data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
Insane Mafia 2 - Page 151
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
![]() | ||
Insanious
Canada1251 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:23 Kavdragon wrote: People who are nagging Bum: If you'll just listen to what he's saying, you'll see that it doesn't matter which of the two is scum! If you have a plan for both possibilities, why would you waste your time trying to figure out which one is more likely? If the outcome is the same either way, why spend the effort figuring which way to do it, when you could spend that time doing something else! No one is perfect, so quit with the personal attacks. Remember who voted him in. Just because he doesn't spam incessantly and posting stream-of-concious all the time doesn't mean he's not here and working. You gave him your trust, so don't callously throw it away. /rant because if we get the red now, then we don't need to waste the KP and can kill other scum at night... or try to. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
Insanious
Canada1251 Posts
| ||
![]()
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
| ||
Insanious
Canada1251 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:45 GMarshal wrote: [spectral voice] more visitors soon, this is good, one gets lonely out here, in the vast cold of the mafia forums [/spectral voice] GMarshal you make me smile... and for that I will not call the ghost busters. | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:08 Beneather wrote: ##Vote: Tackster ... I honestly thought he had been modkilled. | ||
ilovejonn
Canada2548 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:57 bumatlarge wrote: ... I honestly thought he had been modkilled. The guy has 7 posts. Yes, I included his /in post. | ||
ilovejonn
Canada2548 Posts
On March 26 2011 11:45 Beneather wrote: I think we should just lynch all the IG players (: Bound to get some scum players then and we won't have to worry about items making Mafia win.. So killing all the IG players will probrably help us more than it's going to hurt us.. so bad. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On March 30 2011 10:00 ilovejonn wrote: The guy has 7 posts. Yes, I included his /in post. That is ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous. I can't wrap my head around that guy, esp with his last post. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
##Vote Lemonwalrus Those are LW's posts in the beginning: On March 25 2011 03:09 Lemonwalrus wrote: Sorry about the one-liners from before...it is my first time, I didn't realize that was inappropriate. I promise to make all future posts of mine painfully and needlessly verbose. As far as the bum/not bum vote, I think bum is the best bet for the town for reasons that have already been discussed at length. (the biggest one for me being that I think if he wasn't blue by now one of the real blues would have surely counter-claimed) (If you are a blue and therefore know that bum isn't, please, there is no reason for you not to counter claim) So unless someone gives one hell of a compelling reason for me not to I intend to vote bum. As far as the irc channels goes, well, gather round fellas, because I may be new to mafia, but I am an old hand at irc. I think having an irc for this is a very bad idea. Basically, it is just a more fast paced version of the forum which, on the one hand i know we all think 'well that is good it gives the scum more of a chance to fuck up and reveal themselves when they are under the gun' but the thing is, everyone will fuck up sooner or later. I'm sure if we do an irc channel literally everyone that participates will, sooner or later, say something that convinces someone that they are scum. That is what happens when you are able to share information without thinking hard about it first. (for instance, look at my signature...do you think any of those guys (besides aesop) would have said those things if they had had time to re-read it before clicking a post button?) Also, I see a major component of the irc channel debate will be 'x isn't active in irc, he must be scum' or 'x is too active in irc, he must be scum' basically wifom madness imo, since with imperfect data either choice will put suspicion on a player and, since town outnumbers scum, more suspicion floating around should benefit scum. So I vote no on irc and yes on bum, and the above are my reasons. On March 25 2011 03:17 Lemonwalrus wrote: wtf the more i post the more i get crap for not posting, what do you guys want from me ![]() Also I hadn't even thought of the impersonating people on irc thing that GMarshal brought up in his post. That is yet another convolution that irc will bring to the process. (although if we caught someone impersonating it would make it pretty obvious they were scum...so a potential for reward if a scum were to be so bold as to impersonate someone) I think the real problem with the irc is that there is such a thing as too much information when you are trying to make a decision. If we have pages and pages of posts and pages and pages of irc logs to go by, 2 sides could make bulletproof arguments for one person being scum/not scum, and it could be almost impossible to tell who was right with any sort of objectivity. Also....picking through irc logs sounds really tedious. I know that has no importance in the function of the game, but I just feel it will be less fun with a mountain of irc logs...and I kinda want to have fun. These are his posts now: On March 28 2011 12:07 Lemonwalrus wrote: There there jackal, there there. Once town wins the IG you can play with the bandages, I promise. On March 28 2011 09:48 Lemonwalrus wrote: Items in the item game were RNGed, you can not make any inferences into alignment based on what item someone has. On March 28 2011 15:19 Lemonwalrus wrote: Also since this thread loves to jump on people for not posting a lot just letting you all know I've got an exam in 16 hours and I plan to spend every minute between now and then either sleeping or studying. I might still post here and there though. Happy scum-hunting. On March 29 2011 11:39 Lemonwalrus wrote: My last post was 21 pages ago, in much, much simpler times. I've read the thread from then so far but not as thoroughly as I would have liked to so I'm gonna go back and try to piece things together. In the mean time, if anyone (specifically bumatlarge) has any questions for me to answer go ahead and post them and I'll try to help you out. I'm switching my vote to him. Please switch with me guys. Look at his posting style change completely. I know I said take a stand, but admitting maybe you made a mistake is just as important. | ||
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
takes 2 people to unvote Tackster and vote LW for Tackster to be safe. Okay fine then | ||
Kavdragon
United States1251 Posts
On March 30 2011 09:26 Insanious wrote: because if we get the red now, then we don't need to waste the KP and can kill other scum at night... or try to. At what cost? Look what we've done all day. We've argued about who is scum in the Item Game. The end result is that we are still not certain about who to lynch. Once we make this lynch, what scum hunting have we done? Almost nothing! I'm not convinced that the trade off was worth it, so I don't think that Bum should be criticized for not spending all his effort on this lynch. Whatever. What is done is done, let's move on and start scum-hunting. | ||
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I switched my vote as well because I reread the past day and I don't like lemon's play. I mean, Tackster appeared to AtE all of us, but... I don't think that's the scum side of him. I really don't. (anymore.) | ||
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
On March 30 2011 10:27 Kenpachi wrote: if im counting right, (14)Tackster vs 11(LW) takes 2 people to unvote Tackster and vote LW for Tackster to be safe. Okay fine then nowait 15 peolpe | ||
Kavdragon
United States1251 Posts
On March 30 2011 10:27 Kenpachi wrote: if im counting right, (14)Tackster vs 11(LW) takes 2 people to unvote Tackster and vote LW for Tackster to be safe. Okay fine then 15-11 I think. If two people move, Tack is still the first person to 13 votes. We need three. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
Why would you side with someone that isn't even defending himself? On January 10 2011 11:52 Ace wrote: Sometimes it's just better to think of a simple answer. You have no idea what the Mafia know and don't know their motives. Hence it's just a simple decision on who is more believable here. Stop WIFOMing yourself. This was a really simple decision but you got caught up in stuff that really made no sense. Trying to find out who is the other Scum before getting on with the current lynch was a bad idea. Lemon didn't come in at all today to either help push for Tack's lynch nor did he say anything about the various small accusations against him. | ||
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
![]() | ||
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
| ||