EPTTL Mafia XXXIV: Pokemafia - Page 16
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Brocket
Australia192 Posts
| ||
|
Node
United States2159 Posts
On December 10 2010 13:56 Insanious wrote: Completely random I know... but can someone tell me how to get to the voting thread. On the front page it says "vote in a separate thread found here" but there's no link on here, or after it. I think I missed where it was listed and would be nice to be able to see the votes... I have a feeling I'm missing something very obvious. If you go to the mafia forum here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=31 you can see the voting topic about five topics down. Here's a link to the topic itself: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=175624 | ||
|
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
Nice to get a reaction from you folks though | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On December 10 2010 13:57 Brocket wrote: I'm glad you asked that insanious because I also don't know. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/4hfHm.png) mafia is a viewable forum u just have to browse the forum section of tl, it doesn't appear in a tab on the left. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/ it'll show up underneath "featured threads" i think | ||
|
Node
United States2159 Posts
On December 10 2010 13:59 zeks wrote: Vote on infun is placeholder for now - though his recent slip ups seem unusual Nice to get a reaction from you folks though How do you feel that he slipped up? | ||
|
Brocket
Australia192 Posts
| ||
|
dinmsab
Malaysia2246 Posts
LSB Vote:Infundibulum d3_crescentia vote: Hesmyrr tube Vote: LSB zeks Vote:Infundibulum Gabriel Vote:Infundibulum Kenpachi vote:Gabriel jcarlsoniv vote Gabriel Infundibulum: 3 votes Gabriel: 2 votes Hesmyrr: 1 vote It would be nice for the voters to justify their early votes. | ||
|
Insanious
Canada1251 Posts
Also to actually contribute to the thread somewhat, I really don't like either of the bandwagons we have going. Infun hasn't really done anything, especially not to garner the wrath of 10% of the people playing this game. On the other hand Gab came off a little rough and confrontational, but I really don't think he came off that scummy... | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Gabriel your actions are getting out of hand. I don't care if you were some vet before you got banned, right now you're playing like a reactionary noob with his first red role. Oh and change your sig. Right now my vote is on Gabriel, we might hit a red day one  | ||
|
DCLXVI
United States729 Posts
Seriously though, I am confused by gabriel. he makes some decent points about hesmyrr looking active but no content and infund's poor logic, but then he supports his points terribly. He attacks everyone who responds to him and then ragequits. Then the people he attacked + brocket vote him. Not sure if brocket is a newbie or is scum jumping on a free bandwagon. I need to read though the thread a few times more to get a clear view of what is going on, but I would like to hear some more posts on why gabriel/brocket/hesmyrr/infund are posting the way they are, not just people jumping on one side or the other. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
 ) | ||
|
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
It's 3 votes out of 31 people, stop overreacting. I have my suspicions of infun from his posts but I think he's "contributed" enough to warrant an exemption from day 1. Because the cop wants to not be found by the mafia so he should know how people look for him And because the medic wants to find the cop so he can protect him. Small hunch its a soft claim so take it with a grain of salt (and don't go ape shit on me) I'm going to keep my vote on him for now until tomorrow when enough time has passed and we can make a fair inactive list, which then I'll vote for one from there. | ||
|
Insanious
Canada1251 Posts
| ||
|
Insanious
Canada1251 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On December 10 2010 15:22 Insanious wrote: So now we have 4 people voting for Gabriel with little to no explanation... actually I think like only 1 person explained why they were voting for Gab and the other three didn't even say they were voting for him or why... bandwagon on an active, outspoken player? Me no likey... Most people gave a reason, Gabriel took an extremely hostile stance towards several players, gave shaky reasons for his actions and bandwagoned shamelessly and then became extremyl defensive and rage quit when people questioned him. Until someone comes along and acts scummier I'll be keeping my vote on who I feel is the best lynch. | ||
|
Brocket
Australia192 Posts
Infund so far hasn't earned any of the votes against him as far as our discussion has progressed. And no one as of yet has made a big impression on me. And yes I'm super noob as you can tell by my post count. I really don't know anything. | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
On December 10 2010 15:31 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Most people gave a reason, Gabriel took an extremely hostile stance towards several players, gave shaky reasons for his actions and bandwagoned shamelessly and then became extremyl defensive and rage quit when people questioned him. Until someone comes along and acts scummier I'll be keeping my vote on who I feel is the best lynch. Honestly, gabe's play has been distracting and inconsistent at best and scummy at worse. I mean, look at this: On December 10 2010 09:40 Gabriel wrote: I rather start the blind shoot into this small room with a shotgun. We are not getting analysis going too far away day one. Picking the right guy at the right time is picking a dead weight at first. He goes from saying "We're not going to be able to analyze anyone day 1, let's just lynch an inactive and hope it removes some dead weight" to... On December 10 2010 11:20 Gabriel wrote: Interesting: my half good "im new" shot is now voting for me. Kenpachi care to explain A) your vote B) your deep posts? Trying really really hard to paint ken as scum. And he doesn't even have any decent basis for it! One quote is a throwaway reaction to the day 1 post, one quote is asking about rules of the game, and the rest are useless but harmless posts. Like I said before, if he had taken even a second to look at ken's play in salem he would have seen that ken spammed like crazy even though he was medic. He might be active but he's certainly not helpful, and I think he knows it. Personally, I *do* think good analysis can be done day one. My vote's with gabe for now. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On December 10 2010 15:22 Insanious wrote: So now we have 4 people voting for Gabriel with little to no explanation... actually I think like only 1 person explained why they were voting for Gab and the other three didn't even say they were voting for him or why... bandwagon on an active, outspoken player? Me no likey... Well, I explained why I voted for him, as well as a few others. I think it is rather clear at this point why people are voting for him. Lynching an active is actually not a bad thing because they have posted enough to analyze their posts. His posts are extremely questionable with shaky logic and poor accusations. I love how he is pointing the finger and Infund and Kenpachi for being inactive in the first 4 hours of the game, but has said nothing about the number of people who haven't posted yet or who have barely posted. I'm hoping everyone steps up and contributes, because lurkers suck. | ||
|
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
You can just bookmark it, and stop worrying about it. (i know I'm not in this game, but I'm watching, hope this kind of post is acceptable) | ||
| ||
