EPTTL Mafia Ban List - Page 41
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
| ||
|
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
On December 23 2010 16:58 Incognito wrote: Oh it doesnt look like that in the OP. This is chaoser's first ban, correct? If so, I'd just say give him a 1 game ban and count the warning towards his next ban. i.e. next game is a 4 game ban instead of 3. I see this more as a genuine mistake. As far as I remember chaoser doesn't appear on my list of assumed inactives. If you are modkilled for going inactive in 2 games at once, your Banned Game Count will be calculated as if you were modkilled in one game and warned in the other. Regular modkill with no history = 1 game, warning = +1 game. Total = 2 games. What is different? And I hadn't thought of putting them on the warning list after removing them. I do like the idea that once you've served out a ban, your slate has been wiped clean though. A lingering warning goes against that a bit. However, it is definitely one possible solution. | ||
|
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
On December 23 2010 17:14 Qatol wrote: Regular modkill with no history = 1 game, warning = +1 game. Total = 2 games. What is different? And I hadn't thought of putting them on the warning list after removing them. I do like the idea that once you've served out a ban, your slate has been wiped clean though. A lingering warning goes against that a bit. However, it is definitely one possible solution. Warning is usually for the next game, right? I guess it all has to do with the order you hand out the ban + warning or warning + ban. I'd go with deferring the second ban. Its a nice ideal to have a "clean slate" after youve served your ban, but lets face it, in reality your slate isn't clean even with the current rules. Your next ban is upped to a 3 game ban. If you really had a clean slate, the next ban would still be a 1 game ban. I don't see how this deviates from the current ideal of the ban list. | ||
|
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
| ||
|
ilovejonn
Canada2548 Posts
| ||
|
seRapH
United States9776 Posts
So PM annul and beg for your life. ;D | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On December 23 2010 19:04 Qatol wrote: I think this is a good point to stop and ask what other people think. In particular, I'd like to hear from annul and DrH, seeing as how they're the ones whose games were disrupted by this in the first place. if someone signs up to two games at once and then goes inactive to get modkill, we should weigh in the factors behind this in assessing bans if there is a legit reason, i am fine with a 1 game ban for both inactivity infractions. i understand shit comes up but it takes you 30 seconds to post "emergency came up, cant participate this cycle, pls be lenient" and then hosts will at least know what is going on, and you can explain yourself when you return if it is so egregious that you really cant, then we should consider that too. compare: "i had to focus on my schoolwork so i couldnt play" with "my mom had a heart attack during dinner and we immediately went to the hospital and stayed there for two days" - the first one, i would expect you to put school first but you should have 30 seconds to post "i cant play this game cycle" for our sakes. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On December 23 2010 21:51 ilovejonn wrote: Can I exempt from my ban? It's my first time playing mafia and I wasn't really inactive. I even posted before the voting deadline but I forgot about the voting thread and just voted myself in the mafia thread instead. I forgot voting for yourself as a placeholder only applies when electing the mayor... I'm still new to the game and I promise I won't do it again. =[ i defer to the community for this one. am willing to be reversed and remanded if there is consensus | ||
|
deconduo
Ireland4122 Posts
On December 24 2010 02:16 annul wrote: i defer to the community for this one. am willing to be reversed and remanded if there is consensus I think a warning is fine. I'm happy cos town actually won  | ||
|
Barundar
Denmark1582 Posts
 | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
On December 24 2010 03:12 deconduo wrote: I think a warning is fine. I'm happy cos town actually won If my opinion matters at all, I will always er to the side of leniency. Let it slide with a warning. | ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
...I'm getting old. | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
What do people think about Chaoser? Still waiting on Gabriel to comment. | ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
| ||
|
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
On December 24 2010 12:03 Kenpachi wrote: Im sitting out of RoL's Team mini mafia It's a mini game, so you're going to have to clear that with RoL first. On December 24 2010 21:34 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: I think warning for chaoser, he wasn't in my games though. I would like him to play in TMM3 as a vet though. I don't think anyone else is arguing for just a warning. However, if you really want him to play, just make your game not follow the ban list. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On December 22 2010 00:48 Amber[LighT] wrote: I thought martyrdom wasn't tolerated in TL mafia? It directly violates one of the most important rules of the game: 2. Betraying your role and ruining the game for everyone by doing something like hand out your mafia's member list to the town. It sucks to watch that game go from 'meh' to 'not too bad' to 'what the fuck?' in a matter of days because of a few players. **It sucks to watch any TL mafia game do the above. Lol... Did you not play in Callers "Three Kingdoms" game? Lol...Mad funny because everyone betrayed there win condition. Hesmyrr for god mode of the game. haha | ||
| ||
