| Forum Index > General Games |
KwarK
United States44393 Posts
On August 28 2011 23:16 Byzantium wrote: Perhaps he means the cloak from a gate-jump session change? Given that is the only way a huginn could possibly lock me right after decloaking and I explicitly said the context was local +50ing while I was on a gate I thought it was clear. Evidently not clear enough for tofu. | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19264 Posts
On August 29 2011 00:11 KwarK wrote: Given that is the only way a huginn could possibly lock me right after decloaking and I explicitly said the context was local +50ing while I was on a gate I thought it was clear. Evidently not clear enough for tofu. I blame Irene. | ||
|
carrion
United Kingdom87 Posts
| ||
|
Byzantium
United States423 Posts
http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?229-Low-Sec-Empire | ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34507 Posts
 | ||
|
TurpinOS
Canada1223 Posts
DERP | ||
|
Byzantium
United States423 Posts
Link to the vidoes (and as the titles suggests a lot of other good/excellent PvP vids) listed under Rooks & Kings. http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?139-All-good-pvp-videos-since-the-nanonerf | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On August 28 2011 16:58 Firebolt145 wrote: why? People won't be able to gather resources safely > leads to an infaltion of manufacture costs > people can't mission as much to pay for the increased manufacture cost so they're more reliant on plex > higher demand for plex | ||
|
rredtooth
5464 Posts
On August 29 2011 04:12 Risen wrote: what?People won't be able to gather resources safely > leads to an infaltion of manufacture costs > people can't mission as much to pay for the increased manufacture cost so they're more reliant on plex > higher demand for plex | ||
|
Invol2ver
United States330 Posts
On August 29 2011 04:12 Risen wrote: People won't be able to gather resources safely > leads to an infaltion of manufacture costs > people can't mission as much to pay for the increased manufacture cost so they're more reliant on plex > higher demand for plex How else will MA mining fleets communicate that they are in trouble with no local? Sound logic. | ||
|
Body_Shield
Canada3373 Posts
| ||
|
Inzek
Chile802 Posts
On August 29 2011 04:12 Risen wrote: People won't be able to gather resources safely > leads to an infaltion of manufacture costs > people can't mission as much to pay for the increased manufacture cost so they're more reliant on plex > higher demand for plex if i undertstand your logic.. plex prices should go down... | ||
|
Warri
Germany3208 Posts
On August 29 2011 07:56 Inzek wrote: if i undertstand your logic.. plex prices should go down... excatly lol. If anything prices go down because more people switch to selling plexes rather than missioning theirself. | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On August 29 2011 05:49 redtooth wrote: what? That line means that people will become more reliant on buying plex and selling it in game to fund their play. On August 29 2011 06:58 Invol2ver wrote: How else will MA mining fleets communicate that they are in trouble with no local? Sound logic. You're implying that people don't use local to discover threats to themselves. I guess local +50 means nothing, you right. On August 29 2011 07:58 Warri wrote: excatly lol. If anything prices go down because more people switch to selling plexes rather than missioning theirself. This means you think the supply of plex will increase, meaning people will spend more real life money on plex. I don't think this is the case, but if you do then yes, that is what will happen. I don't think the amount of real life money people are willing to spend on EVE will go up that much. I could be wrong, though. | ||
|
Valenius
United Kingdom1266 Posts
On August 29 2011 08:16 Risen wrote: That line means that people will become more reliant on buying plex and selling it in game to fund their play. You're implying that people don't use local to discover threats to themselves. I guess local +50 means nothing, you right. This means you think the supply of plex will increase, meaning people will spend more real life money on plex. I don't think this is the case, but if you do then yes, that is what will happen. I don't think the amount of real life money people are willing to spend on EVE will go up that much. I could be wrong, though. I'd agree with Karah here, There are enough people out there willing to pay for plex with real money, but at lower prices it becomes more practical to pay in game. If anything i'd expect plexes to rise for a couple of days, but nothing major, followed by a dip back down to about 10m below they are now. Valenius; Speculative Economist*! * Loosely using this term.. | ||
|
Inzek
Chile802 Posts
On August 29 2011 08:16 Risen wrote: That line means that people will become more reliant on buying plex and selling it in game to fund their play. =><= On August 29 2011 08:16 Risen wrote: This means you think the supply of plex will increase, meaning people will spend more real life money on plex. I don't think this is the case, but if you do then yes, that is what will happen. I don't think the amount of real life money people are willing to spend on EVE will go up that much. I could be wrong, though. you are not making any sense.... | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
|
Warri
Germany3208 Posts
What changes is that you might not have enough ISK anymore and instead of doing missions you want to get money by selling plexes, in which case there will be an overflow of supply and prices drop. | ||
|
Inzek
Chile802 Posts
| ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games summit1g3350 FrodaN913 Beastyqt698 B2W.Neo564 Pyrionflax202 UpATreeSC111 shahzam63 ZombieGrub24 Railgan6 |
|
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Kung Fu Cup
IntoTheTV X SOOP
Reynor vs Zoun
Neeb vs Rogue
FEL
Patches Events
AI Arena Tournament
FEL
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
