EPT[Patch 3.01: Season 3] General Discussion - Page 125
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
obesechicken13
United States10467 Posts
| ||
|
nafta
Bulgaria18893 Posts
On February 08 2013 03:25 GregMandel wrote: omg I really love graves. Best solo Q adc ( well I haven't played Draven yet so ... ) Biggest mistake of your life.Ever since I got owned by some random in solo q he became my main XD.Always win lane never not win lane. | ||
|
GregMandel
France822 Posts
You heard it here first. | ||
|
NpG)Explosive
France994 Posts
On February 08 2013 02:58 Scip wrote: Darien only 22 bucks, instant buy, he outclasses every european and NA toplane by a league and a half I think. I feel he's in a league of his own when it comes to feeding when you're on tilt, but I doubt there is a bonus for that. He lost his lane so many times during the second half of 2012 and I'm not sure I'll ever see the dominating Darien from the early days of M5. He really did well at Katowice though and he can be a beast on a good day. My team is: Alexich Diamond (he and alex are strong, consistent players) Edward (also very good, KS as sona all day for crazy stats) Soaz (so cheap) Jimbz (a bet, he did very good during the LCS qualifiers, could be the most talented player in his team so they may play around him) | ||
|
JonGalt
Pootie too good!4331 Posts
On February 08 2013 01:37 Ghost-z wrote: This I agree with. It would be better if your teams total gold value inflates above 100 you should still be able to keep that same lineup and score points. But should you choose to re-arrange your lineup you would be forced to the 100 gold salary cap again. I like this idea a lot. This seems to give a fair way to strategize your team in two different ways. | ||
|
Mensol
14536 Posts
He is the best NA midlaner without doubt. | ||
|
Vlanitak
Norway3045 Posts
| ||
|
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
On February 08 2013 03:45 Vlanitak wrote: http://www.newsoflegends.com/index.php/team-solomid-to-become-tsm-snapdragon-and-appear-on-tv-3626/ I am not entirly sure if I like or dislike the MTV style that this is going at o god lol..... | ||
|
Bladeorade
United States1898 Posts
On February 08 2013 03:26 obesechicken13 wrote: I've been to POF kinda ashamed to admit it. I don't think I ever pmed anyone though. Had a bunch of excuses like they were all boring. Why is it shameful? | ||
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
SNAPDRAGON WAI | ||
|
DoXa
Switzerland1448 Posts
On February 08 2013 03:45 Vlanitak wrote: http://www.newsoflegends.com/index.php/team-solomid-to-become-tsm-snapdragon-and-appear-on-tv-3626/ I am not entirly sure if I like or dislike the MTV style that this is going at hahaha what? Snapdragon? but fine with me, going to have something to laugh about and it will create drama. drama always good | ||
|
57 Corvette
Canada5941 Posts
Oh well, hopefully it will be funny at least. | ||
|
nojitosunrise
United States6188 Posts
On February 08 2013 03:45 Vlanitak wrote: http://www.newsoflegends.com/index.php/team-solomid-to-become-tsm-snapdragon-and-appear-on-tv-3626/ I am not entirly sure if I like or dislike the MTV style that this is going at The qualcomm title sponsorship is much cooler IMO. | ||
|
nafta
Bulgaria18893 Posts
On February 08 2013 03:45 Vlanitak wrote: http://www.newsoflegends.com/index.php/team-solomid-to-become-tsm-snapdragon-and-appear-on-tv-3626/ I am not entirly sure if I like or dislike the MTV style that this is going at Will this be the jersey shore of gaming?xD | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
On February 08 2013 03:45 Vlanitak wrote: http://www.newsoflegends.com/index.php/team-solomid-to-become-tsm-snapdragon-and-appear-on-tv-3626/ I am not entirly sure if I like or dislike the MTV style that this is going at I don't even know what to say. Well, they probably could have picked a... less family friendly team at least, TSM seems pretty chill as opposed to, say, Curse. It looks like it'll be a web series, unless I misread the article. | ||
|
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
BAYLYFE of gaming. Way better than Jersey. | ||
|
Doctorbeat
Netherlands13241 Posts
| ||
|
obesechicken13
United States10467 Posts
Because online dating is considered shameful in general. You're tagged as an extrovert if you have to find girls online. | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
On February 08 2013 04:00 obesechicken13 wrote: Because online dating is considered shameful in general. You're tagged as an extrovert if you have to find girls online. And PoF isn't exactly the "classiest" out of them, on top of that. But, I guess it's free, so there's that. | ||
|
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On February 08 2013 04:00 obesechicken13 wrote: Because online dating is considered shameful in general. You're tagged as an extrovert if you have to find girls online. Far less so nowadays though. I know tons of people meeting and having successful relationships online and it's not icky or weird at all. That being said, the people are serious about it (read: "not fucking weirdos") tend towards paid services because they don't just want one-night stands. Yet even that isn't a hard and fast rule. | ||
| ||
