Edit: looks like I'll be a replacement :/
/in please
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Edit: looks like I'll be a replacement :/ /in please | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + maybe please please ![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On October 29 2010 12:44 Coagulation wrote: bumatlarge. as a campaigning candidate for mayor what is your political stance on bandwagoning are you pro Bandwagon or Anti bandwagon plz explain This made me think, Pandain and bumatlarge currently have the most votes (for whatever that's worth) so perhaps they should have a mini debate where they answer questions from the voters (no mafia allowed :D). I would like to ask both candidates their positions on role claiming, when (if ever) is role claiming neccesary? If you believe role claiming is necessary then how would you factor in not knowing all of the roles in this game? | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
I'm not saying you are mafia I just think your strategy is too dangerous right off the bat. I have no doubt a town circle will coalesce later but for now I'm sticking with either bum or pandain for mayor (still haven't made up my mind). | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On October 29 2010 15:21 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Show nested quote + On October 29 2010 15:15 infinitestory wrote: On October 29 2010 15:11 DoctorHelvetica wrote: omg guys what if fishball bumatlarge are both scum and bumatlarge backed out so that when fishball flips scum he'll look town can you explain why under these circumstances bum would look town i didnt think that out very well TT Perhaps they are both scum and bum announced so fast so that fish had time to prepare his statement and now bum backs out since fish is ready. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
my problem is this. If we elect you as mayor.. you will have communications with people outside of this thread(pm) that will influence the game and could be extremely vital to scum hunting. I would rather have a mayor that has transparency.. any communications he makes will be public so we can keep an eye on him. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
There's plenty of time to vote for mayor so I'm going to think long and hard about this. Dr. H is looking pretty good right now but I may go back to Pandain depending on how Dr. H's candidacy changes things. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Honestly I feel the same way Ace and BrownBear do, I'd love to have one of the people who isn't actively running be the mayor. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Can't trust Fishball because his "circle" refuses to come forward making his statement seem false Can't trust Bumatlarge because of his fast entry and even faster withdrawal once Fishball entered the race I don't have a reason to distrust Doc H that is worse than the reasons I distrust the other candidates. Doc gets my vote for now. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On October 31 2010 05:30 jcarlsoniv wrote: One thing I want to point out: From voting thread. Kenpachi has not posted once since the game started. Let's keep a closer eye on lurkers than we did in Haunted. I started a list of lurkers but it's as home, if a list isn't posted by 8 or so tonigh when I get home I'll post mine. Another quick reason why to vote for doc, he's already stated his day one lynch would be youngminii who so far has been the scummiest player. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Youngminii: scummy posting Kenpachi: stealth voting And I still have this lingering suspicion of bumatlarge and fishball, this is probably me just being paranoid but I feel like they are related somehow. Also youngminii supports fishball, and bumatlarge has a bandwagon that uses the same platform pandain did (the "I'm not fishball" platform). These are probably baseless and I'm just inexperienced but... They just make me nervous. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
I'm actually a little unsure why you don't like that post. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On October 31 2010 08:41 NB wrote: Show nested quote + On October 31 2010 08:37 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Have we solidified a day one lynch? I feel like this should be our highest priority right now, we've only got a few hours left. I'm still suggesting youngminii because of his scummish posts. Although I feel like Kenpachi would be a good lynch as well, the possibility that he's afk or something gives him enough reasonable doubt that I don't think he should go day one. i asked the GM... he said mayor get to lynch 1 person day1, from day2 on its voting Yeah I know but Doc said that he wanted to hear from the town about who they thought was a good target. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On October 31 2010 12:18 Fishball wrote: Show nested quote + On October 31 2010 12:16 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: I think Fishball should be the highest priority for medics tonight, his circle just got about a thousand times safer, there still might be mafia in it but it'll be really easy to find the leak with only 3 (I think?) members left. As much as I appreciate the concern, what the hell do you mean "you think"? My post is just 6 above yours, on the same page... You should already know that I'm keeping an eye on you. Shit >_>... this makes me look really stupid at best and really red at worst. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Gonna spoiler the next part because it's pretty far fetched + Show Spoiler + Could DocH be the elder and not know it? So far he's the only person to have confirmed interaction with jcarl | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 02 2010 08:48 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Youngminii First post: Show nested quote + On October 29 2010 14:55 youngminii wrote: I buy fishball's story. I don't buy bum's. This was fishy because he made no attempt to back this up. However I felt that a vote for fishball was less fishy than a last minute change from fishball to me so I made SiNiquity my #1 vote target. After SiNiquity martyred himself I switched back to youngminii, who dodged the lynch and SiNiquity died. I'll talk about the lynch dodge later. Show nested quote + On October 31 2010 19:50 youngminii wrote: hi Sorry for not having been on in a while, I've been away from a computer for a bit (did not know it was going to happen). I'll skim the thread before I say anymore. It's too hard to tell a good excuse for inactivity for a bad one. This is nonconclusive. I will say this. Mafia's favorite thing to do is to make a player look suspicious because "he is making an excuse for being inactive" or because "oh they're inactive". So many players are usually inactive in a game mafia just has to swing the inactive bandwagon on to a blue player. In a normal set-up inactive players often have power roles and post rarely in the thread in fear that they'll somehow out themselves to the mafia. Be wary of hyperfocus on inactive players. Show nested quote + On October 31 2010 20:20 youngminii wrote: oh god that was a shitfest, i didn't read everything to the full but i got the general gist of what's going on Before you ask me to do something stupid like roleclaim, ask yourselves: Why in God's name would scum have an ability that allows them to not die? Lynches always bypass the 'oh this guy has two lives' thing anyway. Why would I not try to defend myself after being pressured for so long? If you thought I was biding my time so that someone could try to take the attention away from me, why didn't anyone? DrH I'm surprised you didn't think of the second question. Also, a whole lot of your reasoning for your accusations in this thread comes from the metagame, which is stupid because some people like not playing the same style every single game. Stop relying on the metagame, especially if you've only seen me play *once*. Hang on, your reasoning is flawed anyway because if you actually used the metagame, you would have seen my active posting in Haunted Mafia as scum. Why in the world would you still try and get me lynched? Unlynchable/Judas can just as well be a mafia role as a town role. The bold part struck me as strange because I think youngminii knows better than to use such a WIFOM argument. His second part "lynches bypass the two lives thing" is irrelevant. Obviously that is not his role since he dodged the lynch. He paints me as relying on the metagame, which is not the case. I've referred to it and used it in my analysis, I haven't relied on it. I don't feel the metagame should be totally ignored. We as a town agreed to lynch an inactive on the first day and I felt that YM was the most suspicious amongst the inactives. It's simple. I responded to his post and this argument didn't really go anywhere. Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 03:42 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 01:44 Pandain wrote: On October 31 2010 20:20 youngminii wrote: oh god that was a shitfest, i didn't read everything to the full but i got the general gist of what's going on Before you ask me to do something stupid like roleclaim, ask yourselves: Why in God's name would scum have an ability that allows them to not die? Lynches always bypass the 'oh this guy has two lives' thing anyway. Why would I not try to defend myself after being pressured for so long? If you thought I was biding my time so that someone could try to take the attention away from me, why didn't anyone? DrH I'm surprised you didn't think of the second question. Also, a whole lot of your reasoning for your accusations in this thread comes from the metagame, which is stupid because some people like not playing the same style every single game. Stop relying on the metagame, especially if you've only seen me play *once*. Hang on, your reasoning is flawed anyway because if you actually used the metagame, you would have seen my active posting in Haunted Mafia as scum. Why in the world would you still try and get me lynched? We're not asking you to roleclaim per se, we're asking you to explain why you were the lynch target, and you survived. No comment. Nevermind, you are correct. I misstated: The bodyguard prevents the Mayor from being hit, either during day or during night, and can't die except by Murrayitis or getting lynched. Doesn't that mean the bodyguard can't get hit at night by scum anyway? Pandain basically says here "We don't want you to roleclaim just tell us about your role and why you didn't die (aka roleclaim plz)". Youngminii doesn't fall into this potential trap and doesn't comment. Good. Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 04:07 youngminii wrote: Seriously Pandain? The lynch is the town's greatest weapon, you can't make scum immune to lynches without making the game horribly imbalanced. In any case, why don't you think about it carefully before telling me to claim? If I'm invincible, no one will believe me. If I'm immune to lynches, mafia will kill me. If I'm able to manipulate something, that will make me just as suspicious as I am now. Stop being an idiot and play the game properly. You always do this over-analytical crap which doesn't work. Go back a step and think before you post. Maybe you should start with the first post where clearly says PMs are not allowed. His point here is good. The town has nothing to gain from youngminii roleclaiming at this point. what they do have is a potentially good role to lose. Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 04:17 youngminii wrote: He didn't PM me, he seems to be using "why aren't you PMing others" as an argument. If you can't explain in thread, then I would suggest we somehow incorporate youngminii into a pming circle I don't want him to claim in thread if it hurts(thus through pms) and I don't even want him to claim entirely Sorry Pandain, you're not an idiot, your arguments are. I know you didn't read the thread entirely, so I'll just tell you it's already known by know there are roles where pms are allowed. If you're invincible, town(at least me) is not going to be like "wtf". If your immune, well then actually we might let you die if it will help other roles live So you're assuming that I can PM people and your argument is that I should be roleclaiming through PMs? And please, tell me how letting me die is a good thing? Back up your arguments. In any case, your posts have been hugely scummy to me, but then again they always are. I've never been in a mafia game where you've given solid arguments as a townie. YoungMinii doesn't seem to like Pandain D: (then again I guess you could say the same thing about me times a billion in this thread.) Pandain is pretty clearly trying to backtrack his way out of the fact that he was rolefishing here. YoungMinii does a good job of explaining why he disagrees with Pandain but is being quite harsh. I can confirm from watching his behind the scenes play in haunted mafia that youngminii is just a harsh dude, it's part of his personality. I thought he and quickstriker were gonna kill eachother in irc D: Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 04:22 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 04:20 Artanis[Xp] wrote: f a player is "gone for the night", would that player also be able to protect me if they were a bodyguard that same night? If Aeres hypothetically is the second bodyguard and my other bodyguard is dead: Aeres leaves for the night and the mafia hits me. Do I survive? This is a question too hypothetical to answer as it would require me to confirm or deny roles and give too much information away. Translation: Aeres is scum and he's making up the role. By answering this question, I would be confirming the existence of the fake role and as such, I can't give a real answer. Maybe. Drawing way too heavy of a conclusion from that post already. This is a pretty early accusation of Aeres and it's interesting to note that it came before Ace essentially started the Aeres bandwagon. If the mafia wanted to kill Aeres, why would the focus on him so specifically? Why would they continue this focus after Aeres came out as not being bodyguard. If Aeres is town, it's pretty simple. He's the easiest target to lynch because he lied and admitted it. This is before Aeres lied though. However Aeres claims were very suspicious and youngminii's suspicions aren't poorly founded. I wasn't necessarily convinced that he was a bodyguard but I did want to believe it (as having 2 bg's would be nice D ![]() [r]This is where I start to disagree, YM is gunning for someone right now, and it feels like he is just dying to start a bandwagon. What a better way than to post something inflammatory like “Aeres is scum”, this is bound to cause controversy because Aeres hasn’t been proved lying and even though he it is discovered he lied later I still think YM is WAY to focused on starting a bandwagon against Aeres.[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 04:28 youngminii wrote: Yeah but that's just saying "IF there's a role like the one Aeres is claiming then it would be so" On November 01 2010 04:24 Aeres wrote: On November 01 2010 04:21 infinitestory wrote: I hope that DC actually isn't a Bodyguard as he implied. If he wasn't, that means there's still a hidden Bodyguard out there, and I can stall for time while the Mafia searches for the hidden one. In that period, we can coalesce into a more organized town and start trying to get at the Mafia.On November 01 2010 04:16 Aeres wrote: On November 01 2010 04:14 DoctorHelvetica wrote: i was just thinking "why the fuck would you do that oh my god" but then I read the rest of your post and that you can survive a short while without medics. I'm not sure it was necessary to claim. If the Mafia thought the only bodyguard was dead, they might waste hits on me, even stack them. Yeah, I might have been a bit hasty, but I can at least control the times I am vulnerable and the times I am not. I would think that the time stalled for by roleclaiming would be equal to the time stalled by Mafia hitting you in vain. I don't know whether Artanis would give us such a blatant lie, i.e. about the number of bodyguards. If you are, as you claim, a bodyguard, then I think that makes DCXLVI highly suspicious. Why are you so sure there are 2 bodyguards? Wasn't your logic behind the 1 bodyguard theory based on the assumption that DCX is a bodyguard? I want to ask you guys something too. Would it be a good idea to analyze the Murrayitis's mechanics and how it would affect the game in the long run? I think I find it's interesting but I'm not sure if other players agree or not. I don't see why not. Putting a lot of pressure on Aeres here, but it comes off as sensible to me. Aeres roleclaim was illogical and youngminii is catching him in some inconsistent claims. This is a good town post if you ask me. [r]You see Aeres’ role claim as illogical but I considered doing the same thing. I really didn’t think it would cause the hubbub it did when Aeres did so I’m glad I didn’t but just the same to a new player it seems like a sensible thing to do. The body guard is revealed so hey, I’ll claim to throw the mafia off.[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 04:46 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 04:24 Aeres wrote:I hope that DC actually isn't a Bodyguard as he implied. If he wasn't, that means there's still a hidden Bodyguard out there, and I can stall for time while the Mafia searches for the hidden one. In that period, we can coalesce into a more organized town and start trying to get at the Mafia. Why would you say this if you only think there are 2 bodyguards because of dcx's 'claim'? Good catch. Why would Aeres say this? [r]Again from a new players perspective Aeres is making a lot of sense, I would have said the same thing in his position.[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 10:28 youngminii wrote: Okay I don't care what's going on right now since it doesn't seem to be anything of great substance. Why is no one pointing their finger at Aeres? Did you not read the night post? A bodyguard died (Annul). Now according to LSB/Artanis, there's only one bodyguard. Maybe he's lying but if he is, we're still operating under the assumption that DCL softclaimed bodyguard. So that makes 3 in total. Aeres's claim never made sense to me anyway, and the scumtells that he dropped (oh hey I'm assuming there's two bodyguards because of DCL's softclaim.. But what if DCL isn't a bodyguard? Who's the other one?). It almost looked as if Aeres was trying to gain our trust, make us lose trust in DCL and weed out any other bodyguards that may have tried to claim. this is an improtant part of the post because it points out a possible mafia motivation for Aeres' actions. The people jumping on the youngminii bandwagon have tried to claim that "Aeres play makes sense as town not mafia" when it's been demonstrated a few times that's not really quite the case. [r]Okay fair enough but I don’t know what youngminii bandwagon you’re talking about, at this point there are no votes for YM (in fact I’m the first vote which is almost 7 hours away).[/r] Lynch All Liarsss [r]Sounds so good on paper right? LAL, great pro town catch phrase. But everyone lies a little bit in mafia and this is just and inflammatory post against Aeres.[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 12:14 youngminii wrote: Pandain, slow down. Stop posting. Stop spamming the thread with long but useless information. DrH, stop replying to his 'arguments'. You'll just detract from other, more important issues. Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 12:17 youngminii wrote: Sure that's important. The arguments being put forward (mainly by Pandain) are not important. They are useless, misguided and nothing will be brought up out of them. The only thing they might be able to do is convince some people to vote for DrH without any conclusive evidence. Focus on Aeres. In case you don't know, LAL = Lynch All Liars. Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 12:22 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 12:21 Pandain wrote: Alright, I think just a series of reasonable questions will help express my point. Actually, sometimes I can't express an argument in question form so :/ On November 01 2010 12:04 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Doesn't really mean anything. If the insanity thing was such a big deal people could have switched bandwagons. The problem is the insanity thing applies to everyone and it isn't a point against me, it's just a part of this game that must be considered. 1.There were only two hours left 2. A major factor is that no one can even say if you actually used your role. The person who you claimed to have poked says he received no such thing. Now you defend yourself by saying you could've been roleblocked, or he could've been bussed. The first point is okay, but negated for reasons later expressed below. The second point is just illogical. It is more logical to assume you are mafia than that jcarl just happened to get bussed. Everything adds up Pandain. How could that kind of a role even have an insane aspect? Well we could start with the intial concern from infinitestory that my poke transfers murrayitis to a person. Perhaps the poke doesn't confirm itself to the other player but does tell me if they have murrayitis. Perhaps my poke only has a certain chance of going through. There are many possibilities here Pandain, am I really supposed to believe you couldn't think of 1? Point is it didn't even happen Yeah, it is. That is the importance of my role as I understand it and as it is described in my role PM. What else do I have to go off of? Would you like me to tell you the importance of my role in an insane variation which I have no way of predicting or knowing? Exactly! So why are you running if your role has a high chance of being unimportant. You claim its to soak up POTENTIAL roleblockers, but any townie could run and do just that. You're attacking me for defending him. Let me call it a chainsaw defense, which is even worse. What theory doesn't make sense? It doesn't make sense that jcarls could have lied? You're not even considering that? In order to bring up the possibility that he might not be telling the truth I have to also accuse him of being mafia? Wow dude I never thought you would make such awful points. Yes, it doesn't make sense for jcarl to lie. You yourself think he hasn't, and yet you critizice me for defending just that. I have considered it, but consider it highly more likely you are just scum. My poke didn't go through to him and you all want to know why. So I'm telling you all the ways this could be possible and jcarls telling a lie is one of these things. It's a possibility among many that I have offered and it is the one I am pursuing the least and even calling the least likely. Just drop it. I never accused jcarls and your clown-ass arguments aren't coming anywhere close to making it look like I did.' Why did you lie to us if you knew this could happen. Why did you continue to claim you could be 100% confirmed Why would wasting a potential roleblocker's use on one night outweigh having an unconfirmed mayor who's lied. I didn't lie to get elected. I had no reason to distrust the mods and never truly considered the possibility that my role was insane when I was talking about 100% confirmation. I intentionally withheld information because I didn't want the mafia to consider the possiblity that I would be soaking up roleblocks they might have. This is a "lie" designed to benefit town. You start with "I didn't lie to get elected" and end with "this is a lie designed to benefit town." You claimed you would be 100% confirmed, now you claim you knew this would not happen. I did ditch the 100% thing. I consistently recognized the possibility that I would be insane and offered checks against it to the town. see the quote STOP He is very insistent on ending the argument I'm having with Pandain. Now I agree Pandain's arguments were illogical and dumb, but his intense focus on the Aeres bandwagon is something people brought up as suspicious. Why is it suspicious? Mafia don't focus down on a target like that unless they REALLY want them dead, especially this early in the game when their voting power isn't that strong. Mafia change their targets to what they think is the easiest, what's gonna bring the least criticism on them, what arguments does the town want to hear? A townie has every reason to focus down on the player they most suspect, since it is essential that scumlynches occur. Anything else could very well be mafia noise and distraction. Attempts to discredit focus don't cut it for me. [r]It’s suspicious because of his single mindedness, and of how little substance his posts have. He has had some good points but a lot of what he’s said is inflammatory and meant to rile up the town. I’m going to say it right now, I’m not experience at mafia so most of my arguments are face value, I wasn’t in haunted IRC so I don’t knew how he operates. From my perspective it looks like he’s trying to get an Aeres bandwagon started without considering everything.[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 12:31 youngminii wrote: His 'lies' are more like promises that turned out to be untrue due to unforeseen circumstances. Do you not see what's happening? Someone: So DrH I think you might be lying because of x DrH: Well I wasn't lying but y happened so it looks like I was lying about x but there might also be the possibility of z (ie. he's covering all bases) Pandain: So you expect us to believe you about y AND z? How convenient that you came up with them (then he goes back to the original arguments that DrH already covered) Just stop it. This is a good post. Pandain never responded though of course. [r]Good post because it’s bashing Pandain who you currently have a beef with.[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 12:43 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 12:40 Nemesis wrote: Damn this has turned into a shitfest. Can we please stop with all these "what ifs" bullshit? I guess important thing right now is who I am going to lynch, then I'm sleeping. Aeres, kgo. Continual focus on Aeres [r]Without any supporting evidence.[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 12:45 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 12:36 infinitestory wrote: On November 01 2010 12:31 youngminii wrote: His 'lies' are more like promises that turned out to be untrue due to unforeseen circumstances. Do you not see what's happening? Someone: So DrH I think you might be lying because of x DrH: Well I wasn't lying but y happened so it looks like I was lying about x but there might also be the possibility of z (ie. he's covering all bases) Pandain: So you expect us to believe you about y AND z? How convenient that you came up with them (then he goes back to the original arguments that DrH already covered) Just stop it. I'm sorry, but I refuse to simply ignore the alignment of our mayor. I am in no way convinced he is a townie, even if you are. Knowing our mayor has an extra vote still, even if he doesn't have night protection anymore, he is still a power player that deserves additional attention. That's not the point. There's no way of finding out whether or not our Mayor is a blue or a red as of now. The arguments that Pandain is putting up are ridiculous and stretched way too far, if you honestly keep up with your persistent following of this idiocy (I'm talking about his arguments, not Pandain himself) then I'm going to have to label you as scum following a blind argument aimed at taking down a blue mayor. Defending me. While I'm glad somebody agrees Pandains arguments were dumb mafia would have a good motivation to attach themselves to me and make it appear as though they are on my side. If they die and flip red the mafia can easily use that to get me lynched. That's why I don't like speculating too much about factions, it can really go either way. [r]The point is not that he’s defending you but that he continues to attack Pandain.[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 12:47 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 12:46 DoctorHelvetica wrote: On November 01 2010 12:38 Pandain wrote: On November 01 2010 12:29 DoctorHelvetica wrote: it didn't highlight any lies because at the time I had said it I did not take into account the possibility of my role being insane. when this was brought out i immediately stopped saying it, as would be the reasonable thing to do Nope, for example this post was made after posts about insanity. Bad point. I said my power is to confirm itself to another player. This is still the case and I never retracted that statement. That is my role. To poke another player and confirm my role/name to them. Note I didn't use the term "100%" here. On October 31 2010 08:50 DoctorHelvetica wrote: But how important can it be if it's less important than mine that is mostly important on its ability to confirm itself? And again Again I'm not referring to my ability to 100% confirm but your assertion that you can confirm yourself as a townie through your role. which you said you could do without being mayor. Which you ALSO haven't done by the way. On October 31 2010 09:10 DoctorHelvetica wrote: and when he claims to have such a huge role that can ALSO confirm itself as being 100% town. He said "oh i can confirm myself being town" but now he's letting me have it because I can confirm myself as being town? The also implies you can confirm yourself as 100% town, and then says it again. Here you admit your role is important in its ability to confirm yourself. Yet you continue to run. Not running from it at all. I am openly admitting constaantly that my role has a power that can confirm itself to another player. It seems pretty clear I was roleblocked, it's very simple. I'm not saying "Oh no my role actually can't do that" just that it was prevented from doing so last night. i explained my role and how it worked and how it confirmed to people good for you cute addition ;o you're so snarky anyone who didn't think of the possibility that that could be roleblocked/affected by busdrivers/affected by the lie of whoever it confirms to needs to take responsibility for that since I explained why I never brought it up in the first place I stand by the statement that my role confirms itself 100% to whoever I poke. What Artanis has said recently has made me more confident then ever that my role is not insane and that it does exactly as it says which means I was roleblocked, some other role stopped me from poking, or that jcarls lied alright, so when can we confirm if that's the truth? I suppose when I am not roleblocked and my poke goes through? Or that my poke goes through and the person I poked is honest about it? Perhaps I should poke you and see if you tell the truth about it or not. how is that a lie? if the poke goes through it is a 100% confirmation, that is the power and that is still the power I have. Just stop replying to him, no one except infinitestory (and his scum buddies if he's scum) will listen to him. You'll drag it on too. Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 12:56 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 12:48 DoctorHelvetica wrote: On November 01 2010 12:47 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 12:46 DoctorHelvetica wrote: On November 01 2010 12:38 Pandain wrote: On November 01 2010 12:29 DoctorHelvetica wrote: it didn't highlight any lies because at the time I had said it I did not take into account the possibility of my role being insane. when this was brought out i immediately stopped saying it, as would be the reasonable thing to do Nope, for example this post was made after posts about insanity. Bad point. I said my power is to confirm itself to another player. This is still the case and I never retracted that statement. That is my role. To poke another player and confirm my role/name to them. Note I didn't use the term "100%" here. On October 31 2010 08:50 DoctorHelvetica wrote: But how important can it be if it's less important than mine that is mostly important on its ability to confirm itself? And again Again I'm not referring to my ability to 100% confirm but your assertion that you can confirm yourself as a townie through your role. which you said you could do without being mayor. Which you ALSO haven't done by the way. On October 31 2010 09:10 DoctorHelvetica wrote: and when he claims to have such a huge role that can ALSO confirm itself as being 100% town. He said "oh i can confirm myself being town" but now he's letting me have it because I can confirm myself as being town? The also implies you can confirm yourself as 100% town, and then says it again. Here you admit your role is important in its ability to confirm yourself. Yet you continue to run. Not running from it at all. I am openly admitting constaantly that my role has a power that can confirm itself to another player. It seems pretty clear I was roleblocked, it's very simple. I'm not saying "Oh no my role actually can't do that" just that it was prevented from doing so last night. i explained my role and how it worked and how it confirmed to people good for you cute addition ;o you're so snarky anyone who didn't think of the possibility that that could be roleblocked/affected by busdrivers/affected by the lie of whoever it confirms to needs to take responsibility for that since I explained why I never brought it up in the first place I stand by the statement that my role confirms itself 100% to whoever I poke. What Artanis has said recently has made me more confident then ever that my role is not insane and that it does exactly as it says which means I was roleblocked, some other role stopped me from poking, or that jcarls lied alright, so when can we confirm if that's the truth? I suppose when I am not roleblocked and my poke goes through? Or that my poke goes through and the person I poked is honest about it? Perhaps I should poke you and see if you tell the truth about it or not. how is that a lie? if the poke goes through it is a 100% confirmation, that is the power and that is still the power I have. Just stop replying to him, no one except infinitestory (and his scum buddies if he's scum) will listen to him. You'll drag it on too. Why? The more desperate he gets the better everyone can see how scummy he's playing. And how easy it would be for the mafia to turn it against me if I just say nothing at all. Regardless I feel like this a lot of noise designed to distract from the Aeres situation. Would be nice and all if Pandain didn't play like this all the time. I'm still waiting for a counter argument for/from Aeres, until then my vote will stand. @inifinitestory: So we elected DrH because we thought he'd be able to confirm. Now there may be a way for a red to take away that ability to confirm OR they may be the possibility that DrH is red. So you want to spam up the thread and kill him based on that? At most, I see this as a 50/50 chance, mathematically speaking. I see Aeres as a much better investment. P.S. I'm ignoring you Pandain, I don't feel the need to respond to your argument and spam the thread even more. Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 13:07 youngminii wrote: You don't fake a roleclaim to confuse mafia. You will only end up confusing town, especially if you do it early in the game. Everyone knows this. Even if there was the small chance that he's telling the truth, he deserves to be killed because of the simple fact that he lied and confused town. His lie and DrH's 'lie' are completely different things. This type of play is discouraged and he should be killed off for it, Bill Murray used to do it a lot to the great dismay of everyone. LAL This is the truth, really. It causes way more harm to the town than it does to the mafia. This I disagree with. If we knew somehow that Aeres was 100% town it would be dumb to lynch him especially when the role "Cruiseship Captain" that he claimed could be valuable. [r]More attempts at bandwagoning Aeres WITH NO EVIDENCE. Also more shots at Pandain and one at infinitestory[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 13:07 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 13:06 Misder wrote: I'm going to bring this up again, why do you think mafia chose to kill annul? Do you think they found about him being the bodygaurd? Cause I don't see another reason why mafia would kill him. He didn't make any amazingly good post that would screw mafia over did he? The only real reason I can think of is he played extremely well in Haunted Mafia (carried us to victory). Maybe they saw him as a threat. Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 13:13 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 13:06 DCLXVI wrote: Still that is the best way for him to use his role if he is telling the truth now, I just am not sure where to criticize his confession. LAL or believe that it was an honest mistake? Kind of a dumb play for scum so I am inclined to believe him. I've been thinking about this for a while now. Mafia use a chatroom or something similar as an efficient tool for chatting. Often times the mods of the game join the chatroom to oversee what's happening. So at the point where Aeres had already roleclaimed the second bodyguard (after Annul) a lot of people were asking Artanis whether or not he made lies up. Artanis replied that he would not give an outright lie. This would tell us there is only one bodyguard (unless I'm missing something) which essentially outs Aeres as a liar. So I'm thinking Artanis probably gave Aeres a heads up that he was going to say what he said about the lies beforehand so that Aeres could get a chance to redeem himself a little bit by admitting his lie. ie. he was backed into a corner with no more options. I'm probably horribly wrong on this though, heh. Fair enough. Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 13:15 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 13:06 DCLXVI wrote: So the potential doctor is risking saving a "confirmed" blue vs losing himself as well. Unless someone provides me with an good enough reason I will not fully roleclaim You're going to die anyway. Unless the mafia are allowed to move the hit? Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 13:19 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 13:16 Nemesis wrote: I don't know why there are a good amount of people lynching Aeres. Aeres basically roleclaimed to take a hit incase DC was actually bodyguard. And if he isn't lying about his role, that is basically the best thing he can do with it. Also, what benefit could roleclaiming as bodyguard give mafia really? Trust? Too much relaxation? As scum they could put us into a state of 'oh hey the Mayor has a bodyguard, he won't die, we don't need a doctor to protect him' if we think he's still got an active bodyguard. I mean, who the hell would actually go to the trouble of making an entire 'Cruiseship Captain' role by themself? Looks like it was looked over and peer reviewed by an entire team of people imo. The original Cruiseship Captain Crap: On November 01 2010 04:12 Aeres wrote: + Show Spoiler + Okay, since it seems that the Doc's position as Mayor is in jeopardy, I'm going to put some interesting info out there. On October 31 2010 10:23 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Further news I forgot to put in the night post: Due to budget cuts, we have only managed to purchase one bodyguard for the Mayor. Artanis lied. There are two Bodyguards, not one. I don't know who the first one is (I suspect it's DC), but I am the second one. I was going to play dumb about my role of Bodyguard until DC screwed up. I dunno if he really is the other Bodyguard, but if he is, I feel like if he was killed, then the Mafia, upon learning that there is a second Bodyguard (due to a failed hit on Mayor), would start hitting the most outspoken townspeople in lieu of the Mayor. Since I am in fact one of the more outspoken people in this topic, I was at risk of being "tapped", so to speak. I would also like to note that my normal role greatly assists my ability to act as a Bodyguard. Since Bodyguards block hits on the Mayor, killing them makes the Mayor vulnerable. My role is designed to increase my longevity as long as possible. My role is called the "Cruiseship Captain". I am eligible to PM a mod in order to set sail for the ocean and leave town for the night, thus becoming immune to any and all night actions (positive and negative alike, including roleblocks and DT checks). I am not permitted to set sail on consecutive nights. Because of this mechanic, I can survive on my own for a short while. Having a Medic tend to me will not be necessary for the first few nights. Once my role has been exhausted of uses (I do not know how many times I can set sail in this game, only that it is more than once), Medics are more than welcome to assist me. Also, please keep in mind that my role has an additional function that I am not presently willing to reveal. Yeah, this is all great, Aeres, but now you sound mighty suspicious to me! Well, yes, I cannot deny that I seem fishy (pardon the pun, I am a Cruiseship Captain, after all). I also imagine it does not help my case that setting sail makes me immune to DT checks. I assure you all, however, that I am working in the interests of the town. Believe me, I'd rather not cause suspicion when it isn't warranted, but DC's possibly slip-up forced my hand. Now i'm not sure. The cruiseship captain seems like it could be a legit role. This is really not useful speculation since we don't know what Artanis is thinking. [r]More speculation mixed in with his attacks on Aeres.[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 13:47 youngminii wrote: You should see Pandain's style of play in other games. In almost every game as town he would pull this type of shit and get killed and flip town and cause mass confusion. @jcarl: I understand what you mean by the town being very secure about me but there's not much they can do. As far as they can tell, I might be invincible and trying to kill me will do nothing. In any case, there's not really anything toooooo scummy about my (perceived) role imo. True. Pandain is a pretty scummy town player. [r]In your opinion (and his… there seems to be a connection between you and YM?)[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 14:05 youngminii wrote: Well then we should kill Aeres and find out, no? ^_^ Kills for information, not a strategy I like. I suppose there is no better alternative, we have to lynch somebody and ym/ace made a good case for Aeres. [r]There is a better alternative, lynch YM[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 14:50 youngminii wrote: I cannot think of these situations you refer to but I'm about a hundred percent sure that a softclaim that was vague at best (which turned out to not be a claim) at basically the beginning of the game does not warrant a roleclaim that not only claims the bodyguard role but an extra Cruiseship Captain role. Oh, let's not forget the fact that he said that the mods lied about the number of bodyguard roles too. Good point here. [r]Actually the soft claim was pretty convincing to me, he STILL gets in an attack on Aeres.[/r] Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 15:08 youngminii wrote: Someone was killed with the role of ADD Doctor, which stated that you had a 10% chance of killing the patient if he wasn't being hit (or something like that). After the death, Artanis stated that the 10% chance was a lie and he would never have actually killed anyone. This tells us there are small, gay lies but no outright ones. Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 15:18 youngminii wrote: Oh right. There were quite a few. Even I thought the mods were lying because they never said anything about it. Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 22:24 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 20:18 Coagulation wrote: the way hes jumping all over aeres with lynch first ask questions later looks scummy. Actually I'm just waiting for a counter argument. There's only so much I can say by myself, it takes two to create a discussion. Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 22:25 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 22:24 NB wrote: very interesting that the elder vote has been used again? Could it be that there is some insight that our DTs has connection with the elder and the vote is 100% correct? :D Interesting theory. We should keep this in mind, perhaps? Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 23:50 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 22:43 Amber[LighT] wrote: I'm not going to quote YM directly since he seems to be active (wow..). Why you so active? Day 1 you were hiding in the back not making many waves. Now you want to go after someone who has probably made a "newbie" mistake as though he's just stolen all of the cookies from the cookie jar. Look at your arguments, and look at other arguments. You're really gunning for someone who we don't really know enough about. And you're kinda throwing random discussion out. Sad to say this is typical of your "pro-town" play. It's also worth noting that we know you're not "just a townie" since you would usually play quiet until you're lynched, making yourself completely useless. How useful your being should determine your alignment... I apologise, I can try be more inactive just for you. What a great argument you have there. I've already said I was afk for basically all of day 1, are you seriously saying you can't see that? Probably made a 'newbie' mistake? It's a pretty huge mistake/scumtell if you looked at it carefully, I don't see why you're letting the cookie thief get away without even a slap on the wrist. I look at my arguments and then I look at the argument I threw out. Pandain and DrH going at it about how DrH has no way of proving he's innocent. Is this argument constructive? No, it will bring nothing new to the table. No analysis, except maybe Pandain's overeagerness of going for DrH. My arguments are designed to punish the liar, the person who got caught red handed in his 'one man hero attempt to save the bodyguard'. I'm still waiting for the counterargument and it's not coming. So yeah, I think I'll go ahead and gun him. I wasn't aware I had a style of being quiet until I'm lynched if I was just a townie. If you could direct me to a game where I did this, please do. Ditto for my typical 'pro-town' play. Oh yeah, how is it worth nothing I'm not 'just a townie'? You realise there are no 'just a townies' in this game, right? Or are you that inactive? I'd appreciate it if you stopped pulling idiotic arguments out. Thank you very much, I'm not sure Amber read the thread all the way through. He didn't catch my roleclaim and a few other bits of key information so I'm just gonna disregard the first part here. Amber's entire argument here is pretty much meta. Youngminii makes the case for his lynch of Aeres. This is a good post by YM imo. [r]It’d be fun if one of his posts didn’t contain a personal attack, regardless he’s still hitting Aeres because he lied, at this point BIG SCREAMING DEAL. I don’t care that Aeres lied, it makes sense to me and I think YM is desperately trying to get a bandwagon going based simply on “the lie” which if you just read his posts might make you think the lie caused half the town to be killed.[/r] ________________________________________ Show nested quote + On November 01 2010 23:55 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 23:44 Aeres wrote: ##Vote Aeres There's no redemption for me now. I made a bad move as an inexperienced player, and the town suffered because of it. I'm too much of a liability to keep alive, so I am voting for myself to smooth things out when I'm lynched. Again, I apologize for making such an audacious play. I clearly should have considered the ramifications of my actions better, and because I was hasty, the town is no better off than before. At best, I learned what not to do in a Mafia game. I don't expect to survive the day, so I'm taking the chance now to say good luck. I let you guys down, but I'm still rooting for you. I don't even... What? I've said time and time again I'm waiting for you to argue. I'm not 100% certain you're scum, I don't think anyone is, and you have this time to point out why we shouldn't lynch you. It is never, ever good town play to lynch yourself unless there's a special scenario/mechanic that directly helps town to do it. Another good point by youngminii. IMO this shows that he isn't a mafia hellbent on lynching Aeres (could be a mafia trying to do something else) but is merely interested in lynching whoever the best target is at the time. If he was mafia wanting a bandwagon on Aeres, there is no reason to make a post cautioning the town that he might be a VI. [r]Hell bent hehe perhaps you forgot all his other posts then? He’s just about as hell bent as you can get… did you already forget the LAL shit? Other than that he does make a good point here, why did Aeres vote for himself?[/r] Show nested quote + On November 02 2010 00:03 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 23:57 Amber[LighT] wrote: On November 01 2010 23:50 youngminii wrote: On November 01 2010 22:43 Amber[LighT] wrote: I'm not going to quote YM directly since he seems to be active (wow..). Why you so active? Day 1 you were hiding in the back not making many waves. Now you want to go after someone who has probably made a "newbie" mistake as though he's just stolen all of the cookies from the cookie jar. Look at your arguments, and look at other arguments. You're really gunning for someone who we don't really know enough about. And you're kinda throwing random discussion out. Sad to say this is typical of your "pro-town" play. It's also worth noting that we know you're not "just a townie" since you would usually play quiet until you're lynched, making yourself completely useless. How useful your being should determine your alignment... I apologise, I can try be more inactive just for you. What a great argument you have there. I've already said I was afk for basically all of day 1, are you seriously saying you can't see that? Probably made a 'newbie' mistake? It's a pretty huge mistake/scumtell if you looked at it carefully, I don't see why you're letting the cookie thief get away without even a slap on the wrist. I look at my arguments and then I look at the argument I threw out. Pandain and DrH going at it about how DrH has no way of proving he's innocent. Is this argument constructive? No, it will bring nothing new to the table. No analysis, except maybe Pandain's overeagerness of going for DrH. My arguments are designed to punish the liar, the person who got caught red handed in his 'one man hero attempt to save the bodyguard'. I'm still waiting for the counterargument and it's not coming. So yeah, I think I'll go ahead and gun him. I wasn't aware I had a style of being quiet until I'm lynched if I was just a townie. If you could direct me to a game where I did this, please do. Ditto for my typical 'pro-town' play. Oh yeah, how is it worth nothing I'm not 'just a townie'? You realise there are no 'just a townies' in this game, right? Or are you that inactive? I'd appreciate it if you stopped pulling idiotic arguments out. Thank you very much, Well without putting much effort into outting you since you don't know yourself well enough, this was (what looks like) your end-post for Flamewheels game: On August 15 2010 23:09 youngminii wrote: I'm a bit sick of this game. I don't think I like playing town roles that much, I'm just not motivated to play, sorry about the afkness. I'm still trying to keep up with what's happening though. From what I can tell: Misder = mafia (confirmed) foolishness = mafia (in my eyes) So there go my votes. Reference Post: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=139517¤tpage=91#1811 Very apathetic. Not very engaging. Not really pushing with "evidence." You had this epiphany where you're going to use reason in your posts? I find it highly suspicious. I was scum. Nice try though. Thanks for the 4000th ![]() amber made a dumb mistake here : / maybe i should read through ambers posts Well that's the end of YM's posts. I think youngminii is a pro-town player. Amber's attempts to metagame and make youngminii look mafia for it were pathetic and fell flat on their face. He has shown that he is willing to consider a better target than Aeres should it arise, and his arguments against Aeres in the first place are mostly good ones. Aside from that he's contributed other useful posts throughout the thread. Now I'll talk about the lynch dodge. I know of three roles that can dodge lynches: unlynchable (either mafia or town) saulus (mafia) judas (town) The unlynchable does not get lynched the first time he is lynched. The second time it will work. The saulus is a mafia player that when lynched the first time becomes town. I consider this an OP role because the saulus can then release the mafia list, unless the saulus is a player intentionally kept in the dark about who else is mafia. the judas is a town player that when lynched the first time becomes mafia. Opposite of Saulus. My main concern for youngminii is that this is his role. It is also possible that a bus type of role acted on youngminii/SiN or that a pardoner type role was somehow involved. Ultimately speculation is nonconclusive and i'd be highly suspicious of further attempts to force youngminii to roleclaim. [r]I think YM is the best Scum target we have, he’s consistently tried to get a bandwagon going on a player who probably made an honest mistake, he attacks Pandain over and over and over again and tries to shut the discussion about your townieness down. I’m actually getting suspicious of you know especially since you went really easy on YM imo. Your analysis was really soft and you got in several good shots at Pandain while you were at it.[/r] | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
You say he probably just made an honest mistake? what makes you believe this? I feel I've pointed out a huge inconsistency in Aeres' defense and everyone seems to be ignoring it. Is the inconsistency where Aeres says he hopes that DC isn't the body guard? This makes sense, he assumes DC soft claimed (so did a lot of other people) so he decides to fake claim to draw a hit. Then he says he hopes DC wasn't the body guard after all and that the real second body guard is hidden. This makes sense, under his false claim he's trying to trick the mafia further by adding a third person into the body guard mix. This all made sense from his perspective when I try and put myself in his shoes it seems like a logical strategy. Regarding Pandains post; I don't think we should lynch Doc H tonight, he's still to valuable if he's telling the truth. We need to lynch either Aeres or YM, I've already stated I think YM should be lynched because I think he's more likely to be scum but if we lynch Aeres and he flips town then it tells us just about the same thing as a YM lynch: we need to look at Doc H. If YM is blue or Aeres is red then I'm completely lost ![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Regarding Pandains post; I don't think we should lynch Doc H tonight, he's still to valuable if he's telling the truth. We need to lynch either Aeres or YM, I've already stated I think YM should be lynched because I think he's more likely to be scum but if we lynch Aeres and he flips town then it tells us just about the same thing as a YM lynchwhere he flips scum: we need to look at Doc H. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + He's gonna get over 9000 posts because of this game | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Ive seen divine around that fucking lurker, feel free to bandwagon him. Divine voted for me as mayor ![]() This is before and after the night post. Here are some theories also. Rolebloker targetted Dr.H we assume, right? Dr.H is immune to M-rus. Mafia has a now dead PD. I think mafia is very conservative in their actions for fear of the virus. Which makes me think that town is likely to have a virus spreading role if they found some unprecedented infected. I suggest a medic considers dr. h as a target, since he is immune and becoming a clearer townie day by day. Maybe he hasn't been paying attention but Doc is definetly not a clearer townie And would it be selfish or scummy to ask for that vaccine if it hasnt already been dished out? ![]() Role Fishing maybe? He makes a list of players and their actions but it's not really anything new, it feels like he's scum trying to act like town. He posts a lot of small, rather irelevent posts that make him look active but are actually pretty substanceless. Investigate me all the way, but i suggest if we have a PD to make sure i dont start spreading AIDS everywhere. My power lets me have a permanent mason relationship with someone the rest of the game. They dont know who else I add each day, and they cannot PM anyone but me. So if im red, i can distort everything to hell. But if I start spreading misinformation, I'd like to think that the people I choose would be smart enough to catch it. And even if M-rus works that it immediately contracts to the person who visits, and then contracts to the person who visits them, I cannot contract it, because I can do it at the start of each day, so people who protect and investigate me are under no danger unless I am plagued. If I am immune, I cannot contract it when I add people, so I feel like a worthy candidate of having a PD vaccinate me. Is this his power? Why haven't we heard more about it? It's been long enough for him to use it. He makes a couple apologies for being inactive I think it's safe to say you are claiming plague doctor, and the person you protect gets notified that you did this? That could be convenient. I do find it possible that mafia could have there own plague doctor, but Im not here to speculate that. If you use your power on me, and I can add you, we can start a circle. To verify it, you would give me one bodyguard who I would relay all of the information I learn. A medic can protect me if they wish, without fearing M-rus. If there is another plague doctor besides Dr.H (if that is what you are) Id suggst picking fishball, who has stated he has means to a circle and a role. That way another medic can choose between myself and fishball to protect. Whats really important is that the medics are safe in this from the M-rus, and if fishball or I die from a lucky shot by mafia, then oh well, fishball or myself die. Is this plausible Dr. H? If so, then you have my vote. Here's his reason for voting for our dear mayor. I did not withdraw my candidacy, I merely stated that fishball's plan was similar to mine, and if alot of the town thought him the better candidate I would not have a problem, but after reading into it and stating my opinions, I still want to be mayor, because 1) I know Im town, and will work in every way possible to make everything clear to everyone on what is happening. 2) I can make bodyguards in my circle! 100% confirmed townies, so if im poisoned or lynched, I can pass on all my info to them. How you will verify them though, might be a tad confusing. I hope to figure that out, and Im open to ideas. 3) I WONT FUCK IT UP. (Fairly sure fishball wont either if he isnt red) Again, Im fairly certain it should be between fishball and I, because we can make circles happen, and he has stated that he has the power to flesh out the weeds of his. I'd like for him to address connecting circles through me, that would be cool. I need to catch up now, I was working. Also, if a person is contaminated with M-rus in the night, and they are visited that same night, do the visitors contract it? This is very important, because if medics protect him, we need to know how the M-rus functions. Someone help me out, what does he mean by this post? He can make body guards? I am not in Fishball's circle. I have an ability to form a town circle of my choosing. I already choose my first person. I don't have any other role, but I can easily access any circle already made if they are pro town. I don't have anything to hide now, and I guarantee everything I do will have crystal clear reasons as to why. The only thing I will not tell you is who. I believe my method will work slower then fishball, but it will be more effective later on. It's not all that dangerous if I am not mayor, but it can be really strong if I am mayor. I dont think anyone aside from fishball has hinted that they can do this. It should be between me and him. Here's where he first talks about his role, a role easily faked by scum (like fishballs but fishball was proved innocent and I think that makes it even more likely the bum is lying). SHIT I have to go but I'm gonna post this anyway... I'll be back. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 04 2010 15:03 Coagulation wrote: i noticed im on a couple shitlists also Yeah but I've just been stupid, you've been DTed... See the difference ![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 05 2010 13:55 LunarDestiny wrote: DC, one thing didn't make sense to me. Why did you role claim bodyguard on night 1? If the mafia decide to kill you, your mad hunter role is wasted. I don't think he was role claiming, I think he was checking to see if his bombs could kill the mayor and thought we would guess his role through his questions. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 08 2010 03:05 infinitestory wrote: Show nested quote + On November 08 2010 03:01 Kenpachi wrote: On November 08 2010 02:57 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: I will be voting for hyperbola and Kenpachi, neither have contributed much and both seem like they are scum flying under the radar. Now I realize that these are the same arguments people are using against me and I really don't have a defense for that except that I'm not scum, if it would help I'll roleclaim. Then roleclaim to defend yourself instead of saying that you have no defense Not necessarily. Only if you think it'll help your defense. >__> I'll role claim because it's the only thing I have left at this point. I am the Veteran Granny, I can survive a hit but "doctors keep pushing me around", so if a doctor visits me, they will die. I'm guessing this refers to plague doctors so if I was to be infected I couldn't be healed. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 08 2010 08:34 Nemesis wrote: Show nested quote + On November 08 2010 08:27 kitaman27 wrote: Nemesis, I noticed you changed your vote from Ace to me based on his weak defense. Explain to me why I would put myself out here like this to target a single town member. 14 town remaining 5 mafia remaining A 1:1 trade doesn't work out too well, now does it? Hmm well honestly I don't care who gets lynched at this point. Depending on who flips what, the next day lynch is quite clear. Why? We have a chance to lynch a scum right now and you say you don't care? This goes back to the "let's just lynch someone for information" which I think is a bad policy. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 08 2010 15:58 infinitestory wrote: Ok then. I can't find a hole in your story, and kitaman's investigations are just too correct for me to fault him quite yet (plus, if he were mafia and really wanted to get rid of you, he would almost certainly have came out and said directly that you're scum instead of providing the correct description of what happened) So who else is on your scumdar right now? (don't include kitaman, as I don't want this argument looping around anymore) Wait... If kitaman is telling the truth doesn't that make Ace scum? I don't see how you can have it both ways. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 08 2010 16:13 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On November 08 2010 16:06 infinitestory wrote: On November 08 2010 16:04 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On November 08 2010 15:58 infinitestory wrote: Ok then. I can't find a hole in your story, and kitaman's investigations are just too correct for me to fault him quite yet (plus, if he were mafia and really wanted to get rid of you, he would almost certainly have came out and said directly that you're scum instead of providing the correct description of what happened) So who else is on your scumdar right now? (don't include kitaman, as I don't want this argument looping around anymore) Wait... If kitaman is telling the truth doesn't that make Ace scum? I don't see how you can have it both ways. kitaman tells the truth: infun did not leave house, amber did not leave house, ace carried out a hit ace tells the truth: carried out the hit on deconduo that's how you can have it both ways Then it comes down to what are the odds that Ace uses his vig hit the night I happen to check him. Quite a coincidence that he claims the only hypothetical situation that would save him. Coinsidence? perhaps but it explains how a red got night killed. Thanks for explaining IS, I'm on board with kita and ace both being town. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 09 2010 13:19 Coagulation wrote: ![]() Posting after death *cough* + Show Spoiler + jk | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 10 2010 05:35 infinitestory wrote: *ebwop: i mean completely unjustified in the sense that meapak was a legitly better lynch, and a lot of people decided to just ignore that fact >_______> Wow you really seem to have it in for me X_X. Actually you and RoL both seem to think I'm red which is unfourtunate given that you two seem to be running the show right now. I voted for hyperbola as a throw away lynch, I have no idea where the bandwagon came from. Actually both of my lynches yesterday were throw away because the massive shitfest made it so really unclear what was going on. I agree that Pandain is red and I'm still unsure how he's still alive, he's escaped like two lynches now. I alo think it was retarded to lynch KtheZ and if you're looking for lynch suspects I'd start looking at those who voted for him. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 10 2010 08:03 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Give us 30 minutes guys, gotta sort shit out. Lotta people gonna die tonight, murrayitis might trigger. hot damn things are gonna get interesting. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 10 2010 08:44 LSB wrote: Guys I'd like to congratulate you all for making this the largest thread in the Mafia forum since TL Mafia 2. (only 3100+ posts to go!) I think you're enjoying watching this. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
I think YM is red, he and Ace were the people who pushed hard for aeres and Ace has since flipped red. I stand by my earlier role claim of Granny Veteran. It wasnt really that useful early in the game and it can't confirm itself but now it becomes more valuable because the mafia have lost a role blocker so baring they have two, it would take a twice as long to night kill me. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
L who do you suggest we lynch if you don't wanna lynch kenpachi? | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 11 2010 01:55 Nemesis wrote: Show nested quote + On November 11 2010 01:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Happy page 200 ppl. L who do you suggest we lynch if you don't wanna lynch kenpachi? Dun Dun Dun, three of the four unconfirmed people banding together with three mafias left. Coincidence? I think not. I'm off for now, I have a midterm today and somehow I'm wasting my time here. How am I banding together with them? I still have my vote on Kenpachi and I intend to keep it that way. The reason I asked what L thought is because he's been the most vocal against pretty much anything everyone has said in the past half a day or so. I was wondering if he was just stonewalling or if he had legitimate reasons. He hasn't convinced me that LD and Glasse are bad and if anything he sounds like someone desperately trying to start a bandwagon. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On November 11 2010 11:57 Nemesis wrote: Also, where the hell is everyone? It just feels too quiet in here, it's weird. :X L is not really open for debate. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
![]() | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Dota 2![]() Rain ![]() Bisu ![]() Sea ![]() Shuttle ![]() Jaedong ![]() Horang2 ![]() BeSt ![]() Larva ![]() JulyZerg ![]() [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games B2W.Neo1452 Beastyqt932 DeMusliM433 mouzStarbuck422 XBOCT362 crisheroes359 ArmadaUGS75 KnowMe58 Liquid`VortiX48 QueenE39 ZerO(Twitch)11 Organizations StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • LUISG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s Dota 2 League of Legends |
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
GSL Code S
Cure vs sOs
Reynor vs Solar
OSC
Replay Cast
GSL Code S
Maru vs TriGGeR
Rogue vs NightMare
The PondCast
Replay Cast
OSC
Online Event
[ Show More ] CranKy Ducklings
SC Evo League
Chat StarLeague
PassionCraft
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Chat StarLeague
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Wardi Open
PiGosaur Monday
Replay Cast
|
|