EPTPick Their Power Mafia 2 - Page 44
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
deconduo
Ireland4122 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
On July 26 2011 11:06 supersoft wrote: please be so kind and quote this one more time ;-) or wait... lol, i can't believe it... Am I lucky and found a non-townie by accident? :D What O.o Explain, please? Also, don't GFs normally get picked on Night 1? That means Day 1 is the best time for a check, as there is no possibility of framers/covers or the GF, unless those roles may act during the day | ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
| ||
Mig
United States4714 Posts
| ||
|
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 25 2011 10:48 Nisani201 wrote: It doesn't matter if you give someone the elder wand anyways. For someone to properly use the elder wand, said person must kill its last owner. So ON would have to kill sandroba to use it. On July 25 2011 10:56 Nisani201 wrote: There is probably a Snape, and in that case we should wait the whole Harry Potter/Voldemort thing out until Snape claims. He has not been doing anything pro-town at all this game. He is semi-lurking and from time to time, he pitches in a few lines of pure speculation or other worthless 1 liners. He has not tried to analyze anyone or tried to contribute to any town discussion. In fact his only convictions are his lynch votes which he hastily votes for with pretty much no analysis. On July 25 2011 12:27 Nisani201 wrote: Ugh, first I have redFF being a hero in Vigi mafia and shooting someone in the first hour of vigi mafia, and now I have this? Ugh, whatever. youngminii is probably scum, because he, you know, KILLED A TOWNIE ON THE SPOT. ##Vote youngminii On July 26 2011 10:13 Nisani201 wrote: BC is suspicious, but not just for trying to avoid an alignment check. This post I found particularly scummy: The above post was extremely uninformed and looked like it was trying to start a bandwagon. That, in addition to the reasons I stated earlier in this post, I think that BC is the best lynch. ##Vote: Bloodyc0bbler Not only is he not contributing, he is very willing to throw his vote to any bandwagon and to anyone that he feels safe voting for. Look at his post concerning BC. He states that BC is suspicious. OK, now let's see your reasoning. He brings up one post with BC providing his reasoning to lynch Jackal. It's curious to see him use "trying to start a bandwagon" as an excuse as that is exactly what he is doing. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On July 26 2011 11:21 heist wrote: Not only is he not contributing, he is very willing to throw his vote to any bandwagon and to anyone that he feels safe voting for. Would you prefer me to vote for someone I don't feel safe voting for? Because that makes no sense. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On July 26 2011 11:06 supersoft wrote: please be so kind and quote this one more time ;-) or wait... lol, i can't believe it... Am I lucky and found a non-townie by accident? :D lol im just worried if anyone quotes you we won't be able to control your check but w/e. | ||
|
heist
United States720 Posts
What bothers me about your vote for BC is your main reason is something he did before this entire fiasco with the dt checks. Why didn't you come out before? Why wait till BC has argued with a lot of the town and only vote to lynch after Curu did so? | ||
|
heist
United States720 Posts
On July 26 2011 11:23 Nisani201 wrote: Would you prefer me to vote for someone I don't feel safe voting for? Because that makes no sense. Safe as in you think you will not receive any backlash from your vote, not safe as in your convictions. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On July 26 2011 11:26 heist wrote: You voted for YM because you didn't think anyone would challenge you too hard on it because you can just say YM killed a townie - suspicious! That's correct. I voted for someone and I provided evidence for why I thought that it was a proper lynch. I don't see anything wrong with that. | ||
|
Mig
United States4714 Posts
On July 26 2011 11:34 BloodyC0bbler wrote: I love when morons fall into place. Of the 5 people currently voting for me vigi's feel free to clear the numbers out. There will be at least 2 anti town there already. Thank you dumb tards for playing the game I call "mafia are bad". BC would you say your 10 page argument was good for the town in anyway? | ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On July 26 2011 11:35 Mig wrote: BC would you say your 10 page argument was good for the town in anyway? Look who crawls out of the woodwork. Good to see you again Mig. You haven't said much all game | ||
|
Mig
United States4714 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On July 26 2011 11:35 Mig wrote: BC would you say your 10 page argument was good for the town in anyway? If you fail to see any actual reasoning out of my posts then then I feel very sorry that you exist in your small world. Not only did it get people actually discussing the pros and cons of an unconfirmed dt, it generated discussion from multiple people. Moreso however, it prompted people to suddenly appear and jump onto a voting train with very little actual reasoning. I would say the bonus' of such an endeavour is always for the good of the town. Discussion never hurts town, nor do arguments. Especially when you keep them firmly isolated on a singular topic. | ||
|
Mig
United States4714 Posts
| ||
|
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
|
heist
United States720 Posts
EDWOP Were the alignments influenced in any way by role for anyone? | ||
|
Mig
United States4714 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On July 26 2011 11:48 Mig wrote: Isolated on a singular topic which had nothing to do with finding scum. You lead the town in a discussion that took up 10 pages 8 hours and accomplished nothing. Saying discussion never hurts town is blatantly false. There is a big difference between a good discussion on suspects and the 10 page argument you had. Really? Everyone involved or concerned was busy herp derping around instead they argued constructively on how to use a particular role. At the end of that discussion we were all at a standstill. Then randomly a bunch of people who weren't even part of it, quickly jump in and say "bc is scum for refusing to comply to a check" however they don't comment on that topic, don't voice opinion instant bandwagon. Do you not realize you just got schooled? In that entire process we had 1 vote cast and suddenly hours after the discussion, and even after the discussion was even really taken place as no one was talking anymore, randoms come in to make a bandwagon? Fascinating isn't it? Anything that forces people to commit to an issue gives valuable behavioural analysis. Discussion of who is scummy etcc is all fine and dandy but these are the situations that make analysis easier. Anyone with a particular agenda will push it, scum will get heated and potentially slip up, etc... With how fast people try and will most likely still try to bandwagon me with absolutely no analysis of their own just shows how much mafia / third party want me dead. Townies will either find me a stubborn green or a potential scum. However considering that within 15 minutes we have votes from you, nisani, redff and supersoft. Awesome ain't it? that within 15 minutes 4 randoms all come to the same conclusion of who to vote for when everyone involved in the discussion throughout that 8 hours couldn't? Well done my friend, keep stepping on those eggshells. | ||
| ||
