EPTI am therefore going to vote for L, who will then probably lynch me
this will work out for the best for everyone.
thank you,
bill
Three Kingdoms Mafia (三国演义) - Page 13
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
I am therefore going to vote for L, who will then probably lynch me this will work out for the best for everyone. thank you, bill | ||
|
DarthThienAn
United States2734 Posts
On May 18 2010 17:00 BrownBear wrote: Uhh... did you not read his post? He's specifically stating that he's glad he DOESN'T have to worry about people yelling "MAFIA" because there are no mafia in this game, and he knows there are 4 factions. Perhaps you should read peoples' posts before you flame them. or perhaps you shouldn't because trolling and flaming are highly encouraged. =D | ||
|
LunarDestiny
United States4177 Posts
THIS POST IS NOT A LIE.  | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
Instead of talking about people they'd want killed on day one, people are busy giving someone a free day vig power. So lets talk about people that should be killed. Target 1: On May 18 2010 11:43 Abenson wrote: Yay *Jumps on bandwagon* ##VOTE: Radfield I can't understand abenson shitting around after being repeatedly told to stop being such a waste of air. On the topic of "can the person granted the day vig hit disobey the town?" well sure, but then we just shoot him the day after. I'd expand upon this but I'd rather not until someone's dumb enough to pick someone random for their day hit. | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On May 18 2010 14:03 BloodyC0bbler wrote: So, you have a plan to kill inactives? Cool. However, you stress the word I'll" decide who to kill. This strikes me as a Leaderish sort of talk. Why you ask? Because by stressing that You will decide over the majority, it means you already have a predisposed agenda. This would put you as the head of yellow turbans, wei, wu, or shu. This could easily be a minor error in your writing, however, it seems unlikely. Your idea to kill inactives is sound only so long as we haven't narrowed down someone who is an obvious yellow turban. Untop of it, your bandwagon is insanely suspicious for such an early start. The 'I'll' in my post was a joke. As in, once you give me your armies, I could theoretically kill whoever I wanted to. In fact, I'd say 'we'll' is much more leaderish talk then I'll. | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
"This strikes me as a Leaderish sort of talk. Why you ask?" I'll tell you why. Because he is the yellow turban leader, and is fishing to see if Radfield is potentially on his side without him dying (yellow turbans obviously can't recruit leaders). Radfield gives him the advantage in two ways: 1) he is currently swaying the army voting and has power 2) he is a smart, good, solid player who would be a practical addition to BloodyC0bbler's turbans. L has been quiet, and really not posting as much (wanting to stay out of the fray) until I mentioned his name at all. I am surprised people are not donating their armies to a veteran, and are donating to a "new" player "who has played well in the past" in Radfield, who is my 3rd suspect in reasons I will be giving after this is finished on L. L may just be busy living it up (as it's a great time of year), and we can hold him accountable if he doesn't "come out of his blue shell". I would suggest him as a secondary target for "who is a faction leader we need to kill" He is likely Cao Cao in my opinion. Radfield is a little harder to pin, and my reasoning is because of the past success of "good, new players" in getting roles. I gave Korynne a spot in the mafia in my LAMM, and citi.zen has been elected to become mafia in a few games since his success. Hell, flamewheel even let me have a shot. What I'm getting at is Radfield could potentially be Sun Quan or Liu Bei (though I kind of doubt it). Trust me on this one, BloodyC0bbler would be a good lynch for us in terms of balancing the game and lowering the skill ceiling for us relatively noob players. He is most definitely a power role, and is the player I would deem "most likely to be leading the yellow turbans" based NOT ONLY upon his being a good player who is favored but ALSO upon his posting fishing for information out of Radfield. Whoever is elected, I implore you to consider lynching BC. | ||
|
Jugan
United States1566 Posts
On May 18 2010 19:26 Bill Murray wrote: kill the yellow turban leader BUT YOU ARE THE YELLOW TURBAN LEADER? What has this game come to???? | ||
|
Korynne
Canada990 Posts
On May 18 2010 19:39 Bill Murray wrote: I gave Korynne a spot in the mafia in my LAMM, Thanks Bill, it was fun. =D | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
Not even Manuel L. Hackson In fact I yelled at caller for not giving me Cao Cao, but he told me all the roles were done by RNG exclusively (and as a side note I owe Ace a punches for that). Because of that, I don't think your case against BC is as strong as you've made it out to be. I still think abenson is a better kill because frankly stupidity like his should be metagamed against. He's basically afk trolling deadweight every game. In terms of the behavioral analysis, all of the pins you put on BC can be put on abenson as well, but abenson doesn't act differently when he's mafia or town. If he's part of the turbans, there's pretty much nothing that'll give him away later on, and he'll always be a "oh, we'll kill him tomorrow" candidate. That said, under abenson I'd put BC until he makes a reply post. Apart from those two, Jugan, Scamp and Tricode seem to be worthy people to pressure or kill on day 1. Maybe more pressure when it comes to scamp, but the other two are just as deadweight. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
Initially each faction consists of just one person. Every night, each faction may recruit another player to their team. Some players are unrecruitable, however, including enemy faction leaders. If the faction leader is slain, the entire faction collapses and dies with him. However, you can recruit enemy players as long as they are not the faction leader. If a player is recruited by multiple faction leaders at the same time, they all cancel out. The wording of this is ambiguous because of its position. Do the turbans start with multiple players? There is also a 4th Party in the form of the Yellow Turbans. They may recruit anybody but faction leaders and Yellow Turbans cannot be recruited. However, if the Yellow Turbans try to recruit a faction leader, they all die. | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
| ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
Someone is recruited into a faction, lets say the Blue one. Then the next night 2 of the other factions attempt to recruit the same person. It seems fairly obvious that in such a case it would be cancelled out and they would stay blue but just to double check. | ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
On May 18 2010 22:59 XeliN wrote: Also would like to know what happens if: Someone is recruited into a faction, lets say the Blue one. Then the next night 2 of the other factions attempt to recruit the same person. It seems fairly obvious that in such a case it would be cancelled out and they would stay blue but just to double check. If a player is recruited by multiple faction leaders at the same time, they all cancel out. heil Caller | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
the wording BC used in talking to radfield is a dead giveaway of him fishing for information on leaders the main reason we need worry that he could be doing that is because he is the yellow turban leader i will admit that it is a necessity for people to do that from every player slot. it would also be in your benefit to lie, L, about the method he used to pick. based upon my character, though, i can GUARANTEE he handpicked roles. | ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
On May 19 2010 00:21 Bill Murray wrote: caller can say one thing and have done another the wording BC used in talking to radfield is a dead giveaway of him fishing for information on leaders the main reason we need worry that he could be doing that is because he is the yellow turban leader i will admit that it is a necessity for people to do that from every player slot. it would also be in your benefit to lie, L, about the method he used to pick. based upon my character, though, i can GUARANTEE he handpicked roles. and i can GUARANTEE that they were randomly generated just ask BC how well i randomly generate roles | ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
| ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
| ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On May 19 2010 00:50 XeliN wrote: Ah ok so they start with more then 1, that makes sense tbh, in which case mayb suspect lynching might be more viable for day 1, although I'm not against inactive//Abenson The great thing is there's no way to mess up the lynch/DayVig today. We don't need a majority, we can't hit a townie, the worst we can do is.... there is no worst. | ||
| ||
