|
On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation?
600 million people unemployed should be enough.
Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with
Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this.
|
|
|
On May 08 2012 09:04 JonnyBNoHo wrote:Job creation IS keeping up with technological unemployment. That's why the unemployment rate has not increased along with new technology. Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with.
Also, upon actually reading the wikipedia entry for technological unemployement, I would like to point to all the historical predictions for technological unemployement that have proven false so far.
|
On May 08 2012 09:04 DeliCiousVP wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation? 600 million people unemployed should be enough. Show nested quote +Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this.
And fifty years ago were those 600 million people's parents all employed...? Fact is, and this might suprise you, the most technologcially defeicient countries actually have the highest unemployment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rate
WHOA
|
On May 08 2012 09:09 1Eris1 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2012 09:04 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation? 600 million people unemployed should be enough. Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this. And fifty years ago were those 600 million people's parents all employed...? Fact is, and this might suprise you, the most technologcially defeicient countries actually have the highest unemployment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rateWHOA
Yepp but its the developed countries that sets the tone for the future if we cant keep employment up they wont be able to when they catch up in advancement. Nice rhetoric tho.
But chillax peeps this a good thing means you can most likely play SC2 for the rest of your days if you want to without starving to death.
|
On May 08 2012 09:04 DeliCiousVP wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation? Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this.
Who disagreed with that fact?? You just keep recycling the same random facts over and over again without providing the facts to the questions we actually ask.
You've pointed out your "enough food for 10 billion" fact over and over. Ya know, like a troll.
|
On May 08 2012 09:14 DeliCiousVP wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2012 09:09 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:04 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation? 600 million people unemployed should be enough. Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this. And fifty years ago were those 600 million people's parents all employed...? Fact is, and this might suprise you, the most technologcially defeicient countries actually have the highest unemployment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rateWHOA Yepp but its the developed countries that sets the tone for the future if we cant keep employment up they wont be able to when they catch up in advancement. Nice rhetoric tho. But chillax peeps this a good thing means you can most likely play SC2 for the rest of your days if you want to without starving to death.
He posted facts, not rhetoric. You post BS over and over and over...
|
He doesnt read anything he posts. All his video links have been from the same news station, and when you watch one, it suggests the others on the sidebar. He just found them and is randomly posting them, and most of them disagree with him anyway. His text links are from wikipedia, and the articles again contradict the point he is trying to prove, and usually do so in the first or second sentence. He doesnt even read them. He is either a troll or he is insane. There is no point in talking to this guy.
|
On May 08 2012 09:14 DeliCiousVP wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2012 09:09 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:04 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation? 600 million people unemployed should be enough. Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this. And fifty years ago were those 600 million people's parents all employed...? Fact is, and this might suprise you, the most technologcially defeicient countries actually have the highest unemployment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rateWHOA Yepp but its the developed countries that sets the tone for the future if we cant keep employment up they wont be able to when they catch up in advancement. Nice rhetoric tho. But chillax peeps this a good thing means you can most likely play SC2 for the rest of your days if you want to without starving to death.
The developed countries are keeping up on a general level though. There's a reason they've mostly been stagnant at around 3-9% since WWII. (With a few exceptions, namely Russia and China) But hey, you're definetely right they might stop. We might also all die to a meteor tomorrow.
|
To save you guys from further frustration i wanna get this out of the way. Im not wrong here and im the one arguing with reason not personal insults or trying to riddicule. i Suggest that if you cant handle that leave a snyde comment and walk away.
|
On May 08 2012 09:24 DeliCiousVP wrote: To save you guys from further frustration i wanna get this out of the way. Im not wrong here and im the one arguing with reason not personal insults or trying to riddicule. i Suggest that if you cant handle that leave a snyde comment and walk away.
I think you might be evaluating the situation incorrectly here. The attitude that you can't possibly be wrong is quite disturbing.
|
On May 08 2012 09:24 DeliCiousVP wrote: To save you guys from further frustration i wanna get this out of the way. Im not wrong here and im the one arguing with reason not personal insults or trying to riddicule. i Suggest that if you cant handle that leave a snyde comment and walk away.
Hahahahaha!!
You: "I'm arguing with reason"
Us: Hey DeliCiousVP give us proof of your crazy claims!
You: "Accept change of your being and allow yourself to be wrong and you will exit the matrix."
Let me repeat: hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
|
On May 08 2012 09:21 1Eris1 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2012 09:14 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:09 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:04 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation? 600 million people unemployed should be enough. Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this. And fifty years ago were those 600 million people's parents all employed...? Fact is, and this might suprise you, the most technologcially defeicient countries actually have the highest unemployment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rateWHOA Yepp but its the developed countries that sets the tone for the future if we cant keep employment up they wont be able to when they catch up in advancement. Nice rhetoric tho. But chillax peeps this a good thing means you can most likely play SC2 for the rest of your days if you want to without starving to death. The developed countries are keeping up on a general level though. There's a reason they've mostly been stagnant at around 3-9% since WWII. (With a few exceptions, namely Russia and China) But hey, you're definetely right they might stop. We might also all die to a meteor tomorrow.
Iam not basing that of them either we accept that we are exploiting the third world or we assume that their inferior monkey creatures and thats the cause of all their ills.
Life is becoming easier and better each year escpially in the western world mostly due to our technological advancement. Our wellfare society that we are entering now will allow more people to express their creativity without worriying about having a job.
Sweden for example is a wellfare society and it is one of the reason we have so many progamers with around 10% of Germanys total population and less then 3% of USA's population. obviously other things factors in to such as gaming culture but its harder to become a progamer when you have to become a mininum wage worker at mcdonalds.
I think you might be evaluating the situation incorrectly here. The attitude that you can't possibly be wrong is quite disturbing.
Hehe obviously i can be wrong ive already been wrong on a few things in this tread such as me forgetting that einstein went to school. But first of this is a discussion i dont have to prove anything i can just use reasonable rhetoric and "WIN" the fact that i tried to provide sources for everything i say is going the extra mile.
also its hard for me when i get a comment like this "You still havent shown us any proof that this crazy society will work" First of it shows a since of demand like im somehow bound to offer jack to support my claim when i have already "Won" in reasoning. and second its such a general question i would not know where to start need to be more specific then that.
|
On May 08 2012 09:33 DeliCiousVP wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2012 09:21 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:14 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:09 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:04 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation? 600 million people unemployed should be enough. Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this. And fifty years ago were those 600 million people's parents all employed...? Fact is, and this might suprise you, the most technologcially defeicient countries actually have the highest unemployment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rateWHOA Yepp but its the developed countries that sets the tone for the future if we cant keep employment up they wont be able to when they catch up in advancement. Nice rhetoric tho. But chillax peeps this a good thing means you can most likely play SC2 for the rest of your days if you want to without starving to death. The developed countries are keeping up on a general level though. There's a reason they've mostly been stagnant at around 3-9% since WWII. (With a few exceptions, namely Russia and China) But hey, you're definetely right they might stop. We might also all die to a meteor tomorrow. Iam not basing that of them either we accept that we are exploiting the third world or we assume that their inferior monkey creatures and thats the cause of all their ills. Life is becoming easier and better each year escpially in the western world mostly due to our technological advancement. Our wellfare society that we are entering now will allow more people to express their creativity without worriying about having a job. Sweden for example is a wellfare society and it is one of the reason we have many progamers with around 10% of Germanys total population and less then 3% of USA's population. obviously other things factor to such as gaming culture but its harder to become a progamer when you have to become a mininum wage worker at mcdonalds. Wait what? 10% of german population are pro-gamers? Source?
|
On May 08 2012 09:33 DeliCiousVP wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2012 09:21 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:14 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:09 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:04 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation? 600 million people unemployed should be enough. Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this. And fifty years ago were those 600 million people's parents all employed...? Fact is, and this might suprise you, the most technologcially defeicient countries actually have the highest unemployment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rateWHOA Yepp but its the developed countries that sets the tone for the future if we cant keep employment up they wont be able to when they catch up in advancement. Nice rhetoric tho. But chillax peeps this a good thing means you can most likely play SC2 for the rest of your days if you want to without starving to death. The developed countries are keeping up on a general level though. There's a reason they've mostly been stagnant at around 3-9% since WWII. (With a few exceptions, namely Russia and China) But hey, you're definetely right they might stop. We might also all die to a meteor tomorrow. Iam not basing that of them either we accept that we are exploiting the third world or we assume that their inferior monkey creatures and thats the cause of all their ills.
We are not exploiting the third world. That's why they will be as rich as we are in a few decades.
|
On May 08 2012 09:33 DeliCiousVP wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2012 09:21 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:14 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:09 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:04 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation? 600 million people unemployed should be enough. Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this. And fifty years ago were those 600 million people's parents all employed...? Fact is, and this might suprise you, the most technologcially defeicient countries actually have the highest unemployment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rateWHOA Yepp but its the developed countries that sets the tone for the future if we cant keep employment up they wont be able to when they catch up in advancement. Nice rhetoric tho. But chillax peeps this a good thing means you can most likely play SC2 for the rest of your days if you want to without starving to death. The developed countries are keeping up on a general level though. There's a reason they've mostly been stagnant at around 3-9% since WWII. (With a few exceptions, namely Russia and China) But hey, you're definetely right they might stop. We might also all die to a meteor tomorrow. Iam not basing that of them either we accept that we are exploiting the third world or we assume that their inferior monkey creatures and thats the cause of all their ills.
This is a false dichotomy, in reality there are many reasons why developing countries are not yet on par with the developed world. I take it you have not read anything on development studies either?
Anyway, this is starting to feel a bit too much like a gang beating. I'm out untill someone more interesting comes along.
|
On May 08 2012 09:33 DeliCiousVP wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2012 09:21 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:14 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:09 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:04 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation? 600 million people unemployed should be enough. Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this. And fifty years ago were those 600 million people's parents all employed...? Fact is, and this might suprise you, the most technologcially defeicient countries actually have the highest unemployment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rateWHOA Yepp but its the developed countries that sets the tone for the future if we cant keep employment up they wont be able to when they catch up in advancement. Nice rhetoric tho. But chillax peeps this a good thing means you can most likely play SC2 for the rest of your days if you want to without starving to death. The developed countries are keeping up on a general level though. There's a reason they've mostly been stagnant at around 3-9% since WWII. (With a few exceptions, namely Russia and China) But hey, you're definetely right they might stop. We might also all die to a meteor tomorrow. Iam not basing that of them either we accept that we are exploiting the third world or we assume that their inferior monkey creatures and thats the cause of all their ills. Life is becoming easier and better each year escpially in the western world mostly due to our technological advancement. Our wellfare society that we are entering now will allow more people to express their creativity without worriying about having a job. Sweden for example is a wellfare society and it is one of the reason we have many progamers with around 10% of Germanys total population and less then 3% of USA's population. obviously other things factor to such as gaming culture but its harder to become a progamer when you have to become a mininum wage worker at mcdonalds.
I'm sorry, but you literally keep changing your train of thought in the middle of your sentences. Are you pro-technology now? Just a few posts ago it was a demon that was stealing jobs...Also, how exactly are we exploiting third world countries, and how exactly is that providing US with jobs?
Haha, wait what? What does progaming have to do with any of this? And are you seriously suggesting that some people should get to play SC2 all day and other people should have to work to pay for that? wtf
|
On May 08 2012 09:41 Crushinator wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2012 09:33 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:21 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:14 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:09 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:04 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation? 600 million people unemployed should be enough. Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this. And fifty years ago were those 600 million people's parents all employed...? Fact is, and this might suprise you, the most technologcially defeicient countries actually have the highest unemployment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rateWHOA Yepp but its the developed countries that sets the tone for the future if we cant keep employment up they wont be able to when they catch up in advancement. Nice rhetoric tho. But chillax peeps this a good thing means you can most likely play SC2 for the rest of your days if you want to without starving to death. The developed countries are keeping up on a general level though. There's a reason they've mostly been stagnant at around 3-9% since WWII. (With a few exceptions, namely Russia and China) But hey, you're definetely right they might stop. We might also all die to a meteor tomorrow. Iam not basing that of them either we accept that we are exploiting the third world or we assume that their inferior monkey creatures and thats the cause of all their ills. This is a false dichotomy, in reality there are many reasons why developing countries are not yet on par with the developed world. I take it you have not read anything on development studies either?
oh, realy please enligthen me i obviously have no clue what goes on in the third world
|
On May 08 2012 09:43 1Eris1 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2012 09:33 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:21 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:14 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:09 1Eris1 wrote:On May 08 2012 09:04 DeliCiousVP wrote:On May 08 2012 09:00 1Eris1 wrote:Also, where is your evidence regarding job creation? 600 million people unemployed should be enough. Thanks to the link that proves a data point (food production) no one disagreed with Alot of people in this tread disagreed and actively wrote how it was false yes and that iwas faking numbers on this. And fifty years ago were those 600 million people's parents all employed...? Fact is, and this might suprise you, the most technologcially defeicient countries actually have the highest unemployment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_unemployment_rateWHOA Yepp but its the developed countries that sets the tone for the future if we cant keep employment up they wont be able to when they catch up in advancement. Nice rhetoric tho. But chillax peeps this a good thing means you can most likely play SC2 for the rest of your days if you want to without starving to death. The developed countries are keeping up on a general level though. There's a reason they've mostly been stagnant at around 3-9% since WWII. (With a few exceptions, namely Russia and China) But hey, you're definetely right they might stop. We might also all die to a meteor tomorrow. Iam not basing that of them either we accept that we are exploiting the third world or we assume that their inferior monkey creatures and thats the cause of all their ills. Life is becoming easier and better each year escpially in the western world mostly due to our technological advancement. Our wellfare society that we are entering now will allow more people to express their creativity without worriying about having a job. Sweden for example is a wellfare society and it is one of the reason we have many progamers with around 10% of Germanys total population and less then 3% of USA's population. obviously other things factor to such as gaming culture but its harder to become a progamer when you have to become a mininum wage worker at mcdonalds. I'm sorry, but you literally keep changing your train of thought in the middle of your sentences. Are you pro-technology now? Just a few posts ago it was a demon that was stealing jobs...Also, how exactly are we exploiting third world countries, and how exactly is that providing US with jobs? Haha, wait what? What does progaming have to do with any of this? And are you seriously suggesting that some people should get to play SC2 all day and other people should have to work to pay for that? wtf
Oh i see now your trolling to. No i think we should all merge the SC2 universe and steal their minerals and gas infuse our cars with vespene that would solve all our problems.
Do you have any sources that suggest we cannot create a vespene gas combustion engine? And dont give me facts proposed in video form or a bias title because i assume if you give me a source that debunks my theory it wont have the name "Vespene gas do not work in combustiable engine" if i see that title i know its bias so.
|
|
|
|