3. If anyone initiates an unjustified nuke, someone with a real nuke launch a revenge strike against this initiator. If the initiator was mafia - good riddance. If the initiator was town, that person was still acting irresponsibly by initiating a nuke without a good case, and good riddance.

there's no reason to add extra radiation when a country can anti-nuke and we lynch the retard next day

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 23 2010 23:07 GMT

#284

##Vote: L
because he is banned and there isn't really a much better first day target

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 24 2010 00:28 GMT

#294

Okay, you've convinced me nemY
you're right, L contributes to the game way too much and i'm going to guess he is pro-town for now until he starts posting again
##Vote: nemY

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 24 2010 04:56 GMT

#331

why should we lynch him right away when he comes back? it's not like being inactive is a confirmation of being mafia. if he does come back, we give him a bit to post so we can analyze him. there are better targets for lynches already.

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 24 2010 08:18 GMT

#333

you or abenson duh

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 24 2010 08:21 GMT

#334

imo abenson is worse than phrujbaz because all he has done is given a vote by what you call "bandwagoning" and phrujbaz hasn't gotten a chance to even voice his opinions
why vote to lynch someone that's probably going to get modkilled? you'll just end up wasting a lynch

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 24 2010 14:19 GMT

#349

changing my vote to abenson because he hasn't even bothered to post to explain himself
##Vote: Abenson

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 24 2010 22:14 GMT

#419

i think the people abstaining are really dumb, you're preventing the town from getting information and we need all the information we can get since there are no clues. if it's true that opz and abenson both know each other's roles and shit, then abenson needs to confirm that in the thread so the suspicion is no longer on them.
we can have them both RC each other in the thread so that if one of them dies, atleast we know that the other one is also telling the truth since the majority of the votes are on them.

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 24 2010 22:23 GMT

#428

okay if you guys think lynching either abenson or opz is bad, then who else should we vote for? i'm willing to consider someone else

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 24 2010 22:24 GMT

#429

at the rate the votes are going, there will be no majority

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 25 2010 01:49 GMT

#514

yes on anti nuke
##Vote: RebirthofLegend

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 25 2010 01:52 GMT

#515

wait i retract that sorry, still not sure whether we want to anti-nuke RoL's nuke
i just got back and read that a nuke was launched

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 25 2010 02:16 GMT

#518

what are the chances that RoL and caller are both mafia and RoL tried to mind game us to saving caller and removing him from the suspect list? i see no good reason to save caller because he hasn't posted much. RoL could also be an angry towny who acted stupid and shot a random nuke because and that nuke just happens to hit caller, a potential mafia member.

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 25 2010 03:00 GMT

#541

even if caller turns up mafia, we should lynch RoL for being dumb. he's obviously shown that he has no self control and there's a chance he has more than one nuke. we shouldn't give him the opportunity to launch another one.
also i think if his nuke is a dud, we should lynch him anyway.

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 25 2010 03:08 GMT

#543

He's been active in terms of defending L early on in the game, when we were bickering whether or not to kill him day 1

yeah okay one post and im ACTIVELY defending him.

i'm sorry i get easily swayed by other people's ideas.
yes, first i voted for L because hey, he's banned and he's not going to contribute anyway. then nemY convinced me to take my vote off L because its a fact he contributes more to the game than either of us and he will be back posting soon.

my vote for nemY was because only three people had votes on them at the time. nemY, opz, and L. btw i like to remind you it was your friend opz who voted for nemy before me. i actually thought he was useful and contributing so i voted the same person he voted for. note that after nemy, i switched my vote to you.

i wanted to lynch you because you and opz were failing at confirming each other's innocence. by lynching you, it would show opz's alignment. i'm pretty sure you would vote for yourself if you were in my position.

now my current vote on RoL is because he launched a potential nuke and that just invokes chaos and is not a pro-town move.

johnnyspazz

Taiwan1470 Posts

March 25 2010 03:38 GMT

#559

yeah i have no idea why people like xelin are abstaining. no matter how innocent RoL might be, we can't excuse play that's anti-town. i'm using the FoS on Xelin because i think he's just trying to skate under the radar by abstaining.