| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Rassy
Netherlands2308 Posts
This cant be coincidence lol. China is called to the rescue,they have to keep north korea under control. Leaders in china dont want to risk their newly earned capitalist wealth so they will do everything they can. It is a bit risky,when north korea feels it cant rely on its natural aly china annymore they might do something desperate. Still think its rethoric and nothing more,postponing the inevitable. Korean unification will happen within 1 decade. | ||
|
thezanursic
5489 Posts
| ||
|
NervO
Netherlands511 Posts
| ||
|
Zandar
Netherlands1541 Posts
On March 09 2013 23:35 NerdFace wrote: South Korea gots 3/3 upgrades + all other upgrades and North Korea is not upgraded and don't even got combat shields or stim and they are supply capped. I don't see how North Korea makes a chance. South Korea's main command center, supply, tech and production are all in close range of NK's gigantic siege tank line. | ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8690 Posts
On March 09 2013 23:35 NerdFace wrote: South Korea gots 3/3 upgrades + all other upgrades and North Korea is not upgraded and don't even got combat shields or stim and they are supply capped. I don't see how North Korea makes a chance. nuke>200/200 army | ||
|
LuckyFool
United States9015 Posts
yeah but 1 nuke can't take out the entire army + mineral line. NK would only have 1-2 nukes tops. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
| ||
|
docvoc
United States5491 Posts
On March 09 2013 23:48 Shikyo wrote: It's not Starcraft. 1 nuke would make both koreas inhabitable. As much as the joke was funny, this is the truth. One plutonium tipped missile (it doesn't even have to be an ICBM since it's a close range shot so it requires much less technology) would pretty much destroy most everything in the seoul area all the way around SK it would probably spill over to NK also. | ||
|
Capped
United Kingdom7236 Posts
On March 10 2013 00:07 docvoc wrote: As much as the joke was funny, this is the truth. One plutonium tipped missile (it doesn't even have to be an ICBM since it's a close range shot so it requires much less technology) would pretty much destroy most everything in the seoul area all the way around SK it would probably spill over to NK also. Yes...the joke was funny untill you stated the obvious. North korea's goverment is really fucking stupid, what do they hope to gain out of this? Sure they can launch a nuke or two and kill millions of innocent people, then the rest of the world will just march in and gun them down, its futile. Its like they have small man syndrome and are constantly trying to flex their muscles to impress when everyone views them as pathetic because of it. Needs to fucking stop. | ||
|
theBALLS
Singapore2935 Posts
On March 10 2013 00:30 Capped wrote: Yes...the joke was funny untill you stated the obvious. North korea's goverment is really fucking stupid, what do they hope to gain out of this? Sure they can launch a nuke or two and kill millions of innocent people, then the rest of the world will just march in and gun them down, its futile. Its like they have small man syndrome and are constantly trying to flex their muscles to impress when everyone views them as pathetic because of it. Needs to fucking stop. that is exactly why they will never actually do anything at all. They're not that dumb. | ||
|
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
On March 09 2013 23:48 Shikyo wrote: It's not Starcraft. 1 nuke would make both koreas inhabitable. Not even close. A single nuclear weapon isn't even close to being strong enough to make both countries inhabitable much less a nuke made by NK. | ||
|
Silvanel
Poland4731 Posts
On March 10 2013 02:44 heliusx wrote: Not even close. A single nuclear weapon isn't even close to being strong enough to make both countries inhabitable much less a nuke made by NK. This. Direct hit to say Seoul would be devastating obviously, but its not even close to affecting entire penisula. | ||
|
bOneSeven
Romania685 Posts
| ||
|
Xenocide_Knight
Korea (South)2625 Posts
On March 09 2013 23:48 Shikyo wrote: It's not Starcraft. 1 nuke would make both koreas inhabitable. I don't think nuclear weapons are quite that powerful | ||
|
grush57
Korea (South)2582 Posts
On March 10 2013 03:16 Xenocide_Knight wrote: I don't think nuclear weapons are quite that powerful the nuke they tested in 2009(?) was 5kt which would make a blast of like 1-2km, which would kill not even a hundred thousand(tho obviously more after radiation but it wouldnt even destroy all of seoul) | ||
|
Zahir
United States947 Posts
| ||
|
kafkaesque
Germany2006 Posts
Also, its important to note that China, Pyongyang's only major diplomatic ally, endorsed the latest UN resolution. This makes the entire situation much less threatening. I wouldn't want the US of A to fuck with China, I'm much too sheltered to thrive in a WWIII situation. | ||
|
Yergidy
United States2107 Posts
| ||
|
Yuljan
2196 Posts
On March 10 2013 04:05 kafkaesque wrote: This makes the entire situation much less threatening. I wouldn't want the US of A to fuck with China, I'm much too sheltered to thrive in a WWIII situation. Dont worry. We would not support the US against China anyway. We only honor alliances if it doenst cost us much nowadays. | ||
|
HellRoxYa
Sweden1614 Posts
On March 09 2013 20:46 Sinedd wrote: they can scream all they want they dont have a slightest chance in an open conflict with the South.. USA tolerates the country (for unknown reasons) so they can live for now, but if that changes, they're goners.. It's all about cost. Doing nothing (and just giving in just enough, with food aid mostly, to keep them relatively quiet) costs very little compared to getting rid of the regime. I have no doubt it could be done but the costs, both in human lives and in purely economical terms, would be absolutely massive as it stands right now. | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
2v2
PiGosaur Monday
LiuLi Cup
RSL Revival
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
RSL Revival
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
