EPTThe way I'm thinking about it is like this. Jbright and LSB, which one would be an easier call for a vigi? We lynch Jbright and leave LSB for a vigi to hit.
TL Mafia XXXVII - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
The way I'm thinking about it is like this. Jbright and LSB, which one would be an easier call for a vigi? We lynch Jbright and leave LSB for a vigi to hit. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 03 2011 09:01 deconduo wrote: Just a note: chaoser: annul, icemac, JBright Cubed: annul, icemac, JBright kevconsim: annul, icemac, JBright <- new player I think but serious lurker. votes without explaining. please post more lists that have no meaning because they take out all the context. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
so we lynched seraph? cool, let's hope he flips red, fingers crossed. Can you post results now RoL? want to read and go drink cause it's my bday lol | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 03 2011 11:43 ohN wrote: Oh man i was so busy these past few days and i completely forgot i was playing. D: ##Vote: ohN Sorry, I'll catch up asap. LOLOLOL. wow...how more scum can you get lol | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
"CB1 cannabinoid receptors mediate anxiolytic effects: convergent genetic and pharmacological evidence with CB1-specific agents" | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 03 2011 11:50 Jackal58 wrote: Encouraging people to smoke a doobie in a game that already promotes massive paranoia. This is scum right here folks. well of course =p. it's more for anxiety disorder though rather than regular old anxiety | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 03 2011 12:43 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I made a mistake Night 1 with the role PM's which made the mafia not realize that their KP rounds up. This cost them the ability to use a power. To compensate for that Night 2 I gave them an extra .5KP OHHHHHHH, that makes so much sense. WOWWWWW THANKS FOR MAKING ME WASTE MY TIME ANALYZING THE DAMN THING!! i am never going to analyze shit ever again. Between this and the BC fiasco...I give up... | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
This doesn't say much in itself because other members of the town have the same thing going for them (hi chaoser!). I totally did! Was just wrong on icemac that's all ;_; | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 04 2011 12:19 Foolishness wrote: GG don't worry, we'll get em for ya <3 | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
REPEATING WHAT I JUST SAID! SCUMMMMMMMMMMMM lol | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 04 2011 13:12 LastArgument wrote: for all the excitement from this game and looking at the last page and seeing two giant writeup's on me I am amused. One of you guys / mafia failed pretty hard. I took a hit last night. I am now going to begin my massive writeup on who I suspect this game, and I should have it up before bed in a few hours. You'll notice both of them have been by people who voted right both times to get mafia. Vet claim is so typical of scum | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 04 2011 13:24 kevconsim wrote: Too bad im not mafia! so it will take 3 days for us to win What do you mean by "take us 3 day to win"? | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 04 2011 13:52 LunarDestiny wrote: You shitting me? 30 players setup, 4 mafia. That doesn't even make sense in terms of KP... | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 04 2011 13:55 kevconsim wrote: I am a Townie Can you comment on who you think are mafia then? Who are the two you think are mafia? | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
Unless.....you're the GF and they were regular mafia. The pressure is on you so you need to sell out one of your underlings to keep your 1 KP and only losing 0.5 KP instead. Your post is so scum it's not even funny: + Show Spoiler + On February 25 2011 06:34 LunarDestiny wrote: I read about the last three pages and found not very strong reasons that Annul is scum. I don't see much scum tell in his vote switch from Chaoser to Gmarshall. Annul did justify his vote on Gmarshall on why his plan is bad. Another thing people keep mentioning is the aggressiveness how Annul is playing which looks like how he played in XXXV where he was scum. The difference is there he was accusing LSB being scum with flawed reasons. This game, he actually justified his vote and did provide reasons unlike the old "LSB postings are spams and have few contributions." I played with Annul many times before and it seems that he is always aggressive on day1. XXXV: Accused LSB mafia because he spams and don't contribute much. Merc Mafia: Claimed medic to me (day vig) and planned to have 100% town victory. Survivor Mafia (ongoing): After the quick 3 people alliance, he rallied and formed the counter 5 people alliance to take control of the game. This game compared to other games I played with Annul, I consider that he is playing less aggressive. This post is prime example of day 1 defending of a dead mafia. It soft claim defends annul. He compares the behaviour of 3 games of annul, 1 red, 2 town. In each of the three games he played very similarly except in game 1 as mafia he used bad logic to get someone killed. The link here is between this current game and that game, he was playing much differently from his town norm, revealing him as red. This would easily be seen from the looking from game as town and game as red of annul, but instead he tries to link all 3 games under the same style, when 1 was definitely different. Misrepresenting the facts is something one would do to defend ones teammate. On February 25 2011 07:58 LunarDestiny wrote: Looked over Annul's posts: 1) He posts are generally short and don't have much content to them. I do find Annul saying Gmarshall is mafia based only on his circle thing is not convincing. 2) This is the part I disagree. Annul did what most people will do in this situation. He attacked someone whom he believe is mafia and defended himself when he was in huge danger of being lynched. If he didn't go after someone, ok... since not everyone got a mafia read on day1. And his defense on himself is normal behavior. To determine if he is really mafia, you have to look at the time when he felt pressured and tried to redirect the lynch to another person (Gmarshall in this case) and if there are any support from others. People did pointed out Gmarshall's circle thing is a horrible idea but no one voted for him after Annul's switch. Again he slightly defends annul here by trying to use a wifom defense for annul, while then redirecting to another player. He also mentions how people pointed out how bad the idea of the circles was, when the major objectors were gryff, annul. Seraph posted against it briefly (flipped red), lunar did, and ohn did. Almost no one else was opposed. Reservations possibly had in that the groups created could have been fixed if gm is red. However, when we know two of the main group flipped up red, and one of which is the person lunar is defending you see a pattern. Pretty much a copy and paste of Foolishness' post on him on Day 2 that can be found here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=191888¤tpage=54#1073 You add in a little flavor and change the words around to try to present it like it's your own analysis but it's been said and done better by foolishness. Foolishness summed it up nicely as "Your PM to me didn't match up with what you did". You basically took a roundabout way of saying that. That's disrespectful, taking a dead man's words. Lets move on to day 2. On February 27 2011 14:44 LunarDestiny wrote: Back. Catchup time... So mafia are targeting experienced players like they always do. People are talking about annul's lynch and there is a bus on annul. First of all, I don't think mafia would sacrifice one of their member to make others more safe. So those who voted annul early or greatly accused him aren't likely to be mafia. Those who jump onto the bandwagon or voted late without giving good reasons should be looked at. Post doesn’t say much other than recap generally what everyone was talking about, fairly useless. Oh really now? What about these useless posts? I wonder who wrote them... On February 23 2011 15:46 LastArgument wrote: As you asked what I found troublesome about this post. as per the town guide found http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=188179 You did what would be as general talking. Rather than being specific with the use of the roles you mention you instead mention generalities. It also a post that lacks emphasis on the fundamental skill in which it has been suggested towns need to play by which is behavioural analysis. This and factoring in your earlier claim makes it seem fairly odd no? So basically you explained what general talking is; which is explained in the guide anyway. On February 28 2011 04:42 LastArgument wrote: I have spent some time trying to organize my thoughts and here is some of what I have thought on. First off two players stand out more than others to me. Icanflylow(now bumatlarge) and LSB. I know LSB has been analyzed by barundar. There is however one post that strikes me as particularly useless made by LSB that should be used as a reason for an obvious lynch. This post ranks players in three catagories. 1 being the “top players” 2 being ones who have experience or shown to have it 3 being people who have less experience than 2 4 being new players. However, if you start reading the post more carefully, you will realize it’s a post indicating how the mafia “should” hit people to avoid off the radar. Now, a mafia reading this post now knows how to properly divide hits to maximize the team from dying. It doesn’t directly say how we should be saving those people, or how to analyze them. (note: he makes a short post on “how to use this list” right after but essentially says its useless till day 4-5). This list didn’t provide people who should be dt checked, it didn’t provide a list of who should be medic protected. It instead provided a long post that doesn’t help the town as much as it helps mafia. Why make a post as town that shows activity but barely helps the town at all? This could be a lack of experience on my part, but it surprises me this post was made without further detailing or breaking down of how the town can use the information aside from “bide and wait till people die to pin the reds” Bumatlarge This is his second post in the game, he clears one player of suspicion, FoS two players, one of which is responsible for the most pro town idea this game. It isn’t much to go on, but based on all the pages the thread has, the only thing he was able to comment on was the annul lynch? And do generalization FoS on players without anything solid? Seems off to me. And then you go on to talk extensively about the list, when that is covered by THE VERY SAME GUIDE YOU JUST LINKED under the category: Talking about issues that allow mafia to easily blend in Talking about it is easy and pretty much anyone can take a side whether against the list or not due to differing people's opinions on it combined with people's different levels of paranoia. You can't really pin someone just cause they are AGAINST the list or FOR the list. You then go on to talk about LD's votes and criticize them...let's look at yours On February 25 2011 04:59 LastArgument wrote: I will be voting Icanflylow until a more suitable target can be brought up. As of now there is too much on either side of the fence to lynch one of gm/annul/chaoser/ice whereas icanflylow has posted once in the thread jumping on a bandwagon and not providing real input into the game. This vote may change depending on arguments brought forward, however 1 post to poorly justify ones vote on a bandwagon seems far to scum like to ignore at this moment. If he has been active in pm's someone let me know so that my view of him may be changed, but as of right now he seems the least contributing member of the game. ##vote icanflylow and On March 03 2011 08:57 LastArgument wrote: I'm heading out for a bit and just got home from work and should be back before voting. However, until then. ##vote Jbright Yeah....I don't think I need to cover what Foolishness has already covered in terms of voting. Foolishness points out pretty concisely that you've read the guide and that you've clearly had the ability to think and post constructively, but you didn't. At 16 total posts, I'd say you've been trying to hide all game real hard, only really posting big posts when you needed to, like now. Godfather, you going down. | ||
| ||
