• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:06
CEST 23:06
KST 06:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Pro gamer house photos Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Soulkey Muta Micro Map?
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
[MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 766 users

Experimental Mini Mafia - Page 6

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 05 2010 23:50 GMT
#745
On December 06 2010 08:39 annul wrote:
1. not giving you any more information. you are mafia, why would i tell you my thought processes?

2. it is as good a proof as anything you can produce.

3. hypnotist, as you claim it, is the same thing as an insane DT. you get to rolecheck someone at night and get the wrong information. this is an insane DT. dont try to argue like it isnt. does the town see what KJ does? i mean seriously this is ridic

4. i am an insane DT that has limited use and a minor set of abilities to choose from when i run out of these uses. as stated earlier, not going to explain to you (especially as you are mafia) what these minor abilities are. but nice try.


  1. By revealing what your supposed Night actions, we can decide for ourselves who is lying.

  2. I've presented a very clear case as to why you are mafia, including my checks and an analysis of your posts.

  3. I'm am not arguing that my role does not work like an Insane DT. I am arguing that the name of the role is Hypnotist. My role and abilities clearly fits with DrH's hints and LSB's Hobo watching. What is your role and how does it work?

  4. That's just silly.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 06 2010 06:03 GMT
#751
On December 06 2010 14:28 annul wrote:
i dont fully counter claim because it is 7-3 now and i am playing for endgame. i am going to assume mafia has 2 KP and one of their night 1 was blocked (maybe a delayed kill like poison in haunted?). if i die, KJ dies anyway, so the argument of "fully claim to take down a mafia" isnt gonna work, since he is going down tomorrow no matter what when i flip town.


First off, there actually are 6 Town players to 3 mafia. If we miss this lynch, we'll be in LYLO. You're trying to confuse the town into believing that our situation is better than it is.

On December 06 2010 14:28 annul wrote:
if i gave you the name of my role, then this will signal how to defeat my abilities.

my role runs out of juice because that is how drh set up the role? i have never seen this role before, ever. so it is new. i have multiple things i can do at night but the DT-type ability is most potent, so i use it.


You don't have to give us the name of your role. Just tell us which hint corresponds to your role.

On December 06 2010 14:28 annul wrote:
i am sure there is somebody in the town who can help me defend myself. where are they?


No one is going to defend you now.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 06 2010 06:36 GMT
#754
On December 06 2010 15:20 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I seriously would Lol if Annul is actual insane DT. Seriously, you should of fully role claimed.

And Aidnai. You promised to roleclaim. That's why. I don't care whats up with that, it should still come out. I don't CARE about what roles you have. We have numbers of how many roles exist. Almost all blue. Mass roleclaim, pop pop pop shit that matches up.

Everyone wants to be all protective and shit. Sheesh. Cut some losses.


annul is definitely not the Insane DT. I don't know what his role is yet because not everyone has role-claimed.

According to my notes there are 5 roles that have still not been claimed. Two of these are pharmacists. I'm still in favour of keeping not role-claiming to keep our pharmacists hidden. We don't know how many KPs the mafia has and I still need protection for at least one more night. I have likely suspects that I want to check but we need one more vote on annul to get us there.

Anyone want to do the honours and remove this scum from our game?
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 06 2010 06:44 GMT
#756
On December 06 2010 15:43 annul wrote:
btw i actually thought it was 7-3, not 6-3, not like its some intentional deception when its obviously checkable on the OP (as i am pointed out to now)

oh wow. if i die we lose, the game is over.

the remaining players, the final voters need to think very very carefully about this lynch. when i die, assuming mafia has 2 KP, the game is over unless some medic save occurs.


OR, if we assume that mafia has 2 KP then we could lynch you and reduce the mafia KP to only 1. We'd buy ourselves one more chance tomorrow.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 06 2010 20:55 GMT
#772
~OpZ~, I followed your lead and I have waded through all of annul's posts. I compiled them into a single list and looked through them for players who he supports/opposes/avoids. Here they all are:

+ Show Spoiler +

On November 29 2010 22:51 annul wrote:
/in if allowed, sure


On November 30 2010 09:19 annul wrote:
ok hi so like, the "spirit" is probably a ghost, in haunted ghosts were medics...

there are lovers in the game

children are... http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Innocent_Child (so maybe the variation is in play)

black hood... vig?

doctor

thats 6. so 6 more to go


On November 30 2010 12:55 annul wrote:
btw it is illegal to claim on day 1 ROL


On November 30 2010 12:37 annul wrote:
i must have missed it but where did drh say no PMs?


On November 30 2010 13:10 annul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 12:46 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Oh and if I am correct on the pharmacist role it means we can't block any of the kills tonight, so whoever is the most active will die, or anyone who is confirmed. So anyone important should avoid claiming, because if I am correct it means you will die and there is nothing that can be done to stop it.


only time "nothing can be done" is today (if you are right on the role that is), and we cant roleclaim today


On November 30 2010 14:38 annul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 13:59 Fishball wrote:
Hell, the game just started.

{...}

But if one were to ask me for "advice", I would say I'm more inclined to look at the inactives,


##vote fishball


On December 01 2010 06:04 annul wrote:
uh

orgolove could just be changing his vote as a way to get more people onto fishball and off of ROL... i mean without a "vote changer" role existing.


On December 01 2010 06:04 annul wrote:
and lol KJ, good to see you and i finally agree that hostile attacks have no place in mafia games


On December 01 2010 06:23 annul wrote:
see that is the problem, you do not need to "unnerve" anyone into anything. this is a competitive game yes, but use your competition to win people over on argumentation, not insults, etc. all i am saying is that if you agree with that, finally, then good, we can continue without problems

but i do find it very funny, the above post of yours. timely, indeed.

at least you dont condone it IRL, that is good.

PS not trying to "get the last word" - only commend you for your sudden change of heart in playstyle


On December 01 2010 06:23 annul wrote:
there is a big difference between "that argument is bad because X" and "you make bad arguments"

big big difference


On December 01 2010 06:36 annul wrote:
you definitely do not make the first type of statement; or at least you didnt, to me, in sengoku..

but if you dont want to be addressed, then sure, ill stop addressing you. i will grant you the cessation of attack that you did not grant me. <3

so okay, back to this game, did nobody catch what i said about orgolove? maybe hes making shit up about this vote redirection role, to put more peeps onto fishball and off of ROL (or maybe even coag, if he's bussing)?


On December 01 2010 06:51 annul wrote:
to be fair i had no idea you were even signed up for this game, i would have went /out had i known. i dont want to play with you either. it seems that all you are going to do is fight me in every single game we play. no matter what. you were wrong about me in sengoku and so it makes me think that your sole intention is to attack me regardless, whatever color you think i am or whatever color i actually am.

so believe me the sentiment is mirrored from my perspective as well.


On December 01 2010 09:01 annul wrote:
so explain to me why we have gotten off of fishball?

look at the post i made when i voted him, when i quoted his post and showed the two blatant contradictory ideas. then look at orgolove. he either 1. is bussing fishball or 2. someone actually used that power and wants to save fishball, and the only logical use of this is a mafia use


On December 01 2010 11:39 annul wrote:
i think these clues mean that there is a role called "the hammer" that ends the day with the vote no matter what


On December 01 2010 11:40 annul wrote:
preacher probably refers to a priest role (bodyguard)


On December 01 2010 15:29 annul wrote:
wow

drh says that he has hinted to all roles

where is the vote redirection role hint?

vote fishball, then vote orgolove tomorrow


On December 02 2010 01:22 annul wrote:
opz already has a "vote" on aidnai (through ROL) so you technically need to unvote first.

also, there are 14 votes up and the day isnt over, so whoever hasnt voted must be "the hammer"

its glasse. glasse is the hammer. which is lol because of what happened with him and his profile clues in haunted ;D but glasse is teh hammer.



also i have changed my mind about orgolove. the corruption clue (if he is being honest) was written in all 4 colors, making me think it is a random effect and does not signal town or mafia or blue or miller. makes me think it is a random effect that happens. so orgolove for now is off my hook. i still like the fishball kill though for reasons iterated previously


On December 02 2010 02:37 annul wrote:
hahahaha, AND the OMGUS with no other explanation whatsoever.

seriously how is there a better target than this


On December 02 2010 03:01 annul wrote:
yeah, [almost] every single action anyone takes in these games has the implicit "i wanted to" attached to it.


On December 02 2010 05:18 annul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 05:09 DarthThienAn wrote:
On December 02 2010 04:31 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
I do not have a role in this game, the riddler thing was just a joke

No jokes allowed!!



your playstyle is a joke

ZIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIING


On December 02 2010 05:19 annul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2010 16:12 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Mafia is a game of deception and misinformation not an intellectual dick measuring contest.


shame it isn't a physical dick measuring contest, because if it were, i'd always win.


On December 02 2010 05:20 annul wrote:
ps southrawrea is fine and all to lynch but really hit up fishball how can you let him go after this crap


On December 02 2010 05:24 kingjames01 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 05:19 annul wrote:
On December 01 2010 16:12 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Mafia is a game of deception and misinformation not an intellectual dick measuring contest.


shame it isn't a physical dick measuring contest, because if it were, i'd always win.


Are you trying to show us that you're good at deception and misinformation?


On December 02 2010 05:45 annul wrote:
the fishball issue is as follows:

Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 14:38 annul wrote:
On November 30 2010 13:59 Fishball wrote:
Hell, the game just started.

{...}

But if one were to ask me for "advice", I would say I'm more inclined to look at the inactives,


##vote fishball



then, his OMGUS. then, the potential for mafia-controlled vote redirection. then, his lack of contribution whatsoever, even despite him saying "hell the game just started" yeah its been going on for a while - what has he done? a bunch of nothing


On December 02 2010 05:46 annul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 05:43 Coagulation wrote:
unlynchables that have activated powers upon lynch



wat


On December 03 2010 02:58 annul wrote:
"the hammer almost struck back"

so that means the axe strikes early.


On December 03 2010 06:05 annul wrote:
hey peeps,

allow me to interject the awesomeness of this game to advertise the fact that HARRY POTTER MAFIA is forming! it will go down once salem finishes. i really like the role list and setup for this one (i am biased of course) and it will be pwnage and awesome.

go go play sign up lets rock this biiiitch <3


On December 03 2010 06:56 annul wrote:
hey now im allowed to make garbage posts all the same as you do <3


On December 04 2010 04:54 annul wrote:
um

fishball claimed spirit. says he will get more powers when he dies.

why arent we insta-voting him?


On December 04 2010 04:55 annul wrote:
three options:

1. he is mafia. good lynch
2. he is spirit. good lynch.
3. he is neither. not that good a lynch, but what are the odds he is #3?

##vote fishball


On December 04 2010 04:59 annul wrote:
he CLAIMED spirit. would a non-mafia, non-spirit claim spirit?


On December 04 2010 05:05 annul wrote:
mafia would be ridiiiiiiculously overpowered if they got the spirit role. our only way to kill mafia is by the town lynch (and maybe a vig role).


On December 04 2010 05:05 annul wrote:
coagulation

was there a hint to a traitor role?


On December 04 2010 05:09 annul wrote:
... how is that a hint to a traitor role? sounds like confirmation of the second lover to me.


On December 04 2010 05:11 annul wrote:
i missed it then.

whatever, who would you rather us kill? opz?


On December 04 2010 05:13 annul wrote:
oh. well in that case, how would KILLING him make him town -> mafia? seems like he is already mafia then under that analysis


On December 04 2010 05:14 annul wrote:
but okay then.

##unvote fishball
##vote ~opz~


On December 04 2010 05:24 annul wrote:
orgolove, you assume that it is a mafia role that nullifies the vote.

i think it is a part of his ability. since he wants to be town lynched, it is a detriment to his ability to make it harder for him to be town lynched. remember the clue says "the SYSTEM is corrupt" in all 4 colors. makes me think its a neutral occurrence. or maybe, even, the first to get to 4 gets a vote taken off of them (as happened last time).


On December 04 2010 05:35 annul wrote:
##unvote ~opz~
##vote fishball


i still think hes town and would benefit from lynch.


On December 04 2010 05:36 annul wrote:
Fishball:
Orgolove, Kingjames01, jcarlsoniv barundar coagulation annul

opz:
aeres


is this correct?


On December 04 2010 06:31 annul wrote:
KJ sure knows how to be pro at insults amirite


On December 04 2010 07:39 annul wrote:
is fish at 7 or 8?

i.e., is it over, or is there still a chance to debate this lynch?


On December 04 2010 09:19 annul wrote:
well its over now, he has 8, anything happening now wont count

now that its confirmed, i think fishball played ridiculously well. i think he survives this lynch with more power. i think he has been lying that he wont stay alive with new powers, so that the mafia keeps voting him.


On December 04 2010 10:28 annul wrote:
no. deconduo could only VOTE if he was the hammer.

it is possible for him to not vote in a day cycle.


On December 04 2010 16:10 annul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 04 2010 14:33 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
fuck it im just gonna end the night when i get everyones actions

i work too late tomorrow and im too tired

plus i hate it when people change too much. I have all night actions. you people have 30 minutes to make your decisions.



drh = caller?


On December 04 2010 16:19 annul wrote:
no i agree you just said night ends in 30 minutes like 2 hours ago


On December 05 2010 03:35 annul wrote:
maybe there is a night vig somewhere


On December 05 2010 04:30 annul wrote:
well we dont know who the night vig hit and who the mafia hit

so maybe the mafia hit the tracker and the night vig took out coag or something

though maybe the mafia controls the night vig


On December 05 2010 16:23 annul wrote:
let me ask you something ghrur

just an immediate response, but for shit like, for example,

"no. deconduo could only VOTE if he was the hammer.

it is possible for him to not vote in a day cycle."

which i said in clarification of someone else making a false assumption... this is a "nothing" post to you. so, tell me, ghrur, what IS a "something" post? if you call this a nothing post then how can i even attempt to respond to your claim that 95% of my shit are "nothing posts"?

and where is your analysis of KJ? he had a "pointless argument" all the same with me. why are you not calling him out on the bullshit too?

maybe you and he are both mafia. in fact that makes sense, since he is now conveniently "going to tell you everything" and how you are now going to "protect him"... hmmmmm


On December 05 2010 16:32 annul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 07:39 ghrur wrote:
I'm assuming PMs are allowed right?


nothing

Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 07:53 ghrur wrote:
Op, so PMs aren't allowed. Darn.
WELL... that kinda throws a wrench in my plans.


nothing

Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 08:39 ghrur wrote:
I'd suggest we just pressure people through voting and discuss our opinions on who looks suspicious or not. Also, having a plan for town to organize around is NEVER bad. I mean, if we can get a town circle, all the better right? Let's see, so far those who haven't posted:
Barundar
RoL
Jcarlsoniv
annul
Pandain (wut?)

Well, might as well be bold.

##Vote RebirthofLegend



posting the inactives like 2 hours after game begins, as if it means something, and then a random vote out of nowhere with no logic or reason? k

Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 09:59 ghrur wrote:
Why would we want to do that? Dr. H is basically giving us unlimited time to get a GOOD lynch in, and you want to rush it? Why? I think we can hit a mafia day 1 giving our low player pool if we really try. Cmon Decond, I KNOW you have mafia sniping skills. ^_^



just as much "nothing" as my posts he claims are nothing posts

Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 11:42 ghrur wrote:
On November 30 2010 10:17 deconduo wrote:
On November 30 2010 09:59 ghrur wrote:
Why would we want to do that? Dr. H is basically giving us unlimited time to get a GOOD lynch in, and you want to rush it? Why? I think we can hit a mafia day 1 giving our low player pool if we really try. Cmon Decond, I KNOW you have mafia sniping skills. ^_^


I was mostly kidding <3


Seems more like we switched alignments. >_>


nothing post

Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 10:10 ghrur wrote:
After that roleclaim and that defense, I'll admit I was wrong. Decond seems town to me now. :p. I mean, no town would admit to misusing that role so quickly. Peace? lol.


admission of wrongness, cool, better than being called out for it later i guess

Show nested quote +
On December 01 2010 08:08 ghrur wrote:
Hey look! RoL and I agree despite me never even reading his analyses. ^_^
Well, I guess we have a lynch candidate.

##Vote Aidnai


nothing post, bandwagon follower

Show nested quote +
On December 04 2010 10:55 ghrur wrote:
Oh good god. I come back and there's green blood everywhere. Ugh, green is such a nasty color. We need more red blood... + Show Spoiler +
or purple blood. ^_^ Purple so sexy yo, it's like gretorp and haunter


But damnit man, Decond never even got to post his analysis. >_<


nothing post

Show nested quote +
On December 03 2010 13:51 ghrur wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 03 2010 09:45 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2010 08:12 ghrur wrote:
On December 03 2010 03:52 kingjames01 wrote:
On December 03 2010 03:15 Barundar wrote:
As for town night actions we can discuss other targets, but how can they be of use if we don’t know if my scan can be trusted?

Fun fact: My ability gives me a read on both the target and people visiting him. So if I target someone who gets sniped I get a read on the mafia, and no matter the returned alignment will be able to point him out. Good reason to scan likely targets.

As for surviving, I place my faith in a pharmacology student


Okay, this is a good ability for us to build our scum-hunt around. I'm voicing my support for the plan whereby Barundar checks someone of his choice, (keep your target a secret for now Barundar) and announces his findings in the morning. Of course our conversation is public so mafia will try their best to ruin it. What we need is for a Pharmacist to prescribe some medicine to Barundar or whatever it is that you do to keep him safe until the morning.

Coagulation is our other DT. We know that one of our DTs tells the truth, the other one lies. Since Coagulation's results are PM'd out randomly, I suspect that he is the one who will have trustworthy results. I'd like for him to be safe as well.

There is no real way of ensuring this or coordinating the actions of the Pharmacists though without them claiming. Obviously, Pharmacists should not claim until they absolutely have to.

Everyone else, as enlightening as it is, stop with the role-claiming unless you are forced to do so or have a very good reason. Each time someone claims, we have one less place to hide our Pharmacists.



I think you guys are relying way to much on pharmacists. So we know they exist, but do we know how many? 1? Maybe 2? I mean, it's a 15 person game, it isn't that big. If Mafia has 2 KPs and aims for both Coag and Barundar, I'm thinking we just lost 1 DT night one. The thing is... why did you guys claim night 1? >_< And Fishball, making Decond would be WAYYYYY to OP to mafia. There are already 3 members, if they only need 4 to lynch every other day, then they can basically screw town over every other day. No way Decond's mafia if his roleclaim is true.

Anyway, I feel like we should be scum hunting, but i'm not so sure about my suspects anymore. I say there's no way Decond's mafia. jcarlsoniv, idk, he seems uncharacteristically held back for someone who basically can't die, but on the other hand, there's no way mafia would volunteer to lynch themselves (WIFOM not included in the argument). I'm just keeping a watch on Aidnai right now. =/ I have another thought; I guess I'll wait until morning to make an accusation if anything. :p


If you have doubts about my alignment, then your worries will be satisfied assuming everything works out with the checks/lynch.

When day rolls around, I ask everyone to hold off voting for me until we have our information from our DT. If something bad happens with the checks, I don't want to be killed off for no reason.


Nah, I have hardly any doubts on you right now. Your defense was adequate, your volunteering for lynch is uncharacteristic of mafia, I'm just stupid. xP


admission of wrongness, see above

Show nested quote +
On December 03 2010 08:12 ghrur wrote:
On December 03 2010 03:52 kingjames01 wrote:
On December 03 2010 03:15 Barundar wrote:
As for town night actions we can discuss other targets, but how can they be of use if we don’t know if my scan can be trusted?

Fun fact: My ability gives me a read on both the target and people visiting him. So if I target someone who gets sniped I get a read on the mafia, and no matter the returned alignment will be able to point him out. Good reason to scan likely targets.

As for surviving, I place my faith in a pharmacology student


Okay, this is a good ability for us to build our scum-hunt around. I'm voicing my support for the plan whereby Barundar checks someone of his choice, (keep your target a secret for now Barundar) and announces his findings in the morning. Of course our conversation is public so mafia will try their best to ruin it. What we need is for a Pharmacist to prescribe some medicine to Barundar or whatever it is that you do to keep him safe until the morning.

Coagulation is our other DT. We know that one of our DTs tells the truth, the other one lies. Since Coagulation's results are PM'd out randomly, I suspect that he is the one who will have trustworthy results. I'd like for him to be safe as well.

There is no real way of ensuring this or coordinating the actions of the Pharmacists though without them claiming. Obviously, Pharmacists should not claim until they absolutely have to.

Everyone else, as enlightening as it is, stop with the role-claiming unless you are forced to do so or have a very good reason. Each time someone claims, we have one less place to hide our Pharmacists.



I think you guys are relying way to much on pharmacists. So we know they exist, but do we know how many? 1? Maybe 2? I mean, it's a 15 person game, it isn't that big. If Mafia has 2 KPs and aims for both Coag and Barundar, I'm thinking we just lost 1 DT night one. The thing is... why did you guys claim night 1? >_< And Fishball, making Decond would be WAYYYYY to OP to mafia. There are already 3 members, if they only need 4 to lynch every other day, then they can basically screw town over every other day. No way Decond's mafia if his roleclaim is true.

Anyway, I feel like we should be scum hunting, but i'm not so sure about my suspects anymore. I say there's no way Decond's mafia. jcarlsoniv, idk, he seems uncharacteristically held back for someone who basically can't die, but on the other hand, there's no way mafia would volunteer to lynch themselves (WIFOM not included in the argument). I'm just keeping a watch on Aidnai right now. =/ I have another thought; I guess I'll wait until morning to make an accusation if anything. :p


"HEY LETS SCUM HUNT BUT UHHHHHH DON'T INCLUDE ME OK" also includes some pretty interesting stuff in paragraph 1, its as if you want to signal you know stuff but cant. mafia much?

Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 12:25 ghrur wrote:
On December 02 2010 12:21 kingjames01 wrote:
You hinted that your DT role is different. Based on your role PM, do you think that this following scenario could work?

  • The other DT announces himself.
  • You check him.
  • He checks you.
  • You both compare your results in the morning.




Well, there are a few things that could go wrong with this:
Mafia has someone to frame people with.
One of them is paranoid, not insane.
One of them is insane and the other is paranoid.
We could have mafia claiming DT because everyone's already checked for, especially if godfather exists or there's he's a paranoid DT.

But w/es, I suggest you take whatever you've got. If that's just this plan, than so be it. =/



wifom

Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 10:20 ghrur wrote:
On December 02 2010 10:19 LSB wrote:
On December 02 2010 10:06 deconduo wrote:
On December 02 2010 10:04 Node wrote:
I can't help but notice that the day ended as soon as aidnai no longer held more votes than southrawrea. So deconduo, you're saying that you suspected south enough to kill him without the majority?

And what do you mean by "I can only vote if my vote hammers"?


If 8 people are needed to lynch, I can only vote if theres 7 votes on that person already. The exception being when I use my power.

Wait, so did you use your power?


Yeah, he used his power. Notice there were only 4 votes for SouthRawrea.


as much "nothing" as some of mine

Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 02:06 ghrur wrote:
God, how did Barundar die? >_< Didn't he say he had a "pill?" Also, 7-3 now, we're going to need to lynch a mafia today. Let's not rush this lynch.


nothing

Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 02:13 ghrur wrote:
On December 05 2010 02:12 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
oh shit ghrur for some reason i thought you were dead and i was about to flip on you for cheating hard


Hahaha, mixing up the games there Doc. xD


nothing

Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 12:58 ghrur wrote:
Opz, I understand if you're suspicious of me, but I'm going to tell you, I left a hint somewhere along the way confirming my towniness. If you want me to prove it to you, I can do so during the night. I mean, would a mafia push Decond so hard (like an idiot :p)?


this is pretty LOL to me. you leave a hint, because you intend the town to find it (otherwise why leave hints at all) but if you want town to find it, why not just be forthcoming with it? why risk mafia finding it and understanding it and not the town? maybe because you are mafia yourself?

Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 13:02 ghrur wrote:
On another note, my 1000th post is coming up. ^_^ Anyone know when mutas pop? Or lurkers?



nothing

Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 14:06 ghrur wrote:
On December 05 2010 13:25 kingjames01 wrote:
On December 05 2010 13:02 ghrur wrote:
On another note, my 1000th post is coming up. ^_^ Anyone know when mutas pop? Or lurkers?


=) Are you going to spam to get to 1000?


Ouch. T_T That hurts.

On December 05 2010 12:58 ghrur wrote:
Opz, I understand if you're suspicious of me, but I'm going to tell you, I left a hint somewhere along the way confirming my towniness. If you want me to prove it to you, I can do so during the night. I mean, would a mafia push Decond so hard (like an idiot :p)?


Well, you've been pretty inactive. Now it seems like you're asking not to be lynched so that you can make it to the Night. If you WERE in fact Red, this would be a pretty good play.

You've basically put us in a really awkward position. We cannot ask you to reveal your clue if it puts us at risk. However, we cannot allow you to just throw out vague hints and give you a free pass through the lynch.

What else can you say?


I've been inactive because I haven't been able to use TL for around 17 out of the last 21 hours or so. =/ If you want actual inactives, look at Aidnai who's basically disappeared despite him promising an analysis. Look at Node who hasn't even been here since the new day started. Heck, even Aeres who's last post was over 24 hours ago.
Besides, I've been actively reading this thread, it's just I don't exactly trust my scumhunting after pushing Decond, suspecting Aidnai, and suspecting jcarl without much results. =/ Would you like me to post my thoughts on the game?


im inactive but about to post an analysis on annul calling him out for supposedly providing nothing to the town, cool











soooooooooooooooooooo yeah i can play this game too


On December 06 2010 04:04 annul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 18:15 ghrur wrote:
+ Show Spoiler [another interesting phenomenon] +
On December 05 2010 17:52 aidnai wrote:
Well, I have my analysis on Aeres almost ready to go, and i check the thread to see what's up, and here's Annul vs Ghrur.

Before this argument came up, i had not considered annul, but I already analyzed ghrur (didn't post much of it though) and decided he was town. Reading their arguments, it still looks to me like ghrur is town, and he has done a decent analysis, imo better than his analysis of deconduo. Annul's reaction is... well, definitely a reaction. I want to go through the thread and decide for myself about annul though. He really flew under my radar up until now...

Bottom line: I think we may have a winner here, and to avoid confusion and multiple lynch targets, i will hold off on my aeres analysis for now. I'll post it if Annul vs. Ghrur is not going anywhere.



Post both.
Also, yes, it is indeed a reaction. You know what's more interesting? He was DEFINITELY online between the time he last posted and the time of my post. Yet why, annul, did you not post your thoughts on the discussion? Opz asked for opinion. Why did you not give it to him? Why were you lurking instead of actually posting and being helpful? You could've said "GHRUR WAS SCUM" or "GHRUR IS USELESS" before I posted anything. In fact, if you were sure I am indeed scum and you are town, you would have done so and tried to secure a safe lynch for the town. However, you didn't. Instead, you stayed in the background, posted nothing since December 5th, 4:30 despite you being on at: 7:21, 9:35, 10:09, 11:23, 11:34, 13:37 (LOL 1337), and 14:09. Why wait until I call you out at 15:44 and post only at 16:23? There are a plethora of un-analyzed people. You could've easily posted about any of them. You could've posted your opinions on me, Node, KJ, Aidnai, but you didn't. Probably to not draw attention to yourself because, heck, as Divinek has shown, sometimes the easiest way to win for scum is to lurk. With that, good night. I'll be off for the next 9 hours.



i only post my reaction of you after you go on offense against me. i dont go through the hassle of checking every single post of somebody and analyze them unless i have a reason to.


On December 06 2010 04:12 annul wrote:
next, KJ tries to use our argument as a vehicle to suspect i am mafia? he is just as guilty - if not more so - of any beef we have. he started the garbage up in sengoku and he continues the garbage here. so he uses this as a predicate to attack me?

he is not the "insane detective". i am. and i know that node is a green. thats it, so why would i come out? waste of a DT really. but now the town wants to attack me and i need to save my ass. the ghrur/KJ connection is pretty obvious.

i have one check remaining, then i run out of DT power. keep me alive and tonight i will return a verdict on ghrur. KJ is very good at writing a whole bunch of convincing shit while being utterly incorrect and misleading - i know this for a 100% fact now. i was on his ass forever and now hes taking an opportunity to lynch me because i hate him. im not the mafia - he is. and so is ghrur, probably.

in the meanwhile because KJ is an obvious liar,

##vote kingjames01


On December 06 2010 05:01 annul wrote:
i said i only had that information, not that that was all i have checked. think about it, two nights to check, one target, hmmmm maybe one of my checks is dead?

LSB was my other check.

of course i am asking for a reprieve, because i am not mafia, and now i know for sure that you are. is there any other time in the game that a player is going to ask for a reprieve other than when people are on their ass for day lynch? think about it.

i hate you because you are ridiculously incendiary for no reason. your arguments are always very offensive, even if you deny this until the end. our fight in sengoku (which, by the way, your 50 pages of accusations turned out to be false, go figure)... our fighting here... all you do is cause problems. and ghrur conveniently overlooks the mutuality of it all. it really is interesting.

my "proof" is who do you believe more? there are two competing claims. you claimed insane DT and called me out. i am the true insane DT. i really do not know why you did this, because when i do flip town, you die tomorrow. its a weird sacrifice that i do not understand. but nevertheless, it is true; i am town, and if he is saying otherwise, he must be mafia.

also, you never showed "proof" either - you posted a chain of convenient situations that somehow makes you the insane DT. this is hilarious because now i know PRECISELY what you are capable of doing while red. any future games, i will trust you 0%.

so if i die today, when i flip blue (green i guess in this game ;\), look at KJ and look next at ghrur. and if i dont die today, i will check ghrur out tonight.

KJ has a history of making very long posts that sound great and look nice but ultimately are full of logical holes. do not let him win this time.


On December 06 2010 05:01 annul wrote:
and yes, i do run out of juice. when i am out of DT power i have other smaller things i can do.


On December 06 2010 05:59 annul wrote:
"ive been told" - what?

it was KJ who is pulling this garbage out this time. he is mafia and lying and is targeting me, specifically, because of the reaction he knows i will have.

yes, when i run out of juice i can do limited things. obviously i would say what they were if i didnt think it was a dumb idea to do so. presuming i do live i dont want people knowing what it is, because then they can possibly prevent it from happening.

furthermore, "the free pass to kill who i want" is fallacious. IF i were mafia (which i am not), mafia is going to be able to kill tonight all the same... so people are gonna die tonight no matter what, why would killing me (or, in the actual case, any mafia to begin with) stop that from happening?


On December 06 2010 06:38 annul wrote:
i do not fear the roleblock, that is not what i talk about when i say that people can avoid my ability.

assume i am mafia (i am not)... if you town lynch me today, you assume i cannot return to my mafia team and influence future actions? if i were mafia, i still win even if i am dead. i can still assist them with future night kill choices. or, you know, i could tell them today what i want to happen tonight, right? so really i demur that argument.

but of course, am not mafia. KJ is. and as to jcarl, isnt it much more likely that i defend myself when i am called a red by a DT when i am in fact the DT and i KNOW he is lying? not just suspect, but KNOW? think about it


On December 06 2010 08:39 annul wrote:
1. not giving you any more information. you are mafia, why would i tell you my thought processes?

2. it is as good a proof as anything you can produce.

3. hypnotist, as you claim it, is the same thing as an insane DT. you get to rolecheck someone at night and get the wrong information. this is an insane DT. dont try to argue like it isnt. does the town see what KJ does? i mean seriously this is ridic

4. i am an insane DT that has limited use and a minor set of abilities to choose from when i run out of these uses. as stated earlier, not going to explain to you (especially as you are mafia) what these minor abilities are. but nice try.


On December 06 2010 14:28 annul wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 06 2010 09:45 ghrur wrote:
Annul, at least counterclaim fully if you're going to say that you're the insane DT and not KJ. Right now, your counterclaim doesn't even give us enough information to believe you. What clue points to your role? What're your other minor abilities? Why does your role "run out of juice?" Why wouldn't you be willing to fully claim to kill a mafia member? What is the name of your role? Come on, unless you tell us all those, are you seriously expecting us to believe your counterclaim over KJ's claim? Furthermore, your description of a role is nowhere to be found on Mafia Wiki. From the roles seen before, every role has an equivalent on Mafia Wiki. Why would you suddenly get a mash-up of a temporary insane DT followed by random "weaker" powers that you won't even share with us? I think this is just a last ditch attempt to confuse town and escape from your lynch.

##Vote Annul



i dont fully counter claim because it is 7-3 now and i am playing for endgame. i am going to assume mafia has 2 KP and one of their night 1 was blocked (maybe a delayed kill like poison in haunted?). if i die, KJ dies anyway, so the argument of "fully claim to take down a mafia" isnt gonna work, since he is going down tomorrow no matter what when i flip town.

if i gave you the name of my role, then this will signal how to defeat my abilities.

my role runs out of juice because that is how drh set up the role? i have never seen this role before, ever. so it is new. i have multiple things i can do at night but the DT-type ability is most potent, so i use it.

i am sure there is somebody in the town who can help me defend myself. where are they?


On December 06 2010 15:43 annul wrote:
btw i actually thought it was 7-3, not 6-3, not like its some intentional deception when its obviously checkable on the OP (as i am pointed out to now)

oh wow. if i die we lose, the game is over.

the remaining players, the final voters need to think very very carefully about this lynch. when i die, assuming mafia has 2 KP, the game is over unless some medic save occurs.


On December 06 2010 15:45 annul wrote:
or we can lynch you and achieve the same effect, IF that is the effect it has on the KP.


On December 06 2010 15:47 annul wrote:
weeeeeell then.

i fucking hate you KJ lol

good luck scum!


In all of these posts, he doesn't actually support anyone so I can't link him to any other possible mafia.

However, he only attacks Fishball, myself and ghrur.

So the fact that he doesn't actually attack someone is not enough for me to choose that player to check tonight. I have my suspicions for a possible mafia. I'm pretty sure that this player is Red based on posts and behaviour this game but we'll find out after the Night is over. I have to choose to check someone secretly so that the mafia can't ruin my plan.

Also, I'm going to ask for protection from the Pharmacists. We need to keep the mafia guessing though, so randomly decide to protect yourself or me but don't reveal who you chose. That way they'll have a hard time deciding who to kill.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 06 2010 21:53 GMT
#775
On December 07 2010 06:40 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Point is, Aidnai could of been nailed in the coffin had Annul changed his vote.


That's true. Obviously I don't doubt your motives since we know you're Town. However, I cannot openly commit to choosing a specific target in the thread. If I announce who I will check, then the mafia could either switch my target to someone else or just kill that player rendering my action useless.

At the time I had my vote on orgolove and just after DrH posted the vote count you decided to vote for me. Also, if either of us changed our vote, we could have been the "nail in the coffin" since deconduo was waiting to cast the Hammer.

On December 01 2010 17:49 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Vote tally:

Aidnai - 6
Voters: Aeres, Barundar, RebirthOfLegend, ghrur, jcarlsoniv, noe

Coagulation - 2
Voters: orgolove, SouthRawrea

Fishball - 3
Voters: annul, Coagulation, aidnai,

RebirthOfLegend - 1
Voters: Fishball,

ghrur - 1
Voters: Pandain

orgolove - 1
Voters: kingjames27


On December 02 2010 01:07 ~OpZ~ wrote:
13 is zombie not brain surgeon. I don't want to discuss blues because they aren't important. What is important is finding scum. Now stop discussing them.
##Vote: kingjames01


Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 06 2010 22:10 GMT
#776
On December 07 2010 06:53 kingjames01 wrote:
That's true. Obviously I don't doubt your motives since we know you're Town. However, I cannot openly commit to choosing a specific target in the thread. If I announce who I will check, then the mafia could either switch my target to someone else or just kill that player rendering my action useless.


Alright, let me elaborate on my plan a little. I have two options but I won't reveal which one I will use.

Option 1:
  • Check aidnai tonight.
  • If aidnai is mafia, we lynch him tomorrow.
  • If aidnai is not mafia, we will have to analyze to find another suspect for the lynch.
  • Either way, I'll check my other suspect tomorrow night.


Option 2:
  • Check my other suspect tonight.
  • If my other suspect is mafia, we lynch the other suspect tomorrow. Then I check aidnai overnight.
  • If my other suspect is not mafia, we lynch aidnai tomorrow.


I have strong feelings for either option, but of course I won't discuss that before the results are revealed.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 06 2010 22:37 GMT
#777
When is the Day post going to come? Everything is so up in the air right now.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 06 2010 23:03 GMT
#780
The colours in the Night 3 post reminds me of Christmas... =)

I hope everyone gets their actions in soon! I'm really excited to see what happened.

We should coordinate so that everyone is online at the same time. Depending on what my check shows we could then all vote and not give mafia any time to react and form a defense. If we rush the day then we can get into another Night phase.

At the moment, the game is 5 Town to 2 Mafia. We're in very good shape especially since we have 1 player who is very likely to be mafia. I also have my eye another player who's posts have been full of logical holes.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 06 2010 23:14 GMT
#783
On December 07 2010 08:12 ghrur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2010 08:03 kingjames01 wrote:
The colours in the Night 3 post reminds me of Christmas... =)

I hope everyone gets their actions in soon! I'm really excited to see what happened.

We should coordinate so that everyone is online at the same time. Depending on what my check shows we could then all vote and not give mafia any time to react and form a defense. If we rush the day then we can get into another Night phase.

At the moment, the game is 5 Town to 2 Mafia. We're in very good shape especially since we have 1 player who is very likely to be mafia. I also have my eye another player who's posts have been full of logical holes.


I swear, if you get killed tonight, we're back to square one. I only have one suspect right now. =/


=) Well, I'm planning for just that scenario... I've been leaving clues around.

What happens to a house when the windows are left open?
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 06 2010 23:22 GMT
#784
If I were to be hit tonight, my secrets can be easily figured out. It's not like I hid them in a far-away, inaccessible location such as, Kehlsteinhaus.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 06 2010 23:24 GMT
#785
On December 07 2010 08:12 ghrur wrote:
I swear, if you get killed tonight, we're back to square one. I only have one suspect right now. =/


If I die tonight, do not let the war break out. That will only benefit mafia.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 07 2010 00:14 GMT
#787
Is anyone around? I don't want to announce the results of my check until I know we have enough voters here to secure a lynch. In the meantime, I'm going to go through this player's posts and look for connections to other members of the mafia.

Also, I received a pill last night which I took. Thanks to the pharmacist who kept me alive. =)
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 07 2010 01:03 GMT
#795
Sorry, I'm here. I took my dog for a walk. =)
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 07 2010 01:07 GMT
#796
If you look back at my last few posts, I was hinting at the name of the player of who I would be checking. I was basically just making suggest homonyms of the name Aeres.

I can't post the PM directly but to paraphrase, I visited Aeres at his house last night and hypnotized him. While he was under my spell he revealed that he was Green.

I looked through his posts and there are a lot of instances where he made very scummy posts. When I revealed my role and that annul was Red, he refused to take part in the discussion and never actually cast a vote.

[b]##Vote Aeres[\b]

Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 07 2010 01:08 GMT
#797
EBWODP:

If you look back at my last few posts, I was hinting at the name of the player of who I would be checking. I was basically just making suggest homonyms of the name Aeres.

I can't post the PM directly but to paraphrase, I visited Aeres at his house last night and hypnotized him. While he was under my spell he revealed that he was Green.

I looked through his posts and there are a lot of instances where he made very scummy posts. When I revealed my role and that annul was Red, he refused to take part in the discussion and never actually cast a vote.

##Vote Aeres
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 07 2010 01:16 GMT
#801
I think I know who the last person is based on both annul and Aeres' play.

I've gone through Aeres' posts and I'll compile them in my next post. For now I just wanted to point out his voting history:

Voted for aidnai.
Changed his vote to SouthRawrea and helped lynch our Psychic.

Voted for Fishball, our Priest.
His vote was cancelled and he voted for ~OpZ~, our Innocent Child.

When Fishball was lynched and deconduo was killed as well, he posted in an over-dramatic way about his disappointment with the situation.

When it was clear that annul was Red, he refused to vote and has not since returned to the thread.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 07 2010 01:35 GMT
#804
Here are all of Aeres' posts:

+ Show Spoiler +

On November 30 2010 10:12 Aeres wrote:
Woo, crisis averted!

Hey, guys. I'm new in town, need a place to stay. =O


On November 30 2010 10:14 Aeres wrote:
That is correct, deconduo. Glasse had to leave for unknown reasons, so I'll be subbing in.


On November 30 2010 10:17 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 10:17 deconduo wrote:
Hai Aeres o/

Lurkerz: Barun, RoL, Pandain

The game hasn't been on a long time though.

Yeah, I read what happened so far. Not too much, but that'll change with time.


On November 30 2010 23:27 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 20:39 Barundar wrote:
So if I understand this lover/sibling mechanic right, we have a group of players, not necessarily mafia, who will always try to swing votes away from each others? But they do not know if each others are town or mafia? Will make it harder to interpret vote swings >_<

I’ve read this + Show Spoiler +
On November 30 2010 13:07 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
To discuss the other roles in the OP I don't think there was an additional lover.
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 09:43 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Another student got his Pharmocology degree.
Somebody has been born anew with the power of love.



I think this acted as a conversion role. "born anew" implies a change in roles from one alignment to other, and since there is no third party and I doubt a mafia got converted by a townie, I think it means one of the mafia just recruited a townie against us. The way the town/mafia ratio is set up it doesn't give us initial start counts or anything, just tells us how much mafia there are in the game, assuming the conversion can't fail then it would be three regardless. I imagine the mafia can choose as to when they do it and the person they choose retains their power this would give the mafia incentive to WAIT on the conversation, but then it might be OP, so there might only be a certain amount of time they can wait for the conversion, but its mere speculation.

...

So to summarize, I think there is a mafia conversion power in the lover, judging by how it was used. A Vigi variant in the hooded man, and a possession power in the spirit role.
a few times, and I really don’t understand how to interpret the “with the power of love” part of the clue. Care to explain? I agree with the rest of the role assesments.

What's everyones thoughts on beggar? Some sort of information role?

I’m going to vote for Aidnai for now, his post does seem to paddle through the same sentences a few times on a closer look.

#vote Aidnai

PS: Pandain time to post :-)

About the "love" part, my guess is that it implies some sort of symbiosis with the other "lover"; perhaps this manifests itself in the form of being able to PM each other? The Doc did say that certain roles would be able to engage in private messaging.

As for beggar, I'm at a loss as well. You're probably correct in thinking it's an information role, but I wouldn't be able to guess much more than that.

RoL's analysis of Aidnai seems convincing enough. For now, my vote will stay on him, but as usual, this vote is still tentative.

##Vote Aidnai


On December 01 2010 01:27 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2010 01:21 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Two men with a third eye, one tells the truth and the other lies

Now this is interesting.

The "two men" part clearly means there are two players that this refers to. Having a "third eye" is often meant to imply some sort of extrasensory perception, a method of seeing past what normal people are capable of. In the case of Mafia, I would think the Third Eye allows the player to see the true alignment of a player.

One Eye lies, one tells the truth. Perhaps this means that one of the Third Eyes is sane, and the other is insane.

Of course, I doubt that in a game as crazy as the Doc wants it to be, there would be two roles that are identical in function and opposite in results. These "Third Eye" people must have some sort of difference in their roles besides the obvious "liar / truth-teller" dichotomy.


On December 01 2010 01:40 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2010 01:35 jcarlsoniv wrote:
On December 01 2010 01:27 Aeres wrote:
On December 01 2010 01:21 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Two men with a third eye, one tells the truth and the other lies

Now this is interesting.

The "two men" part clearly means there are two players that this refers to. Having a "third eye" is often meant to imply some sort of extrasensory perception, a method of seeing past what normal people are capable of. In the case of Mafia, I would think the Third Eye allows the player to see the true alignment of a player.

One Eye lies, one tells the truth. Perhaps this means that one of the Third Eyes is sane, and the other is insane.

Of course, I doubt that in a game as crazy as the Doc wants it to be, there would be two roles that are identical in function and opposite in results. These "Third Eye" people must have some sort of difference in their roles besides the obvious "liar / truth-teller" dichotomy.


Not necessarily. They could be exactly the same role, and one of them is sane, while the other is insane, but neither of them knows which one they are. This will cause a lot of mind grapes.

I'm aware that that possibly exists, but from what I know of the Doc's intentions here, he wants this whole GAME to be a mindfuck in terms of roles. Insane Mafia didn't have exact repeats of roles, and the Doc himself compared that game's intent to this one, so I don't feel like he'd dull the variety by inserting two near-identical roles when he could have two roles that are similar, but have subtle differences aside from the insanity factor.


On December 01 2010 04:58 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2010 04:48 orgolove wrote:
So. I was given express permission to post this (i.e. it's not a roleclaim) by DrH.


I was given PM notification that my first vote was invalidated and I have to switch my vote.


There are 2 possibilities:
1. There's some hidden mechanic in the game that nullifies a random vote each day (not likely)
2. or there is a blue/red role that can invalidate a vote


I'm leaning towards #2. Given the power of such a role, and given that it was done to reduce the number of votes in the co-leader to be lynched, I think it is likely that it is a mafia role.


So for now, I'm forced to switch, so I'm changing my vote to the default:

##Vote: Coagulation


But I consider Fishball to be highly, highly suspect.



*Note: I know that reds can now use this information as an excuse to change their votes later on. But if we can catch 1 mafia in day 1, I think it is all worth it.

A vote-invalidator? Sounds like the Booger role that Coagulation had in Insane, except the targeted voter can choose someone else to vote instead of being negated entirely. This'll make it difficult to reach a majority vote.

I'm interested, Orgolove: why do you say that Coagulation is the "default"?


On December 01 2010 05:04 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2010 05:01 orgolove wrote:
On December 01 2010 04:58 Aeres wrote:
I'm interested, Orgolove: why do you say that Coagulation is the "default"?


Because he's a spammer and pretty unlikely to be helpful to town given his past predispositions, whether he's a blue or a red. -_-

Coagulation may be blunt and sometimes hostile, but he's not an idiot. I don't think a policy lynch on Coag is the wisest move to make... but we'll see.


On December 01 2010 05:38 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2010 05:31 Pandain wrote:
hehe orgo why no comment?

...On what?


On December 01 2010 07:03 Aeres wrote:
Vote tally so far:

Aidnai - 3
Voters: Aeres, Barundar, RebirthOfLegend

Coagulation - 3
Voters: jcarlsoniv, orgolove, SouthRawrea

Fishball - 2
Voters: annul, Coagulation

RebirthOfLegend - 2
Voters: Fishball, ghrur

ghrur - 1
Voters: Pandain

orgolove - 1
Voters: kingjames27


On December 01 2010 07:03 Aeres wrote:
C'mon, guys, our votes are way too divided right now. We need to find some solid candidates instead of voting purely based on hearsay and OMGUS.


On December 02 2010 02:18 Aeres wrote:
To be honest, my vote on Aidnai was because I was following the lead of a more experienced player (RoL) who seemed to know what he was talking about. Since I've been really busy for the last few hours, I hadn't gotten around to changing my vote, despite that being on my itinerary. I'll unvote for now, but I don't have any solid clues on who to vote for now, so for the time being, I shall abstain.

##Unvote Aidnai

God, it's gonna take a while to end the day.


On December 02 2010 09:37 Aeres wrote:
For lack of a better plan, I'm gonna vote for SouthRawrea to make him talk at the very least, and maybe move the day forward like jcarlsoniv said.

##Vote SouthRawrea

I just wish all this passive agreement didn't make me look like a sheep, because I sure do feel like one right now... =(

+ Show Spoiler +
It's shear humiliation! *rimshot*


On December 02 2010 09:39 Aeres wrote:
So, does this mean deconduo is the "hammer"?


On December 03 2010 01:53 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2010 01:33 Barundar wrote:
On December 01 2010 12:15 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Sometimes the hammer strikes back

and it almost struck evil

Aidnai had 6 votes, so only needed one town vote before Decon would be forced to vote him. "strike back"

This might be me being thrown by a red herring, but this post from the Doc makes me suspicious of Aidnai. If Deconduo's "hammer" role is as Barundar claims, one more vote would have effectively lynched Aidnai. The part saying "and it almost struck evil" makes me think that we were very close to lynching a Mafioso. The hammer was almost forced to take down Aidnai, who is possibly the "evil" referred to in this post.


On December 03 2010 01:58 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2010 01:56 kingjames01 wrote:
On December 03 2010 01:43 Fishball wrote:
On December 03 2010 01:26 Barundar wrote:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=7144843

A lot of people was suspicious, but difference is they didn't execute someone else as soon as they had the chance. Earlier you posted:
Next, regular vote counts are really important in a majority lynch game, by losing count someone can get lynched a lot easier than you'd think. ESPECIALLY as there are probably vote manipulation roles.

Seems counter-intuitive to rush-lynch someone then?

If you are mafia it would make sense to claim ASAP, since the last vote is always going to be suspicious, something a mafia would hate.

In any case I haven’t forgotten this discussion was started by Fishball, who magicly vanished again. I would still like to hear your thoughts on this though Decon, we haven’t seen anything concrete from you yet, except the roleclaim, but that doesn’t seem to scare you?


Yes I'm magical.
In my little magical world, I sit in an office most of the time and "work".

Wait.
What roleclaim? Oh you mean the comments I had for deconduo's roleclaim?
Scare me? Why so scared? I no scared!


Fishball, you seem to be repeating yourself a lot. Are you feeling sick? Is it contagious?

Are you saying that Fishball's posts might be limited by some kind of infection role? As if he was delusional?


On December 03 2010 06:16 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2010 06:05 annul wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
hey peeps,

allow me to interject the awesomeness of this game to advertise the fact that HARRY POTTER MAFIA is forming! it will go down once salem finishes. i really like the role list and setup for this one (i am biased of course) and it will be pwnage and awesome.

go go play sign up lets rock this biiiitch <3

Leave your advertising out of this thread, please. You have a thread for your game already, so the information is available to anyone. Trying to bring attention to it here is essentially spamming the thread, and we've done enough of that.


On December 04 2010 02:36 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 04 2010 02:31 deconduo wrote:
On December 04 2010 02:30 Barundar wrote:
Would speeder fit Fishballs role, since he cannot die?

If your role says you have a radar gun then its 99.9% that the speeding clue refers to you.

Are you sure? The clue says that someone was CAUGHT speeding, not that somebody caught someone ELSE who was speeding. Probably just a matter of semantics, but I thought it was worth bringing up.


On December 04 2010 03:11 Aeres wrote:
After reading Orgolove's post, I'm inclined to agree that Fishball is definitely acting unusually. Perhaps it's not conclusive evidence yet, but this inconsistency with Jcarlsoniv and Fishball is of too much import to ignore. That, and Fishball's not acting in the interest of town, which is a red flag right there. I'm going to vote for him, until/unless future events cause me to rethink this.

##Vote Fishball

I apologize for lurking and not contributing as often as I should, but I've been sick for the past day, so my mind's a bit cloudy. Once I get better, I'll stop the bandwagoning and actually do shit for once. = /


On December 04 2010 03:15 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 04 2010 03:11 Fishball wrote:
On December 04 2010 03:00 orgolove wrote:
I mean it's highly UNLIKELY that both are lying compared to just fishball who's in a web of lies.

And I bet he's going to come back any second now despite
On December 04 2010 00:31 Fishball wrote:
Anyways people, I'll be gone for a while, so I'll leave the discussion to you guys.


I check the thread periodically in between work, I'm in the office and the computer is right in front. It's not like I have to run 10 miles to reply.
I do this every game. You played with me last game, you know my pattern. All of a sudden you're questioning this? Also, "a while" is a relevant thing. Right now you're trying so hard, its really funny from my perspective.

Hmm, I wonder if Zombie is a Town Aligned role or not

Why wouldn't it be town-aligned? Why would Mafia knowingly try to nightkill one of their own? It makes no sense, unless you're insinuating that it was a way to try and convince town that Orgolove was one of the good guys, and that's pretty deep into WiFoM territory.

I don't like how you're evading Coagulation's requests so blatantly, either. Something's not right about you.


On December 04 2010 03:28 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 04 2010 03:22 Coagulation wrote:
I know drh likes to talk about roles where if someone gets lynched then they are converted to mafia.
hes already said hes rooting for mafia in this one
Fishball will be changed to mafia if hes lynched.
Its 100% clear he wants lynched
And its 100% clear that he does not want me to get the information to help town.

That seems pretty unlikely; if it's true, than we might as well have considered this game to have 4 Mafia all along, with Fishball just being able to disrupt the town openly. That seems pretty OP, even for an experimental game. It doesn't help that you're basing this on speculation.

If you're right, though, it just means we have a surefire scum that we can nightkill. And furthermore, this makes me doubt if that vote-blocker thing is actually a role, or just a random event; that role is more of a Mafia thing, so if the vote-blocker is scum, why use it to keep a lynch off a person that benefits Mafia if lynched?


On December 04 2010 03:39 Aeres wrote:
What the fuck.

I just got a PM from the Doc. Apparently, my vote was invalidated due to "corruption", so I have to change my vote...

Orgolove, is this what happened to you?

##Unvote Fishball for now, I guess.


On December 04 2010 04:35 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 04 2010 04:30 kingjames01 wrote:
Also, it's very interesting that both votes lost due to corruption were both on Fishball.

I'm not so sure. I've been thinking about it a bit, and both corruptions were made when Fishball was the person with the most votes against him. I think that this vote blocking crap is just a random occurrence that maybe doesn't have anything to do with Fishball, as far as his role is concerned, and Fishball was protected simply due to the majority of votes being on him at the time.

What I think is going on is that at the beginning of the day, the Doc uses an RNG to pick a random player. That player will have his vote blocked, and will receive the PM once the Doc has free time at work or something.

This is only what I have by going off of the incidents with Orgolove and I, however. Perhaps I can detect a meaningful trend should this occur on Day 3.


On December 04 2010 05:00 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 04 2010 04:55 annul wrote:
three options:

1. he is mafia. good lynch
2. he is spirit. good lynch.
3. he is neither. not that good a lynch, but what are the odds he is #3?

##vote fishball

Why is it necessarily a good thing to lynch Fishball if he's a spirit? He's not really acting in town's interest right now, so why give him more powers if we're not sure they'll benefit us?

Something seems off about this post, but I can't put my finger on it.


On December 04 2010 05:18 Aeres wrote:
##Vote ~OpZ~ for reasons stated by Walrus-Shopper.


On December 04 2010 05:26 Aeres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 04 2010 05:24 annul wrote:
orgolove, you assume that it is a mafia role that nullifies the vote.

i think it is a part of his ability. since he wants to be town lynched, it is a detriment to his ability to make it harder for him to be town lynched. remember the clue says "the SYSTEM is corrupt" in all 4 colors. makes me think its a neutral occurrence. or maybe, even, the first to get to 4 gets a vote taken off of them (as happened last time).

Hmm... I hadn't considered this before. It does make sense, and would adequately explain why both votes that were redirected were on Fishball. If this trend doesn't deviate on Day 3, then I feel we can place some degree of trust in this.


On December 04 2010 05:32 Aeres wrote:
I agree, Kingjames01. There are too many inconsistencies, too many things that don't add up. I can't vote for him today, but consider my vote to be on him in spirit.


On December 04 2010 10:15 Aeres wrote:
I vote to lynch ~OpZ~ anyway. I hate crying children.


On December 04 2010 10:19 Aeres wrote:
....Fuck.

Fucking fuck.


On December 04 2010 10:21 Aeres wrote:
What were we supposed to have done in that situation? Fishball was more of a detriment than an asset to the town, but there was no way to get rid of him barring two town deaths.

Doc, you suck.


On December 04 2010 10:24 Aeres wrote:
No, you'd still suck because the Priest is a shitty-ass role. =(


On December 04 2010 10:24 Aeres wrote:
And you gave it to a player who wasn't all that fond about winning.


On December 04 2010 10:26 Aeres wrote:
Also, wasn't Deconduo the only person that could've been the hammer? So, town was fucked either way.


On December 06 2010 05:15 Aeres wrote:
I'm really sorry that I haven't been posting anything lately. I assure you, though, I have been reading the thread, so I'm aware of what's going on.

Show nested quote +
On December 05 2010 15:44 ghrur wrote:
For aeres, I feel aside from a few posts here, he hasn't been scummy:

+ Show Spoiler [aeres] +


About the "love" part, my guess is that it implies some sort of symbiosis with the other "lover"; perhaps this manifests itself in the form of being able to PM each other? The Doc did say that certain roles would be able to engage in private messaging.

As for beggar, I'm at a loss as well. You're probably correct in thinking it's an information role, but I wouldn't be able to guess much more than that.

RoL's analysis of Aidnai seems convincing enough. For now, my vote will stay on him, but as usual, this vote is still tentative.

##Vote Aidnai

To be honest, my vote on Aidnai was because I was following the lead of a more experienced player (RoL) who seemed to know what he was talking about. Since I've been really busy for the last few hours, I hadn't gotten around to changing my vote, despite that being on my itinerary. I'll unvote for now, but I don't have any solid clues on who to vote for now, so for the time being, I shall abstain.

##Unvote Aidnai

God, it's gonna take a while to end the day.


Votes Aidnai only because of following RoL/more experienced player.

C'mon, guys, our votes are way too divided right now. We need to find some solid candidates instead of voting purely based on hearsay and OMGUS.


He says we should scumhunt instead of going off OMGUS, yet he never does it himself.

For lack of a better plan, I'm gonna vote for SouthRawrea to make him talk at the very least, and maybe move the day forward like jcarlsoniv said.

##Vote SouthRawrea

I just wish all this passive agreement didn't make me look like a sheep, because I sure do feel like one right now... =(


Not really too scummy, but votes SouthRawrea for no reason really, and ends up securing the bandwagon for Decond's first axe.

After reading Orgolove's post, I'm inclined to agree that Fishball is definitely acting unusually. Perhaps it's not conclusive evidence yet, but this inconsistency with Jcarlsoniv and Fishball is of too much import to ignore. That, and Fishball's not acting in the interest of town, which is a red flag right there. I'm going to vote for him, until/unless future events cause me to rethink this.

##Vote Fishball

I apologize for lurking and not contributing as often as I should, but I've been sick for the past day, so my mind's a bit cloudy. Once I get better, I'll stop the bandwagoning and actually do shit for once. = /


Once again votes with other's analyses. Doesn't really do his own on people.

##Vote ~OpZ~ for reasons stated by Walrus-Shopper.
Once again votes because of someone else's reasoning.

....Fuck.

Fucking fuck.

And an overreaction on the day post. Although, this is explainable because that was really screwed up. >_<

And since then, he hasn't posted... which is strangely weird. I feel like he has scummy posts, but I also feel like his other posts are helping to contribute by analyzing the hints. This is different than annul who basically posted nothing, and accused using the same info again and again. Aeres seems more like unsure about who he wants to vote/unsure of his ideas instead of trying to hide information.

That last part, in bold, is essentially spot on. I confess I'm not very good at analysis, and what analysis I write up tends to be based more on speculation and "what if?"s than something that the town can come to a consensus on. Because of that, I tend not to post what I think of players, since what I have written up isn't about to convince anyone, and sometimes not even myself. It's definitely something I should work on, I know. Lack of confidence hurts in a game based on deception. = /

And I feel the overreaction to the day post is justified, considering the outcome.

But enough QQ'ing. I'll see what I can come up with for legitimate analysis in a while.



As you can see for yourself, his behaviour this game clearly shows his alignment. Also, I'm pretty sure that the last remaining mafia player is aidnai.

Tonight I'll check him and we'll win in the lynch tomorrow. =)!
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 07 2010 01:51 GMT
#807
Well, the action that I requested last night was to Hynotize Aeres. The PM from DrH indicated that he is Green.

My first check said that ~OpZ~ was Red.
At this point I was not sure about my sanity.
Then ~OpZ~ was revealed to be the Innocent Child.

My second check showed that annul was Green.

These checks are the proof that I need that Aeres is Red.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
December 07 2010 01:59 GMT
#810
Well, aidnai has not actually contributed to the success of the town this whole game. He has continually raised the suspicion of other players but somehow was never lynched.

annul never took sides on the innocence of aidnai.

Aeres voted to lynch aidnai Day 1 but retracted his vote when it became clear that aidnai was close to being lynched.

Also, I trust everyone else left in the game. I think that you have all shown yourselves to be pro-town. Only one person was lurking but I figured out that he was one of the Town Pharmacists on Day 1 based on a clue that he left.

Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
18:00
Grand Finals
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
CosmosSc2 117
JuggernautJason94
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 269
Hyun 51
Aegong 25
League of Legends
Grubby7534
Dendi1289
Counter-Strike
fl0m2403
Stewie2K1095
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox2398
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu658
Other Games
tarik_tv15677
gofns9858
summit1g5293
FrodaN3856
shahzam287
ToD239
Skadoodle207
Sick44
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2273
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 90
• HerbMon 29
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21981
• Ler118
Other Games
• imaqtpie1967
• Shiphtur349
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
1d 12h
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
2 days
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.