This is correct.
|
On August 08 2011 01:20 Mig wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2011 01:04 redFF wrote:
In what way was Coags day 1 play scummy? He voted for trotske. Disappears gives no reasons for the vote. When he is called out on it he appears to defend himself says trotske is the most scummy but lists no new reasons why. If Coag actually thought trotske was the scummiest there was plenty of evidence to push for his lynch, but he chose not to. So the reasons for that would either be A) coag is just lazy/useless town or B) he didn't actually want trotske lynched because he knew he was town and didn't want the backlash.
Im getting sick and tired of repeating myself because you guys have reading comprehension issues.
I explained TWICE why i voted him. You guys are just making up shit and sensationalizing NOTHINGNESS For the sake of Pushing Something ANYTHING to look pro town.
I voted trotske cause of the stupid breadcrumbs he was oblivious about. I dont see anyone scummier. I noticed alot of people ignored the question tho and Its probably a good idea to keep an eye on them also.
i dont have a case on him worth wasting towns time.
Its a placeholder vote Its a fucking vote on the 1 person that gave me red flags with the crumb and shit. ITS A PRESSURE VOTE TO SEE HOW HE AND HIS SCUM BROS RESPOND. ITS AN ACTION TO GET INFORMATION TO BUILD A CASE. Im sorry but im not gonna make up fucking shit and try to get trotske lynched just because its "DAY1" OMG I NEED A CASE TO PUSH. Im not here to buy town cred.
This is EXACTLY WHY I DO NOT PUSH CASES ON PEOPLE UNLESS SOLID EVIDENCE IS THERE On day 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
