EPTNorth Korea Fires Artillery Rounds at South Korean Island…
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
drhojo
United States53 Posts
| ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:00 shutdown_exploded wrote: right. but countries are not pets. they don't go away when you punish them. see: iraq. Also, they'd then shell Seoul and potentially take out something like half of S Korea's population. | ||
|
Rouel
Sweden138 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:00 konadora wrote: http://tv.zeroboy.net/konadora/ for the latest news, streaming MBC now Thank you. | ||
|
Blitzmarine
39 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:49 DystopiaX wrote: Well, maybe not china. And you're assuming N korea would behave rationally, when this is not necessarily the case. Also, if they have nukes, which is not known, 1 would be enough to wipe out most of S Korea...the blast in modern nukes would encompass much more than the 1 city that happened in WWII. Fallout would potentially take most of China/East Russia if the nuke is advanced enough. Many specialists assumes that N.Korea have several Hirosima-class nuclear bomb at most. It is not matter of technoligy but matter of 'How much nuclear material they have?'. But it is still big threat to South Korea and its ally, though. | ||
SilverskY
Korea (South)3086 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:02 konadora wrote: wow someone in parliament suggest US give SKorea nukes BOY THERE'S AN IDEA. Herp derp. Fucking moron. | ||
|
dinmsab
Malaysia2246 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:02 konadora wrote: wow someone in parliament suggest US give SKorea nukes worst.idea.ever. We have enough nukes in the world allready. | ||
|
mizU
United States12125 Posts
If the U.S. got shelled by Russia, mannnnnnn it'd be trouble. | ||
|
DayJP
Brazil477 Posts
said he wants to leave it between them, and wants peace and stability to be achieved PHEW | ||
|
Alejandrisha
United States6565 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:00 shutdown_exploded wrote: right. but countries are not pets. they don't go away when you punish them. see: iraq. See also: Germany CNN just started their coverage but it's pretty much a review of everything I've read on this thread so far | ||
|
bokchoi
Korea (South)9498 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15394 Posts
| ||
|
keV.
United States3214 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:00 10fps wrote: Okay NK, you flexed your muscles...now please stop. Having grown up during war I can only say that people thinking it's somehow "interesting" or "entertaining" don't know the first thing about it. It's pure horror. Watching a documentary decades later doesn't even remotely paint the picture of an actual conflict and the hell it brings. Doesn't matter if you are trying to appear as an internet tough guy or actually believe what you are saying....you are uninformed, insensitive and dead wrong. This the kind of attitude that starts pointless bullshit. The word interesting is being completely misunderstood in this thread. If this situation isn't "interesting" then why then fuck are you all reading this thread. Stop going to battle with everyone just because you are emotionally charged. | ||
|
ddrddrddrddr
1344 Posts
| ||
|
Slardar
Canada7593 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:02 konadora wrote: wow someone in parliament suggest US give SKorea nukes I would actually be in favour of this idea. Jesus that's brilliant.... why don't they just do that?! Considering the reasonably small size of the Korea's a few is all you really need to be utterly threatening. What are NK allies going to do? Give them nukes ontop of the nukes they claim they already have?! | ||
|
gosuRob
United States319 Posts
User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:02 dinmsab wrote: worst.idea.ever. We have enough nukes in the world allready. Also, how the hell would they use them? Bomb the country next to them, get owned as well. Even if they were willing to use it. | ||
|
drhojo
United States53 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:02 DystopiaX wrote: Also, they'd then shell Seoul and potentially take out something like half of S Korea's population. I'm just saying something needs to be done because next time it might be a nuke. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
chobopeon
United States7342 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:02 mizU wrote: Why wouldn't you retaliate if you got shelled? If the U.S. got shelled by Russia, mannnnnnn it'd be trouble. Not an analogous situation at all. | ||
|
fAnTaCy
United States893 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:03 RobbybabyDTF wrote: Lets have a moment of silence for the 60-70 starcraft copies that got burned Not funny | ||
| ||
