|
On July 07 2011 08:51 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2011 08:50 JeeJee wrote:On July 07 2011 08:48 GMarshal wrote:On July 07 2011 08:46 JeeJee wrote:On July 07 2011 08:44 Drazerk wrote:On July 07 2011 08:43 JeeJee wrote:On July 07 2011 08:42 GMarshal wrote:On July 07 2011 08:41 JeeJee wrote:On July 07 2011 08:39 GMarshal wrote:
I'm dead in a few hours JeeJee, I'm not scum.
And I fail to see how you drew the conclusion that I'm in communication with chaos. I think chaos13 just completely misinterpreted my theoretical power which may or may not be real or fictitious with the EMP. The EMP has no effect on radiation levels or anti-nukes. What it actually does depends on a couple things though :/ You'd have to be pretty retarded to misinterpret it in such a way You'd also have to be pretty retarded to shoot nukes at me/day 1 at all, yet here we are. Anyway, what would you do with my theoretical ability JeeJee? Who would your fictitious experts in infiltration target and why? your mom sigh... Theoretical ability at JeeJee! What do you want me to bother with his posts for? If he flips (I have an odd sinking feeling that he won't), then I'll answer it in full detail -- it will still be day. Unless he has to use this theoretical ability before he pops -- that's up to him to confirm Well if this theoretical and in no way proven ability did exists then one would probably need to still be alive and uncratered to use it, right? Not necessarily, it could easily be a last will or a vengeful ability. In fact it fits very well as such, certainly much better than multiple day-use abilities that can be used in the same cycle. So let's see -- you're confirming you have to be alive to send in the request? Hypothetically. It would be quite a strange hypothetical ability that could be carried out without a glorious leader, so yes, if this ability did exist I would need to be alive to execute it. I would also probably have to sell off my only nuke to afford such expensive and powerful infiltrators.
Well in that case, I would go with someone like opz, an active lurker.
|
On July 07 2011 11:05 Coagulation wrote:
and each one is more derp filled than the last. enjoy.
Continuous reaction to the thread
![[image loading]](http://i40.tinypic.com/1127db9.jpg)
You know it's true.
|
Why are people like GM and heist wtf'ing at me? Follow your policy all you want, it's going to take forever to lynch all these idiots. Sinani nuked someone without any consensus whatsoever, I make him pay. Should be happy I saved a whole cycle for you.
You realize that there are (before sinani nuked) already 3 non-consensus nukers? What do you think is going through the potential nukers mind? "Oooh I probably shouldn't nuke, or they'll lynch me"
Fuck no.
Here's what's really going on "rofl already 3 people launched nukes, no way I'm getting lynched any time soon"
That's where I come in.
Any questions?
|
On July 07 2011 12:41 sinani206 wrote:
MY NAME IS NOT CAPITALIZED GOD DAMNIT
Is that right....
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/012cb.png)
|
On July 07 2011 13:35 Zona wrote:
Alright, I read through once and will start reading again (or maybe reviving a tool that will make it easier for me to reread)
but for now two minor thoughts:
I think it's a good idea if we demand all anti-nukes that are used, to be claimed by the user, in order to link the person who was saved and the anti-nuker for later analysis.. Suppose a scum anti-nukes for another scum. If the anti-nuker is forced to claim, then the two players are linked for when later either one flips. If a town anti-nukes for someone they feel is town and is correct, that's a good situation later on for flips. (Of course if a town player anti-nukes for someone who is mafia, that's kind of bad - but this linkage information shouldn't be used in isolation, but along with other evidence that appears. There's also a potential gambit by a scum anti-nuker who saves a town and hopes the town flips later to burnish the scum's townie credentials, but in this case that scum loses an anti-nuke AND keeps a town member alive for the time being, so I think that's a worthy tradeoff).
Some of you are saying that we should leave the conspirator alone for now - but the role might have additional abilities that could be detrimental to everyone.
palmar fakes GM --
mataza nukes sandro, anti-nuked by minii --
minii nukes mataza, anti-nuked by GM --
mataza counter-nukes minii, anti-nuked by minii --
15.10 sandro nukes GM --
16.02 sinani nukes YM --
16.06 jeejee nuke sinani --
16.07 sinani counternuke jeejee --
any questions?
|
On July 08 2011 03:10 TheAwesomeAll wrote:
people its night, lets stay silent for the dead, since we had quite a few of them.
or you know, we could actually discuss shit, because staying quiet is something only mafia wants -.^
Anyway, I saved myself before I went to sleep since it seemed nobody was going to anyway. But I'm not quite sure what happened.
Here's my log:
palmar fakes GM --
mataza nukes sandro, anti-nuked by minii 7@2.14 -- "intercepted"
minii nukes mataza, anti-nuked by GM 7@4.11 -- "gone awry" -- LANDED ANYWAY?
mataza counter-nukes minii, anti-nuked by minii 7@3.01 -- "shot down"
15.10 sandro nukes GM -- boom (nothing happened)
16.02 sinani nukes YM -- WENT FOR PALMAR
16.06 jeejee nuke sinani -- boom
16.07 sinani counternuke jeejee -- "failed to detonate"
My question is, what the fuck happened to minii>mataza, which caller clearly posted "gone awry" after GM claimed to have shot it down, but it landed anyway?????
GM doesn't die, as I expected (come at me tonight mafias), and YM, instead of dying, somehow bounced the rocket to palmar who said "lol bye" and went into the atmosphere.
And zombies.
Good ol' Caller game..
Primary suspects: GM & chaos13, and minii unless he can explain what happened to the missile aimed at his face and why his missile only pretended to be shot down. 2 super fishy things with one person.
Come at me mafias.
|
On July 08 2011 03:56 syllogism wrote:
Also Jeejee why did you nuke sinani206 if you were suspicious of youngminii
I didn't become suspicious of minii until after both nukes involving him did something totally unexpected.
I nuked sinani because he nuked without town consensus. Nothing more to it. The day was heading in the direction of "yeah there's a lynch policy but already so many people broke the policy that there's no way it's actually going to be enforced" just like WaW1.
L had what I believe now is the only viable plan in WaW1. Nuke the fuck out of any rogue nuker immediately, since as you can see, we didn't even lynch any rogue nukers last day.
Would I do it again? Hell yes.
Everyone should think about that when you're considering launching a nuke based on gut feeling and other bullshit. No such thing as "well they probably won't actually lynch me so there's no consequence" anymore. Your ass is mine.
P.S. ze is a TLdota joke. Caller is/was a TLdota player. Put the 2 together.
|
On July 09 2011 13:33 Zona wrote:
Wait, didn't Operation Dunkirk go through?
Then he must have been hit twice?
OP says campaigns go into effect the following day, so starting today the british get extra lives I guess.
I'm fucking mad from CCM, so I'll go sleep and get back to this thread tomorrow. Honestly haven't been reading this that much, my lack of posts probably confirms that.
My No-Bullshit-Tolerance still stands from last day -- if you nuke someone without town consensus I am nuking the fuck out of you. No more of that nonsense lynch-the-nuker policy that clearly did fuck-all yesterday. L was right in WaW1 after all.
|
Mornin' boys, tossed my vote on ULTRA for the op
Now onto the fun stuff
So YM nuked dec without consensus but he's already getting nuked, I can ignore him.
Sandro nuked YM but I think it's justified given that YM is pretty much guaranteed scum, and everyone who posted seemed to agree on killing him
My arsenal lies in wait.
|
On July 10 2011 01:44 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2011 01:43 JeeJee wrote:
Mornin' boys, tossed my vote on ULTRA for the op
Now onto the fun stuff
So YM nuked dec without consensus but he's already getting nuked, I can ignore him.
Sandro nuked YM but I think it's justified given that YM is pretty much guaranteed scum, and everyone who posted seemed to agree on killing him
My arsenal lies in wait.
hihi catch up before you post kthx
I caught up since the night post. You claimed a relatively unimportant role (I think? I am not a history buff) but then it ends up flipping night 1. Tough luck bro =\ But there is no way there are two of you, so one of you is lying.
And one of you is dead, so I'm inclined to trust that guy.
|
On July 10 2011 01:57 deconduo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2011 01:49 JeeJee wrote:On July 10 2011 01:44 youngminii wrote:On July 10 2011 01:43 JeeJee wrote:
Mornin' boys, tossed my vote on ULTRA for the op
Now onto the fun stuff
So YM nuked dec without consensus but he's already getting nuked, I can ignore him.
Sandro nuked YM but I think it's justified given that YM is pretty much guaranteed scum, and everyone who posted seemed to agree on killing him
My arsenal lies in wait.
hihi catch up before you post kthx I caught up since the night post. You claimed a relatively unimportant role (I think? I am not a history buff) but then it ends up flipping night 1. Tough luck bro =\ But there is no way there are two of you, so one of you is lying. And one of you is dead, so I'm inclined to trust that guy. -Why was his role given when he flipped whereas no one elses was? -Why does he have a different victory condition?
I'm not the host, how would I know?
If you're telling me this is another no-flip game, you're retarded. The one thing I trust so far is the flips that happened so far. Nothing else.
|
On July 10 2011 04:10 PaqMan wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2011 04:04 youngminii wrote:On July 09 2011 15:08 PaqMan wrote:
Fuck. I really don't want to nuke him because if he survives everything's going to be batshit-insane WIFOM.
And there are certainly better things to lynch imo.
Decisions, decisions... this is basically what i based it on nice omgus vote by the way Lol. I think it's just funny how everyone is like DONT LAUNCH NUKES!!!, but when someone actually does, everybody's just like "ehh, whatever". Give me a valid reason why I shouldn't vote for you? OYa "Guys I promise I'm town!" Isn't a valid excuse.
Yeah, nobody gives a shit. That's why I'm here. Someone launches a nuke without consensus, I'm on their ass. YM launched one, but he has a nuke headed for him already, so I didn't bother sending a second one.
It's the only policy that works.
|
k this makes no fucking sense
if YM was telling the truth then he should have lived through the nuke, unless sandroba's zombie nukes are 2x as powerful
if he's lying, why did he flip what he said he would flip? and how does chaos13 being the same person factor into this
|
Zombie nukes 2x as powerful
Heard it here first.
|
What the fuck guys? Wow. I guess that's what happens when there isn't an overarching deterrent of WRL / ToD to stop people from nuking. Anyway I guess I should claim and hope for an anti-nuke =\
Before that though, let's join the fray:
##Nuke: Zona
Hey scum.
The reason I didn't claim right away btw is because caller fucking trolled me with this role.
I'm a Laser Tyrannosaurus Cyborg Robot.
![[image loading]](http://www.cynicalsmirk.com/images/robot_dinosaurs.jpg)
Since I can't copy my PM I'll just paraphrase:
I can smell someone every night (rolecheck)
I can eat someone once per game (nightkill)
And my lasers can shoot down a nuke aimed at me once.
I win with the town, but only if I eat an Axis leader.
I rolechecked Syllo last night and he was Chesthair Nimitz of Brahmerica, so he's legit. He can confirm.
My little paws are crossed for an anti-nuke. Good luck town.
|
|
|
Your local T-rex reporting in with random tidbits
@OpZ, it doesn't matter what you know is true. Makes no difference at all. You can figure out all mafia day one, *know* it to be true,but if you don't convince anyone that still counts as playing terribly. Mafia is never about what you know, but what you can make other people believe.
@Curu, yep mad props to you for pointing me in the right direction in CCM ^^ Shame I couldn't turn it around :<
@Caller thx for hosting bro. Caller games never get old. Mafia victory ftw <3 My undefeated-as-mafia streak continues! BTW can you post our campaigns for night 2? We picked a campaign that didn't do anything night 1.. and we never reached night 2... :<
@Anyone using any form of "meta" argument in the game -- it's so pointless. When did this trend come about? It never makes for a good argument, because only complete tools play mafia one way and town another. I can point you to many games where I trolled just like this game, but was town. Likewise, I can point you to a game where I was very helpful as mafia. It doesn't matter. Stop using it as an argument; I'm gonna ignore anyone that mentions meta in upcoming games now -.^
|
On July 13 2011 02:51 syllogism wrote:
People who only troll, and thus are worthless, should be policy lynched, is that supposed to be a good point for dismissing meta? It's not. Besides, it's not really meta when you know someone is capable of playing really when and in another game is pretending to be dumb and not doing anything.
Should be, but it doesn't happen. Just like the "lynch lurkers" policy. Sounds nice but doesn't happen outside of the occasional day one lynch. It just takes hell of a lot of effort to make legit analysis, and in a caller game, where everything can change on a dime (sup no more radiation, *everyone nukes*, OOPS JUST KIDDING *everyone loses*), and everyone believes everything (sup t-rex and ocean) it's not really worth it. At least that's what my thought process was behind this game.
"Meta"arguments are still bad.
|
|
|
On July 13 2011 04:42 Curu wrote:I don't think Mafia team won, I think TAA and Palmar won.
I dunno man, my win condition is for axis to outnumber or equal the town, and since TAA/dec lived and no townie did, I think it's fulfilled -.^ Ditto for everyone else on the axis team unless they had an additional requirement
I still want to know what our campaigns would've done night 2 :<
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
