EPTOn December 15 2010 07:50 ShoCkeyy wrote:
Want to bandwagon against me? Well heres your chance to now redeem yourselves from what I'm about to post.
Analysis for Day 1:
Already agreeing with each other, but hey this isn't enough yet.
+ Show Spoiler +
d3, why don't you also watch out for your team mates? or are you trying to confuse the town as well. Here's some more agreeing by LSB, BUT CONTRADICTING. First d3 says meh to LSB plan, but then later on agrees to LSB plan.
+ Show Spoiler +
Some more agreeing from d3 to LSB
+ Show Spoiler +
Something a townie once said, which is quite true. Why would you go into a game already telling what people to do? Why do you constantly force your opinion to be "the voice of reasoning"
+ Show Spoiler +
Tube Calling out LSB after LSB tried to "Defend" himself from Kav
+ Show Spoiler +
Day 2 Coming soon.
Want to bandwagon against me? Well heres your chance to now redeem yourselves from what I'm about to post.
Analysis for Day 1:
Already agreeing with each other, but hey this isn't enough yet.
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 10 2010 07:43 LSB wrote:
I'll just use posts made before
Inactives:
Plan
Firstly. DO NOT CLAIM
DO NOT CLAIM
Good now that we got that out of the way, some other ideas.
One plan that would work is to use the blue roles to promote activity in the town.
The Alakazam should check the inactive people and the lurkers, as it is incredibly difficult if not impossible to tell the difference between a bored townie and a lurking mafia.
The Chansey's should protect active players, this way the mafia won't be able to take out the people who are contributing the most to town, so people won't be scared of trying to put forth their opinions.
I'll just use posts made before
Inactives:
Plan
Firstly. DO NOT CLAIM
DO NOT CLAIM
Good now that we got that out of the way, some other ideas.
One plan that would work is to use the blue roles to promote activity in the town.
The Alakazam should check the inactive people and the lurkers, as it is incredibly difficult if not impossible to tell the difference between a bored townie and a lurking mafia.
The Chansey's should protect active players, this way the mafia won't be able to take out the people who are contributing the most to town, so people won't be scared of trying to put forth their opinions.
On December 10 2010 07:47 Amber[LighT] wrote:
*Things like role checks.
I agree with LSB as well, no role claiming strategies. They almost never work.
*Things like role checks.
I agree with LSB as well, no role claiming strategies. They almost never work.
On December 10 2010 10:03 d3_crescentia wrote:
Hesmyrr with the insubstantial "I agree" post. Let's watch out for him.
Hesmyrr with the insubstantial "I agree" post. Let's watch out for him.
d3, why don't you also watch out for your team mates? or are you trying to confuse the town as well. Here's some more agreeing by LSB, BUT CONTRADICTING. First d3 says meh to LSB plan, but then later on agrees to LSB plan.
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 10 2010 10:15 d3_crescentia wrote:
LSB's blue plan is pretty meh. It's not a good plan of attack for our Zams to check lurkers and inactives; they should be checking people who could be scum, including whoever is contributing the most. Keep in mind that all the mafia needs to do is to distract and confuse the town enough so that they make poor decisions.
LSB's blue plan is pretty meh. It's not a good plan of attack for our Zams to check lurkers and inactives; they should be checking people who could be scum, including whoever is contributing the most. Keep in mind that all the mafia needs to do is to distract and confuse the town enough so that they make poor decisions.
On December 10 2010 10:11 LSB wrote:
Remember, the town's best weapon is analysis. By checking the inactives, we flush out the mafia to the limelight where they easily could be found. We want the mafia to attempt to distract the town, this way we can catch onto what they are doing. The town has to be vigilant to guard against these attempts
+ Show Spoiler +
Discussing a plan is one of the best ways to generate activity and catch a scum btw
Remember, the town's best weapon is analysis. By checking the inactives, we flush out the mafia to the limelight where they easily could be found. We want the mafia to attempt to distract the town, this way we can catch onto what they are doing. The town has to be vigilant to guard against these attempts
+ Show Spoiler +
Discussing a plan is one of the best ways to generate activity and catch a scum btw
On December 10 2010 10:15 d3_crescentia wrote:
I'd rather we just kill the inactives. I think checking them is a waste.
I'd rather we just kill the inactives. I think checking them is a waste.
Some more agreeing from d3 to LSB
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 10 2010 10:32 d3_crescentia wrote:
Seconded. That is kind of bullshit.
Seconded. That is kind of bullshit.
Something a townie once said, which is quite true. Why would you go into a game already telling what people to do? Why do you constantly force your opinion to be "the voice of reasoning"
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 10 2010 08:53 jcarlsoniv wrote:
@LSB: While trying to coordinate blues seems good, I have to say, the more games I play, the more I hate to see people directing blues in thread. On Day 1, I think they need to do what they think needs to be done without influence from the thread. Any direction from the thread can also be seen by scum, and thus they will be clued in as well. No, obviously, I know that the blues don't need to listen to what is said in the thread, but they will be influenced by what is said. Let's hope we have good blues this time around.
@LSB: While trying to coordinate blues seems good, I have to say, the more games I play, the more I hate to see people directing blues in thread. On Day 1, I think they need to do what they think needs to be done without influence from the thread. Any direction from the thread can also be seen by scum, and thus they will be clued in as well. No, obviously, I know that the blues don't need to listen to what is said in the thread, but they will be influenced by what is said. Let's hope we have good blues this time around.
On December 10 2010 09:59 jcarlsoniv wrote:
I don't not support it (if that makes any sense). I am going under the assumption that our blues are at least halfway competent players, and will be able to think for themselves to use their roles effectively. This may be very naive though.
I think general direction right now is fine for now, as long as we don't get too specific, especially Day 1. The last thing I want is for blues to be sniped right away. In this sense, I definitely agree with you that everyone should keep their roles secret for now.
I don't not support it (if that makes any sense). I am going under the assumption that our blues are at least halfway competent players, and will be able to think for themselves to use their roles effectively. This may be very naive though.
I think general direction right now is fine for now, as long as we don't get too specific, especially Day 1. The last thing I want is for blues to be sniped right away. In this sense, I definitely agree with you that everyone should keep their roles secret for now.
Tube Calling out LSB after LSB tried to "Defend" himself from Kav
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 11 2010 14:39 tube wrote:
Also, before you defend LSB you should take another look at the manners in which hes been posting
Look at his defense against Kav's [long] list of suspicions. He tries to answer for all of his posts by merely responding that they were all taken out of context. Nor does he even say what "specific purpose" any of those posts had. If those purposes were to answer questions, they had more of an effect of making him look like hes trying hard to come off as town. Though apparently we should see his purposes as "quiet obvious" to the point where he does not have to explain them. (or can't?)
Also, before you defend LSB you should take another look at the manners in which hes been posting
Look at his defense against Kav's [long] list of suspicions. He tries to answer for all of his posts by merely responding that they were all taken out of context. Nor does he even say what "specific purpose" any of those posts had. If those purposes were to answer questions, they had more of an effect of making him look like hes trying hard to come off as town. Though apparently we should see his purposes as "quiet obvious" to the point where he does not have to explain them. (or can't?)
Day 2 Coming soon.
You should probably also note in your smear campaign that the post you quoted from me wasnt a simple agree. I had another post that you neglected:
On December 10 2010 07:46 Amber[LighT] wrote:
Lynching an inactive typically results in lynching an apathetic townie. Everyone should be posting frequently to discuss who should die for day 1. There are no PM's so everything should be out in the open.
We should really worry less about how the blues should play. Thinks like role checks won't be overly reliable, and saving people cannot be discussed in the thread. It probably would be a good idea for the electrodes to think about where to place voltorbs and pick up on good scum tells.
Lynching an inactive typically results in lynching an apathetic townie. Everyone should be posting frequently to discuss who should die for day 1. There are no PM's so everything should be out in the open.
We should really worry less about how the blues should play. Thinks like role checks won't be overly reliable, and saving people cannot be discussed in the thread. It probably would be a good idea for the electrodes to think about where to place voltorbs and pick up on good scum tells.
