|
Unfounded matchfixing accusations are not welcome. Refrain from making off-the-wall accusations without concrete evidence. |
On September 28 2014 15:32 kongoline wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 15:08 IMoperator wrote:
I'm pretty sure that Shield didnt really take that game seriously vs. Alliance, you can tell by the rammus ban and shit. It's too bad for C9 because Shield will be playing at 100% for sure. wut, rammus is a common pick/ban in korean soloQ and shook has pretty much only rammus games on his kr account (30 games with 77% winrate), he just beat c9 with it and nws planned to fp ryze who gets crushed by jungle camp( thats why balls was so behind he could never leave his turret) im sure rammus ban was 100% serious
Idk man, they were all smiling when they banned rammus, I'm pretty sure they were trolling. Rammus honestly isnt that great of a pick.
|
Bearded Elder29905 Posts
Even if they were trolling in ban/pick phase that does not change anything. Everyone claims that Korea is 10 levels above EU/NA teams and even if they trolled banning Rammus, they should easily roll over Alliance and actually they lost 14 fucking 0 and couldn't do shit.
|
lol fans are wayyy more rabid than i thought. I went to sleeping saying Reddit was baying for a rematch, and now there're people petitioning against Riot's decision? lol.
|
Worried for C9 today 
|
On September 28 2014 15:41 ShootAnonymous wrote:
lol fans are wayyy more rabid than i thought. I went to sleeping saying Reddit was baying for a rematch, and now there're people petitioning against Riot's decision? lol.
Its because of the remake they had for SK vs GMB(?) due to an aatrox bug (which arguably had less impact than the homeguard bug). Decisions should be consistent, not random.
|
|
|
On September 28 2014 15:43 iKill[ShocK] wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 15:41 ShootAnonymous wrote:
lol fans are wayyy more rabid than i thought. I went to sleeping saying Reddit was baying for a rematch, and now there're people petitioning against Riot's decision? lol. Its because of the remake they had for SK vs GMB(?) due to an aatrox bug (which arguably had less impact than the homeguard bug). Decisions should be consistent, not random.
Well, I'm the last person to defend Riot (I derive immense enjoyment from watching Riot's fails and flops) so yeah they dug themselves a deep, deep hole with that precedent.
Personally but I'm of the Valve/DotA school of thought that bugs are actually features in disguise, and if they haven't been taken out of competitive mode or otherwise ironed out everyone's free to make use of them, much less if they happen unintentionally. OMG shouldn't be punished for FNC's inability to use rumble ult on creeps, or for Riot's inability to iron out bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
Bearded Elder29905 Posts
|
OH? Kabum showing some spirit
|
HOLY SHIT KABUM! SHOWING UP NA LOL
|
|
|
Yeah, that ain't optimal C9.
|
ROFL.
C9 pls
nice engage by Kabum to dive past T2 mid.
If you covered up the numbers I wouldn't know that C9 was ahead by 8K gold.
|
just tuned in...
WHAT IS GOING ON
|
Holy shit that was awful C9
|
On September 28 2014 15:43 iKill[ShocK] wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 15:41 ShootAnonymous wrote:
lol fans are wayyy more rabid than i thought. I went to sleeping saying Reddit was baying for a rematch, and now there're people petitioning against Riot's decision? lol. Its because of the remake they had for SK vs GMB(?) due to an aatrox bug (which arguably had less impact than the homeguard bug). Decisions should be consistent, not random.
All the Shen bug games with no remakes is probably the 'consistent' decision, with the GMB/SK remake being an outlier.
Also, it's so ambiguous whether or not the homeguard bug changed the outcome. You start assuming changed decisions on the part of Soaz because Loveling has ~300-400 less hp when he comes out(he gets a tick of fountain+homeguard heal, he would lose the homeguard boost but still get a fountain tick for a few hundred). It's probably more significant that he got half a second or so of the movement speed before he leaps, if that's how long Soaz needed for another auto playing the same way he did then yea they probably failed to win* as a direct result of it.
*They didn't lose immediately after the failed nexus attempt.
|
|
|
b-b-but, hai is challengers in korea!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
