|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On July 09 2011 02:53 syllogism wrote: Is it normal for hosts, or Caller in particular, around here to provide safe fake claims for scum?
That would ruin all the fun... I put effort into the fake claims I have created for future trolling
|
That would change my opinion of Sandroba. I do find it slightly suspicious how quickly he dropped his case against YM based on the role claim. Also he seemed convinced there 100% had to be Lenin in this setup, which looks off to me. Yesterday he asked someone to save Sinani206 and YM, and now that someone did save YM, he used that fact for his case against YM.
|
|
ALSO!!! I just realized my namechange has finally gone through.
I AM NOW KNOWN AS PaqMan! I previously went by Cthsazsa.
Finally you can stop calling me a "her" GM
|
Wait you are Cthsazsa? Why the name change
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On July 09 2011 03:59 syllogism wrote: Wait you are Cthsazsa? Why the name change
Clearly a scum ploy to remove all traces of himself during the game.
Lynch him now.
|
On July 09 2011 02:18 deconduo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2011 02:10 GMarshal wrote: So, decon, Opz, who is your number 1 scum read at this point in the game?
GGQ. He's usually active, and he's been lurking even more than OPZ. Like OPZ, the moment I called him out for lurking he FOSed me. He's also been active elsewhere in the forums. I didn't FoS you the moment you called me out. Spreading disinformation to discredit my argument. You either have a decent power, are mafia, or are conspirator.
My next for scum is Gmarshal/Sandroba.
I also think YM could be scum. I would vote for him if his name was pushed.
Deconduo is scum though so it's irrelevant who I think is scum.
|
opz you always think i'm scum
let's hurry up and kill deconduo already
|
GM, since we have time to talk, can you explain your weird flip-flopping on Day 1 to me?
First you went from policy lynching Mataza even if he were town, to trying to shoot down the nuke heading towards him, and entrusting him to a warden for the town.
You also have a ton of contradictions after Mataza launched his nuke, about whether to lynch, or to nuke, and even though you had agreed on a lynch, you later call for a nuke, which YM took as permission to start firing. There's more contradictions too.
Can you explain this to me, please? (I can start quoting if you want, too)
|
United States22154 Posts
On July 09 2011 05:02 Mr. Wiggles wrote: GM, since we have time to talk, can you explain your weird flip-flopping on Day 1 to me?
First you went from policy lynching Mataza even if he were town, to trying to shoot down the nuke heading towards him, and entrusting him to a warden for the town.
You also have a ton of contradictions after Mataza launched his nuke, about whether to lynch, or to nuke, and even though you had agreed on a lynch, you later call for a nuke, which YM took as permission to start firing. There's more contradictions too.
Can you explain this to me, please? (I can start quoting if you want, too) Sure, I was going to policy lynch anyone who nuked, to garner additional information I offered to nuke Mataza IF and only IF 50% of the town would agree. If YM, interpreted that as "permission" to nuke then he needs to actually read what I posted. I wanted to nuke Mataza so we could have more discussion for the lynch other than "policy". Then sand nuked me, and decided that "hey people who nuke aren't going to be lynched" and I had to get rid of my counter nuke, so I figured, if I save myself the town will decide I'm scum and spend all of tomorrow lynching me/nuking me, so I might as well save Mataza, who I had a town read on (despite the stupidity). Since we were apparently not policy lynching/nuking anyone, I might as well save him.
Funny you call me out on "flip flopping" when sand went from "no nuke" to "fuck this, NUKE GM", while I mostly maintained that nuking was a bad idea and should only be done with town consensus. Not that anyone listens to me.
|
Some French d-bag has started building the Maiginot Line, it will be completed tommorrow.(Game Time)(Assuming he survives)
|
On July 09 2011 05:10 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2011 05:02 Mr. Wiggles wrote: GM, since we have time to talk, can you explain your weird flip-flopping on Day 1 to me?
First you went from policy lynching Mataza even if he were town, to trying to shoot down the nuke heading towards him, and entrusting him to a warden for the town.
You also have a ton of contradictions after Mataza launched his nuke, about whether to lynch, or to nuke, and even though you had agreed on a lynch, you later call for a nuke, which YM took as permission to start firing. There's more contradictions too.
Can you explain this to me, please? (I can start quoting if you want, too) Sure, I was going to policy lynch anyone who nuked, to garner additional information I offered to nuke Mataza IF and only IF 50% of the town would agree. If YM, interpreted that as "permission" to nuke then he needs to actually read what I posted. I wanted to nuke Mataza so we could have more discussion for the lynch other than "policy". Then sand nuked me, and decided that "hey people who nuke aren't going to be lynched" and I had to get rid of my counter nuke, so I figured, if I save myself the town will decide I'm scum and spend all of tomorrow lynching me/nuking me, so I might as well save Mataza, who I had a town read on (despite the stupidity). Since we were apparently not policy lynching/nuking anyone, I might as well save him. Funny you call me out on "flip flopping" when sand went from "no nuke" to "fuck this, NUKE GM", while I mostly maintained that nuking was a bad idea and should only be done with town consensus. Not that anyone listens to me.
Huh? I was just asking about you first, because I think I said somewhere that I bet you live through the nuke, and I was going to try to get you lynched today if you did. That was prompted by the big contradictions and flip-flopping. Since then, my read's changed a bit though, so I'm reading through some of your posts again. I wanted you to clarify what your thought process was there, and it's much better to get it from you, than to just make shit up.
Also, I get that San flip-flopped, weird how you want to redirect attention to him. Just because he did it, doesn't make him the only one who did it, nor does it mean that there should be no focus on other players. For the record, he's also a zombie who wants to eat my face, but that doesn't mean I can't ask other players questions.
|
Wiggles, Gm...opinion on deconduo.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On July 09 2011 06:35 ~OpZ~ wrote: Wiggles, Gm...opinion on deconduo.
Going to steal this one - I don't think he is scummy as you make him out to be but he's up there with a few of them. He was pretty much spot on with his analysis on you which makes me think that at least one of you is scum but I have not made my mind up on who yet.
|
wtf is the maiginot line? its ever been in a mafai game?
|
The Maginot Line (French: Ligne Maginot, IPA: [liɲ maʒino]), named after French Minister of War André Maginot, was a line of concrete fortifications, tank obstacles, artillery casemates, machine gun posts, and other defences, which France constructed along its borders with Germany and Italy, in light of its experience in World War I, and in the run-up to World War II. Generally the term describes only the defences facing Germany, while the term Alpine Line is used for the Franco-Italian defences.
excuse me for not doing this first, Will this prevent nukes or something?
|
On July 09 2011 06:49 TheAwesomeAll wrote: wtf is the maiginot line? its ever been in a mafai game?
It was the line of what might very generously be called "defenses" between France and Germany before World War II, suffice to say it was unsuccessful.
|
Wasn't it the defensive line france made from germany?
Drazek, what was spot on?
|
You will find out tomorrow, perhaps you should stop role fishing
|
On July 09 2011 06:53 Navillus wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2011 06:49 TheAwesomeAll wrote: wtf is the maiginot line? its ever been in a mafai game? It was the line of what might very generously be called "defenses" between France and Germany before World War II, suffice to say it was unsuccessful. Cuz Germany only goes through Belgium to get to France. Duh
|
|
|
|