|
|
On October 24 2012 01:50 DownOnMyNiece wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote:
Sorry, but Obama is not a true follower of the lamb of christ if he is selling coke. Jesus wrote on the stone tablets he gave to moses
Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote:
Jesus wrote on the stone tablets he gave to moses
Spoken as a true man of the Church!
I've been pastor of my congregation for 15 years. I believe i've earned the title "man of the church". I'd appreciate it if you'd refer to me as "pastor king charlie" from now on, I believe i've earned that as well. I can't say I agree with going "down on my niece"...unless of course if my niece was a covert member of the altar boys or church staff.
|
I think this thread needs a new foreign policy re trolls
|
On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 01:28 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 24 2012 01:22 ziggurat wrote:Interesting story breaking about Obama selling cocaine while he was in university. Also interesting that the Romney campaign is refusing to touch it. To me this is to Romney's credit, and is at odds with everyone on here claiming that he'll say anything to win. The story is probably not true, of course, but apparently the guy is willing to take a polygraph so who knows? http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/10/president-obama-sold-cocaine-college-trump-charges-republicans-rejectMaybe this is the big story that Trump said he would be announcing tomorrow. Obama already admitted to using drugs in college, so even if this is true, it probably won't hurt his campaign. Besides, there are so many horrible things Obama has said and done over the years, many of which trump selling cocaine. Sorry, but Obama is not a true follower of the lamb of christ if he is selling coke. Jesus wrote on the stone tablets he gave to moses that using mind altering substances is blasphemy and that anyone who engages in mind altering practices or buys products deriven from petroleum will be banished to the darkest realms of hell with satan (and his dominion). Coke is an evil drug because it promotes sex, and sex promotes hatred. Hatred promotes jealousy and jealousy promotes the republican party. Most people prefer pepsi over coke anyway, so i'm voting for Obama.
I can't even...
I just don't even know.
|
On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 01:28 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 24 2012 01:22 ziggurat wrote:Interesting story breaking about Obama selling cocaine while he was in university. Also interesting that the Romney campaign is refusing to touch it. To me this is to Romney's credit, and is at odds with everyone on here claiming that he'll say anything to win. The story is probably not true, of course, but apparently the guy is willing to take a polygraph so who knows? http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/10/president-obama-sold-cocaine-college-trump-charges-republicans-rejectMaybe this is the big story that Trump said he would be announcing tomorrow. Obama already admitted to using drugs in college, so even if this is true, it probably won't hurt his campaign. Besides, there are so many horrible things Obama has said and done over the years, many of which trump selling cocaine. Sorry, but Obama is not a true follower of the lamb of christ if he is selling coke. Jesus wrote on the stone tablets he gave to moses that using mind altering substances is blasphemy and that anyone who engages in mind altering practices or buys products deriven from petroleum will be banished to the darkest realms of hell with satan (and his dominion). Coke is an evil drug because it promotes sex, and sex promotes hatred. Hatred promotes jealousy and jealousy promotes the republican party. Most people prefer pepsi over coke anyway, so i'm voting for Obama.
That's the craziest thing I've ever heard. Coke is way better than Pepsi and most people know that.
|
On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: jealousy promotes the republican party Tell me, Pastor King Charlie, if jealousy promotes the Republican Party, then why is it always Democrats who want to steal from successful people?
|
On October 24 2012 02:03 Swazi Spring wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: jealousy promotes the republican party Tell me, Pastor King Charlie, if jealousy promotes the Republican Party, then why is it always Democrats who want to steal from successful people?
You don't get to call it theft until you actually prove that taxes are theft (an absolutely ridiculous notion). Last I checked, you lost that argument.
|
On October 24 2012 02:10 Stratos_speAr wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 02:03 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: jealousy promotes the republican party Tell me, Pastor King Charlie, if jealousy promotes the Republican Party, then why is it always Democrats who want to steal from successful people? You don't get to call it theft until you actually prove that taxes are theft. Last I checked, you lost that argument. Let's argue over semantics! Nope, didn't "lose" that argument.
|
On October 24 2012 02:03 Swazi Spring wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: jealousy promotes the republican party Tell me, Pastor King Charlie, if jealousy promotes the Republican Party, then why is it always Democrats who want to steal from successful people?
I'm not saying ALL successful people are evil people that got their money through nefarious ways...but let's be real...99% of them are evil and stole their money from the populace. Democrats are a lot like Jesus. They take back what the evil corporate machine has stolen from people and give it back to the homeless, where it belongs.
Jesus says in Leviticus "Rejoice in the heavens, for I am Lord. Thou shalt not revel in false gods such as the Republican party in 2000 years."
Republicans are just jealous of homeless men being the TRUE sages of our time and steal all of their money so that they can never get their profound messages off the ground. I mean, do you think it is a coincidence that the sign of the Republican party is an elephant? Have you ever met a nice elephant? Heavens no.
My vote is for Obama...change McCain can believe in.
|
On October 24 2012 02:11 Swazi Spring wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 02:10 Stratos_speAr wrote:On October 24 2012 02:03 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: jealousy promotes the republican party Tell me, Pastor King Charlie, if jealousy promotes the Republican Party, then why is it always Democrats who want to steal from successful people? You don't get to call it theft until you actually prove that taxes are theft. Last I checked, you lost that argument. Let's argue over semantics! Nope, didn't "lose" that argument.
So you weren't able to back up your claim that taxes are theft; in fact, the full definition of theft was brought up and it was clearly shown that taxes do not fall into that category, yet you label this clarification as "semantics", implying that it was superfluous, and then try to say that you can continue calling taxes theft?
|
On October 24 2012 02:03 Swazi Spring wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: jealousy promotes the republican party Tell me, Pastor King Charlie, if jealousy promotes the Republican Party, then why is it always Democrats who want to steal from successful people?
Both parties want to "steal" from people.
Democrats believe in helping those in need, Republicans do not. It's an ideological difference. For this reason, Democrats will usually support higher taxes than Republicans. (Small amount of hyperbole in here)
Edit: And who cares if he calls it theft. It's clearly a disagreement over the definition of the word and a useless discussion. Swazi is being obtuse on purpose to attempt to prove a point.
|
On October 24 2012 02:12 KING CHARLIE :D wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 02:03 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: jealousy promotes the republican party Tell me, Pastor King Charlie, if jealousy promotes the Republican Party, then why is it always Democrats who want to steal from successful people? I'm not saying ALL successful people are evil people that got their money through nefarious ways...but let's be real...99% of them are evil and stole their money from the populace. Democrats are a lot like Jesus. They take back what the evil corporate machine has stolen from people and give it back to the homeless, where it belongs. Jesus says in Leviticus "Rejoice in the heavens, for I am Lord. Thou shalt not revel in false gods such as the Republican party in 2000 years." Republicans are just jealous of homeless men being the TRUE sages of our time and steal all of their money so that they can never get their profound messages off the ground. I mean, do you think it is a coincidence that the sign of the Republican party is an elephant? Have you ever met a nice elephant? Heavens no. My vote is for Obama...change McCain can believe in. Thank you, Pastor King Charlie, your biblical insight has once again triumphed over the forces of the Satan (Republicans).
|
A note on "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt". Romney called us to look at the record, here it is: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/opinion/19romney.html
Catchy headlines aren't always a good idea. I bet Romney is kicking himself in the ass for writing a headline that's so easily misquoted. Although Obama didn't misquote it. At the end of the article it says:
The American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk.
In a managed bankruptcy, the federal government would propel newly competitive and viable automakers, rather than seal their fate with a bailout check. Romney called for a managed bankruptcy, i.e. privately financed. He says that the government should guarantee financing AFTER the bankruptcy. He did NOT call for the government to bailout the auto industry, which is what happened. In the last sentence, he even rejects a government bailout.
But, no private financing was available at the time, because this happened in the middle of the global financial crisis. It had to be a government bailout. So not only was Romney wrong about what he said, what he said wasn't possible.
|
On October 24 2012 02:14 Stratos_speAr wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 02:11 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 24 2012 02:10 Stratos_speAr wrote:On October 24 2012 02:03 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: jealousy promotes the republican party Tell me, Pastor King Charlie, if jealousy promotes the Republican Party, then why is it always Democrats who want to steal from successful people? You don't get to call it theft until you actually prove that taxes are theft. Last I checked, you lost that argument. Let's argue over semantics! Nope, didn't "lose" that argument. So you weren't able to back up your claim that taxes are theft; in fact, the full definition of theft was brought up and it was clearly shown that taxes do not fall into that category, yet you label this clarification as "semantics", implying that it was superfluous, and then try to say that you can continue calling taxes theft? Again, you're arguing semantics, over what you personally define "theft" as. Taxation is theft because it presumes the government has a higher claim to your money than you do. The Founding Fathers and John Locke also recognized that taxation was theft, albeit a necessary evil. The three fundamental natural rights all people have are to: life, liberty, and the fruits of your labor (property). Hence the fruits of your labor being a fundamental natural right.
|
On October 24 2012 02:15 Swazi Spring wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 02:12 KING CHARLIE :D wrote:On October 24 2012 02:03 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: jealousy promotes the republican party Tell me, Pastor King Charlie, if jealousy promotes the Republican Party, then why is it always Democrats who want to steal from successful people? I'm not saying ALL successful people are evil people that got their money through nefarious ways...but let's be real...99% of them are evil and stole their money from the populace. Democrats are a lot like Jesus. They take back what the evil corporate machine has stolen from people and give it back to the homeless, where it belongs. Jesus says in Leviticus "Rejoice in the heavens, for I am Lord. Thou shalt not revel in false gods such as the Republican party in 2000 years." Republicans are just jealous of homeless men being the TRUE sages of our time and steal all of their money so that they can never get their profound messages off the ground. I mean, do you think it is a coincidence that the sign of the Republican party is an elephant? Have you ever met a nice elephant? Heavens no. My vote is for Obama...change McCain can believe in. Thank you, Pastor King Charlie, your biblical insight has once again triumphed over the forces of the Satan (Republicans).
All the answers are through Christ (our lord). The only way the Republicans are winning the election is if the Rapture happens on Nov. 3rd. Because then, all of the benevolent crusaders (Democrats) will be taken to the playground in the sky at the hem of our King (Christ the Lord). and the evil Republicans will be left to vote for their evil ways until Armageddon comes and Ben Affleck kills them all with his terrible rendition of "Leaving on a Jetplane"
|
wtf the random religious talk.
Anyways, I'm curious why allegations of election fraud, especially by the republican party aren't being taken more seriously. The voter registration fraud, inconsistencies in voting results and generally the apathetic response to the undermining of a democratic process worries me.
|
On October 24 2012 02:24 Lmui wrote: wtf the random religious talk.
Anyways, I'm curious why allegations of election fraud, especially by the republican party aren't being taken more seriously. The voter registration fraud, inconsistencies in voting results and generally the apathetic response to the undermining of a democratic process worries me. Democrats like to call any form of voter registration laws to be "racist," then again, they call everything they don't like "racist."
|
On October 24 2012 02:18 Swazi Spring wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 02:14 Stratos_speAr wrote:On October 24 2012 02:11 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 24 2012 02:10 Stratos_speAr wrote:On October 24 2012 02:03 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: jealousy promotes the republican party Tell me, Pastor King Charlie, if jealousy promotes the Republican Party, then why is it always Democrats who want to steal from successful people? You don't get to call it theft until you actually prove that taxes are theft. Last I checked, you lost that argument. Let's argue over semantics! Nope, didn't "lose" that argument. So you weren't able to back up your claim that taxes are theft; in fact, the full definition of theft was brought up and it was clearly shown that taxes do not fall into that category, yet you label this clarification as "semantics", implying that it was superfluous, and then try to say that you can continue calling taxes theft? Again, you're arguing semantics, over what you personally define "theft" as. Taxation is theft because it presumes the government has a higher claim to your money than you do. The Founding Fathers and John Locke also recognized that taxation was theft, albeit a necessary evil. The three fundamental natural rights all people have are to: life, liberty, and the fruits of your labor (property). Hence the fruits of your labor being a fundamental natural right.
You keep saying semantics with a tone that implies that it's not worth talking about. If you are going to discuss anything philosophical, you need to accept that semantics are incredibly important.
The entire point of taxes is that they are the dues that you owe the government for being a benefactor of society. Any respected political philosopher in history has acknowledged that society respects both your rights and duties, and taxes are part of your duty. That is where government gets its claim to your money.
Democrats like to call any form of voter registration laws to be "racist," then again, they call everything they don't like "racist."
Give us any credible reason for voter I.D. laws aside from limiting minorities and the poor (heavily democratic demographics) to vote and then you can brush off claims of implicit racism.
|
On October 24 2012 02:24 Lmui wrote: wtf the random religious talk.
Anyways, I'm curious why allegations of election fraud, especially by the republican party aren't being taken more seriously. The voter registration fraud, inconsistencies in voting results and generally the apathetic response to the undermining of a democratic process worries me.
Well, you answered it yourself. This is a "DEMOCRATIC PROCESS"...not a republican process. Of course they aren't going to like it much. I don't see much problem with stuffing the ballot box as long as it's with votes for people running under the Democratic party, and here's why.
One time my church was having a raffle for a King James Bible. They had tons of little kids putting the entries into this shoebox, all excited to win it, as if they were ever going to read or benefit from the bible in the first place.
I took it upon myself, during fellowship time, to break into the raffle room and remove their entries, while putting my name in there 1000 times. I won the bible. The kids started crying, but there is NO WAY they would have used it as well as I could. I take solace in that.
User was warned for this post (off topic)
|
On October 24 2012 00:58 JonnyBNoHo wrote:Show nested quote +On October 23 2012 23:27 Rassy wrote:On October 23 2012 21:40 DoubleReed wrote: Obama stomped the debate and looked powerful and presidential. Though nobody cares about foreign policy.
I still have no idea how Romneys going to balance the budget without triggering a recession. I learned alot from this post. It could explain why manny people outside america are not particulary found of the usa. (personally i like the usa btw, dont want to bash, this is just an observation since i realy find this post verry remarkable) The usa goes to war all over the world, wars with manny innocent victems, and wars wich lead to great suffering without particulary improving the situation for the people there after the war is over All in the name of free world and democracy your country does this. And the response of the people in america is "we dont care for it " Well: seeing how much impact usa,s foreign policy has on people all over the world: Maybe you should start caring. Romney: You cant balance the budget, the budget is not meant to be balanced, to manny people profit from it beeing unbalanced nor does it have to be balanced btw The budget deficit is just an accounting isue. Its not real, its virtual monney, owned for 90% to an organisation who created it out of thin air. It is just used to control the amount of monney in circulation/inflation. The fed owns 90% of all usa debt, they could in theory just say: "we scrap that debt" and noone in the world would notice a difference (beside from massive inflation) The only recent president who managed to get a surplus on the budget was clinton, but that was only due to the massive boom the economy got from the devolopment of the internet. Annyway:to balance the budget without storming the usa into recession there realy is only one option. Cut your military expenses, or simply increase the monney suply by other means then government spending. Knowing romney ,he will probably choose for the later. Balancing the budget is not needed at all though, what is needed is a reform of the monetary system. The Fed owns $1.6T of treasuries out of $16T - that's 10% not 90%. The Fed simply doesn't fund the deficit, nor is the deficit the same as monetary policy. Yep.
|
On October 24 2012 02:18 KING CHARLIE :D wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 02:15 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 24 2012 02:12 KING CHARLIE :D wrote:On October 24 2012 02:03 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 24 2012 01:46 KING CHARLIE :D wrote: jealousy promotes the republican party Tell me, Pastor King Charlie, if jealousy promotes the Republican Party, then why is it always Democrats who want to steal from successful people? I'm not saying ALL successful people are evil people that got their money through nefarious ways...but let's be real...99% of them are evil and stole their money from the populace. Democrats are a lot like Jesus. They take back what the evil corporate machine has stolen from people and give it back to the homeless, where it belongs. Jesus says in Leviticus "Rejoice in the heavens, for I am Lord. Thou shalt not revel in false gods such as the Republican party in 2000 years." Republicans are just jealous of homeless men being the TRUE sages of our time and steal all of their money so that they can never get their profound messages off the ground. I mean, do you think it is a coincidence that the sign of the Republican party is an elephant? Have you ever met a nice elephant? Heavens no. My vote is for Obama...change McCain can believe in. Thank you, Pastor King Charlie, your biblical insight has once again triumphed over the forces of the Satan (Republicans). All the answers are through Christ (our lord). The only way the Republicans are winning the election is if the Rapture happens on Nov. 3rd. Because then, all of the benevolent crusaders (Democrats) will be taken to the playground in the sky at the hem of our King (Christ the Lord). and the evil Republicans will be left to vote for their evil ways until Armageddon comes and Ben Affleck kills them all with his terrible rendition of "Leaving on a Jetplane"
I love you.
|
|
|
|