EPTOn January 12 2013 06:01 JBright wrote:
Can we make names for DARKNESS or OVERMIND and give it to Neo?
Can we make names for DARKNESS or OVERMIND and give it to Neo?
Those writing-staff peoplez are the ones that should go creative.
[TL R&D] T.R.O.L.L.S. - Page 4
| Forum Index > LoL Strategy |
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
Those writing-staff peoplez are the ones that should go creative. | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
On January 12 2013 05:49 MagicARide wrote: I got an idea, ravenous hydra statikk shiv GP Not only do you do massive aoe damage, you also blow up every minion wave with ease That's how I played him the last ~4 games. Avarice + Vamp is good in lane (along with a flask so you're pretty well unkillable/manaless), and then Hydra comes quick with your Avarice and Q fueled farm. I like to follow it up with IE for huge pokes that also decimate nearby enemies. Auto + Q + Hydra active demolishes waves and with TP + Ult you can splitpush like a boss. | ||
|
necrosed
Brazil885 Posts
On January 12 2013 04:57 Roffles wrote: Any Mordekaiser experiments will be thrown your way. Sidenote: Do BRs still play Morde? Or have they moved on to another champ? We never were full Mordekaiser. That's a really old forum tier list by a random guy in the forums (he changed his summoner name). Here. Somehow it perpetrated that BRs love Mordekaiser, and arguably, in season 1, the best BR player, Kanzeon (now paiN Kami Razer), went to 2.2k by playing solely Morde and Udyr, so it kinda stuck on. I would say that nowadays BR's most used champion is probably Teemo, Evelynn or Katarina. | ||
|
willoc
Canada1530 Posts
| ||
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On January 12 2013 06:01 JBright wrote: Can we make names for DARKNESS or OVERMIND and give it to Neo? Department (of) Administrators (of) Rabblerouser Kicking (and) Necessary Evil Solution Supplying. | ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On January 12 2013 06:43 AsmodeusXI wrote: Department (of) Administrators (of) Rabblerouser Kicking (and) Necessary Evil Solution Supplying. Director of Advanced Research, Knowledge, and Normal Elo Smurf Spotting Opportunity, Venture, and Extreme Research Management, Identification, and Nullification Director | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
| ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
tl;dr No one will research things you want them to research; they will research what they want to research. This thread won't survive just off of requests. edit: typo | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
Also though I kinda agree with Skippy. Is this just a Caller thread for 2013, or is something actually supposed to be happening with this? | ||
|
Ryalnos
United States1946 Posts
On January 12 2013 03:10 Caller wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=209337 Btw, baller = caller ??? | ||
|
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
| ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
| ||
|
EquilasH
Denmark2142 Posts
On January 12 2013 07:06 Scip wrote: I am sorry for probably not understanding how this works, but I can't really distinguish between this thread and the general thread. Especially given that about 1/6 of posts here are theorycrafting, which is probably a lesser fraction than what GD has. I don't mean to be a negative nancy, but if we are to make a theorycrafting centre, we need more and stricter rules to survive more than 2 days. Things like conducting your research, providing replays with explanations and analysises of the previously theorycrafted elements, with conclusion and pointing towards other related areas in need of research. I mean posting that you like the idea of critplank is wonderful, but it's not more useful than posting that in GD. tl;dr No one will research things you want them to research; they will research what they want to research. This thread won't survive just off of requests. Maybe this thread should be a thread for the correct plural forms on certain words instead, so far we've got: Aegis -> Aegides (or something) Analysis -> Analyses | ||
|
samthesaluki
914 Posts
| ||
Sc2eleazar
United States70 Posts
Section 1: Proposed theory A succinct description of theory being researched/tested Section 2: Research log Running commentary on any theory crafting / experimentation with relevant links/vods Section 3: Notable PMs Rather than clogging the thread with comments/suggestions/offers for help; pm the proposer who will update this section with relevant/helpful PMs Section 4: conclusions At the close of experimentation update this section with results; lingering questions/concerns; recognition of involved parties; suggestions for further study | ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On January 12 2013 07:06 TheYango wrote: Now try BANHAMMER. Bidirectional Analysis of Newbie Hermeneutics, Advanced Matchmaking, and Map Evaluation Researcher On January 12 2013 07:06 Scip wrote: I am sorry for probably not understanding how this works, but I can't really distinguish between this thread and the general thread. Especially given that about 1/6 of posts here are theorycrafting, which is probably a lesser fraction than what GD has. I don't mean to be a negative nancy, but if we are to make a theorycrafting centre, we need more and stricter rules to survive more than 2 days. Things like conducting your research, providing replays with explanations and analysises of the previously theorycrafted elements, with conclusion and pointing towards other related areas in need of research. I mean posting that you like the idea of critplank is wonderful, but it's not more useful than posting that in GD. tl;dr No one will research things you want them to research; they will research what they want to research. This thread won't survive just off of requests. The point of this team is to move from simply talking about ideas to implementing them. TheYango, myself, and many others have posited many different possibilities over the years, and particularly in recent months due to Season 3, but because many of them require team environments/coordination or would draw the ire of other players in matchmaking having a team specifically for the testing of such ideas seemed valuable, and also fun. I'll work some hard information into the post, but I wanted to capture and amplify the semi-serious spirit which spawned this idea. We're not simply making a thread to discuss theory, we're making a team/group/community to go out and test things together in a fun, friendly environment. On January 12 2013 07:15 WaveofShadow wrote: I am saddened and insulted that just because I'm not super active poster now I don't get included. Also though I kinda agree with Skippy. Is this just a Caller thread for 2013, or is something actually supposed to be happening with this? You didn't post your interest. :3 I'll put you down for Assistant to the Janitor's Assistant. | ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
| ||
|
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On January 12 2013 07:39 Roffles wrote: Oh hello there Wave, you are essentially my #2 PR guy. Glad to have you on board. #2 Janitor? I c wut u did there. | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
On January 12 2013 07:40 AsmodeusXI wrote: To add to the "What's The Point" discussion, I think that my commitment is going to be that whenever I'm in the "TROLLS" chat room, I'm available to help people test ideas, theorycraft, and develop new LoL strats. If they're constructed in GD, the serious about them making themselves available in TROLLS to actively test and analyze them. That's my hope. #2 Janitor? I c wut u did there. Well he did just have a kid, he's probably used to cleaning up crap at this point. | ||
|
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On January 12 2013 07:42 Requizen wrote: Well he did just have a kid, he's probably used to cleaning up crap at this point. Touche. | ||
| ||
