EPTIncognito's TL Mafia XVI - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
I will just once again plead innocence, since there's still nothing new.  | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 25 2010 12:15 789 wrote: Tredmasta was as much of a stretch as kane was. I was considering voting for flamewheel, but at the time I voted it wouldn't have mattered. It is all a moot point if Zona is right about us reading the clues wrong. From the general mood, I feel like both tredmasta and I were equally as likely a "stretch." | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 25 2010 12:54 789 wrote: It could be a useful tactic for the mafia to send one to do that. If the mafia can cause chaos amongst the townies it makes it much harder for them to work together and take out the mafia. I think it's still hard to say exactly what the mafia is doing, considering the options available to them while they are still under the cover of anonymity. However, it is very viable that those pointing fingers could be mafia agents, especially since: 1) Mafia at this point aren't as afraid of losing members, since their KP remains at 3 until they drop to 4 members and, 2) More town suspicion means less actual fire focused at them. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 25 2010 12:58 DoctorHelvetica wrote: What a game huh? Watched it at the local sports bar. Unbelievable. What was the final score? I heard it was close. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
And by "clues clues" you mean "one clue." Two words does not a sufficient response make, bandwagoner. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 25 2010 13:27 JohannesH wrote: At the moment we dont have much anything besides incognitos clues which are unreliable to the max. So some fingerpointing is much better than just staying silent and lynching the dude whos got a strange picture on profile. Interesting point: we do seem to be reading clues wrongly. Both as a means of defense for myself (since I have not been clearly, and rightly so since logically I could still be a mafia member) and as a new (semi-new) train of thought: At this time, we are going to be extending networks to those who we feel like we can trust in. Therefore, more information about players can be spread this way. Perhaps, as a few people have stated, it would be more in our interests to watch actions, not clues. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 25 2010 13:37 ghote wrote: your right we should just not look at clues and blindly hang anyone who pisses us of nice idea This coming from a person who jumps onto wagons with the first accusations? No, we don't discount clues entirely--we use what is given to use, albeit misleading as it seems, and keep that in mind when we are dealing with other people. Clues become exponentially more important as we go on, and perhaps after this next night round we will be able to. But seeing as how we have a day to wait until the next set, we might as well try to analyze people and go back to clues when we have more information. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Your timing was win, though your message was not. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 25 2010 15:38 flamewheel91 wrote: Your timing was win, though your message was not. On a lighter note: +1. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 25 2010 16:23 JohannesH wrote: Hm I didnt get the point of this message, postcount++? :D No I like 1337. I feel like I just ended on too bitchy of a note. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 25 2010 16:22 JohannesH wrote: No. Its just the other way around. Usually this game is played without any clues whatsoever. Agreed. XV wasn't, and it was a very exciting read. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 25 2010 22:20 citi.zen wrote: A couple of random observations, which will not help anyone at this point: the mafia killed the first three people if you list naes alphabetically, ignoring punctuation marks; we complain about clues, but in the end we did not really use the strongest ones for lynching either night. Hobbes and freewheel are still with us, and t_co and kane turned out to be green. flamewheel I agree though: until we get the next set of clues, it would be prudent for us to look based on players' actions and interactions. Seeing as how I cannot actually dissuade people from logic since clues are there, I invite persons who have suspicions about me to interrogate me further. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 25 2010 23:53 citi.zen wrote: BloodyC0bbler's mafia game ain't going any better for the town. I'd say theirs is worse. Lynching an inactive detective night one, then losing a bodyguard following the night, then the two vigilantes... yeah. 'Snot looking good for them. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 26 2010 00:04 citi.zen wrote: I don't see how we are saying the same thing: you are suggesting looking at people's actions instead of clues, I am stating that we tried tha with t_co and kane, and it has not worked out very well. Oops, quoted wrong person. My apologies. My thoughts still stand. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 26 2010 07:19 citi.zen wrote: I mean, if you read the thread regularly and generally reply promptly, I would think there would be... more. I don't mean to single you out, keit, hyperbola, free and a few others are in the same boat. citi.zen... once again, FLAME. Man if I'm going to be singled out at least it should be done correctly  789's post is interesting though, the part about Skronch... | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 27 2010 04:48 Ng5 wrote: Mystlord eyem the strongest. Very-very weak link. It takes strength to throw someone out the window. But it doesn't to kick the fridge's door on someone. keit Again the only link is showing down an apple down the victim's throat. I don't know much for how barbaric Cookie Monster is, but isn't it far-fetched to call him so? Something not so obvious. meeple Into the fray my friends, may our feet be swift, our hands be sure, and our necks keep a firm grasp on our heads. ... Swift feet... Just how swift should you be to kick the door on someone right as you see they are ducking behind it. Given that Incognito was the quickest to react. And hands sure? How sure (and quick) should hands be to block a knife with an apple. And also, being struck, blocking with an apple and showing it right down their throat - and then throwing them out of the window. The quote itself also seems something you would say before a charge - a far-fetched relation with taunting, but it's still not much more far-fetched than the previous links. Another thing. Maybe there's someone linked to a barbaric/tribal shaman? I have the feeling something is still missing about this barbaric person we haven't uncovered yet. Just a feeling. Third night clue--death by poisonous mist. Mystlord himself says the killer (who takes off his scarf) seems impervious to it. Just something to say. Okay back to game theory. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
| ||
