EPTDespite their applause, even the most staunch Republicans must be aware of the hypocrisy.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1093
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
Despite their applause, even the most staunch Republicans must be aware of the hypocrisy. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
Edit: lol, he doesn’t even call for compromise. He just says it make America great or the highway. The man has never been weaker, but he is still trying to pick a fight. | ||
|
CorsairHero
Canada9491 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
Edit: the mythical caravan has been spotted. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
Edit: Boo. Not happening. Wanted so badly for him to declare it in front of SCOTUS. Edit2: the women in Congress part was cool. Points to Trump on that. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
IyMoon
United States1249 Posts
On February 06 2019 11:47 Plansix wrote: Did he just to the state of the union to attack the late John McCain? This is fucking embarrassing. When did this happen? | ||
|
IyMoon
United States1249 Posts
On February 06 2019 11:39 On_Slaught wrote: Trump building the case for a live declaration of emergency? Edit: Boo. Not happening. Wanted so badly for him to declare it in front of SCOTUS. Edit2: the women in Congress part was cool. Points to Trump on that. Trump did create all those jobs, so he really deserves the credit | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
Earlier I guess, my mistake. He dump on democrats at a lunch on earlier and also decided to take a dig at McCain. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
blunderfulguy
United States1415 Posts
On February 06 2019 11:59 Pandain wrote: State of the Union is so stupid. It's basically just a propaganda machine for both political parties. Not sure why, but I find a bunch of elected congressmen continually chanting "USA" and clapping at every second statement to be pretty juvenile. I was trying to think of a word to describe it. Juvenile seems to fit very well. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
Edit: give Doug Mills a bonus, he got the photo of the night. | ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15723 Posts
| ||
|
Ayaz2810
United States2763 Posts
On February 06 2019 12:49 Mohdoo wrote: This is a really bad rebuttal. You think? It seems like it hit all the right notes to me. She had a very limited window in which to deliver it. Give her an hour, and she could do much better than Donnie Moscow. | ||
|
Introvert
United States4862 Posts
| ||
micronesia
United States24740 Posts
| ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
I like the rebuttal. It wasn't really a rebuttal in the sense of going point for point with the SOTU, but laid out a contrasting vision of where the Dems want to take the country. I liked her energy too. The backdrop of people was kind of weird, though. | ||
|
Falling
Canada11369 Posts
On February 06 2019 03:32 Plansix wrote: Slander is spoken. If it is in print, it is libel. - JJJ But it is nice that the champions of Free Speech turn to the goverment to silence other groups and people through lawsuits. Because free speech is all well and good if it is them, but it isn't for anyone else. Seriously, the most amusing part of all of this is that their arguments are the same arguments used to create hate speech legislation. They want to be protected from speech that would harm their ability to function in a free society, while they employ speech that does the exact same thing. But is always nice when people cheer on the racists and white supremacists, not because they agree with racism, but because they want to see a group dedicated to fighting racism taken down a couple pegs. I don't think it's inconsistent at all. Introvert is the first I've heard of someone being against defamation laws. Presumably he has been against it for some time. But I don't think any of these people that are defending themselves against defamation were against the defamation laws before, but suddenly changed their minds. It simply didn't come up before because they hadn't been defamed sufficiently to push back. Libel and slander is means there must be a false statement that can be objectively demonstrated to be false amongst other things. Hate speech is a nebulous term that if used in the way I've seen it used, would include the Bible. What is hate? Is it something that is disagreeable to you? Very often that seems to be the measure. | ||
| ||
