|
You guys think I'm scum? Make a damn case. I haven't seen any evidence or explanation of it so far. I'm almost the only person in this whole game who has made a formal FoS of anyone. It turned out wrong, but perhaps that could have been avoided if you guys actually discussed it with me. I did not shoot syllogism. I'm inclined to believe Amber's claim of that kill.
@Curu I know it looks suspicious that I happened to make that after syllo accused me. He didn't provide a drop of explanation though. In my experience that is a scum tendency. If you think that is an OMGUS you are sorely mistaken. On the one hand we have syllo saying "scum, let's lynch him, I think he's scum" and then I say "syllo is scum for the following reasons ____". That's not an OMGUS. That's good town play. I think he is mafia, so I say so and explain why. Being wrong doesn't make me mafia. Whoever shot him is more likely to be mafia than I am.
@Palmar you can screw right off. You haven't been helpful so far this game at all. I didn't even realize you had made a case on syllo, so you can't accuse me of 'bandwagoning' on your case. Not once did I reference your case. If I was going to bandwagon I would have said yeah Palmar that's really good and then voted him. I think you're just going into your usual 'tunnel chaos' mode.
|
On July 28 2011 21:02 Palmar wrote:
Chaos13 can get lynched or shot. Like I'd be perfectly fine with a day vig just taking him out right now.
If you think I'm mafia make a goddamn case you derp. I haven't seen a single bit of explanation. This is ridiculous
|
On July 28 2011 21:13 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 21:12 chaos13 wrote:On July 28 2011 21:02 Palmar wrote:
Chaos13 can get lynched or shot. Like I'd be perfectly fine with a day vig just taking him out right now. If you think I'm mafia make a goddamn case you derp. I haven't seen a single bit of explanation. This is ridiculous You were perfectly fine with bandwagoning my case on syllogism.
I already said I didn't realize you had made a case on syllo. You'll notice that I actually provided reason for my vote, which is a hell of a lot more than most people so far have done. You have nowhere near enough reason to justify calling for a day vig.
|
On July 28 2011 21:17 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 21:15 chaos13 wrote:On July 28 2011 21:13 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 21:12 chaos13 wrote:On July 28 2011 21:02 Palmar wrote:
Chaos13 can get lynched or shot. Like I'd be perfectly fine with a day vig just taking him out right now. If you think I'm mafia make a goddamn case you derp. I haven't seen a single bit of explanation. This is ridiculous You were perfectly fine with bandwagoning my case on syllogism. I already said I didn't realize you had made a case on syllo. You'll notice that I actually provided reason for my vote, which is a hell of a lot more than most people so far have done. You have nowhere near enough reason to justify calling for a day vig. So you're not reading the thread either, lol How the fuck did you think the whole supersoft/syllogism deal started?
I've been reading it, but I am quite honestly exhausted. It didn't stick in my memory, or maybe I missed a page or something
|
On July 28 2011 21:21 sandroba wrote:
I can't decide on which of you is mafia so having palmar track chaos is very nice and clear things up. If palmar is town he's prob getting shot anyway tonight, so it makes things easier.
Can you two be friends for now and vote for foolishness. I made several posts on him, go read them.
Yeah except if he's scum he is going to lie and say I visited someone. Probably someone who ends up dead. Then you guys will lynch me and waste another day while scum get a free night -_-
|
Yeah Foolish has been cluttering up the thread with his apparently worthless TLPD thing. So far I haven't seen him post anything of worth. Right now I will either put my vote on him or Palmar, I haven't decided which yet
|
Foolishness, I can't quite recall
if this has ever been addressed. Why exactly are you putting TLPD in all your posts?
|
On July 29 2011 11:35 bumatlarge wrote:
come on guys use that brain of yours, even if it isnt what you think you could just accuse foolishness of misleading hints!
???
I don't understand this post
|
On July 29 2011 11:46 Varpulis wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2011 11:26 chaos13 wrote:
Foolishness, I can't quite recall
if this has ever been addressed. Why exactly are you putting TLPD in all your posts? Some shit to do with either his role or his penalty, maybe both. I think he hinted at it a while ago. Or he's pulling a Drazerk and making it all up.
Hmm. Well I have to say that Foolish is not being helpful. He hasn't contributed anything of substance all game really, except lately with his case for Nisani. I don't like the way nisani looks either, but it matches his meta more than foolishness'. My vote will go for Foolish over nisani.
But Palmar, don't think I've forgotten about you.
##Vote: Foolishness
Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go to bed. I am exhausted
|
On July 29 2011 20:03 Palmar wrote:
This vote makes me not like the Foolishness wagon as much.
Unless of course it's a bus, but damn it, Chaos13 is the most scummy player in town.
That's a good constructive post right there, it really helped us out a lot. I am so glad we have such a shining example of excellence to look up to.
|
On July 29 2011 14:16 bumatlarge wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2011 13:18 Varpulis wrote:
ebwop: Yeah, I'm not buying it. He's used beesuit twice, so that's obviously not a trigger word, and he used MurDeR without any effect, which seems counter-intuitive.
Could we focus on analysis not random bullshit theories about Foolishness' role? -_- you're no fun
I completely agree with Varpulis. Unless you (or the person you replaced, rather) made Foolishness' role and that's along the lines of what it is...
Hmm.
However, if that is the case you should probably claim it outright. As it is now it looks like a wild conspiracy theory and will only lead to further confusion and make you look more suspicious in the future.
|
I also still feel that we haven't pulled ourselves together enough. I'm still seeing a lot of random accusations that don't really have much force behind them. Yes, I'm aware that's what my post on Foolishness is like, but there have been enough people explaining why he is scummy that it would not do any good for me to repeat them again.
So here is how all accusations must be made in the future, in order to make things clear and understandable.
Player Name
Verdict:
Explanation and evidence. Quotes must be used here.
Player Name is mafia/town.
##Vote: Player Name
This will allow everyone to clearly see and understand what you are saying. This will provide us with stronger analysis and stronger reference after players flip. Of course this will only apply to the original accusation. If you're supporting someone else's, say so, but there is no need to go through this again.
|
Sorry about all the posts, but I keep thinking of things that I didn't say in the last one.
I'm guessing there is probably 5 scum. I would say the remaining scum team is Palmar, Nisani, and Foolishness. One of the more active vocal players is probably third party. Sandroba or DropBear maybe. DB might even be faking his penalty here, it could be something completely different and he's just doing that to distract from the content in his posts.
|
A vig hit on DB would not go amiss. He basically did all he could to divert attention away from Foolishness' lynch. The longest posts he's made in the game were to say he didn't agree with it, and then shortly after make a case against someone else to try to move it.
Oh and Palmar. You are scum.
|
But he was like the only one defending foolishness. How is that not extremely scummy?
|
And how does it make sense for town to do that? Foolishness was pretty obvious scum, and I can't see any reason why a townie would want to defend him.
|
Hmm....I'll have to think about him some more then I guess
|
You are the Healer. You cure people of their wounds by meditation and channeling. If your protect is successful, it makes the target immune to any number of KP for that night. You may also attempt to protect up to three people.
1 Person: 100% chance of success
2 People: 50% chance of success
3 People: 20% chance of success
The % chance is calculated individually for each target
I made Sandroba's role. It is nearly exactly the way he posted it, decon just changed the wording slightly. Penalty now incoming.
What I find strange is that we have kitaman as a confirmed hit on Amber, and yet you are all going after me based on tentative evidence.
That evidence is as follows:
On July 31 2011 06:48 Palmar wrote:
read my ability, I see any action they perform
initially decon just said chaos13 visited sandroba, but I sent him a pm, and he said I also saw chaos tried to kill sandroba
So this is a claim from somebody who is hugely suspicious. Remember that scumslip a day ago with Foolishness' role? Yeah, that one. Only mafai would be so sure of that. And now we have him claiming this..
So:
1) My visit to Sandroba was a medic protect. I chose to protect 1 person I have a strong town read on, because I don't want to risk not being successful.
2) So he claims a watcher/tracker role...that also receives information on specifically what action occured? Not only that, but he had to PM the host to remind them of this? That is complete and utter bullshit. No watcher/tracker role would have that, it becomes way too powerful. You'll notice that decon apparently didn't tell him what action DB used on me. That's cause he's trying to frame me.
Kitaman is scum, and Palmar is scum. I am town.
|
Sandroba's role does not have a day kill. I can confirm this beyond doubt. Yes, I made it sound like a cult. I even made him appear third party to DT checks, but I guess that was removed. However, it's basically just a mason circle that gets 1 kill/night at the cost of roleblocking every member, and only if it is full. Whoever that kill was, it was not Sandroba.
|
The only thing we can do with Varp is wait to see if decon comes in and checks stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
