|
On June 02 2012 05:18 hls.fetcH wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2012 22:54 daSilvaz wrote:On June 01 2012 22:46 bObaZ wrote:On June 01 2012 22:42 daSilvaz wrote:On June 01 2012 22:37 Pandemona wrote:
Lol banter from le portugals xD
47million Euros is plenty for a player who is being chased by 1 club in Europe (who can get near his 60million Euros buyout) plus Hulk said he wants to leave Porto now, its not a good thing to keep a player at a club when he doesn't want to be there, specially when you can cash in on him for nearly 50million Euros! You are wrong twice, 1st Porto did have offers from other clubs and 2nd Hulk never said he wanted to leave, dont read fake twitter accounts please  . And 47mil for Hulk after buying hazzard for 40mil 2days(?) ago?..haha @ boobaz Ofc you dont want foreigners to know what a disgrace your club is, i understand... LOL Ok. Take the Bike If people who have some interest in football wanted to investigate what REALLY happened in the portuguese football for the last 25 Years, they would be surprised SURE, Hulk will go to Chelsea for 80M€+ SURE Hulk is worth twice the value of Hazard... And pliz don't mix fanatic supporters with the name of the club... You got me wrong, im not fanatic in any way shape or form, im not even afiliated with porto. What i cant stand is you ppl always talking the same bullshit over and over again hoping someday will stick. i could talk also how you club paid a steward to pick a fight with hulk and some other players to ban them for 4 months and much much more... Pathetic, you want a club to be burned to the ground but you're not fanatic? What's a fanatic to you then? Take your hate somewhere else, this isn't the place for this discussion.
You talk about what you have no clue nor do i have to justify myself to you. Obv that was a figure of speech, i dont literally want it to burn, now take your morale to someone that actually cares.
|
On June 02 2012 05:26 daSilvaz wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2012 05:18 hls.fetcH wrote:On June 01 2012 22:54 daSilvaz wrote:On June 01 2012 22:46 bObaZ wrote:On June 01 2012 22:42 daSilvaz wrote:On June 01 2012 22:37 Pandemona wrote:
Lol banter from le portugals xD
47million Euros is plenty for a player who is being chased by 1 club in Europe (who can get near his 60million Euros buyout) plus Hulk said he wants to leave Porto now, its not a good thing to keep a player at a club when he doesn't want to be there, specially when you can cash in on him for nearly 50million Euros! You are wrong twice, 1st Porto did have offers from other clubs and 2nd Hulk never said he wanted to leave, dont read fake twitter accounts please . And 47mil for Hulk after buying hazzard for 40mil 2days(?) ago?..haha @ boobaz Ofc you dont want foreigners to know what a disgrace your club is, i understand... LOL Ok. Take the Bike If people who have some interest in football wanted to investigate what REALLY happened in the portuguese football for the last 25 Years, they would be surprised SURE, Hulk will go to Chelsea for 80M€+ SURE Hulk is worth twice the value of Hazard... And pliz don't mix fanatic supporters with the name of the club... You got me wrong, im not fanatic in any way shape or form, im not even afiliated with porto. What i cant stand is you ppl always talking the same bullshit over and over again hoping someday will stick. i could talk also how you club paid a steward to pick a fight with hulk and some other players to ban them for 4 months and much much more... Pathetic, you want a club to be burned to the ground but you're not fanatic? What's a fanatic to you then? Take your hate somewhere else, this isn't the place for this discussion. You talk about what you have no clue nor do i have to justify myself to you. Obv that was a figure of speech, i dont literally want it to burn, now take your morale to someone that actually cares.
Regardless youve made your point clear, no need to fight the world by repeatedly insulting a club its fans or the people associated with it.
As for Hulk's value. Hes worth whatever anyone is willing to pay for him. Sure he has the 100 mil on his contract but hes no ones going to pay that 38-40 mil seems reasonable simply on the basis of his contract. I think his style is pretty well suited to the PL, a bigger Aguera if you will, maybe a step slower at best. Good signing for sure. I wouldnt pay 40 mil for him but thats how the market is working nothing you can do about it.
|
|
|
First goal goal celebration stance is totally priceless, LIKE A BAAAWZ. His huge as well, close to 2 metres i think. Makes him even better physical
|
|
|
51589 Posts
Anyone watching today's friendlies? Some Belgian guy pushed Cahill onto Hart while chasing the ball, what a cheap fucking shot.
|
On June 03 2012 01:36 GTR wrote:
Anyone watching today's friendlies? Some Belgian guy pushed Cahill onto Hart while chasing the ball, what a cheap fucking shot.
Very dirty indeed, and that in a friendly... Pretty boring game though, but a nice finish by Welbeck there.
|
Yeah Mertins. Loved his reaction to the card - 'I got a yellow? For what?' It's not playing too friendly so far with Parker and Fellaini taking chunks out of each other.
Also Belgium are passing it about nicely, they look like Arsenal. Which I guess makes England Stoke...?
|
england are so bad, shame that volley didn't go in
|
On June 03 2012 02:58 mememolly wrote:
england are so bad, shame that volley didn't go in
60th minute is the first time Hart has made a save...?
And I'm only counting that as a save because it was a Belgian who kicked the ball last.
|
|
|
And let's face it, playing a rigid defensive style is really the only way England will get anywhere at the Euros. We don't have an all-star team and Hodgson hasn't been with them long. They need to concentrate on the basics and keep their formation. Hopefully once we have the midfield working together nicely we can put in some good performances.
|
gets 1-0 results against norway and belgium, hardly going to win the euros playing like that
|
On June 03 2012 03:35 mememolly wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2012 03:18 Sated wrote:On June 03 2012 02:58 mememolly wrote:
england are so bad, shame that volley didn't go in We're purposefully playing a rigid, defensive style. Sorry if that bores you, but it gets results by preventing the other team from having any chances. I can't remember a single Belgian shot from inside the box, proof of the system's effectiveness. It's a shame we still look so disjointed in midfield, but that will get better once the players become more familiar with each other and with the system. Also, Welbeck, what a boss =D gets 1-0 results against norway and belgium, hardly going to win the euros playing like that
I didn't say they'd win it. That said how many 1-0 games did Greece have in Portugal?
England just aren't a top footballing nation, and the players have only recently come together under a new manager. They'd had some players out from injury and have to make do without Rooney for the first two games. Just exactly how are you expecting them to play?
Also have to add beating Norway and Belgium by a goal are better than losing to Bulgaria or Switzerland>.>
|
On June 03 2012 03:38 Sanctimonius wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2012 03:35 mememolly wrote:On June 03 2012 03:18 Sated wrote:On June 03 2012 02:58 mememolly wrote:
england are so bad, shame that volley didn't go in We're purposefully playing a rigid, defensive style. Sorry if that bores you, but it gets results by preventing the other team from having any chances. I can't remember a single Belgian shot from inside the box, proof of the system's effectiveness. It's a shame we still look so disjointed in midfield, but that will get better once the players become more familiar with each other and with the system. Also, Welbeck, what a boss =D gets 1-0 results against norway and belgium, hardly going to win the euros playing like that I didn't say they'd win it. That said how many 1-0 games did Greece have in Portugal? England just aren't a top footballing nation, and the players have only recently come together under a new manager. They'd had some players out from injury and have to make do without Rooney for the first two games. Just exactly how are you expecting them to play? Also have to add beating Norway and Belgium by a goal are better than losing to Bulgaria or Switzerland>.>
I'm not expecting them to play well, england have been poor for 30-40 years now
|
I'd say they've been playing about as expected. I don't really understand the high expectations for England, they haven't been a World-class top side since the 30s, really. '66 was a surprise victory and to be honest they should aim at qualification and getting through the group stages, which they've managed pretty consistently. Throw in the odd semi- and quarter-final appearance and that's about how I would expect england to play.
|
Half time and Netherlands already 4-0 up.
Their attack is really good lmao, even though its against Northern Ireland
|
Btw any of you portuguese have info on coach Leonardo Zardim(spelling?)?
The greek press says he's almost signed with Olympiakos. So what is he like?
|
Portugal cant score lol.
edit: Portugal are really bad lol. I don't think we are going to have any problems in all honesty.
|
On June 03 2012 04:13 Steveling wrote:
Btw any of you portuguese have info on coach Leonardo Zardim(spelling?)?
The greek press says he's almost signed with Olympiakos. So what is he like?
Don't know about him I'm afraid but I was introduced to a young Greek called Ninis - is he consistent? His youtoob vids make him look comfortable on the ball and a good playmaker who can score, but youtoob does have a tendency to make anyone look good...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
