TL Mafia Ban List - Page 122
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Alderan
United States463 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
On January 23 2012 14:00 Alderan wrote: Ill be sitting out Sleeper Cell 2 if that's cool with everyone. You can. On January 22 2012 09:09 sandroba wrote: Yeah, I totally screwed that up, sorry guys. I'll sit out sleeper cell. You can if L is finished before it starts. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
Also how many modkills have there been this game? How many should there have been? | ||
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
Mattchew BrownBear - second ban - 3 games remain igabod Erandorr - second ban - 3 games remain rtgICEMAN Maxella sandroba zeks Chaosquo blahz0r rgTheSchworz Warnings from TL Mafia L: kingjames01 Cwave Meapak_Ziphh Sinani206 now has only one game remaining in his second ban with the conclusion of TL Mafia L. sandroba is noted as sitting out Sleeper Cell 2. Alderan is noted as sitting out Sleeper Cell 2. | ||
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
On January 24 2012 12:06 flamewheel wrote: Reminder that rgTheSchworz and Munk-E were modkilled for inactivity in TL Mafia L. Also how many modkills have there been this game? How many should there have been? Yah, if you count all my failed night actions | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
kitaman27
![]()
United States9244 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6784 Posts
![]() I'll do some summaries when I have the time, can I use that? lol feeling ocd here guys, throw me a lifeline. | ||
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
![]()
Ver
United States2186 Posts
On January 24 2012 17:14 Incognito wrote: I dont see why voting only once during a double lynch warrants a warning. Especially kingjames/Meapak, who clearly weren't intentionally trying to skirt the activity requirements. Agreed. I don't see any motivations for them doing it intentionally and it seems silly to ban for given all the effort and good behavior they put in. | ||
Jayme
United States5866 Posts
That being said I'd like to start my long crawl back with sitting out BC's Arkham if possible, I know sign ups are starting for it. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
| ||
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
On January 24 2012 23:18 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Mafia L's finished, I've been waiting to ask that Mattchew doesn't recieve a ban. I (unintentionally) lead him into posting those screenshots, and it was an honest mistake. I feel like between a modkill and a warning, it's sufficient. Inactivity, as in "I forgot" is also an honest mistake. Though it was his first time--I'll change it to a warning. Mattchew, this means you're free to play in games. About the single votes: once again I don't view "I forgot" as a suitable response. Though it'd be slightly hypocritical of me to let Incognito off when he didn't vote Day 1 (his response was also "I forgot" -_-) so I'll remove those warnings. I must be getting old. On January 24 2012 18:21 Jayme wrote: I think I've played on other sites now to know exactly whats required activity wise on this game...that and hopefully other unforseen nonsense with my family doesn't happen again. Seeing as I no longer live with them I don't forsee this being an issue any longer. That being said I'd like to start my long crawl back with sitting out BC's Arkham if possible, I know sign ups are starting for it. Noted. Thank you, Jayme. rgTheSchworz, you can sit out whichever game starts first. I'll put you down. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On January 25 2012 01:17 flamewheel wrote: Inactivity, as in "I forgot" is also an honest mistake. Though it was his first time--I'll change it to a warning. Mattchew, this means you're free to play in games. About the single votes: once again I don't view "I forgot" as a suitable response. Though it'd be slightly hypocritical of me to let Incognito off when he didn't vote Day 1 (his response was also "I forgot" -_-) so I'll remove those warnings. I must be getting old. Noted. Thank you, Jayme. rgTheSchworz, you can sit out whichever game starts first. I'll put you down. Imma be honest, I deserve to be banned. I clearly broke the rules and a mod-kill + 1 game ban is completely in line with the rules and regulations of the TL Mafia board. Cheese did bait (unintentionally) the rule break out of me, but I should have read the rules more closely as I am a proponent of ignorance not being an excuse. What I would ask instead of lifting the ban is for the ban to be scratched from my record after I sit out Newbie Mini or Hammer. I think this would be fair considering my actions were unintentional, not malicious, and was not the common no effort ban that we are seeing way too much of. ![]() | ||
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On January 25 2012 05:01 Mattchew wrote: Imma be honest, I deserve to be banned. I clearly broke the rules and a mod-kill + 1 game ban is completely in line with the rules and regulations of the TL Mafia board. Cheese did bait (unintentionally) the rule break out of me, but I should have read the rules more closely as I am a proponent of ignorance not being an excuse. What I would ask instead of lifting the ban is for the ban to be scratched from my record after I sit out Newbie Mini or Hammer. I think this would be fair considering my actions were unintentional, not malicious, and was not the common no effort ban that we are seeing way too much of. ![]() I like this, and I also support scratching the ban afterwards. I do not like how no matter how long ago the ban is a 3 game ban is still the next thing, unless we've changed that in my like 6 month hiatus. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
It sucks that you will get a three game ban when it's your second ban, even though your first ban was a year ago and only happened because the new MLP episode had you so excited that you forgot to vote but you've played 30 games without incident since then. So, it could be cool if there could be some mechanic in place for that, maybe 10 games without incident should erase an earlier ban? All of this should of course be up to the player herself/himself to track, the player could come in here with a list of games and flamewheel would know if there was an offence in those games, 'cause he manages the banlist ![]() -e I also like Mattchew's approach to this more than flamewheel's, one game ban because he broke the rules isn't a lot he can probably play again in a couple of weeks. With a system like the one I propose above in place he wouldn't have to deal with old bans coming back to bite him in the ass later if he just behaves from now on ![]() | ||
| ||