Sleeper Cell Mafia - Page 2

On April 26 2011 21:09 Jackal58 wrote:
Apparently everybody has gone to sleep.

On April 27 2011 02:40 Ace wrote:


what is he suspicious of? Saying he might role claim? That isn't a suspicious action at all. You guys are looking for things that aren't there.

If someone says hey I have a pretty good role/strange role/interesting role and I might claim then show me how that is scummy behavior.

On April 27 2011 02:43 tnkted wrote:


It's not specified in the OP. Now can we please stop talking about this? I'll claim day2 if you people are seriously so freaked out. Yes, we're freaked out over it. Especially since I'm not aware of any non-listed roles at the moment. And that's not a good thing, because its also possible that the Reds have unlisted roles/abilities as well..... So I'd like to find out one way or another.

And yes, zork, it should be extremely obvious what I am and why I'm acting this way. NO MORE CLUES.

You guys are spelling my name wrong btw, its TNK not TDK lol.

Now, as for my vote: it's Impervious

He's had almost nothing but one liners.











Oneliners. Every time. Then he has this gem, reiterating an excuse already given by several people for inactivity: Yes, because oneliners are definitely a scumtell.....


Several other people had brought this excuse up already. Wiggles, for example. Trying to blend in? Isnt it better to claim this shit ahead of time, rather than claim it after the fact? Or would you rather discover my behavior changes after a couple of days, and then I claim both the move and the exams as excuses for it?

If it would have been better to claim it after the fact, then I guess I'll do that next time I play a game of Mafia.

Then we get an actual post of substance:


Now, I agree with not focusing on breadcrumbing this game, because its almost impossible for us to catch scum at it. But this post talks about doublechecking people. Now this isn't a scumtell in and of itself, but what is interesting is that he steals the entire content of his post from two other players: I thought both were important things to do.

If we're going to try to outsmart the people with red roles, then we need to catch them before their plan (whatever it is) is fully formed..... By giving away the methods we'd expect them to use, they'll know what to avoid doing..... Frankly, it was really dumb to go so in-depth on that subject.

And making sure the DT knows what he should be doing is always going to be a good thing. I'm not sure if what you initially said was a major blunder, and you're simply trying to cover it up, or if you genuinely have a non-disclosed role. Part of me wants to actually lynch you tonight, to confirm it either way (seeing as you'll probably be a top target for the mafia). Of course, this could bite us in the ass if you really do have a useful role for the town. And I don't want to waste a check on you to find out either way.

First, Sandroba saying "talking breadcrumbs is a waste of time."


Then vain suggesting doublechecks.


Convinced? I am, at least enough for a day1 lynch.

#vote Impervious

On April 27 2011 03:01 Ace wrote:





The OP makes it quite clear that the possibility exists.

Still waiting on more people to post. Really need more activity before I reveal my plan.

On April 27 2011 03:17 Zorkmid wrote:
Strategy to make the DTs waste checks on you perhaps?

On April 27 2011 10:56 Zorkmid wrote:


I think there's another thread you need to vote in.

On April 27 2011 22:49 GMarshal wrote:
I realize its night time, but that is no reason to shut up and stop discussion, we have all of twenty four hours to start deciding things like lynches and blue direction. For the sake of discussion I am going to post a list of people I think need DT checks, vigi shots and medic protects.

DT Checks

Jackal58 - Ace thinks Jackal has been acting scummy, for this reason alone I think a dt should take a look at jackal, the results would be interesting either way

Mr. Wiggles - I already pointed out that I am suspicious of him, it would be nice to know definitely, as I know wiggles has the potential to contribute to the town if he is town aligned, if he is not he is very good about scooting along with large vacuous posts

GMarshal - DTs should aways check the most vocal players. I consider myself a vocal player, therefore I should be checked

Ace - its Ace, as policy he should be checked. Also I find his retraction of the vote on jackal to be unexpected, from seeing previous games with Ace I would have expected him to stick to his guns with the lynch.

Impervious- he has many posts, yet oddly enough, not a single one of them stuck in my mind, to me this means his posts have been empty enough to not be memorable, I think that merits a check

Vigilante Shots - now its *really* debated whether it is best for vigilantes to shoot night one or not, if the vigi is not in imminent danger and is not confident on his mafia kill I belive in saving the shot for later, however some people subscribe to using it for people they would lynch on policy, e.g. liars, or lurkers. If a vigi *had* to fire tonight I would think the best shot would be at an inactive who might be lurking scum. That is the gist of my suggestions on here

Eiii- Lurking, pops up to defend himself, resumes lurking, not a town asset at the moment, so we can do without him

GGQ- more of the same deal with Eiii, lurking inactively, hasn't really weighed in on anything.

why- with a grand total of four posts all he has done is attack jackal, I dont think he is contributing and we can do without him

Vain- I see every one of his posts as either a rehash of old ideas or a non-contribution

darm- because I think it would be hilarious to have him die day one this game too (don't actually shoot him for that, it was a joke...)

Medic Protects

GMarshal- I dont want to die, please dont let me die, I'll go through mafia withdrawal again and it wont be pretty

Ace- he is Ace, high profile target and all that, I want him around in the late game.

Jackal (maybe) - he is a great endgame player, and I wouldn't mind having him around to scum-hunt in the late game, I don't know how likely it is he will be targeted though.

other than that I don't know who scum might go after to be honest, as they risk hitting one of their own whatever they choose to do

Alright, so take a gander and debate my list up and down, who did I forget to include ? Who did I include who shouldn't be there?

On April 29 2011 00:45 GGQ wrote:
The simple fact that Ace didn't die is suspicious enough.

On April 30 2011 09:50 VarpuliS wrote:

Somebody posted that statistic a while ago. People need to stop using statistics is evidence. They can only get us so far.

Analytical reasoning > statistical reasoning in a game of mafia, imo.