EPTOn December 29 2010 13:02 seRapH wrote:
??
And RoL explain why Insanious is scummy?
??
And RoL explain why Insanious is scummy?
He actually implicated both of you! Lets hope you guys don't accidentally hit a mad hatter tonight!
TL Mafia XXXV - Page 33
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
He actually implicated both of you! Lets hope you guys don't accidentally hit a mad hatter tonight! | ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
tell me, how can you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a veteran? | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 29 2010 13:02 seRapH wrote: ?? And RoL explain why Insanious is scummy? !0 Hours ago. You're next. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 29 2010 13:11 annul wrote: god fucking damn it tell me, how can you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a veteran? How can you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt you're not the godfather? | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
he would be a good dt check as well as seraph and insanious ill reanalyse things when i get home. also why can noone spell "pandain" | ||
|
seRapH
United States9719 Posts
k | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
|
Insanious
Canada1251 Posts
On December 29 2010 13:07 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I will post my analysis later tonight I have a friend coming over and am not completely caught up. Here is what it is in a nutshell. Exactly what you said. You seemed WAY too sure that LSB was town. The kind of certainty that only a mafia would have who is going to try to appear to be the only person who was being sane when the lynch came back wrong. I was NOT sure LSB was a town, and I posted that at least 4 times. What I was SURE of, was that lynching LSB now was a bad idea. LSB is red, and we have a sure lynch on day 3 LSB is blue, and town is better off. Lynching LSB now was the worst person to lynch... People didn't listen. Litterally LSB was a bad lynch now, and an amazing lynch on day 3 if he couldn't prove himself. On top of that you tried switching votes to Brocket because of some shitty "he was active in pokemafia" reasoning. Isn't basing lynching on previous actions > lynching on poor analysis. Brocket was a very active and aggressive player when he was town. Now he wasn't even posted like anything. He is acting super different, to me this means he is a different role.Now also in Pokemafia, the mafia totally destroyed the town by being inactive. Posting like once and voting every day. This is how the mafia won in the game, and that is how I see Brocket playing this game so far. To follow that up, you also ignored my analysis on Seraph which would of given you a GOOD switch candidate. I didn't want an active, experienced player to die this early... too bad that didn't work out. In Pokemafia we(town) killed ourselves by voting for active experienced players. Town lost that game because we had no one playing at the end. We need active experienced players playing the game. Seraph hasn't posted that scummily yet, maybe he will show up more like scum later. But he sure is posting and that is better then the 15 players that are letting the mafia hide within them. So let me get this strait, you don't want LSB/Annul to die and are so SURE they are innocent so you want to change vote to someone completely random as opposed to another analysis that was posted? It doesn't make sense unless you want to appear like you were looking out for the town but don't want to implicate the other mafia who heavy suspicion was thrown onto. Annul is green, look at the way he posted. How he went after LSB. This is just like a lot of other greens, they get vocal and voracious so that people listen to them and they can draw fire from the mafia. A mafia and a blue would be too scared to speak that much for fear of being hit in the night. He is a green. LSB was 50/50 red or blue. I gave him the benefit of the doubt, because to me he was blue until night 2 where he was going to prove he was blue. If he didn't prove it, he was red, and no harm done. This means LSB was 100% either blue or red, with a 100% chance of dying if he was red on day 3. No reason to look at him anymore, move on. This means we were looking at 2 terrible candidates and needed to look else where, how hard is that to see... | ||
|
seRapH
United States9719 Posts
On December 29 2010 13:16 DoctorHelvetica wrote: i believe mr zergling is mafia, in fact i have since his very first few hosts he would be a good dt check as well as seraph and insanious ill reanalyse things when i get home. also why can noone spell "pandain" I'm not against DT checking me, not by any means, but should we be directing DT checks with the presence of a framer (possibly two)? | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On December 29 2010 13:16 DoctorHelvetica wrote: i believe mr zergling is mafia, in fact i have since his very first few posts he would be a good dt check as well as seraph and insanious ill reanalyse things when i get home. also why can noone spell "pandain" ebwop | ||
|
Insanious
Canada1251 Posts
On December 29 2010 13:11 annul wrote: god fucking damn it tell me, how can you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a veteran? 1) Get vet to hit LSB 2) LSB lives done, he is vet. | ||
|
Insanious
Canada1251 Posts
On December 29 2010 13:20 Insanious wrote: 1) Get vig to hit LSB 2) LSB lives done, he is vet. EBWOP | ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
Same with Seraph. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
On December 29 2010 13:18 Insanious wrote: I was NOT sure LSB was a town, and I posted that at least 4 times. What I was SURE of, was that lynching LSB now was a bad idea. LSB is red, and we have a sure lynch on day 3 LSB is blue, and town is better off. Lynching LSB now was the worst person to lynch... People didn't listen. Litterally LSB was a bad lynch now, and an amazing lynch on day 3 if he couldn't prove himself. Isn't basing lynching on previous actions > lynching on poor analysis. Brocket was a very active and aggressive player when he was town. Now he wasn't even posted like anything. He is acting super different, to me this means he is a different role. Now also in Pokemafia, the mafia totally destroyed the town by being inactive. Posting like once and voting every day. This is how the mafia won in the game, and that is how I see Brocket playing this game so far. I didn't want an active, experienced player to die this early... too bad that didn't work out. In Pokemafia we(town) killed ourselves by voting for active experienced players. Town lost that game because we had no one playing at the end. We need active experienced players playing the game. Seraph hasn't posted that scummily yet, maybe he will show up more like scum later. But he sure is posting and that is better then the 15 players that are letting the mafia hide within them. Annul is green, look at the way he posted. How he went after LSB. This is just like a lot of other greens, they get vocal and voracious so that people listen to them and they can draw fire from the mafia. A mafia and a blue would be too scared to speak that much for fear of being hit in the night. He is a green. LSB was 50/50 red or blue. I gave him the benefit of the doubt, because to me he was blue until night 2 where he was going to prove he was blue. If he didn't prove it, he was red, and no harm done. This means LSB was 100% either blue or red, with a 100% chance of dying if he was red on day 3. No reason to look at him anymore, move on. This means we were looking at 2 terrible candidates and needed to look else where, how hard is that to see... I decided to read your post actually. Its full of shit. You never dismissed points when it came to why we should lynch LSB, you mumbled some shit about statistically a 1/5 shot which is kind of funny since you shouldn't actually know if their are 6 mafia or not. Logically I would say 6 is a LIKELY number but its not a definite number. On top of that you didn't even dismiss my Seraph analysis. You just keep reiterating the same old shit that doesn't make sense. Let me read pokemafia tonight after my friend leaves and I will tell you why the town lost and I guarantee you it isn't because you killed the "active" people. | ||
|
seRapH
United States9719 Posts
We shouldn't do either, we should do both. Focusing on inactives gets us zero information for future lynches, so that's not a path we should go down. However we can't ignore them either because that'd lead to an inevitable mafia victory. So I propose that we DT check the lurkers and lynch scummy players depending on what the nightkills are. | ||
|
seRapH
United States9719 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 29 2010 13:18 DoctorHelvetica wrote: lol i bet coag is playing on jackals account either that or they have nearly identical diction Coagulation has been no fucking help at all. You wanna know why we have nearly identical diction? I'll tell ya why. But sexual favors are required to unlock the secret. I'm drunk. I'm going to bed. | ||
| ||
