EPTi mean, the cat should be thrown to jail for loli porn =/
Man blames cat for massive amount of pornography - Page 4
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
i mean, the cat should be thrown to jail for loli porn =/ | ||
|
[X]Ken_D
United States4650 Posts
| ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8556 Posts
| ||
|
Brett
Australia3822 Posts
| ||
|
Clow
Brazil880 Posts
| ||
Kinky
United States4126 Posts
What a dumbass. | ||
|
saritenite
Singapore1680 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + The excuse must have worked for him sometime or another, "oh dog ate my homework" kinda thing | ||
|
Quanticfograw
United States2053 Posts
| ||
|
Demoninja
United States1190 Posts
| ||
|
Gnosis
Scotland912 Posts
On August 09 2009 13:27 Ancestral wrote: It is preposterous to believe that sexually abusing a child and wanking to depictions of sexually abused children are of equal detriment to society. Edit: To embrace + Show Spoiler + (Is it ok if the conversation is hidden from those uninterested?) I just mean that theologians have their painstakingly crafted arguments based on, well, theology, in addition to lots of fancy philosophical appeals. I wouldn't know what they are, being a sometimes apathetic engineering major, but basing the argument on academic subjects (history, philosophy, perhaps even theology) is better than trying to come up with ways to make people believe in your religion. And the former certainly exists. I don't know, I think it depends. If it's a situation where new material is constantly being provided because of a viewership, then the viewer holds some responsibility. As much as the one performing the act? Probably not, either way you'd have to have a pretty sick mind. + Show Spoiler + Well, I usually stay away from any forum discussion even approaching the topic of 'God' or religion, for that matter. Too many people who would have us believe they're 'clever'  To be clear, I'm not directing that comment at you (remembering what I said earlier). There are numerous academic arguments for the existence of God, most of them grounded in philosophy and theology, followed by history and science. So, I don't know if embrace really meant to say religion, or if he just uses the word religion interchangeably with the word God, in which case I would find what he said to be a bit odd. In any case, I tend to avoid discussions of 'God' and 'religion' on forums as inevitably, the majority of the arguments are rubbish, "spaghetti monster" arguments. | ||
|
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
| ||
|
Husky
United States3362 Posts
On August 09 2009 16:39 Gnosis wrote: I don't know, I think it depends. If it's a situation where new material is constantly being provided because of a viewership, then the viewer holds some responsibility. As much as the one performing the act? Probably not, either way you'd have to have a pretty sick mind. First off I want to say... this article is hilarious and of course no one is going to buy that story. A great find regardless. Second I will say that people who make that stuff are going to do the terrible acts regardless of anyone viewing their photos or not. Like, seriously. I would imagine the pictures in virtually every case were intended for themselves but they decided to upload and share them anyway. If there was no internet it would be the same amount sicko's breaking the law and doing that stuff as we have today. Should you really be considered a felon for looking at pictures? Is there any proof what-so-ever that pictures is a 'gateway activity' into the real thing? Does looking at guro or incest material increase your chances of actually participating in that activity? Given, the pictures are wrong and horrid, but these are questions that need to be thought about in regards to our current laws. Though it looks bad for anyone who tries to defend them, because OMG U SUPPORT IT OMGGGG Just my .02 | ||
|
Boundz(DarKo)
5311 Posts
| ||
|
KinosJourney2
Sweden1811 Posts
On August 09 2009 10:17 paper wrote: i read this earlier too :3 "Griffin's claim is especially implausible because he claims his cat used keyboard commands to download the stuff. Surely a real cat would use the mouse." a cute pic from the article i read XD ![[image loading]](http://www.blogcdn.com/www.downloadsquad.com/media/2009/08/proncat.jpg) Now we got proof that the cat did it :O | ||
|
Tuke
Finland1666 Posts
| ||
anch
United States5457 Posts
On August 09 2009 17:36 Boundz(DarKo) wrote: Lol. PEDOCAT! new meme!! just add whisker on the bear's picture ![[image loading]](http://i30.tinypic.com/w6pqia.png) | ||
|
moon`
United States372 Posts
| ||
|
iG.Aura
Poland686 Posts
| ||
|
Sinedd
Poland7052 Posts
oh god thats hilarious | ||
|
MasterReY
Germany2708 Posts
last sentence "It is unclear if the cat was neutered." totally random rofl | ||
| ||
