| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
deconduo
Ireland4122 Posts
I offered it to gtrsrs first, sorry  On June 25 2011 01:11 VisceraEyes wrote: I'll cohost PTP2 Decon...I'm trying to write a Craft Their Power game right now that's similar, so the experience would be invaluable. *sharpens my razor blades and starts rolling up my sleeve....* Will PM you now. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
 | ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On June 27 2011 07:16 Caller wrote: so, uh, when can i start making my post Once Bum's, RoL's and iGrok's game starts. Don't worry I will let you know | ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
(or mafia XLIII, but I think we need to fill the vacancy that FW created by skipping over poor #41) | ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
| ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
On June 27 2011 07:53 GMarshal wrote: ... but I think we need to fill the vacancy that FW created by skipping over poor #41 ... No. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
Fine, your wish is my command  Mafia XLIII then | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On June 27 2011 12:02 Foolishness wrote: I'm pretty sure we skipped over another number a while ago as well....someone should find out which number and host it. 29 iirc Not sure if this is the place to post it but I recall reading a post by someone about a point system and I've been thinking about it. Wouldn't it be good to have a point/rank system based on your win/loss? I mean only balanced games should follow this obviously but it can follow something like an iccup ranking system or something less strict (considering it takes weeks to play a single game). With the influx of new players Ace went ahead and hosted an invitational so he could host a game with experienced players right? With a point/rank system you could just put the requirements to join the game in the OP. For actual points given, there could be criteria such as lurking = negative points (unless you're mafia), obvious MVP = extra points, losing would give you points as well for participation but very few compared to a win. Also you could make it so that if it's your first time hosting your game has to be open to all, then as you host more your point/rank restriction could go up. I know there are cons but I'm just throwing it out there. | ||
|
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
On June 27 2011 12:21 youngminii wrote: 29 iirc Not sure if this is the place to post it but I recall reading a post by someone about a point system and I've been thinking about it. Wouldn't it be good to have a point/rank system based on your win/loss? I mean only balanced games should follow this obviously but it can follow something like an iccup ranking system or something less strict (considering it takes weeks to play a single game). With the influx of new players Ace went ahead and hosted an invitational so he could host a game with experienced players right? With a point/rank system you could just put the requirements to join the game in the OP. For actual points given, there could be criteria such as lurking = negative points (unless you're mafia), obvious MVP = extra points, losing would give you points as well for participation but very few compared to a win. Also you could make it so that if it's your first time hosting your game has to be open to all, then as you host more your point/rank restriction could go up. I know there are cons but I'm just throwing it out there. I honestly think this is a terrible idea. First of all, this is a team game. Unless you play a huge sample set, your win/loss rate won't necessarily reflect your skill level. Furthermore, it just breeds even more elitism, which is unneeded. Just follow the games a little. You can tell pretty quickly who is good and who is not. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
Also I have to agree with Qatol... Point system is not a good idea. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
I just don't know who's good and who's not. I haven't been here since around TL Mafia XXX and I just played 2 games where I had no clue how good/bad 90% of the players were. I assumed RoL was pro but he ended up playing like a complete jackass, in which case I would have played differently regarding his posts. That's just one example but you get the picture | ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
oh god i can see the rage | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On June 27 2011 12:19 GMarshal wrote: Fine, your wish is my command Mafia XLIII then Too late! You got XLI! | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
| ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
Die. | ||
|
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
On June 27 2011 12:48 youngminii wrote: Fair enough. I just don't know who's good and who's not. I haven't been here since around TL Mafia XXX and I just played 2 games where I had no clue how good/bad 90% of the players were. I assumed RoL was pro but he ended up playing like a complete jackass, in which case I would have played differently regarding his posts. That's just one example but you get the picture Well hopefully you just learned a valuable lesson. Don't assume someone is an incredible player because they have been around a long time. If you are worrying about that kind of stuff, do your research on their past games and make up your own mind. | ||
|
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
On June 27 2011 13:09 flamewheel wrote: We could use an e-Peen system. Add one = every time you win a game. THIS. A MILLION TIMES THIS. | ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
OSC
Shameless vs MaNa
Nicoract vs Percival
Krystianer vs TBD
Cure vs SHIN
PiGosaur Monday
The PondCast
OSC
Big Brain Bouts
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
BSL 21
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
|
|
|
EPT
