EPTGreetings to all chess players and fans out there.
In that position, doesn't Qf2+ save black?
1.... Qf2+
2. Kxf2 (2.Kd1?? Qf1++) fxg6+
3. Qf3 Rxf3+
4. Nxf3 Bxb2
5. Ra2 Bd4+
and Black survives.
The Chess Thread - Page 8
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Kavas
Australia3421 Posts
Greetings to all chess players and fans out there. In that position, doesn't Qf2+ save black? 1.... Qf2+ 2. Kxf2 (2.Kd1?? Qf1++) fxg6+ 3. Qf3 Rxf3+ 4. Nxf3 Bxb2 5. Ra2 Bd4+ and Black survives. | ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
On February 02 2014 22:20 urboss wrote: As mentioned by wingpawn, after Qe3+ king goes to d1 and Black has no more checks. The engine gives Qf2+ as equal and Qe3+ as +1.0 for White. I had this in a blitz game and played Qe3+ of course, only found out afterwards. How does one ever see stuff like that in a game? If it's a puzzle it's always easier, because you know you have to consider weird looking moves. Always look at the checks and forcing moves and you'll find stuff like this a lot more often. | ||
|
3FFA
United States3931 Posts
On February 03 2014 08:04 GolemMadness wrote: Always look at the checks and forcing moves and you'll find stuff like this a lot more often. How does one tell that a move is forcing and that they aren't just overlooking something? | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23442 Posts
check them from your opponents view also | ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
On February 04 2014 05:11 3FFA wrote: How does one tell that a move is forcing and that they aren't just overlooking something? Checks will always be the most forcing. For captures/threats, just gotta calculate. | ||
|
kwizach
3658 Posts
| ||
|
vndestiny
Singapore3473 Posts
| ||
|
urboss
Austria1223 Posts
He lost to Caruana and Aronian and drew with Nakamura. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 05 2014 22:21 urboss wrote: Carlsen doesn't seem to be as good in rapid chess. He lost to Caruana and Aronian and drew with Nakamura. While you're probably mostly right, I think his result in the rapid was more anomolous than properly representative. | ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
Magnus Carlsen's official youtube channel. I guess this was his big news. Edit: Is there a way to link to the channel without generating an embedded video? | ||
|
misirlou
Portugal3316 Posts
On February 06 2014 21:10 TheBB wrote: http://youtu.be/4EWV_Oa6pPs Magnus Carlsen's official youtube channel. I guess this was his big news. Edit: Is there a way to link to the channel without generating an embedded video? Magnus Carlsen Channel | ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
 | ||
|
BatesCsC
United States99 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On February 05 2014 22:21 urboss wrote: Carlsen doesn't seem to be as good in rapid chess. He lost to Caruana and Aronian and drew with Nakamura. caruana seems like the next new beast. not much shame in that | ||
|
kwizach
3658 Posts
On February 07 2014 09:35 oneofthem wrote: caruana seems like the next new beast. not much shame in that I'd watch out for Anish Giri as well when it comes to talented young players who can still improve. | ||
|
don_kyuhote
3007 Posts
1st time playing OTB chess in many suns. Got 1 month to improve  . | ||
|
hypercube
Hungary2735 Posts
On February 05 2014 22:40 marvellosity wrote: While you're probably mostly right, I think his result in the rapid was more anomolous than properly representative. Yeah, he's still one of the best rapid players in the world, though obviously "bad" compared to his dominance in classical chess. Which is a little strange: there was a time when he was regularly using <30 minutes to his first time control in supertournaments and beating some of the best players in the world. | ||
|
broz0rs
United States2294 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 07 2014 17:41 hypercube wrote: Yeah, he's still one of the best rapid players in the world, though obviously "bad" compared to his dominance in classical chess. Which is a little strange: there was a time when he was regularly using <30 minutes to his first time control in supertournaments and beating some of the best players in the world. Time controls are a funny thing. I'm pretty bad at blitz, but in time trouble in a classical length game I'm really strong. No idea why. | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23442 Posts
in time trouble you have thought a lot about the position and warmed up your brain kinda so you can move real fast. | ||
| ||
