|
|
On August 26 2012 00:32 SayGen wrote: I refuse to vote for Obama cause he lied, like the 2 presidnets before him.
Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Bush: "Iraq has WOMD" Obama: "I will not raise taxes"
I can't vote for Romney cause he sort of lied to about what exactly he knew about Bain Capitol. He did alot of dodging.
And Obama just screwed me with a 250-500$ tax increase every year-- the largest tax increase ever. Obamacare- The first time in American history the goverment can force you to buy a product. Scary times.
Shame one of them will win. America, the country i've served 5+ years of military duty is on a massive decline.
Wish we had Hermain Cain.
Herman Cain? lol
|
On August 27 2012 06:43 Souma wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 06:12 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:50 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:37 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:35 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:30 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:20 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:15 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:12 Gahlo wrote:On August 26 2012 00:32 SayGen wrote: I refuse to vote for Obama cause he lied, like the 2 presidnets before him.
Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Bush: "Iraq has WOMD" Obama: "I will not raise taxes"
I can't vote for Romney cause he sort of lied to about what exactly he knew about Bain Capitol. He did alot of dodging.
And Obama just screwed me with a 250-500$ tax increase every year-- the largest tax increase ever. Obamacare- The first time in American history the goverment can force you to buy a product. Scary times.
Shame one of them will win. America, the country i've served 5+ years of military duty is on a massive decline.
Wish we had Hermain Cain. I don't know about you, but I'm forced to buy car insurance. The only way that Obamacare forces you to pay more is if you don't have health insurance and are buying it now, or are making a conscious choice not to. Only the second is a tax, and I honestly fail to empathize on it. Only morons run around without health insurance, but that's not the issue. The idea that the federal government can coerce private persons into buying things is the issue. I don't mind states doing it because 1) it clearly falls within their powers, and 2) people can just move away if they don't like what their state is doing. There are people that cannot afford health insurance. 1. Why do states "clearly" have the power to coerce private people into buying things? 2. Saying that people can just move away is a false choice, though. First of all, that's just as true with the federal government as it is with state government, but also it's not unrealistic to find all states doing things that you don't like. 1. Police powers are reserved to the states. 2. Are you really going to argue that immigrating to another country is just as easy as moving between states in the US? C'mon man. 1. Police powers means that you can force people to buy things from private corporations??? That seems like a massive stretch. 2. I don't need to argue that. You're the one arguing that it's remarkably easy for people to just get up and move from state to state. But that's not really an argument against it being a false choice. I mean, if every state required auto insurance for instance (I don't know if that's true), you don't get a choice no matter what state you move to. It's a false choice. 1. That's exactly what it means, and that's exactly what states do (like auto insurance). 2. Obviously there are limits to the ability to move if every state is doing something. However, there are real differences between the states and people move from state to state all of the time in pursuit of their own personal preferences. Seriously, xDaunt. Elaborate. Don't just throw crap out there. I'm not saying states do not have the power, but explain how you get "States can force people to purchase from private companies" from "Police Powers." I do not follow. Actually explain. Don't just say "That's obvious" or "That's what it means." Jesus. The police power is the general power to regulate individual behavior. The states are only limited by the Bill of Rights in exercising this power. I can't really make it any simpler than that. It is an elementary rule of Constitutional law. The federal government is allowed to implement taxes, which is what they're doing (even if the Obama Administration keeps denying it). Police power would be arresting or fining them for not having health insurance, which require citations and remain on your record. It's different, although you can argue that taxing them and fining them are basically the same thing, though handled entirely differently. Defining taxing and fining as the same thing does raise some questions about morality/behaviour though! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Remeber that there are only 2 and not 3 things in life that are unavoidable: Death and taxes!
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
On August 27 2012 07:10 radiatoren wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 06:43 Souma wrote:On August 27 2012 06:12 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:50 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:37 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:35 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:30 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:20 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:15 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:12 Gahlo wrote: [quote] I don't know about you, but I'm forced to buy car insurance. The only way that Obamacare forces you to pay more is if you don't have health insurance and are buying it now, or are making a conscious choice not to. Only the second is a tax, and I honestly fail to empathize on it. Only morons run around without health insurance, but that's not the issue. The idea that the federal government can coerce private persons into buying things is the issue. I don't mind states doing it because 1) it clearly falls within their powers, and 2) people can just move away if they don't like what their state is doing. There are people that cannot afford health insurance. 1. Why do states "clearly" have the power to coerce private people into buying things? 2. Saying that people can just move away is a false choice, though. First of all, that's just as true with the federal government as it is with state government, but also it's not unrealistic to find all states doing things that you don't like. 1. Police powers are reserved to the states. 2. Are you really going to argue that immigrating to another country is just as easy as moving between states in the US? C'mon man. 1. Police powers means that you can force people to buy things from private corporations??? That seems like a massive stretch. 2. I don't need to argue that. You're the one arguing that it's remarkably easy for people to just get up and move from state to state. But that's not really an argument against it being a false choice. I mean, if every state required auto insurance for instance (I don't know if that's true), you don't get a choice no matter what state you move to. It's a false choice. 1. That's exactly what it means, and that's exactly what states do (like auto insurance). 2. Obviously there are limits to the ability to move if every state is doing something. However, there are real differences between the states and people move from state to state all of the time in pursuit of their own personal preferences. Seriously, xDaunt. Elaborate. Don't just throw crap out there. I'm not saying states do not have the power, but explain how you get "States can force people to purchase from private companies" from "Police Powers." I do not follow. Actually explain. Don't just say "That's obvious" or "That's what it means." Jesus. The police power is the general power to regulate individual behavior. The states are only limited by the Bill of Rights in exercising this power. I can't really make it any simpler than that. It is an elementary rule of Constitutional law. The federal government is allowed to implement taxes, which is what they're doing (even if the Obama Administration keeps denying it). Police power would be arresting or fining them for not having health insurance, which require citations and remain on your record. It's different, although you can argue that taxing them and fining them are basically the same thing, though handled entirely differently. Defining taxing and fining as the same thing does raise some questions about morality/behaviour though! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Remeber that there are only 2 and not 3 things in life that are unavoidable: Death and taxes!
I can avoid going to Denmark.
|
On August 27 2012 06:23 BlueBird. wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 03:15 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:12 Gahlo wrote:On August 26 2012 00:32 SayGen wrote: I refuse to vote for Obama cause he lied, like the 2 presidnets before him.
Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Bush: "Iraq has WOMD" Obama: "I will not raise taxes"
I can't vote for Romney cause he sort of lied to about what exactly he knew about Bain Capitol. He did alot of dodging.
And Obama just screwed me with a 250-500$ tax increase every year-- the largest tax increase ever. Obamacare- The first time in American history the goverment can force you to buy a product. Scary times.
Shame one of them will win. America, the country i've served 5+ years of military duty is on a massive decline.
Wish we had Hermain Cain. I don't know about you, but I'm forced to buy car insurance. The only way that Obamacare forces you to pay more is if you don't have health insurance and are buying it now, or are making a conscious choice not to. Only the second is a tax, and I honestly fail to empathize on it. Only morons run around without health insurance, but that's not the issue. The idea that the federal government can coerce private persons into buying things is the issue. I don't mind states doing it because 1) it clearly falls within their powers, and 2) people can just move away if they don't like what their state is doing. Am I an idiot/moron etc for not being able too afford health insurance before and now. My dads job didnt offer it, my mom couldnt afford it, then she left her job(was getting it from her before) too move closer too family after my step dad died and my step dad was disabled for 4 years absolutely unable to work eith severe brain damage, we only got disability back pay, and forward for the last month of his life cleared by the judge(as soon as a judge talked to him we got it, but it wasnt until then) government 1 month before he died, disability is a mess. How were we supposed too afford health insurance for me a healthy 18 year old, when we have tons of doctor bills and 1 income for the household.( I don't live at home now but yeah) It falls within their powers according to the supreme court... Also, Your ignoring the fact that moving is a big deal/process especially over a long distance like across the country, but how about just using the same argument at the national level. You can move out of the country if you don't like what your country is doing technically, so that argument doesn't work. With regards to your inability to buy health insurance, no that does not make you a moron. I believe xDaunt was most likely referring to young, single Americans who have more than enough money to buy health insurance but don't want to because they're healthy when he used the word "moron" -- now, this is me giving him the benefit of the doubt for his use of "run around without health insurance", and I'm really putting my own spin.
I would ask you though -- if your family's income is low enough, than perhaps:
a) you are eligible for Medicaid (and if you live in a state that doesn't have a conservative governor opting out of Medicaid expansion, this is more likely) b) if health insurance would cost >8% of your income, you will not be taxed under Obamacare, so you don't have anything to complain about here c) your family could purchase health insurance if you factor in the government subsidies for low-income families included in Obamacare
Now, I don't understand your situation and these are just 3 possible scenarios, but I believe Obamacare is designed to help everyone get the insurance they need.
As for the broccoli argument -- no, the government will never tax you if you don't buy broccoli. As it is, if you are uninsured but go to the ER in a hospital, you are entitled under EMTALA to get full treatment. If you don't have broccoli insurance and you go to the store, you don't get as much broccoli as you need. The two issues are totally different.
|
On August 27 2012 07:10 radiatoren wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 06:43 Souma wrote:On August 27 2012 06:12 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:50 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:37 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:35 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:30 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:20 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:15 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:12 Gahlo wrote: [quote] I don't know about you, but I'm forced to buy car insurance. The only way that Obamacare forces you to pay more is if you don't have health insurance and are buying it now, or are making a conscious choice not to. Only the second is a tax, and I honestly fail to empathize on it. Only morons run around without health insurance, but that's not the issue. The idea that the federal government can coerce private persons into buying things is the issue. I don't mind states doing it because 1) it clearly falls within their powers, and 2) people can just move away if they don't like what their state is doing. There are people that cannot afford health insurance. 1. Why do states "clearly" have the power to coerce private people into buying things? 2. Saying that people can just move away is a false choice, though. First of all, that's just as true with the federal government as it is with state government, but also it's not unrealistic to find all states doing things that you don't like. 1. Police powers are reserved to the states. 2. Are you really going to argue that immigrating to another country is just as easy as moving between states in the US? C'mon man. 1. Police powers means that you can force people to buy things from private corporations??? That seems like a massive stretch. 2. I don't need to argue that. You're the one arguing that it's remarkably easy for people to just get up and move from state to state. But that's not really an argument against it being a false choice. I mean, if every state required auto insurance for instance (I don't know if that's true), you don't get a choice no matter what state you move to. It's a false choice. 1. That's exactly what it means, and that's exactly what states do (like auto insurance). 2. Obviously there are limits to the ability to move if every state is doing something. However, there are real differences between the states and people move from state to state all of the time in pursuit of their own personal preferences. Seriously, xDaunt. Elaborate. Don't just throw crap out there. I'm not saying states do not have the power, but explain how you get "States can force people to purchase from private companies" from "Police Powers." I do not follow. Actually explain. Don't just say "That's obvious" or "That's what it means." Jesus. The police power is the general power to regulate individual behavior. The states are only limited by the Bill of Rights in exercising this power. I can't really make it any simpler than that. It is an elementary rule of Constitutional law. The federal government is allowed to implement taxes, which is what they're doing (even if the Obama Administration keeps denying it). Police power would be arresting or fining them for not having health insurance, which require citations and remain on your record. It's different, although you can argue that taxing them and fining them are basically the same thing, though handled entirely differently. Defining taxing and fining as the same thing does raise some questions about morality/behaviour though! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Remeber that there are only 2 and not 3 things in life that are unavoidable: Death and taxes!
Notice that neither of those things apply to corporations...
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
On August 27 2012 07:14 DoubleReed wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 07:10 radiatoren wrote:On August 27 2012 06:43 Souma wrote:On August 27 2012 06:12 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:50 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:37 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:35 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:30 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:20 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:15 xDaunt wrote: [quote]
Only morons run around without health insurance, but that's not the issue. The idea that the federal government can coerce private persons into buying things is the issue. I don't mind states doing it because 1) it clearly falls within their powers, and 2) people can just move away if they don't like what their state is doing.
There are people that cannot afford health insurance. 1. Why do states "clearly" have the power to coerce private people into buying things? 2. Saying that people can just move away is a false choice, though. First of all, that's just as true with the federal government as it is with state government, but also it's not unrealistic to find all states doing things that you don't like. 1. Police powers are reserved to the states. 2. Are you really going to argue that immigrating to another country is just as easy as moving between states in the US? C'mon man. 1. Police powers means that you can force people to buy things from private corporations??? That seems like a massive stretch. 2. I don't need to argue that. You're the one arguing that it's remarkably easy for people to just get up and move from state to state. But that's not really an argument against it being a false choice. I mean, if every state required auto insurance for instance (I don't know if that's true), you don't get a choice no matter what state you move to. It's a false choice. 1. That's exactly what it means, and that's exactly what states do (like auto insurance). 2. Obviously there are limits to the ability to move if every state is doing something. However, there are real differences between the states and people move from state to state all of the time in pursuit of their own personal preferences. Seriously, xDaunt. Elaborate. Don't just throw crap out there. I'm not saying states do not have the power, but explain how you get "States can force people to purchase from private companies" from "Police Powers." I do not follow. Actually explain. Don't just say "That's obvious" or "That's what it means." Jesus. The police power is the general power to regulate individual behavior. The states are only limited by the Bill of Rights in exercising this power. I can't really make it any simpler than that. It is an elementary rule of Constitutional law. The federal government is allowed to implement taxes, which is what they're doing (even if the Obama Administration keeps denying it). Police power would be arresting or fining them for not having health insurance, which require citations and remain on your record. It's different, although you can argue that taxing them and fining them are basically the same thing, though handled entirely differently. Defining taxing and fining as the same thing does raise some questions about morality/behaviour though! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Remeber that there are only 2 and not 3 things in life that are unavoidable: Death and taxes! Notice that neither of those things apply to corporations...
Touche!
|
On August 27 2012 06:12 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 03:50 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:37 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:35 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:30 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:20 DoubleReed wrote:On August 27 2012 03:15 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:12 Gahlo wrote:On August 26 2012 00:32 SayGen wrote: I refuse to vote for Obama cause he lied, like the 2 presidnets before him.
Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Bush: "Iraq has WOMD" Obama: "I will not raise taxes"
I can't vote for Romney cause he sort of lied to about what exactly he knew about Bain Capitol. He did alot of dodging.
And Obama just screwed me with a 250-500$ tax increase every year-- the largest tax increase ever. Obamacare- The first time in American history the goverment can force you to buy a product. Scary times.
Shame one of them will win. America, the country i've served 5+ years of military duty is on a massive decline.
Wish we had Hermain Cain. I don't know about you, but I'm forced to buy car insurance. The only way that Obamacare forces you to pay more is if you don't have health insurance and are buying it now, or are making a conscious choice not to. Only the second is a tax, and I honestly fail to empathize on it. Only morons run around without health insurance, but that's not the issue. The idea that the federal government can coerce private persons into buying things is the issue. I don't mind states doing it because 1) it clearly falls within their powers, and 2) people can just move away if they don't like what their state is doing. There are people that cannot afford health insurance. 1. Why do states "clearly" have the power to coerce private people into buying things? 2. Saying that people can just move away is a false choice, though. First of all, that's just as true with the federal government as it is with state government, but also it's not unrealistic to find all states doing things that you don't like. 1. Police powers are reserved to the states. 2. Are you really going to argue that immigrating to another country is just as easy as moving between states in the US? C'mon man. 1. Police powers means that you can force people to buy things from private corporations??? That seems like a massive stretch. 2. I don't need to argue that. You're the one arguing that it's remarkably easy for people to just get up and move from state to state. But that's not really an argument against it being a false choice. I mean, if every state required auto insurance for instance (I don't know if that's true), you don't get a choice no matter what state you move to. It's a false choice. 1. That's exactly what it means, and that's exactly what states do (like auto insurance). 2. Obviously there are limits to the ability to move if every state is doing something. However, there are real differences between the states and people move from state to state all of the time in pursuit of their own personal preferences. Seriously, xDaunt. Elaborate. Don't just throw crap out there. I'm not saying states do not have the power, but explain how you get "States can force people to purchase from private companies" from "Police Powers." I do not follow. Actually explain. Don't just say "That's obvious" or "That's what it means." Jesus. The police power is the general power to regulate individual behavior. The states are only limited by the Bill of Rights in exercising this power. I can't really make it any simpler than that. It is an elementary rule of Constitutional law.
The biggest regulation on state power is actually the 14th amendment: for example when New Orleans decided it was de facto legal for officers of the law to murder black people for sport, the federal government stepped in and charge them with civil rights violations, only possible because of the 14th amendment. Kind of a big deal.
That said, the mandate has nothing to do with police power at all and you can simply ignore the mandate and no policeman will ever accost you because of it.
|
On August 27 2012 07:14 JDub wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 06:23 BlueBird. wrote:On August 27 2012 03:15 xDaunt wrote:On August 27 2012 03:12 Gahlo wrote:On August 26 2012 00:32 SayGen wrote: I refuse to vote for Obama cause he lied, like the 2 presidnets before him.
Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Bush: "Iraq has WOMD" Obama: "I will not raise taxes"
I can't vote for Romney cause he sort of lied to about what exactly he knew about Bain Capitol. He did alot of dodging.
And Obama just screwed me with a 250-500$ tax increase every year-- the largest tax increase ever. Obamacare- The first time in American history the goverment can force you to buy a product. Scary times.
Shame one of them will win. America, the country i've served 5+ years of military duty is on a massive decline.
Wish we had Hermain Cain. I don't know about you, but I'm forced to buy car insurance. The only way that Obamacare forces you to pay more is if you don't have health insurance and are buying it now, or are making a conscious choice not to. Only the second is a tax, and I honestly fail to empathize on it. Only morons run around without health insurance, but that's not the issue. The idea that the federal government can coerce private persons into buying things is the issue. I don't mind states doing it because 1) it clearly falls within their powers, and 2) people can just move away if they don't like what their state is doing. Am I an idiot/moron etc for not being able too afford health insurance before and now. My dads job didnt offer it, my mom couldnt afford it, then she left her job(was getting it from her before) too move closer too family after my step dad died and my step dad was disabled for 4 years absolutely unable to work eith severe brain damage, we only got disability back pay, and forward for the last month of his life cleared by the judge(as soon as a judge talked to him we got it, but it wasnt until then) government 1 month before he died, disability is a mess. How were we supposed too afford health insurance for me a healthy 18 year old, when we have tons of doctor bills and 1 income for the household.( I don't live at home now but yeah) It falls within their powers according to the supreme court... Also, Your ignoring the fact that moving is a big deal/process especially over a long distance like across the country, but how about just using the same argument at the national level. You can move out of the country if you don't like what your country is doing technically, so that argument doesn't work. With regards to your inability to buy health insurance, no that does not make you a moron. I believe xDaunt was most likely referring to young, single Americans who have more than enough money to buy health insurance but don't want to because they're healthy when he used the word "moron" -- now, this is me giving him the benefit of the doubt for his use of "run around without health insurance", and I'm really putting my own spin. I would ask you though -- if your family's income is low enough, than perhaps: a) you are eligible for Medicaid (and if you live in a state that doesn't have a conservative governor opting out of Medicaid expansion, this is more likely) b) if health insurance would cost >8% of your income, you will not be taxed under Obamacare, so you don't have anything to complain about here c) your family could purchase health insurance if you factor in the government subsidies for low-income families included in Obamacare Now, I don't understand your situation and these are just 3 possible scenarios, but I believe Obamacare is designed to help everyone get the insurance they need. As for the broccoli argument -- no, the government will never tax you if you don't buy broccoli. As it is, if you are uninsured but go to the ER in a hospital, you are entitled under EMTALA to get full treatment. If you don't have broccoli insurance and you go to the store, you don't get as much broccoli as you need. The two issues are totally different.
I'm actually eligible for stuff now thanks to obamacare and me being a student blah blah blah. This was in the past that I didn't have health insurance and didn't qualify for it and didn't have options. but apparently that's the world that xdaunt wants people too live in. Not only that but I'm a privileged straight white male who grew up middle class before all this and still have the oppurtinty too pursue higher education and I've been lucky too not get any major health problems between 15-20 years old.
I can't imagine what people not so lucky(lower class, minorities, pre existing conditions etc) have too go through, but we can continue too call them hand outs and lazy people and morons cause that makes people feel better about their choices.
|
The Bill of Rights are the first ten amendments...... why would only those ten apply to states and the rest not? The states are bound by all relevant portions of our constitution.
|
All of you are missing the critical difference between what the states can make you do and what the Feds can make you do. Unless behavior falls within the enumerated powers of Congress (which are limited), the Feds cannot unconditionally force you to do or not do something. In contrast, the states do have this power.
Now, a number of you are talking about the Feds using the tax power to force individual action. This is not the same because the individual has a choice to pay the tax instead of doing what the Feds want. Moreover, the Feds cannot make the tax do high as to effectively not give thr individual a choice. If you reread the Obamacare Supreme Court decision, you'll see that this point is expressly made.
|
Christ, don't they teach kids anything about the Constituion anymore? There are some critical gaps in knowledge here. This is all very basic stuff.
|
On August 27 2012 07:25 Risen wrote: The Bill of Rights are the first ten amendments...... why would only those ten apply to states and the rest not? The states are bound by all relevant portions of our constitution. Yes, most of the amendments apply to the states. I forget which ones have not been incorporated.
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
On August 27 2012 07:25 xDaunt wrote: All of you are missing the critical difference between what the states can make you do and what the Feds can make you do. Unless behavior falls within the enumerated powers of Congress (which are limited), the Feds cannot unconditionally force you to do or not do something. In contrast, the states do have this power.
Now, a number of you are talking about the Feds using the tax power to force individual action. This is not the same because the individual has a choice to pay the tax instead of doing what the Feds want. Moreover, the Feds cannot make the tax do high as to effectively not give thr individual a choice. If you reread the Obamacare Supreme Court decision, you'll see that this point is expressly made.
Do you REALLY want to quote the Supreme Court decision on Obamacare? If so, let's see:
By a vote of 5–4, The Court upheld the individual mandate component of the ACA as a valid exercise of Congress' power to "lay and collect taxes" (Art. I, §8, cl. 1).[30] Roberts, writing for the Court, explained:[31]
The Affordable Care Act's requirement that certain individuals pay a financial penalty for not obtaining health insurance may reasonably be characterized as a tax. Because the Constitution permits such a tax, it is not our role to forbid it, or to pass upon its wisdom or fairness.
On August 27 2012 07:28 xDaunt wrote: Christ, don't they teach kids anything about the Constituion anymore? There are some critical gaps in knowledge here. This is all very basic stuff.
I apologize for five Supreme Court justices failing Constitutional Law.
|
On August 27 2012 07:54 Souma wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 07:25 xDaunt wrote: All of you are missing the critical difference between what the states can make you do and what the Feds can make you do. Unless behavior falls within the enumerated powers of Congress (which are limited), the Feds cannot unconditionally force you to do or not do something. In contrast, the states do have this power.
Now, a number of you are talking about the Feds using the tax power to force individual action. This is not the same because the individual has a choice to pay the tax instead of doing what the Feds want. Moreover, the Feds cannot make the tax do high as to effectively not give thr individual a choice. If you reread the Obamacare Supreme Court decision, you'll see that this point is expressly made. Do you REALLY want to quote the Supreme Court decision on Obamacare? If so, let's see: Show nested quote +By a vote of 5–4, The Court upheld the individual mandate component of the ACA as a valid exercise of Congress' power to "lay and collect taxes" (Art. I, §8, cl. 1).[30] Roberts, writing for the Court, explained:[31]
The Affordable Care Act's requirement that certain individuals pay a financial penalty for not obtaining health insurance may reasonably be characterized as a tax. Because the Constitution permits such a tax, it is not our role to forbid it, or to pass upon its wisdom or fairness. Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 07:28 xDaunt wrote: Christ, don't they teach kids anything about the Constituion anymore? There are some critical gaps in knowledge here. This is all very basic stuff. I apologize for five Supreme Court justices failing Constitutional Law.
Citing the rest of the opinion helps.
Congress’s ability to use its taxing power to influence conduct is not without limits. A few of our cases policed these limits aggressively, invalidating punitive exactions obviously designed to regulate behavior otherwise regarded at the time as beyond federal authority. See, e.g., United States v. Butler, 297 U. S. 1 (1936); Drexel Furniture, 259 U. S. 20. More often and more recently we have declined to closely examine the regulatory motive or effect of revenue-raising measures. See Kahriger, 345 U. S., at 27–31 (collecting cases). We have nonetheless maintained that “ ‘there comes a time in the extension of the penalizing features of the so-called tax when it loses its character as such and becomes a mere penalty with the characteristics of regulation and punishment.’” Kurth Ranch, 511 U. S., at 779 (quoting Drexel Furniture, supra, at 38).
We have already explained that the shared responsibility payment’s practical characteristics pass muster as a tax under our narrowest interpretations of the taxing power. Supra, at 35–36. Because the tax at hand is within even those strict limits, we need not here decide the precise point at which an exaction becomes so punitive that the taxing power does not authorize it. It remains true, however, that the “ ‘power to tax is not the power to destroy while this Court sits.’ ” Oklahoma Tax Comm’n v. Texas Co., 336 U. S. 342, 364 (1949) (quoting Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. Knox, 277 U. S. 218, 223 (1928) (Holmes, J., dissenting)).
In full disclosure, you're arguing with a lawyer. I know what I am talking about. You don't.
EDIT: I only cited a small portion of the opinion dealing with the subject. Roberts spends several pages discussing the limits of the tax power.
EDIT 2: And in case anyone hasn't figured it out already, I'm not arguing anything with my descriptions of the Constitution and what the states and feds can and can't do. I'm only describing what the law is.
|
On August 27 2012 07:09 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On August 26 2012 00:32 SayGen wrote: I refuse to vote for Obama cause he lied, like the 2 presidnets before him.
Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Bush: "Iraq has WOMD" Obama: "I will not raise taxes"
I can't vote for Romney cause he sort of lied to about what exactly he knew about Bain Capitol. He did alot of dodging.
And Obama just screwed me with a 250-500$ tax increase every year-- the largest tax increase ever. Obamacare- The first time in American history the goverment can force you to buy a product. Scary times.
Shame one of them will win. America, the country i've served 5+ years of military duty is on a massive decline.
Wish we had Hermain Cain. Herman Cain? lol
So much for this thread being closly moderated, when people can troll your posts and not add anything to the conversation. *Golf clap*
Hermain Cain would of been a great leader. 1) He isn't a real politican. 2) He had great ideas. 999, lower taxes for EVERYONE, less government red tape, Working with the EPA to get them to help business find alternative solutions to help him them into complicance and protect our water and air. 3) He has expereince being a 'Leader'. 4) Unlike Obama,Romney,Clinton,Bush He never said a falsehood. (refering to his political works, obv everyone has lied at some point)
|
On August 27 2012 03:12 Gahlo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 26 2012 00:32 SayGen wrote: I refuse to vote for Obama cause he lied, like the 2 presidnets before him.
Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Bush: "Iraq has WOMD" Obama: "I will not raise taxes"
I can't vote for Romney cause he sort of lied to about what exactly he knew about Bain Capitol. He did alot of dodging.
And Obama just screwed me with a 250-500$ tax increase every year-- the largest tax increase ever. Obamacare- The first time in American history the goverment can force you to buy a product. Scary times.
Shame one of them will win. America, the country i've served 5+ years of military duty is on a massive decline.
Wish we had Hermain Cain. I don't know about you, but I'm forced to buy car insurance. The only way that Obamacare forces you to pay more is if you don't have health insurance and are buying it now, or are making a conscious choice not to. Only the second is a tax, and I honestly fail to empathize on it. I think, with politicians especially, we need to remember what a lie is. A lie is when you say something that is untrue, and you know it or when you say something and have absolutely no intention of backing it up.
1) No one MAKES you buy a car. 2) If you breathe you have to have Health Insurance. 3) Health Insurance in America start rising THE DAY AFTER HE PASSED OBAMACARE when he said it would lower it for everyone.
I do not vote for liars.
I'm just sick of being lied to by politicans. Obama lied, period.
|
On August 27 2012 08:34 SayGen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 03:12 Gahlo wrote:On August 26 2012 00:32 SayGen wrote: I refuse to vote for Obama cause he lied, like the 2 presidnets before him.
Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Bush: "Iraq has WOMD" Obama: "I will not raise taxes"
I can't vote for Romney cause he sort of lied to about what exactly he knew about Bain Capitol. He did alot of dodging.
And Obama just screwed me with a 250-500$ tax increase every year-- the largest tax increase ever. Obamacare- The first time in American history the goverment can force you to buy a product. Scary times.
Shame one of them will win. America, the country i've served 5+ years of military duty is on a massive decline.
Wish we had Hermain Cain. I don't know about you, but I'm forced to buy car insurance. The only way that Obamacare forces you to pay more is if you don't have health insurance and are buying it now, or are making a conscious choice not to. Only the second is a tax, and I honestly fail to empathize on it. I think, with politicians especially, we need to remember what a lie is. A lie is when you say something that is untrue, and you know it or when you say something and have absolutely no intention of backing it up. 1) No one MAKES you buy a car. 2) If you breathe you have to have Health Insurance. 3) Health Insurance in America start rising THE DAY AFTER HE PASSED OBAMACARE when he said it would lower it for everyone. I do not vote for liars. I'm just sick of being lied to by politicans. Obama lied, period. I'm sure everybody that voted for the law expected it to solve rising healthcare costs the very next day. That's how it works. Long arguments about what to do, and then overnight everything is fixed. Sounds like politics to me!
|
On August 27 2012 08:29 SayGen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 07:09 darthfoley wrote:On August 26 2012 00:32 SayGen wrote: I refuse to vote for Obama cause he lied, like the 2 presidnets before him.
Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Bush: "Iraq has WOMD" Obama: "I will not raise taxes"
I can't vote for Romney cause he sort of lied to about what exactly he knew about Bain Capitol. He did alot of dodging.
And Obama just screwed me with a 250-500$ tax increase every year-- the largest tax increase ever. Obamacare- The first time in American history the goverment can force you to buy a product. Scary times.
Shame one of them will win. America, the country i've served 5+ years of military duty is on a massive decline.
Wish we had Hermain Cain. Herman Cain? lol So much for this thread being closly moderated, when people can troll your posts and not add anything to the conversation. *Golf clap* Hermain Cain would of been a great leader. 1) He isn't a real politican. 2) He had great ideas. 999, lower taxes for EVERYONE, less government red tape, Working with the EPA to get them to help business find alternative solutions to help him them into complicance and protect our water and air. 3) He has expereince being a 'Leader'. 4) Unlike Obama,Romney,Clinton,Bush He never said a falsehood. (refering to his political works, obv everyone has lied at some point)
Are you fucking nuts? Herman Cain would have had less experience or knowledge of policy than Palin. He was a joke candidate, like Trump. The only reason he was in the primary was to market himself and get a bump in speaking fees.
Sheesh. Even Herman Cain knew he wasn't qualified to be president.
|
On August 27 2012 08:34 SayGen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 03:12 Gahlo wrote:On August 26 2012 00:32 SayGen wrote: I refuse to vote for Obama cause he lied, like the 2 presidnets before him.
Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Bush: "Iraq has WOMD" Obama: "I will not raise taxes"
I can't vote for Romney cause he sort of lied to about what exactly he knew about Bain Capitol. He did alot of dodging.
And Obama just screwed me with a 250-500$ tax increase every year-- the largest tax increase ever. Obamacare- The first time in American history the goverment can force you to buy a product. Scary times.
Shame one of them will win. America, the country i've served 5+ years of military duty is on a massive decline.
Wish we had Hermain Cain. I don't know about you, but I'm forced to buy car insurance. The only way that Obamacare forces you to pay more is if you don't have health insurance and are buying it now, or are making a conscious choice not to. Only the second is a tax, and I honestly fail to empathize on it. I think, with politicians especially, we need to remember what a lie is. A lie is when you say something that is untrue, and you know it or when you say something and have absolutely no intention of backing it up. 1) No one MAKES you buy a car. 2) If you breathe you have to have Health Insurance. 3) Health Insurance in America start rising THE DAY AFTER HE PASSED OBAMACARE when he said it would lower it for everyone. I do not vote for liars. I'm just sick of being lied to by politicans. Obama lied, period.
I guarantee you Cain would start lying and backtracking the moment he realizes the shit he's in after getting elected.
|
On August 27 2012 08:42 aksfjh wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 08:34 SayGen wrote:On August 27 2012 03:12 Gahlo wrote:On August 26 2012 00:32 SayGen wrote: I refuse to vote for Obama cause he lied, like the 2 presidnets before him.
Clinton: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Bush: "Iraq has WOMD" Obama: "I will not raise taxes"
I can't vote for Romney cause he sort of lied to about what exactly he knew about Bain Capitol. He did alot of dodging.
And Obama just screwed me with a 250-500$ tax increase every year-- the largest tax increase ever. Obamacare- The first time in American history the goverment can force you to buy a product. Scary times.
Shame one of them will win. America, the country i've served 5+ years of military duty is on a massive decline.
Wish we had Hermain Cain. I don't know about you, but I'm forced to buy car insurance. The only way that Obamacare forces you to pay more is if you don't have health insurance and are buying it now, or are making a conscious choice not to. Only the second is a tax, and I honestly fail to empathize on it. I think, with politicians especially, we need to remember what a lie is. A lie is when you say something that is untrue, and you know it or when you say something and have absolutely no intention of backing it up. 1) No one MAKES you buy a car. 2) If you breathe you have to have Health Insurance. 3) Health Insurance in America start rising THE DAY AFTER HE PASSED OBAMACARE when he said it would lower it for everyone. I do not vote for liars. I'm just sick of being lied to by politicans. Obama lied, period. I'm sure everybody that voted for the law expected it to solve rising healthcare costs the very next day. That's how it works. Long arguments about what to do, and then overnight everything is fixed. Sounds like politics to me!
He said it would go down.... Almost a year later---costs continue to rise, and Obamacare hasn't taken full effect yet. I, as well as others believe they will continue to rise--a direct counter to what Obama said. 2 Lies and counting.
|
|
|
|