|
On September 18 2010 03:06 animus123 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2010 02:57 Adila wrote:On September 18 2010 02:54 Hawk wrote:
Forget how batshit insane this lady is, I still can't believe that morons still fall for the old 'I won't ever raise taxes' routine.
It never fails, no matter what level of government you're dealing with, and that's the first thing that politicans do when they get in. What's even more hilarious are the people who say now's not the time to raise taxes. We all know there's never a "good time" to raise taxes for these people. When we get a fair tax system maybe we can talk about there being a 'right time' to increase taxes.
"Fair" is relative. If you ask some one making $1,000,000/year they well have a completely different definition of what "fair" is compared to some one making minimum wage.
Honestly what I think is "fair" now is what ever is best for the economy. Rich families spend less money then many middle class families, thats why they are rich. And while I do belive these middle class families that are spending more then they are earning are very stuipid, at the moment we need these dumb consumers to be spending as much money as possible to get the unemployment level down.
|
On September 18 2010 03:07 Hawk wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2010 03:02 animus123 wrote:On September 18 2010 02:50 Manit0u wrote:Holy crap!
"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."
...
"will be a strong voice in fighting ongoing efforts by anti-gun politicians to dismantle the Second Amendment"
...
O'Donnell advocated the teaching of creationism in public schools and argued for a literal interpretation of The Bible's Book of Genesis
...
O'Donnell has said that she will never vote to increase taxes.
...
O'Donnell has contended that "America is now a socialist economy"
I feel for you USA. On September 18 2010 02:37 Chairman Ray wrote:
What kind of dumb school accepted her into political sciences? A community college perhaps? Did she even legitimately graduate? In earlier years, there had been a discrepancy regarding her university graduation. Her 2006 Senate campaign website identified her as a Fairleigh Dickinson University graduate. However, she did not receive a degree from there until September 2010. I have no problems with points 2 and 4. Point 5 is debatable. Point 1 is...an....odd belief and Point 3 will never happen even if she gets elected thanks to the other 99 Senators. I really don't understand what the point of this thread is other than to bash the Tea Party Candidate. When are you going to agree with everything a candidate represents? Obviously the people of Delaware don't support some of her more crazy notions but they didn't want another corrupt Republican who is only motivated by which lobbyists gave him the most money. The senate doesn't need another life-time political insider. All she has won so far is a primary. Even so, I doubt the republican party will offer her any support. If she wins, it won't be because the people of Delaware are enamored with her religious values, but because they think she offers them a better political future. So they eschewed the allegedly corrupt but definitely experienced candidate for one that has absolutely no experience, and has proven herself to be a moron to boot. Who is to say that she's not going to launch a political career that lasts until she dies, or that a year from now, it will be exposed that she was blowing corporate hotshots for funding?? And this is political progress in America, folks!!
Who's to say she isn't an alien scouting for the invasion? Who's to say Obama isn't a robot?
Everyone knew what they were getting with the other guy. He was like 99% of the other senators. Corrupt, disconnected with the public, with a strong belief in gravity. Isn't this why everyone voted for Obama? Because they wanted change? Why is only OK for the democratic candidates to run as candidate that vows to change current policies? I'd rather give someone new a chance than have the same person as always.
|
On September 18 2010 03:19 NukeTheBunnys wrote:
Rich families spend less money then many middle class families, thats why they are rich.
WRONG
Rich families have goals to make more than they spend, and that's why they are rich. Middle-class families have goals to spend less than they make, and that's why they are middle-class.
|
On September 18 2010 03:22 animus123 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2010 03:07 Hawk wrote:On September 18 2010 03:02 animus123 wrote:On September 18 2010 02:50 Manit0u wrote:Holy crap!
"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."
...
"will be a strong voice in fighting ongoing efforts by anti-gun politicians to dismantle the Second Amendment"
...
O'Donnell advocated the teaching of creationism in public schools and argued for a literal interpretation of The Bible's Book of Genesis
...
O'Donnell has said that she will never vote to increase taxes.
...
O'Donnell has contended that "America is now a socialist economy"
I feel for you USA. On September 18 2010 02:37 Chairman Ray wrote:
What kind of dumb school accepted her into political sciences? A community college perhaps? Did she even legitimately graduate? In earlier years, there had been a discrepancy regarding her university graduation. Her 2006 Senate campaign website identified her as a Fairleigh Dickinson University graduate. However, she did not receive a degree from there until September 2010. I have no problems with points 2 and 4. Point 5 is debatable. Point 1 is...an....odd belief and Point 3 will never happen even if she gets elected thanks to the other 99 Senators. I really don't understand what the point of this thread is other than to bash the Tea Party Candidate. When are you going to agree with everything a candidate represents? Obviously the people of Delaware don't support some of her more crazy notions but they didn't want another corrupt Republican who is only motivated by which lobbyists gave him the most money. The senate doesn't need another life-time political insider. All she has won so far is a primary. Even so, I doubt the republican party will offer her any support. If she wins, it won't be because the people of Delaware are enamored with her religious values, but because they think she offers them a better political future. So they eschewed the allegedly corrupt but definitely experienced candidate for one that has absolutely no experience, and has proven herself to be a moron to boot. Who is to say that she's not going to launch a political career that lasts until she dies, or that a year from now, it will be exposed that she was blowing corporate hotshots for funding?? And this is political progress in America, folks!! Who's to say she isn't an alien scouting for the invasion? Who's to say Obama isn't a robot? Everyone knew what they were getting with the other guy. He was like 99% of the other senators. Corrupt, disconnected with the public, with a strong belief in gravity. Isn't this why everyone voted for Obama? Because they wanted change? Why is only OK for the democratic candidates to run as candidate that vows to change current policies? I'd rather give someone new a chance than have the same person as always.
Obama's academic credentials are about 100x a tad bit more established, he's not tossing religion into everything, he at least had some--not tons--of experience, and he has a grasp of things work, ie., he isn't saying 'A socialist economy is one in which 50% youre dependent on the govt.' or some crap.
|
On September 18 2010 03:22 animus123 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2010 03:07 Hawk wrote:On September 18 2010 03:02 animus123 wrote:On September 18 2010 02:50 Manit0u wrote:Holy crap!
"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."
...
"will be a strong voice in fighting ongoing efforts by anti-gun politicians to dismantle the Second Amendment"
...
O'Donnell advocated the teaching of creationism in public schools and argued for a literal interpretation of The Bible's Book of Genesis
...
O'Donnell has said that she will never vote to increase taxes.
...
O'Donnell has contended that "America is now a socialist economy"
I feel for you USA. On September 18 2010 02:37 Chairman Ray wrote:
What kind of dumb school accepted her into political sciences? A community college perhaps? Did she even legitimately graduate? In earlier years, there had been a discrepancy regarding her university graduation. Her 2006 Senate campaign website identified her as a Fairleigh Dickinson University graduate. However, she did not receive a degree from there until September 2010. I have no problems with points 2 and 4. Point 5 is debatable. Point 1 is...an....odd belief and Point 3 will never happen even if she gets elected thanks to the other 99 Senators. I really don't understand what the point of this thread is other than to bash the Tea Party Candidate. When are you going to agree with everything a candidate represents? Obviously the people of Delaware don't support some of her more crazy notions but they didn't want another corrupt Republican who is only motivated by which lobbyists gave him the most money. The senate doesn't need another life-time political insider. All she has won so far is a primary. Even so, I doubt the republican party will offer her any support. If she wins, it won't be because the people of Delaware are enamored with her religious values, but because they think she offers them a better political future. So they eschewed the allegedly corrupt but definitely experienced candidate for one that has absolutely no experience, and has proven herself to be a moron to boot. Who is to say that she's not going to launch a political career that lasts until she dies, or that a year from now, it will be exposed that she was blowing corporate hotshots for funding?? And this is political progress in America, folks!! Who's to say she isn't an alien scouting for the invasion? Who's to say Obama isn't a robot? Everyone knew what they were getting with the other guy. He was like 99% of the other senators. Corrupt, disconnected with the public, with a strong belief in gravity. Isn't this why everyone voted for Obama? Because they wanted change? Why is only OK for the democratic candidates to run as candidate that vows to change current policies? I'd rather give someone new a chance than have the same person as always.
Yeah let's go with the crazy lady who believes that scientists are making rats with human brains and that everyone should have guns while we teach the bible in schools.
|
On September 18 2010 03:22 animus123 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2010 03:07 Hawk wrote:On September 18 2010 03:02 animus123 wrote:On September 18 2010 02:50 Manit0u wrote:Holy crap!
"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."
...
"will be a strong voice in fighting ongoing efforts by anti-gun politicians to dismantle the Second Amendment"
...
O'Donnell advocated the teaching of creationism in public schools and argued for a literal interpretation of The Bible's Book of Genesis
...
O'Donnell has said that she will never vote to increase taxes.
...
O'Donnell has contended that "America is now a socialist economy"
I feel for you USA. On September 18 2010 02:37 Chairman Ray wrote:
What kind of dumb school accepted her into political sciences? A community college perhaps? Did she even legitimately graduate? In earlier years, there had been a discrepancy regarding her university graduation. Her 2006 Senate campaign website identified her as a Fairleigh Dickinson University graduate. However, she did not receive a degree from there until September 2010. I have no problems with points 2 and 4. Point 5 is debatable. Point 1 is...an....odd belief and Point 3 will never happen even if she gets elected thanks to the other 99 Senators. I really don't understand what the point of this thread is other than to bash the Tea Party Candidate. When are you going to agree with everything a candidate represents? Obviously the people of Delaware don't support some of her more crazy notions but they didn't want another corrupt Republican who is only motivated by which lobbyists gave him the most money. The senate doesn't need another life-time political insider. All she has won so far is a primary. Even so, I doubt the republican party will offer her any support. If she wins, it won't be because the people of Delaware are enamored with her religious values, but because they think she offers them a better political future. So they eschewed the allegedly corrupt but definitely experienced candidate for one that has absolutely no experience, and has proven herself to be a moron to boot. Who is to say that she's not going to launch a political career that lasts until she dies, or that a year from now, it will be exposed that she was blowing corporate hotshots for funding?? And this is political progress in America, folks!! Who's to say she isn't an alien scouting for the invasion? Who's to say Obama isn't a robot? Everyone knew what they were getting with the other guy. He was like 99% of the other senators. Corrupt, disconnected with the public, with a strong belief in gravity. Isn't this why everyone voted for Obama? Because they wanted change? Why is only OK for the democratic candidates to run as candidate that vows to change current policies? I'd rather give someone new a chance than have the same person as always.
Someone new is fine. Someone new like O'Donnell is just asking for trouble.
|
On September 18 2010 03:28 Hawk wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2010 03:22 animus123 wrote:On September 18 2010 03:07 Hawk wrote:On September 18 2010 03:02 animus123 wrote:On September 18 2010 02:50 Manit0u wrote:Holy crap!
"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."
...
"will be a strong voice in fighting ongoing efforts by anti-gun politicians to dismantle the Second Amendment"
...
O'Donnell advocated the teaching of creationism in public schools and argued for a literal interpretation of The Bible's Book of Genesis
...
O'Donnell has said that she will never vote to increase taxes.
...
O'Donnell has contended that "America is now a socialist economy"
I feel for you USA. On September 18 2010 02:37 Chairman Ray wrote:
What kind of dumb school accepted her into political sciences? A community college perhaps? Did she even legitimately graduate? In earlier years, there had been a discrepancy regarding her university graduation. Her 2006 Senate campaign website identified her as a Fairleigh Dickinson University graduate. However, she did not receive a degree from there until September 2010. I have no problems with points 2 and 4. Point 5 is debatable. Point 1 is...an....odd belief and Point 3 will never happen even if she gets elected thanks to the other 99 Senators. I really don't understand what the point of this thread is other than to bash the Tea Party Candidate. When are you going to agree with everything a candidate represents? Obviously the people of Delaware don't support some of her more crazy notions but they didn't want another corrupt Republican who is only motivated by which lobbyists gave him the most money. The senate doesn't need another life-time political insider. All she has won so far is a primary. Even so, I doubt the republican party will offer her any support. If she wins, it won't be because the people of Delaware are enamored with her religious values, but because they think she offers them a better political future. So they eschewed the allegedly corrupt but definitely experienced candidate for one that has absolutely no experience, and has proven herself to be a moron to boot. Who is to say that she's not going to launch a political career that lasts until she dies, or that a year from now, it will be exposed that she was blowing corporate hotshots for funding?? And this is political progress in America, folks!! Who's to say she isn't an alien scouting for the invasion? Who's to say Obama isn't a robot? Everyone knew what they were getting with the other guy. He was like 99% of the other senators. Corrupt, disconnected with the public, with a strong belief in gravity. Isn't this why everyone voted for Obama? Because they wanted change? Why is only OK for the democratic candidates to run as candidate that vows to change current policies? I'd rather give someone new a chance than have the same person as always. Obama's academic credentials are about 100x a tad bit more established, he's not tossing religion into everything, he at least had some--not tons--of experience, and he has a grasp of things work, ie., he isn't saying 'A socialist economy is one in which 50% youre dependent on the govt.' or some crap.
I really don't want to turn this into a debate about Obama, but his academic records are hardly more established when they have never actually been released and any attempt to look at them has been squashed. And it seems none of his classmates even remembers him.
I cannot defend the statement 'A socialist economy is one in which 50% youre dependent on the govt.'
|
"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."
All potical topics aside, what does this statement reveal about her intelligence?
On September 18 2010 03:19 NukeTheBunnys wrote:
Rich families spend less money then many middle class families, thats why they are rich.
This comment is FAR more hilarious than 90% of the funny pic thread!
Thanks!
|
On September 18 2010 03:39 animus123 wrote:
I really don't want to turn this into a debate about Obama, but his academic records are hardly more established when they have never actually been released and any attempt to look at them has been squashed. And it seems none of his classmates even remembers him.
My father played basketball against him at Punahou when he was in high school. Also are you seriously comparing the president's academic credentials to the lady who got her bachelor's degree this month?
Like, seriously, OBAMA NEVER WENT 2 HIGH SKOOL!!!!
|
I mean, Obama was a fucking lawyer after he graduated from Harvard. This lady lied about having an UNDERGRAD degree.
|
On September 18 2010 03:39 ggrrg wrote:
"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."
All potical topics aside, what does this statement reveal about her intelligence?
That she's on par with a mouse?
|
Obama obviously had a body double do all the things he did in Harvard.... or it was just a liberal Harvard conspiracy!
|
If the mouse had a human brain, maybe.
|
The more I read that statement the more I fucking lol
"coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains"
If the brain is inside the mouse it's a fucking mouse brain.
|
Those mice are probably more intelligent than 95% of anyone who is affiliated with any "tea party".
I wonder how many things I could list that are blatantly hypocritical about their entire stupid worthless movement. They are too fixated on sucking on the teets of ole Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh to think for themselves for two seconds to see it.
|
On September 18 2010 03:22 animus123 wrote:
Who's to say she isn't an alien scouting for the invasion? Who's to say Obama isn't a robot?
Everyone knew what they were getting with the other guy. He was like 99% of the other senators. Corrupt, disconnected with the public, with a strong belief in gravity.
http://www.christine2010.com/
So far she's got 1.6 mio $. Do you really think that none of this money comes from people/corporations/whatever that want her to make something "special" for them if she gets elected?
Isn't this why everyone voted for Obama? Because they wanted change? Why is only OK for the democratic candidates to run as candidate that vows to change current policies? I'd rather give someone new a chance than have the same person as always.
Because they tend to choose people who don't appear to be batshit crazy.
On September 18 2010 03:44 Blix wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2010 03:39 ggrrg wrote:
"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."
All potical topics aside, what does this statement reveal about her intelligence?
That she's on par with a mouse?
Made my day xD
|
On September 18 2010 03:42 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2010 03:39 animus123 wrote:
I really don't want to turn this into a debate about Obama, but his academic records are hardly more established when they have never actually been released and any attempt to look at them has been squashed. And it seems none of his classmates even remembers him. My father played basketball against him at Punahou when he was in high school. Also are you seriously comparing the president's academic credentials to the lady who got her bachelor's degree this month? Like, seriously, OBAMA NEVER WENT 2 HIGH SKOOL!!!!
Perhaps I should have been more specific and said no records of his college experience have been released.
On September 18 2010 03:45 Adila wrote:
Obama obviously had a body double do all the things he did in Harvard.... or it was just a liberal Harvard conspiracy!
Why is anyone that questions something about Obama's records always a racist drooling conspiracist? I was only pointing out a lack of documentation to support any claims that Obama really did anything in College. Anyway, this is not a debate about Obama and I do not want to go down this road.
Most of what I have posted has been in support of an uncorrupted conservative policy that actually represents its people. O'Donnell is obviously not the best candidate, but when all you have is a douchebag and a turd sandwich, you take what you can get.
|
On September 18 2010 03:57 animus123 wrote:
Why is anyone that questions something about Obama's records always a racist drooling conspiracist? I was only pointing out a lack of documentation to support any claims that Obama really did anything in College. Anyway, this is not a debate about Obama and I do not want to go down this road.
What? So Harvard just made him an editor for the Harvard Law Review for the lawlz? They made him president of the Harvard Law Review because it was funny? He graduated magna cum laude because his professors felt sorry for him?
Totally didn't do anything in college.
|
I don't agree at all with the comparison of whacko to Obama in terms of education, but he's right. It has nothing to do with the convo.
|
Do you guys want an honest christian PoV or are you just gonna label me as a retard and moron for not logically concluding evolution as 100% certain?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
