EPTThe NonY Fan Club - Page 31
| Forum Index > Fan Clubs |
|
BrodiaQ
United States892 Posts
| ||
|
Hypemeup
Sweden2783 Posts
On April 26 2011 03:37 Gleve wrote: TSL3 spoiler inside, don't open if you didn't watch MC vs Thorzain. + Show Spoiler + You must feel better that Thorzain beat MC also  MC was not 3-0'ed tho  (((( | ||
|
Ohdamn
Germany765 Posts
tyler not gging and almost nobody cares lol i love you tyler | ||
|
Snarra
Denmark94 Posts
| ||
|
Faria
155 Posts
| ||
|
LittleAtari
Jordan1090 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/video/streams/itmeJP | ||
|
ECH0SC
United States39 Posts
| ||
|
Zeri
United States773 Posts
| ||
|
LzH.stOry
United States35 Posts
| ||
|
Zeri
United States773 Posts
On May 04 2011 14:51 goddess wrote: someone should compile tyler quotes My favorite is when he is responding to a question on the drunk sotg about having a 'mid to high diamond come on the show' Tyler: I don't care if you are mid to high diamond whatever the fuck that means. All it means to me is I'm better than you. So no matter what you say, I can always say something better. Definitely an all time favorite. | ||
|
Lochat
United States270 Posts
On May 04 2011 14:30 Zeri wrote: I love tyler because it shows hes a level smarter than most people. Hilarious. | ||
NonY
8751 Posts
lol your signature is funny. We should be friendly but somehow it seems we've gotten off on the wrong foot. Perhaps at some point when I'm sacrificing clarity for convenience, by speaking about an issue without any preparation in a casual atmosphere when I've had a few drinks, or by quickly typing up a short essay at 50 words per minute on a forum, or at some other point when I'm deliberately sacrificing rational thought for something else, I've committed some logical fallacy. But even if I'm not making mistakes, that doesn't put me in the clear. It's essentially impossible to engage in any discussion worth a discussion without committing a fallacy around these parts. No one ever engages in a real full argument to the end. You have to truncate to participate. To try to get out of an argument early AND scot-free is a guaranteed method for committing a fallacy. The only pure way to deal with an issue is to refuse to address it. And I think I might be taking that route more often. Better to stay quiet than to misrepresent your true attitude and your true knowledge. This is true whether you are doing it on purpose (like the PR robots that come do their business on tl.net) or doing it because you don't have the time and the means to properly represent your attitude and knowledge. The exercises you can judge me on in my interactions within this community are nothing compared to what you might observe in an environment that truly puts reading comprehension, critical thinking and logic skills to the test. I can say with 100% honesty that I take no offense whatsoever to your judgment of me and I'm replying just to try to further your understanding and perhaps win you over, but it's ok if I don't win you over. Very Jesus-like of me. Was everything I said in this post perfectly clear? Perfectly unambiguous? If not, then too bad, I'm not gonna take the time to clear it up. Was something I said irrational or stupid? I'm not gonna take the time to patch up the mistake and revise my argument to improve my position. Was it clear to 99% of people and not to you? Through no egregious fault of mine (or yours)? Then continue to think we're all dumb if you want to. True argument takes an incredible amount of time and everyone makes mistakes. On April 13 2011 11:04 Lochat wrote: As someone with a degree in philosophy, please never call Ayn Rand a philosopher. Thank you. yeah we should be friends | ||
|
NExt
Australia1651 Posts
On May 04 2011 17:08 Liquid`Tyler wrote: lol your signature is funny. We should be friendly but somehow it seems we've gotten off on the wrong foot. Perhaps at some point when I'm sacrificing clarity for convenience, by speaking about an issue without any preparation in a casual atmosphere when I've had a few drinks, or by quickly typing up a short essay at 50 words per minute on a forum, or at some other point when I'm deliberately sacrificing rational thought for something else, I've committed some logical fallacy. But even if I'm not making mistakes, that doesn't put me in the clear. It's essentially impossible to engage in any discussion worth a discussion without committing a fallacy around these parts. No one ever engages in a real full argument to the end. You have to truncate to participate. To try to get out of an argument early AND scot-free is a guaranteed method for committing a fallacy. The only pure way to deal with an issue is to refuse to address it. And I think I might be taking that route more often. Better to stay quiet than to misrepresent your true attitude and your true knowledge. This is true whether you are doing it on purpose (like the PR robots that come do their business on tl.net) or doing it because you don't have the time and the means to properly represent your attitude and knowledge. The exercises you can judge me on in my interactions within this community are nothing compared to what you might observe in an environment that truly puts reading comprehension, critical thinking and logic skills to the test. I can say with 100% honesty that I take no offense whatsoever to your judgment of me and I'm replying just to try to further your understanding and perhaps win you over, but it's ok if I don't win you over. Very Jesus-like of me. Was everything I said in this post perfectly clear? Perfectly unambiguous? If not, then too bad, I'm not gonna take the time to clear it up. Was something I said irrational or stupid? I'm not gonna take the time to patch up the mistake and revise my argument to improve my position. Was it clear to 99% of people and not to you? Through no egregious fault of mine (or yours)? Then continue to think we're all dumb if you want to. True argument takes an incredible amount of time and everyone makes mistakes. Can posts individual posts be spotlighted ?? ♥ Tyler | ||
|
chaokel
Australia535 Posts
On May 04 2011 17:08 Liquid`Tyler wrote: lol your signature is funny. We should be friendly but somehow it seems we've gotten off on the wrong foot. Perhaps at some point when I'm sacrificing clarity for convenience, by speaking about an issue without any preparation in a casual atmosphere when I've had a few drinks, or by quickly typing up a short essay at 50 words per minute on a forum, or at some other point when I'm deliberately sacrificing rational thought for something else, I've committed some logical fallacy. But even if I'm not making mistakes, that doesn't put me in the clear. It's essentially impossible to engage in any discussion worth a discussion without committing a fallacy around these parts. No one ever engages in a real full argument to the end. You have to truncate to participate. To try to get out of an argument early AND scot-free is a guaranteed method for committing a fallacy. The only pure way to deal with an issue is to refuse to address it. And I think I might be taking that route more often. Better to stay quiet than to misrepresent your true attitude and your true knowledge. This is true whether you are doing it on purpose (like the PR robots that come do their business on tl.net) or doing it because you don't have the time and the means to properly represent your attitude and knowledge. The exercises you can judge me on in my interactions within this community are nothing compared to what you might observe in an environment that truly puts reading comprehension, critical thinking and logic skills to the test. I can say with 100% honesty that I take no offense whatsoever to your judgment of me and I'm replying just to try to further your understanding and perhaps win you over, but it's ok if I don't win you over. Very Jesus-like of me. Was everything I said in this post perfectly clear? Perfectly unambiguous? If not, then too bad, I'm not gonna take the time to clear it up. Was something I said irrational or stupid? I'm not gonna take the time to patch up the mistake and revise my argument to improve my position. Was it clear to 99% of people and not to you? Through no egregious fault of mine (or yours)? Then continue to think we're all dumb if you want to. True argument takes an incredible amount of time and everyone makes mistakes. yeah we should be friends <333 You're my hero Tyler! | ||
|
oursblanc
Canada1450 Posts
 | ||
|
Latedi
Sweden1027 Posts
| ||
|
Dystisis
Norway713 Posts
| ||
|
SigmaoctanusIV
United States3313 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + lol your signature is funny. We should be friendly but somehow it seems we've gotten off on the wrong foot. Perhaps at some point when I'm sacrificing clarity for convenience, by speaking about an issue without any preparation in a casual atmosphere when I've had a few drinks, or by quickly typing up a short essay at 50 words per minute on a forum, or at some other point when I'm deliberately sacrificing rational thought for something else, I've committed some logical fallacy. But even if I'm not making mistakes, that doesn't put me in the clear. It's essentially impossible to engage in any discussion worth a discussion without committing a fallacy around these parts. No one ever engages in a real full argument to the end. You have to truncate to participate. To try to get out of an argument early AND scot-free is a guaranteed method for committing a fallacy. The only pure way to deal with an issue is to refuse to address it. And I think I might be taking that route more often. Better to stay quiet than to misrepresent your true attitude and your true knowledge. This is true whether you are doing it on purpose (like the PR robots that come do their business on tl.net) or doing it because you don't have the time and the means to properly represent your attitude and knowledge. The exercises you can judge me on in my interactions within this community are nothing compared to what you might observe in an environment that truly puts reading comprehension, critical thinking and logic skills to the test. I can say with 100% honesty that I take no offense whatsoever to your judgment of me and I'm replying just to try to further your understanding and perhaps win you over, but it's ok if I don't win you over. Very Jesus-like of me. Was everything I said in this post perfectly clear? Perfectly unambiguous? If not, then too bad, I'm not gonna take the time to clear it up. Was something I said irrational or stupid? I'm not gonna take the time to patch up the mistake and revise my argument to improve my position. Was it clear to 99% of people and not to you? Through no egregious fault of mine (or yours)? Then continue to think we're all dumb if you want to. True argument takes an incredible amount of time and everyone makes mistakes. this post is amazing. Sometimes I feel the trolls run unchecked around these parts it's an uphill battle because everyone is "the shit" on the internets. Tyler just ownd that guy | ||
|
ForTheDream
Germany1780 Posts
| ||
|
price
United States297 Posts
you kind of were ganged up on probably because you weren't very clear. i dont think incontrol was that clear either, but he was definitely clearer. i think you had a point though, and the best way to resolve the issue in my opinion is to have both types of tournaments going on in the community and to simply see which type is more popular. my guess is that the tournaments that strive to please the most amount of players will be the most successful in the long run anyways ... and my guess is that format would be the one that tyler is advocating for (just my guess who knows) all in all, this is pretty minor stuff and is overblown from my pov. it makes for good listening though | ||
| ||
