EPTOn December 02 2012 10:59 Sufficiency wrote:
Is this the first time M5 plays against a Korean team?
Is this the first time M5 plays against a Korean team?
yes.
[IPL] IPL5 Discussion - Page 262
| Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
|
jpak
United States5045 Posts
yes. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On December 02 2012 10:59 Fusilero wrote: When is lulu getting permabanned vs Korea. When Riot adds more bans, or when teams feel they're important enough to ban over other stuff. | ||
|
shinarit
Hungary900 Posts
| ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On December 02 2012 11:01 TheYango wrote: When Riot adds more bans, or when teams feel they're important enough to ban over other stuff. I'm hoping for the former rather than the latter. | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On December 02 2012 11:02 onlywonderboy wrote: I'm hoping for the former rather than the latter. Rofl riot are so resistant to additional bans they'll never do it. | ||
|
Serpico
4285 Posts
On December 02 2012 11:03 Fusilero wrote: Rofl riot are so resistant to additional bans they'll never do it. If you keep adding more champions would it make more sense to add more bans? | ||
|
GARO
United States2255 Posts
| ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On December 02 2012 11:05 Serpico wrote: If you keep adding more champions would it make more sense to add more bans? Ye but riot pulls out some bs about "Letting pros play their iconic champs" and "making the game about the ingame play not the ban/pick phase" to avoid doing it. | ||
|
Zhiroo
Kosovo2724 Posts
| ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
| ||
|
Zess
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
Rocked this game like clockwork | ||
|
thenexusp
United States3721 Posts
On December 02 2012 11:05 Serpico wrote: If you keep adding more champions would it make more sense to add more bans? You could argue that even if there are 9000 champions a pro could only really get good at 1 or 2 of them, so for targeted bans you don't need more bans than you do currently. Actually allowing more bans means we get worse pro games overall because no one will be playing on their best champs. I hope the reaction when a pro sees another pro dominate with his signature champ his reaction isn't "we gotta add this to our ban list as soon as riot adds more bans" but "i need my own signature champ..." | ||
|
Serpico
4285 Posts
On December 02 2012 11:05 Fusilero wrote: Ye but riot pulls out some bs about "Letting pros play their iconic champs" and "making the game about the ingame play not the ban/pick phase" to avoid doing it. ehh they might as well take away bans then, there's a higher chance of really weird/OP stuff developing if you add more champs with the same amount of bans. Something has to give doesnt it? | ||
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
On December 02 2012 11:05 Serpico wrote: If you keep adding more champions would it make more sense to add more bans? Not really, lets be honest, in tournament play the majority of champions aren't ban worthy. Right now at least, 4 feels like it would be too many. | ||
|
SwizzY
United States1549 Posts
| ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
| ||
|
Navi
5286 Posts
On December 02 2012 10:01 Azarkon wrote: Well, now we know AZB wasn't losing just because of tilting. This is around their level. zzzz | ||
|
iCanada
Canada10660 Posts
That game was so one sided. | ||
|
Dan HH
Romania9206 Posts
On December 02 2012 11:06 Zhiroo wrote: You can play Yi against teams like BB and Meat but not against Koreans tbh. Koreans play him against eachother too. | ||
| ||
