EPTNorth Korea Fires Artillery Rounds at South Korean Island…
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
okajunior
United States125 Posts
| ||
|
Norway
United States341 Posts
| ||
|
Romantic
United States1844 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:35 DystopiaX wrote: according to the stream translator the S Korean president said not to escalate. Darn. I was hoping this would get interesting. Who is in office as president on the ROK and what party is he in? User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
Scrapiron
74 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:30 imweakless wrote: SK and US should make a move about this.. how can they make such stupid move? for once SK make it happen what they want,, Yea we totally need to be in another war. We really need to send a bunch of 20 year old Americans to their death over this! TEAM AMERICA! WORLD POLICE! /end sarcasm | ||
|
Terrakin
United States1440 Posts
| ||
|
ZoW
United States3983 Posts
 | ||
|
NokCha
Korea (South)410 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:37 Fenrax wrote: 14 injured 3 critical Please dont die. For yourselves, your families and for peace. 1 ROKMC soldier is dead :[ (equivalent of the us marines but more badass) | ||
|
mOnion
United States5651 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:38 Romantic wrote: Darn. I was hoping this would get interesting. Who is in office as president on the ROK and what party is he in? why would you want it to get worse? what kind of person are you? | ||
|
rasnj
United States1959 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:36 Norway wrote: I would think SK would retaliate - NK attacked their ground. SK already turned the other cheek with the Ship incident. Why would they retaliate? They can either stand by their principles and do the "just" thing, but that would result in seoul being bombed to pieces. Alternatively they could keep turning their cheek (or do a little symbolic retaliation such as issuing warnings and deploying jets) and almost avoid casualties. | ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
Please... | ||
|
StorkHwaiting
United States3465 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:21 boesthius wrote: the old thread title was "Nuclear Launch Detected" -.- Ah, good change then lol. The old title was very poor taste... Holy jesus though, this is serious. Scrambling fighter jets and exchanging artillery rounds with real casualties. I don't see it escalating to actual war, but troops will be mobilized and people will die. All because of posturing (on both sides). Wars like this are quite sad and foolish. | ||
|
koreasilver
9109 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:38 Romantic wrote: Darn. I was hoping this would get interesting. Who is in office as president on the ROK and what party is he in? Lee Myung Bak, conservative. | ||
|
konadora
Singapore66071 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:38 Romantic wrote: Darn. I was hoping this would get interesting. Who is in office as president on the ROK and what party is he in? wtf? | ||
|
Fenrax
United States5018 Posts
RIP | ||
|
KonohaFlash
Canada1590 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:38 Romantic wrote: Darn. I was hoping this would get interesting. Who is in office as president on the ROK and what party is he in? Because war is interesting right? | ||
|
furymonkey
New Zealand1587 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:38 okajunior wrote: 1 confirmed casualty. This is not looking good You meant death, the word casualty includes injuired. | ||
|
heartjc
United States37 Posts
| ||
|
Ghazwan
Netherlands444 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:38 Romantic wrote: Darn. I was hoping this would get interesting. Who is in office as president on the ROK and what party is he in? This isn't some fucking reality TV show. | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
China has very legitimate qualms about having to deal with a humanitarian crisis along North Korea's northern boarder. If the government of N. Korea falls, people sure aren't going to go running across the world's largest landmine field. They're going North into China. So China's response has been pretty typical, it's how they're dealing with the Tibetan issue, the Uighur issue, and their abysmal human rights record. They tacitly keep doing what they're doing (supporting the N. Korean regime), and hope that somehow the problem just goes away. They surely can't ignore this, but I'm sure they're going to somehow try. | ||
|
Fenrax
United States5018 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:38 Romantic wrote: Darn. I was hoping this would get interesting. Who is in office as president on the ROK and what party is he in? I hope you get banned for that. | ||
| ||
