EPTMan brands his children like cattle - Page 5
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
hellobye
Canada82 Posts
| ||
|
GeMicles
Canada307 Posts
On May 15 2010 06:17 il0seonpurpose wrote: This sounds bad but the first thing I thought of when I saw SK was SKTT1 Telecom we're both bad people then | ||
|
ilj.psa
Peru3081 Posts
| ||
|
DM20
Canada544 Posts
On May 15 2010 12:30 NicolBolas wrote: Because they're children. Children below a certain age aren't able to give consent. It's for the same reason that if you manage to convince a child to have sex with you, it still doesn't count as consent. It has nothing to do with whether or not they were children. They added in cattle to make it sound like he was treating his children like animals, causing people to judge the situation before they even know the facts. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
this is kinda tame in comparison people are over reacting. edit The sc jokes are nerdy and not funny | ||
|
SleepSheep
Canada344 Posts
| ||
|
jstar
Canada568 Posts
sure its kinda weird but if the kids wanted it and were okay with it then why not? | ||
|
SleepSheep
Canada344 Posts
On May 15 2010 12:30 NicolBolas wrote: Because they're children. Children below a certain age aren't able to give consent. It's for the same reason that if you manage to convince a child to have sex with you, it still doesn't count as consent. Yeah, it's illegal. But the law shouldn't be used as the ultimate judicator for what counts as right and wrong. It's reasonable to consider the law as being mostly right about things, but it just can't possibly always be right about all things, and we should be mindful of that. Also I think we can agree that there's a clear moral difference between having sex with a young child, and branding one. | ||
|
Narwhal
United Kingdom314 Posts
| ||
| ||
