[Riot] EU LCS Qualifiers - Page 2
Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
ex-M5, SK, and ex-CLG.eu have all qualified for EU LCS already. Stop asking where they are. -Neo, 23.01.13 | ||
![]()
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
| ||
Mensol
14536 Posts
go go millennium ^^! | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21675 Posts
On January 23 2013 23:58 Mensol wrote: where is ex-CLG.eu? They already qualified during the Season 2 Finals. | ||
veggie16
Poland44 Posts
Group B-probably DB and M, acer don't play at all and crs players were always too lazy to train given the possibilities they had(vide the only tourney they prepared to was TOTL). Group C- easy for TCM, 2nd spot wolves or TJNB Group D-TSM and MYM, only good player on mouz is warhunter, EH is too new in the EU scene. The game has changed guys, nowdays it's more about which team is better prepared than which team has better history/players, this isn't 2011. | ||
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On January 24 2013 02:36 veggie16 wrote: You guys clearly don't know the EU scene saying that atn/giants will leave gruop A, I wouldn't be suprised if anexis(they have a gaming house) takes 1st place in the group followed by fnatic. Group B-probably DB and M, acer don't play at all and crs players were always too lazy to train given the possibilities they had(vide the only tourney they prepared to was TOTL). Group C- easy for TCM, 2nd spot wolves or TJNB Group D-TSM and MYM, only good player on mouz is warhunter, EH is too new in the EU scene. The game has changed guys, nowdays it's more about which team is better prepared than which team has better history/players, this isn't 2011. When you predict, you always need to account some calculated upsets. Just like in the Liquibets for sc. I said giants will advance group A, doesn't mean they're necessarily better than anexis/fnatic. Just that it's what I predict to happen. Plus giants better than you give them credit for. atn I agree, they likely won't advance. And so on Also it feels better afterwards if you predict sick upsets. And nobody remembers if it was all wrong, so it's k. Don't take this pre-tourny banter too seriously ^o^ | ||
Vallelol
Germany1046 Posts
| ||
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On January 24 2013 03:12 Vallelol wrote: Any liquid members on the teams? Yeah, Taeja is on MYM. Trust me. | ||
sylverfyre
United States8298 Posts
I'll admit, I don't recognize the player names on Anexis, but I have a hard time believing that they could get first place over fnatic in group stages. They are unproven and relatively new as a team. Fnatic may have gone through a roster change (Yellowstar) but he's someone who has worked with these players in the past, but now he's taking a leave of absence from school in order to commit more time to LoL (a commitment that he had not made in the past, and was criticized for) Giants failed to show particularly good results in the past. Alternate (former Eloblade) is easy to point to and say "solo queue stars" but they have been together for several months now and you can bet they've been taking this opportunity seriously. Fnatic is going to take the top spot. The second spot I'd favor Alternate, but won't be surprised if there is an upset here - most likely by Anexis. The other groups, however... | ||
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
Yellowstar is a scrub in comparison. They should still advance. aTn is just not good as a team. I'd argue Giants has a better chance than them at advancing. Anexis is a team with really good players. Arquel, celaver, overpow shouldn't be too unkown, tbh. They are skill-wise stronger than Giants, and are the "favorite" for the second spot in the group, but I'm rooting for a giants upset ![]() But we shall see. | ||
![]()
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On January 24 2013 04:43 Dandel Ion wrote: You underestimate how baller Rekkles is. Yellowstar is a scrub in comparison. They should still advance. aTn is just not good as a team. I'd argue Giants has a better chance than them at advancing. Anexis is a team with really good players. Arquel, celaver, overpow shouldn't be too unkown, tbh. They are skill-wise stronger than Giants, and are the "favorite" for the second spot in the group, but I'm rooting for a giants upset ![]() But we shall see. Even with Yellowstar they were able to take a game off of Blaze, more than most teams can say. | ||
![]()
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On January 24 2013 04:43 Dandel Ion wrote: You underestimate how baller Rekkles is. Yellowstar is a scrub in comparison. They should still advance. aTn is just not good as a team. I'd argue Giants has a better chance than them at advancing. Anexis is a team with really good players. Arquel, celaver, overpow shouldn't be too unkown, tbh. They are skill-wise stronger than Giants, and are the "favorite" for the second spot in the group, but I'm rooting for a giants upset ![]() But we shall see. Remember, Rekkles won't be playing. Too young for the LCS. | ||
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On January 24 2013 05:26 AsmodeusXI wrote: Remember, Rekkles won't be playing. Too young for the LCS. Read again. I am aware. | ||
![]()
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
WOW I DUMB. Best Reader NA. sry | ||
Ente
Germany1795 Posts
Group D-TSM and MYM, only good player on mouz is warhunter, EH is too new in the EU scene. Well Naruterador isnt bad but yes your predictions might be right, no idea how strong anexis is btw But other then that pretty accurate predictions. Btw hi Veggie | ||
![]()
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
On January 24 2013 04:43 Dandel Ion wrote: You underestimate how baller Rekkles is. Yellowstar is a scrub in comparison. They should still advance. aTn is just not good as a team. I'd argue Giants has a better chance than them at advancing. Anexis is a team with really good players. Arquel, celaver, overpow shouldn't be too unkown, tbh. They are skill-wise stronger than Giants, and are the "favorite" for the second spot in the group, but I'm rooting for a giants upset ![]() But we shall see. Yellowstar is better for Fnatic than Rekkles. | ||
Doctorbeat
Netherlands13241 Posts
On January 24 2013 06:32 NeoIllusions wrote: Yellowstar is better for Fnatic than Rekkles. Agreed. Yellowstar also has a history with nRated, making his place in the team very fitting. Fnatic should take first place in their group, even though it's bo1. | ||
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
/fanboy | ||
veggie16
Poland44 Posts
On January 24 2013 05:59 Ente wrote: Well Naruterador isnt bad but yes your predictions might be right, no idea how strong anexis is btw But other then that pretty accurate predictions. Btw hi Veggie SUP! My opinion is based on the fact that I was supposed to also be in ANEXIS and the gaming house but due to my studies and personal clashes with overpow it didn't happen. From what I know they are scrimming pretty much 6-7h a day and are regular scrim partners of m5/fnatic/clg. | ||
![]()
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On January 23 2013 10:27 ExoFun wrote: Just a hunch, but all the players are good but very toxic... hope they will be the "bad boys" of the season that can go high when they stick together. So about that toxicity... | ||
SidianTheBard
United States2474 Posts
| ||
| ||