|
On May 17 2009 04:36 vicviper wrote:
"A Nydus Canal is a large, vaginal opening, that if a Zerg unit enters, it may emerge at the other end, in a manner that "greatly puzzles most Terran scientists." (This quote is too much to not mock: What? Men cannot understand the vagina: the symbolic representation of women? I never would have guessed.)"
lol that is gold
Thank you for sharing this it gave me a good laugh
|
Men are from Mar Sara, Women are from Char
|
On May 17 2009 04:54 FieryBalrog wrote:Show nested quote +On May 17 2009 04:53 Rekrul wrote:
uh no, but starcraft IS racist
take a look at the scvs Its true, Russians are the highest race
He meant that the workers (SCVs) are black. 
|
Vatican City State1176 Posts
this article makes much more sense in the way that I can understand the reasoning behind it
even though you might disagree with it or see other reasons why something is as it is, you have to admit, that the author makes some good points
the original article is just not worth reading
PS: sunkens make medics moan in three hits....lol
|
I want to say that this sounds like a troll.
|
scv's are totally black. They have a big nose, look at those lips, check that beard too, and he sounds like a black guy.
HE IS BLACK
otherwise the game is racist for not including black guys (we dont really know who is controlling the goliath ~
|
There is at least one black ghost.
|
No wonder I'm D-. I've been playing the weak feminine race this whole time.
Lurker Spines = rows of massive penises
======D
======D
======D
|
3 Lions
United States3705 Posts
On May 17 2009 07:18 ktp wrote:
No wonder I'm D-. I've been playing the weak feminine race this whole time.
Lurker Spines = rows of massive penises
======D
======D
======D
raping all those medics lol
|
On May 17 2009 06:08 FieryBalrog wrote:Show nested quote +On May 17 2009 06:02 travis wrote:On May 17 2009 05:43 The Raurosaur wrote:On May 17 2009 05:29 travis wrote:
except for most of those stereotypes and motifs are not only based on truths of our society, but on truths of our behavior as individuals of our species. That's a totally unfounded statement. Firstly, we don't understand the interactions between nature and nurture with regards to human behaviour, especially considering the conditioning effect of society. Secondly, what about all the different cultures around the world that have different power structures and different stereotypes and tropes? kewl I get to argue  your point here is a great one, and in general I will concede that many stereotypes may in fact be unfounded outside of our society. but I don't think all. He/she is incorrect. All known societies are based on male public power structures, with some possible fringe exceptions that aren't well studied. All military actions are performed primarily by males in known societies. This includes thousands of different societies across the entire globe, including hunting-gathering based societies, that have never had contact with Europeans. Many societies are polygamous (many wives for powerful men), extremely few societies are polyandrous (and the only known examples, about 2-3, are still patriarchal, and the multiple husbands are usually brothers.) Many societies have taboos for menstruating women (which is sexist according to modern feminists), yet they independently created them. Almost all societies discourage female promiscuity, same idea.
ok, but so what is he/she incorrect about?
Etc. Needs an explanation. Only valid explanation is biological factors, which are actually well studied through the science of evolutionary psychology and evolutionary science in general. Ever wondered why male gorillas are huge compared to female gorillas? Evolution through sexual selection. Same ideas operate in humans.
you seem to be forgetting that civilization also evolves. societies aren't always structured optimally. I find it amusing that you talk about how almost all societies are completely dominated by men, and then follow it up with "Many societies have taboos for menstruating women (which is sexist according to modern feminists), yet they independently created them. Almost all societies discourage female promiscuity, same idea.", as if women have a say about that in a male dominated society.
|
On May 17 2009 04:36 vicviper wrote:
"A Nydus Canal is a large, vaginal opening, that if a Zerg unit enters, it may emerge at the other end, in a manner that "greatly puzzles most Terran scientists." (This quote is too much to not mock: What? Men cannot understand the vagina: the symbolic representation of women? I never would have guessed.)"
ROFL
I stopped reading the article half way through.
|
Jesus christ lol. Some people are so stupid it's disturbing.
|
I really like that post, fierybalrog
|
This is the kind of ridiculousness that can only happen when someone who is highly educated in a bullshit field thinks too much. Interesting proposition at best, idealized fantasy at worst. I hope this paper got her an A, and I'm also pretty amazed that the author actually knew what starcraft was in the first place.
|
Probably the most absurd thing i've ever heard.
|
I love the part about why zerg doesn't use timing pushes.
|
Kerrigan (in her infested form) is the archetypic woman. She rules her dominions with brute force, just like those lesbians do in jail.
And that pretty much sums it up i would say!
|
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL at that last picture Patriot.
But seriously, if Blizzard starts to put more woman-piloted fighters and support units into the game some random dumbass is gonna start rambling about how sexist it is for women to be potrayed in such a way.
Said dumbass may or may not be a woman.
|
So apparently Protoss and Terran never attack early, and just build up.
And here I was trying to learn how to deal with bunker rushes and speedlot pushes.
(Or would those just be metaphoric premature ejaculations?)
|
I like it how he/she went paragraphs about how zerg represent female but can only fish out 3 zerg unit quotes to back it as evidence...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
