"AUSTELL, Ga. - A teenager was decapitated by a roller coaster after he hopped a pair of fences and entered a restricted area Saturday at Six Flags Over Georgia, authorities said.
Six Flags officials are uncertain why the unidentified 17-year-old from Columbia, S.C. scaled two six-foot fences and passed signs that said the restricted area was off-limits and dangerous to visitors, spokeswoman Hela Sheth said in a news release.
Authorities were investigating reports from witnesses who said the teenager jumped the fences to retrieve a hat he lost while riding the Batman roller coaster, said Cobb County police Sgt. Dana Pierce. Police have declined to release the teenager's name until an autopsy is completed.
Six Flags said it closed the roller coaster after the Saturday afternoon accident out of respect for the teen's family. The ride was expected to reopen on Sunday, according to a Six Flags news release.
No riders injured Police said the ride was going full speed when the teen was struck. The ride's top speed is 50 mph, according to the park's Web site.
No one riding on the roller coaster was injured, Sheth said. The teen was with another boy who also entered the restricted area but was not injured, Pierce said.
The teen and his parents were at the park with a group from the Oakey Spring Baptist Church near Springfield, S.C., police said.
In May 2002, 58-year-old groundskeeper Samuel Milton Guyton of Atlanta was killed after he wandered in a restricted area under the Batman roller coaster's path and was struck in the head by the dangling leg of one of the ride's passengers. The ride was closed for a day to allow the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration to inspect the ride. It was deemed safe for passengers.
In June 2007, a teenager's legs were severed when cables snapped on the Superman Tower of Power ride at Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom in Louisville, Ky. Doctors were able to reattach Kaitlyn Lasitter's right foot, but she had to have some of her left leg amputated and subsequent surgeries.
State officials blame a faulty cable and slow response by an amusement park ride operator in the accident. Her family is suing Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom, claiming the park failed to maintain the ride and equipment and ensure riders' safety. The amusement park has denied liability in court filings."
Thoughts?
And please nothing dumb like "he wanted to give batman a piece of his mind".
"Six Flags officials are uncertain why the unidentified 17-year-old from Columbia, S.C. scaled two six-foot fences and passed signs that said the restricted area was off-limits and dangerous to visitors, spokeswoman Hela Sheth said in a news release."
What thoughts should we be having? Batman > Imbecile.
I hope Six Flags doesn't have to deal with a lawsuit because some idiot "scaled two six-foot fences and passed signs that said the restricted area was off-limits and dangerous to visitors."
The sad thing is I could see the parents suing and winning, because when you think about it two six foot fences and some signs are that much of a deterrent these days...
Six Flags is going to have to make people sign a "no stupid" contract upon entering the theme park if this sort of lame shit keeps up.
At six flags the security guard gave some girls in my group a hard time because they ducked under a minor banister in the line for the dark knight ride, yet all they were doing was bypassing about 50 feet of unoccupied walkway. He didn't even witness them doing it but someone else who got kicked off mentioned that they had done it, and then he argued for like 10 minutes and threatened to kick a group of like 10 people off the line before the two girls submitted. If he had worried about important things like people ducking under the roller coasters, maybe this wouldn't have happened :p
i read this a day or two ago. all i could think was, "that kid was a fucking idiot." if it says, "dont cross." uhhh, don't cross it. they even had two fences. -_-
I heard that he wanted his hat because he had dandruff - they know because they found his Head and Shoulders all over the park. Looks like he won't be getting ahead in life, but he didn't have a good head on his shoulders. He must've been head-over-heels for that hat, but he won't be heading home any time soon. Maybe they didn't give him enough of a head's up?
On June 30 2008 14:35 teh.pwnerer wrote: I heard that he wanted his hat because he had dandruff - they know because they found his Head and Shoulders all over the park.
On July 01 2008 03:36 CharlieMurphy wrote: These threads where someone posts some obscure news off of fark.com and then people proceed to make thousands of shitty puns are so lame. Please stop
this story make me want to /cry...not even the puns cheered me up. I lol'ed at the serial killer puns.. but not these.. probably b/c this story is more visual.
On July 01 2008 03:36 CharlieMurphy wrote: These threads where someone posts some obscure news off of fark.com and then people proceed to make thousands of shitty puns are so lame. Please stop
On July 01 2008 03:36 CharlieMurphy wrote: These threads where someone posts some obscure news off of fark.com and then people proceed to make thousands of shitty puns are so lame. Please stop
On July 01 2008 03:36 CharlieMurphy wrote: These threads where someone posts some obscure news off of fark.com and then people proceed to make thousands of shitty puns are so lame. Please stop
Yeah. Make more threads asking horrible questions about innane shit that you could figure out with a google search or the ever-so-elusive "common sense." These threads with puns and odd news are really boring...
the cellphone legality thread you infamously made comes to mind. But honestly I could probably go through most of the threads you've made and find a reason to think you're useless / dumb.
Pun threads are/have been fun and have created some of the best one-liners in TL.net history. A dude getting his head chopped off chasing a hat deserves to be mocked. It isn't a regular occurrence so it is news worthy and the actual good puns are laughable (there have been some in here). Obviously not every pun will be good but that is non-unique, everything on TL.net has its mix of good and bad.
On July 01 2008 03:36 CharlieMurphy wrote: These threads where someone posts some obscure news off of fark.com and then people proceed to make thousands of shitty puns are so lame. Please stop
On July 01 2008 04:45 CharlieMurphy wrote: lmao, so morally I am wrong for wanting to use a phone I found on the ground and you are right for laughing at someone's death.
The fact you can even get there with what was said is astounding.
No, morals didnt come into the reason for why you are so fucking stupid in the cellphone thread. Not for me anyways. The fact that you conceived that finding, using and absorbing something that isn't yours as possibly being legal as if the entire world was some kind of "finders keepers" game blew me away. Of course "finding" a phone and using it to make calls is illegal. Who the FUCK would think otherwise other than a 3 year old and you?
You can try and argue that making puns on a gaming forum about someone's death is morally worse than picking up a cellphone and making phone calls that will be charged to someone else but you would again be wrong. While these words cause no literal or tangible damage you using someone elses phone literally would. You can argue that someone close to the deceased may read this forum but I'd probably avoid that propensity argument.
On July 01 2008 05:07 Hawk wrote: Oh, hold up, the moral police has come to the thread and cast judgement.
Making fun of dead people = cool Using a phone = not!
oh wow idiot citizens comment on moral police work!
Hey, reread the post and pay special attention to the part where I say it isn't about morals and then elaborate on how "using a phone" is not where he went wrong but that he didnt know that finding someone elses phone and then using it IS wrong. I know, the nuances of logical arguments can be confusing from time to time but wade through it and ask questions if you again, get locked up on some fairly basic concepts.
rofl fuck off. You are the laughing stock of this forum and even you know it.
And no, it is never legal to find a phone and use it. No court of law would be ok with that because it would create the situation where someone can "find" a fucking phone when in reality they are stealing it. My logic is a helluva lot more clear and informed than the garbage you spout. Go fill a fucking government document you jester jesus.
On July 01 2008 05:07 Hawk wrote: Oh, hold up, the moral police has come to the thread and cast judgement.
Making fun of dead people = cool Using a phone = not!
oh wow idiot citizens comment on moral police work!
Hey, reread the post and pay special attention to the part where I say it isn't about morals and then elaborate on how "using a phone" is not where he went wrong but that he didnt know that finding someone elses phone and then using it IS wrong. I know, the nuances of logical arguments can be confusing from time to time but wade through it and ask questions if you again, get locked up on some fairly basic concepts.
On July 01 2008 05:48 CharlieMurphy wrote: Your posts complaints are trash annoying get off the boards out of this thread if you don't find it funny.
FTFY
I did find it funny. My complaints were about the guy complaining.. but that'd take reading for you to understand and I figure that a aggressive requirement around here.
What logical fallacy are you referring to 4chan mahini?
If that is what you are referring to I admit that argument requires onlookers to fill in the space. But if you knew what I meant that was all I was going for. If you think I was 100% saying finding any phone and using it in any way is 100% always wrong then you are a fucking moron. Not a stretch considering I am responding to Mahini.
On July 01 2008 05:48 CharlieMurphy wrote: Your posts complaints are trash annoying get off the boards out of this thread if you don't find it funny.
FTFY
I did find it funny. My complaints were about the guy complaining.. but that'd take reading for you to understand and I figure that a aggressive requirement around here.
What logical fallacy are you referring to 4chan mahini?
look he did it again!
kekeke
Lets not discuss shit but rather refer to stuff and make no mention of it later! I'm game!
Ok, how about this. Rather than actually discussing anything yourself, you rely on ridiculous ad hominem attacks to gain some stupid moral ground on your opponent. The retarded phone argument is quite a prime example, as is your 4chan one. Happy now Mr. Debater?
On July 01 2008 05:48 CharlieMurphy wrote: Your posts complaints are trash annoying get off the boards out of this thread if you don't find it funny.
FTFY
I did find it funny. My complaints were about the guy complaining.. but that'd take reading for you to understand and I figure that a aggressive requirement around here.
What logical fallacy are you referring to 4chan mahini?
On July 01 2008 06:06 CharlieMurphy wrote: See what I mean? This perfect poster is infallible when it comes to shitting up threads with off topic name-calling and arguments.
Obviously I am very far from the perfect poster. And I perfectly okay with "shitting up" this thread.. you shouldn't mind either since you asked that people stop making them right?
@Mahini: He asked for examples.. I gave one. Sorry if people are held accountable for the shit they say (yeah that was sarcasm, you don't need to be witty and elude that you caught it this time<3).
On July 01 2008 03:36 CharlieMurphy wrote: These threads where someone posts some obscure news off of fark.com and then people proceed to make thousands of shitty puns are so lame. Please stop
Yeah. Make more threads asking horrible questions about innane shit that you could figure out with a google search or the ever-so-elusive "common sense." These threads with puns and odd news are really boring...
oh did he ask for it?
p.s. i find no harm in punning the shit out of this thread, it's your horrid posts that annoy me the most. you have the uncanny ability to bait people into inane stupid arguments that have nothing to do with the matter at hand.
On July 01 2008 03:36 CharlieMurphy wrote: These threads where someone posts some obscure news off of fark.com and then people proceed to make thousands of shitty puns are so lame. Please stop
Yeah. Make more threads asking horrible questions about innane shit that you could figure out with a google search or the ever-so-elusive "common sense." These threads with puns and odd news are really boring...
oh did he ask for it?
He complains about what he calls a "shitty thread" and I point out he's a hypocrite. He asks for an example and I make what you quoted even more clear for him. I love how you avoid the word "accountability" in my last post and just assume that obviously I meant that he OUT OF NOWHERE is like "Hey iNcontroL! Gimme an example of my own bad thread" And I just happen to read it and give it to him.
you're fucking dense dude. Go back to 4chan where you can be dense but anonymous.
oh, by the way, if we want to start talking about accountability. by all accounts, you shouldn't ever be able to be trusted on subjects of starcraft. i guess that's different though, because youre falling on hard financial time eh?
On July 01 2008 06:37 mahnini wrote: oh, by the way, if we want to start talking about accountability. by all accounts, you shouldn't ever be able to be trusted on subjects of starcraft. i guess that's different though, because youre falling on hard financial time eh?
hahhahahahahahahaha
jesus rofl
god damn you are fucking stupid
ok im done. Have the last word or whatever I cannot even respond to this garbage anymore. EVEN I. And YES I have an amazing talent for arguing REALLY stupid shit so when I cannot even slink that low that is REALLY saying something dude.
On July 01 2008 06:33 mahnini wrote: obviously because he's a hypocrite this thread is automatically good? what generous use of logic.
I cant help but to respond to this cause hopefully even you can see how dumb this is...
I dont say that because he is a hypocrite this thread is good.. that is connecting two seperate statements and assuming they link and even beyond that, are something I am arguing for. I never said this thread was good nor did I say that because he is a hypocrite this thread is any quantity of good or bad. I said independent of each other, charlie is a hypocrite and that this thread contains some good puns and bad puns like anything else on TL.net.
On July 01 2008 05:48 CharlieMurphy wrote: Your posts complaints are trash annoying get off the boards out of this thread if you don't find it funny.
FTFY
I did find it funny. My complaints were about the guy complaining.. but that'd take reading for you to understand and I figure that a aggressive requirement around here.
What logical fallacy are you referring to 4chan mahini?
look he did it again!
kekeke
Lets not discuss shit but rather refer to stuff and make no mention of it later! I'm game!
On July 01 2008 06:37 mahnini wrote: oh, by the way, if we want to start talking about accountability. by all accounts, you shouldn't ever be able to be trusted on subjects of starcraft. i guess that's different though, because youre falling on hard financial time eh?
hahhahahahahahahaha
jesus rofl
god damn you are fucking stupid
ok im done. Have the last word or whatever I cannot even respond to this garbage anymore. EVEN I. And YES I have an amazing talent for arguing REALLY stupid shit so when I cannot even slink this low that is REALLY saying something dude.
On July 01 2008 06:33 mahnini wrote: obviously because he's a hypocrite this thread is automatically good? what generous use of logic.
I cant help but to respond to this cause hopefully even you can see how dumb this is...
I dont say that because he is a hypocrite this thread is good.. that is connecting two seperate statements and assuming they link and even beyond that, are something I am arguing for. I never said this thread was good nor did I say that because he is a hypocrite this thread is any quantity of good or bad. I said independent of each other, charlie is a hypocrite and that this thread contains some good puns and bad puns like anything else on TL.net.
Please tell me you can follow THAT at least..
so basically, you are needlessly attacking CM for him stating his opinion of this thread in this thread and everything after that was simply you repeating the process.
On June 30 2008 13:32 Ryot wrote: Apparently the family is gonna try and sue Six Flags, and they are denying liability.
He climbed fences he wasn't supposed to climb. I really hope Six Flags counter-sues for lost proft for having to shut down the ride. I hope they do it, and I hope they win.
I'm sick and tired of the "I'm not responsible" mentality. Your stupid kid climbed a couple fences. That's his fault. He's dead now. It's not Six Flags' fault because you raised your kid to be a stupid moron.
People have gotten so bad at reading. The story involves three sepertate incidences and some ppl have been commenting combing stories like the teen got his head kicked off. That was the groundkeeper. Also someone said the teen's parents is suing but thats the girl who lost her legs through no fault of her own. That seems legit btw that she should sue for getting her legs jacked up. Geez I thought us ppl were the smartest.
On June 30 2008 13:32 Ryot wrote: Apparently the family is gonna try and sue Six Flags, and they are denying liability.
He climbed fences he wasn't supposed to climb. I really hope Six Flags counter-sues for lost proft for having to shut down the ride. I hope they do it, and I hope they win.
I'm sick and tired of the "I'm not responsible" mentality. Your stupid kid climbed a couple fences. That's his fault. He's dead now. It's not Six Flags' fault because you raised your kid to be a stupid moron.
Seriously, I agree 100%... This culture of no-liability is sickening... People just want to blame someone else and make a quick fucking buck
Haha, does anyone remember half a year ago, a girl got her foot amputated by the superman ride? lol apparently the cable snapped and it amputated her while she was going up/down.
On June 30 2008 13:51 [X]Ken_D wrote: Did the leg that hit the guy's head get hurt?
I can't see how someone can get decapitated by someone's leg at 50mph.
I just don't see it happening..
On July 01 2008 08:50 yn01_ wrote: Haha, does anyone remember half a year ago, a girl got her foot amputated by the superman ride? lol apparently the cable snapped and it amputated her while she was doing up/down.
On July 01 2008 08:50 yn01_ wrote: Haha, does anyone remember half a year ago, a girl got her foot amputated by the superman ride? lol apparently the cable snapped and it amputated her while she was doing up/down.
Lol you're an idiot, i found it hilarious that the superman and batman rides have owned people.
On June 30 2008 13:51 [X]Ken_D wrote: Did the leg that hit the guy's head get hurt?
I can't see how someone can get decapitated by someone's leg at 50mph.
I just don't see it happening..
On July 01 2008 08:50 yn01_ wrote: Haha, does anyone remember half a year ago, a girl got her foot amputated by the superman ride? lol apparently the cable snapped and it amputated her while she was doing up/down.
Lol you're an idiot, i found it hilarious that the superman and batman rides have owned people.
her foot did get amputated I think it was more horrible for the people to watch her, rather than actually being her
On June 30 2008 13:51 [X]Ken_D wrote: Did the leg that hit the guy's head get hurt?
I can't see how someone can get decapitated by someone's leg at 50mph.
I just don't see it happening..
On July 01 2008 08:50 yn01_ wrote: Haha, does anyone remember half a year ago, a girl got her foot amputated by the superman ride? lol apparently the cable snapped and it amputated her while she was doing up/down.
Lol you're an idiot, i found it hilarious that the superman and batman rides have owned people.
her foot did get amputated I think it was more horrible for the people to watch her, rather than actually being her
Lol are you kidding me? watching someone is worse then getting your leg amputated? if anything you'd feel glad it wasn't you
On June 30 2008 13:51 [X]Ken_D wrote: Did the leg that hit the guy's head get hurt?
I can't see how someone can get decapitated by someone's leg at 50mph.
I just don't see it happening..
On July 01 2008 08:50 yn01_ wrote: Haha, does anyone remember half a year ago, a girl got her foot amputated by the superman ride? lol apparently the cable snapped and it amputated her while she was doing up/down.
Lol you're an idiot, i found it hilarious that the superman and batman rides have owned people.
Lets make you ride these rides thousands of time until the statistical probably approaches zero for your penis getting amputated so you won't be able to reproduce.
On June 30 2008 13:51 [X]Ken_D wrote: Did the leg that hit the guy's head get hurt?
I can't see how someone can get decapitated by someone's leg at 50mph.
I just don't see it happening..
On July 01 2008 08:50 yn01_ wrote: Haha, does anyone remember half a year ago, a girl got her foot amputated by the superman ride? lol apparently the cable snapped and it amputated her while she was doing up/down.
Lol you're an idiot, i found it hilarious that the superman and batman rides have owned people.
Lets make you ride these rides thousands of time until the statistical probably approaches zero for your penis getting amputated so you won't be able to reproduce.
On June 30 2008 13:51 [X]Ken_D wrote: Did the leg that hit the guy's head get hurt?
I can't see how someone can get decapitated by someone's leg at 50mph.
I just don't see it happening..
On July 01 2008 08:50 yn01_ wrote: Haha, does anyone remember half a year ago, a girl got her foot amputated by the superman ride? lol apparently the cable snapped and it amputated her while she was doing up/down.
Lol you're an idiot, i found it hilarious that the superman and batman rides have owned people.
Lets make you ride these rides thousands of time until the statistical probably approaches zero for your penis getting amputated so you won't be able to reproduce.
On July 01 2008 07:58 Gokey wrote: Seriously, I agree 100%... This culture of no-liability is sickening... People just want to blame someone else and make a quick fucking buck
Obligatory bash.org:
<samsim> I heard about this guy who broke into a lion's den at the zoo <samsim> and got mauled <samsim> and people were talking about how there should have been better defences put up to prevent people getting into the cage <samsim> a friend of mine suggested setting up some kind of deterrent <samsim> for example, putting some sort of fierce animal in the cage, which would attack anybody who climbed in
On July 01 2008 07:58 Gokey wrote: Seriously, I agree 100%... This culture of no-liability is sickening... People just want to blame someone else and make a quick fucking buck
<samsim> I heard about this guy who broke into a lion's den at the zoo <samsim> and got mauled <samsim> and people were talking about how there should have been better defences put up to prevent people getting into the cage <samsim> a friend of mine suggested setting up some kind of deterrent <samsim> for example, putting some sort of fierce animal in the cage, which would attack anybody who climbed in
<samsim> I heard about this guy who broke into a lion's den at the zoo <samsim> and got mauled <samsim> and people were talking about how there should have been better defences put up to prevent people getting into the cage <samsim> a friend of mine suggested setting up some kind of deterrent <samsim> for example, putting some sort of fierce animal in the cage, which would attack anybody who climbed in
On July 01 2008 07:58 Gokey wrote: Seriously, I agree 100%... This culture of no-liability is sickening... People just want to blame someone else and make a quick fucking buck
<samsim> I heard about this guy who broke into a lion's den at the zoo <samsim> and got mauled <samsim> and people were talking about how there should have been better defences put up to prevent people getting into the cage <samsim> a friend of mine suggested setting up some kind of deterrent <samsim> for example, putting some sort of fierce animal in the cage, which would attack anybody who climbed in
On July 02 2008 02:15 fanatacist wrote: I think it's unfortunate that the news is trying to capitalize on this accident and relates it to other accidents.
On July 02 2008 02:15 fanatacist wrote: I think it's unfortunate that the news is trying to capitalize on this accident and relates it to other accidents.
On July 02 2008 02:15 fanatacist wrote: I think it's unfortunate that the news is trying to capitalize on this accident and relates it to other accidents.
I don't get it.
Learn latin. Or economics.
No I mean if this was supposed to be a joke, I'm not getting it.
On July 02 2008 02:15 fanatacist wrote: I think it's unfortunate that the news is trying to capitalize on this accident and relates it to other accidents.
I don't get it.
Learn latin. Or economics.
No I mean if this was supposed to be a joke, I'm not getting it.
On July 02 2008 02:15 fanatacist wrote: I think it's unfortunate that the news is trying to capitalize on this accident and relates it to other accidents.
I don't get it.
Learn latin. Or economics.
No I mean if this was supposed to be a joke, I'm not getting it.
On July 02 2008 02:15 fanatacist wrote: I think it's unfortunate that the news is trying to capitalize on this accident and relates it to other accidents.
I don't get it.
Learn latin. Or economics.
No I mean if this was supposed to be a joke, I'm not getting it.
On July 02 2008 02:15 fanatacist wrote: I think it's unfortunate that the news is trying to capitalize on this accident and relates it to other accidents.
I don't get it.
Learn latin. Or economics.
No I mean if this was supposed to be a joke, I'm not getting it.
On July 02 2008 02:15 fanatacist wrote: I think it's unfortunate that the news is trying to capitalize on this accident and relates it to other accidents.
On July 03 2008 05:08 CFDragon wrote: http://youtube.com/watch?v=UAbAIpZG7II Surprised I haven't seen this referenced yet, maybe I just haven't read it close enough.
ahem....
On July 01 2008 03:33 bluemanrocks wrote: somone needs to redo one of those "head-on! apply directly to your forehead!" ads with a "batman rollercoaster! apply directly to your forehead!" ad.
On July 02 2008 02:15 fanatacist wrote: I think it's unfortunate that the news is trying to capitalize on this accident and relates it to other accidents.
I don't get it.
Learn latin. Or economics.
No I mean if this was supposed to be a joke, I'm not getting it.
On July 03 2008 23:57 SlickR12345 wrote: they need better protection, there are kids on their park. I say they should put 20 meter fences if they have to.
How about a ride that decapitates people to keep them away from the restricted area?
On July 03 2008 23:57 SlickR12345 wrote: they need better protection, there are kids on their park. I say they should put 20 meter fences if they have to.
What about putting a ride that decapitates people to keep them away from the restricted area?
On July 03 2008 23:57 SlickR12345 wrote: they need better protection, there are kids on their park. I say they should put 20 meter fences if they have to.
Considering he was jumping up and able to touch the coaster from on the other side of the fence, I don't see how it could have been much higher.
At some point you have to put faith in people not being complete idiots. The warning signs should be more than enough to exonerate the park from any lawsuits.
On July 03 2008 23:57 SlickR12345 wrote: they need better protection, there are kids on their park. I say they should put 20 meter fences if they have to.
What about putting a ride that decapitates people to keep them away from the restricted area?
On July 03 2008 23:57 SlickR12345 wrote: they need better protection, there are kids on their park. I say they should put 20 meter fences if they have to.
What about putting a ride that decapitates people to keep them away from the restricted area?
On July 03 2008 23:57 SlickR12345 wrote: they need better protection, there are kids on their park. I say they should put 20 meter fences if they have to.
What about putting a ride that decapitates people to keep them away from the restricted area?
On July 03 2008 23:57 SlickR12345 wrote: they need better protection, there are kids on their park. I say they should put 20 meter fences if they have to.
what's stopping from someone climbing a 20meter fence? then you'll get retards climbing the fence, falling down and breaking their legs AND head.
they should've just put a third fence imo. that would've solved all the problems clearly.
oh and btw, 20meter fence is like 6-7 stories lol?
On July 03 2008 23:57 SlickR12345 wrote: they need better protection, there are kids on their park. I say they should put 20 meter fences if they have to.
What about putting a ride that decapitates people to keep them away from the restricted area?
On July 03 2008 23:57 SlickR12345 wrote: they need better protection, there are kids on their park. I say they should put 20 meter fences if they have to.
What about putting a ride that decapitates people to keep them away from the restricted area?
They could name it 'THE DARWIN ADVENTURE'
ROFL
i dont get it ;_;
I'm not one to bash on people who don't bother in school, but have you really never heard of Darwin?
On July 03 2008 23:57 SlickR12345 wrote: they need better protection, there are kids on their park. I say they should put 20 meter fences if they have to.
What about putting a ride that decapitates people to keep them away from the restricted area?
On July 16 2008 01:33 Soranna12 wrote: ...that's why I keep my legs tucked against the coaster when I ride them...doesn't seem like such a silly idea now
On July 16 2008 01:33 Soranna12 wrote: ...that's why I keep my legs tucked against the coaster when I ride them...doesn't seem like such a silly idea now
EPT
![[image loading]](http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/8800/hardchoicesep1.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/8126/500copyil3.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.ee.duke.edu/~drsmith/cloaking/invisible_man.jpg)
I'm game!
I cannot even respond to this garbage anymore. EVEN I. And YES I have an amazing talent for arguing REALLY stupid shit so when I cannot even slink that low that is REALLY saying something dude.![[image loading]](http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p80/baseballbopper/57e1594c79a346d7f77e826ed7e2fd100a0.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o81/logmatt/Toy%20Archives/Movies/TDK/TDKbatmanbobbleneca.jpg)
