EPT2011-2012 football (soccer) thread - Page 74
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
| ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28797 Posts
| ||
Jonvvv
Norway1530 Posts
| ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
| ||
GTR
51599 Posts
| ||
|
Jonvvv
Norway1530 Posts
| ||
|
Stimp
South Africa780 Posts
| ||
|
King.Crimson
Romania478 Posts
| ||
|
andis35
Latvia346 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28797 Posts
 | ||
|
Eishi_Ki
Korea (South)1667 Posts
| ||
|
Valenius
United Kingdom1266 Posts
On September 19 2011 00:56 Eishi_Ki wrote: Anderson's playing like a complete diddy this game, nothing unusual then It's not like he's played pretty well recently is it? | ||
|
Klive5ive
United Kingdom6056 Posts
On September 19 2011 00:50 Liquid`Drone wrote: 3-0 now, but I don't actually think united has been any better. 1-0 goal was offside, 2-0 was a magnificent finish by nani, and 3-0 was basically just the ball randomly bouncing into rooney's feet. obviously efficiency is a huge factor in football, but I can't help but think that a 1-1 score or even 2-1 in chelsea's favour would be more in accordance with how the game has looked as a whole. 12-5 in goalscoring attempts in chelsea's favour after the first half. I wouldn't go that far. United have committed many players forward on every attack. That's why they've left chances for Chelsea, but it's also how they've scored 3 goals. And Chelsea haven't taken their chances because they're strikers aren't on form. The goalscoring attempts might look in Chelsea's favour but the possession is in United's favour. 1-0 United or 2-1 would be the fairest scorelines in my opinion | ||
|
Zarahtra
Iceland4053 Posts
On September 19 2011 00:50 Liquid`Drone wrote: 3-0 now, but I don't actually think united has been any better. 1-0 goal was offside, 2-0 was a magnificent finish by nani, and 3-0 was basically just the ball randomly bouncing into rooney's feet. obviously efficiency is a huge factor in football, but I can't help but think that a 1-1 score or even 2-1 in chelsea's favour would be more in accordance with how the game has looked as a whole. 12-5 in goalscoring attempts in chelsea's favour after the first half. this will also make second half quite interesting. If anything I feel Chelsea has been a lot better in this game(2nd goal was apparently also offside btw), so they don't really have to much to be ashamed/down about and just need to go crazy in second half. About the Liverpool vs Tottenham game, while Liverpool sucked, the ref ruined any chance for fair game. 1st card on Adam, 1st on Skrtle and the one of Ade I felt were all complete bullshit :/ Even thought the red card(2nd yellow) on Skrtle was quite harsh, but it was kind of the only "can go either way". Anyway fact of the matter is, at the time Adam went out, there was still time to splash them in the face, wake up and stop sucking, but when you're 10-11 the chance for that to happen is... yeah. Tottenham deserved to win, but I feel the ref robbed us of any chance to make a comeback. | ||
|
hasuprotoss
United States4664 Posts
| ||
|
Freaky[x]
Canada995 Posts
| ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
| ||
|
Valenius
United Kingdom1266 Posts
| ||
|
hasuprotoss
United States4664 Posts
On September 19 2011 01:13 Valenius wrote: no way was that a penalty Looks like the ground agrees! | ||
| ||
