Iraq & Syrian Civil Wars - Page 105

On September 01 2013 18:43 sekritzzz wrote:

Kind of how the afghan population used to be freedom fighters but today they are all terrorists because their invader changed. /politics

On September 01 2013 19:50 Denzil wrote:
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/britain-sold-nerve-gas-chemicals-2242520

a very well timed leak that will surely make MPs feel responsible for the deaths and force us into action

i don't doubt that it may be true but i'd take with a very heavy pinch of a salt

"The fuck. Potassium fluoride has plenty of non-chemical warfare uses, such as the production of refrigerants. As does sodium fluoride, which is in fucking toothpaste for Christ's sake. This is like saying "Britain Accused of Sending Nitrogen to Syria. Nitrogen Later Turned Into Ammonium Nitrate, Which Then Turned To Bombs, Which Then Got Used on Civilians."

top post on reddit by someone called shockedsystem

i'm not too knowledgeable on the whole thing so not sure wether what he said is legit

On September 01 2013 20:38 Klive5ive wrote:

Dam, that's really annoying.
As you rightly say it's pretty much meaningless but the public won't see it that way, and I think it has the potential to really destabilise our Government even further.

On September 01 2013 20:13 Godwrath wrote:
Kwizach, the Taliban movement traces its origin to the Pakistani-trained mujahideen in northern Pakistan, during the Soviet war in Afghanistan. Yes, they were freedom fighters at one point, and funded by the US and Arabia Saudi.

On September 01 2013 20:52 kwizach wrote:

The Taliban were not mujahideen. The Taliban were created in 1994 notably because of anger towards some of the mujahideen and their exactions & violence against each other and the population. That Mullah Omar fought during the Soviet occupation doesn't change the fact that he recruited among the people who were precisely weary of the former "freedom fighters" warlords. Some of his commanders obviously had previous conflict experience (many others did not and were actually teachers in Islamic schools), but that doesn't make the Taliban as a group former "freedom fighters". You just copy/pasted the first sentence of a wikipedia article which is extremely vague on the origins of the Taliban, and the "funded by the US and Arabia Saudi" appeared later and did not refer to the Taliban in that article but to the mujahideen that fought against the Soviet Union.

Afghanistan
However, the mujahideen did not establish a united government, and many of the larger mujahideen groups began to fight each other over power in Kabul. After several years of devastating fighting, a village mullah named Mohammed Omar organized a new armed movement with the backing of Pakistan. This movement became known as the Taliban ("students" in Pashto), referring to the Saudi-backed religious schools known for producing extremism. Veteran mujahideen were confronted by this radical splinter group in 1996.

On September 01 2013 21:30 Godwrath wrote:

Yep, why would i rewrite something that is already on perfect english ?

Another copy paste refering to your point on them not being mujahideen, since afghanistan post afghanistan soviet war was mostly warlords fighting each other until the Taliban was formed (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mujahideen) :



You can argue they are not Mujahideen, but you can't argue the movement origin traces back to the Mujahideen.

On September 01 2013 21:44 Godwrath wrote:
What I gathered from your first post implied that the Taliban suddenly appeared on 1994 and had nothing to do with the Mujahideen who were backed up by the US in the soviet afghan war. Maybe i missread you.

On September 01 2013 22:12 Joedaddy wrote:


that is some hardcore conspiracy theory stuff lol. is that what they teach yall in school in mother russia?

On September 01 2013 22:36 Rosie wrote:

As Americans you uncomfortable to hear this, but you can make up your own, independent opinion just by looking at the problem from both sides. you have a right to assume that it Freemasonry fiction. this is the most comfortable position

On September 01 2013 22:41 plgElwood wrote:
Obama just said : " Our Government/Senat is on holiday, hope you are not get killed by assad, mr syrian-democrat, i hope you breathe sarin-gas mr syrian-islamist, we are not functionung until 9/9/13, k thx bai"

On September 01 2013 22:48 Nouar wrote:


On the way to Moscow ? Excuse me, are you believing the world thinks moscow is the ultimate target ? What for ? It's not Cold War anymore, and Russia is hardly a "target" for anyone. Sure they are more relevant than France for example who still thinks highly of itself, but... not *that* much. Yeah, take a look at both sides :-D

For example the side of these people killed by their government. 1400dead, 400children. I'm sure those children were wannabe-terrorists.
I trust the expertise of my coworkers who, while we are not important anymore, take pride in themselves, and would not have given false results on the expertise of chemicals a few months ago, just to please the US and zionism.
I do not trust the russian government waving their arms "it's impoooooosssssibeul than the syrian gov used gas ! It's a trap !", since I feel them more inclined to just help their protégé and contradict the rest of the world meanwhile.